Breve Análise do Apple MacBook 12 (início de 2016) 1,1 GHz

Name: Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Brand: Apple

Pioneiro. Um dos aparelhos mais debatidos da linha da Apple foi atualizado: O MacBook 12 omite recursos não essenciais e se foca na maior portabilidade. Ventoinha, muitas interfaces, um touchpad mecânico, um longo deslocamento das teclas: "Você não precisará disso".

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/06/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of anonym gekauft im Apple Store

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz (MacBook 12 (Early 2016) Serie)

Processador

Intel Core m3-6Y30 2 x 1.1 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 515

Memória

8 GB

, DDR3L-1866 soldada

Pantalha

12.00 polegadas 16:10, 2304 x 1440 pixel 226 PPI, APPA027, IPS, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Apple SSD AP0256, 256 GB

, NVMe, 231 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: headset, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Broadcom 802.11ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.1 x 280.5 x 196.5

Bateria

41.4 Wh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h

Sistema Operativo

Apple OS X 10.9 Mavericks

Camera

Primary Camera: 0.345 MPix 480p FaceTime

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, dois microfones, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

Released

04/19/2016

peso

927 g, Suprimento de energia: 171 g

Preço

1449 Euro

Links

Apple página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2015-03 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz DIN A4 ❌

Dual-array microphone, 3.5 mm headphone jack

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 Broadcom 802.11ac	735 MBit/s +29%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
MSI GE72 965M Ti Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	183 MBit/s -68%
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Realtek RTL8723AE Wireless LAN 802.11n	24.3 MBit/s -96%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 Broadcom 802.11ac (Hinum)	510 MBit/s +28%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s
MSI GE72 965M Ti Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	304 MBit/s -23%
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Realtek RTL8723AE Wireless LAN 802.11n	45.3 MBit/s -89%


363 cd/m²	362 cd/m²	352 cd/m²
346 cd/m²	387 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
363 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	339 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

APPA027 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 358 cd/m² Minimum: 6.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 387 cd/m²
Contraste: 823:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
82.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)	Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 HD Graphics 6000, 5650U, Apple SSD SD0256F	Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2015-03 HD Graphics 6000, 5250U, Apple SSD SM0128F	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Apple SSD AP0256
Display		19%	-39%	-38%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	66.8	91.2 37%	40.1 -40%	40.56 -39%	67.6 1%
sRGB Coverage	95.4	98.1 3%	59.8 -37%	60.6 -36%	95.6 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68	79.3 17%	41.51 -39%	41.95 -38%	68.7 1%
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6)
Response Time Black / White *	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6)
PWM Frequency
Screen		-7%	-57%	-44%	1%
Brightness middle	387	399 3%	329 -15%	368 -5%	345 -11%
Brightness	358	393 10%	310 -13%	349 -3%	325 -9%
Brightness Distribution	88	92 5%	82 -7%	90 2%	90 2%
Black Level *	0.47	0.22 53%	0.405 14%	0.493 -5%	0.324 31%
Contrast	823	1814 120%	812 -1%	746 -9%	1065 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	2.96 -85%	3.96 -148%	3.29 -106%	1.62 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4		7.51 -88%	5.22 -31%	2.51 37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1	3 -200%	3.51 -251%	3.06 -206%	1.88 -88%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	3.83 ^57%	2.68 ^82%	2.55 ^86%
CCT	6680 ^97%	7049 ^92%	6711 ^97%	6397 ^102%	6411 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61.6	71.15 16%	38.4 -38%	38.8 -37%	61.8 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82.2	97.87 19%	59.8 -27%		95.5 16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / -0%	-48% / -53%	-41% / -43%	1% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.6 ms rise
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

3353

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

7355

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

5585

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.35 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

29.8 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

90 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.3 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

20.3 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

218 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Elite x2 1012 G1, Intel Core m5-6Y54	111 Points +22%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K, Intel Core m7-6Y75	104 Points +14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370, Intel Core m5-6Y57	101 Points +11%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T, Intel Core m7-6Y75	100 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700, Intel Core m5-6Y54	99 Points +9%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz, Intel Core M-5Y31	98 Points +8%
Dell Latitude 12 E7275, Intel Core m7-6Y75	96 Points +5%
Dell Latitude 11 5175, Intel Core m5-6Y57	95 Points +4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz, Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz, Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3, Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N, Intel Core m3-6Y30	86 Points -5%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA, Intel Core m7-6Y75	80 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Elite x2 1012 G1, Intel Core m5-6Y54	255 Points +17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz, Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T, Intel Core m7-6Y75	214 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz, Intel Core M-5Y31	211 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3, Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N, Intel Core m3-6Y30	204 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700, Intel Core m5-6Y54	200 Points -8%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K, Intel Core m7-6Y75	196 Points -10%
Dell Latitude 13 7370, Intel Core m5-6Y57	180 Points -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA, Intel Core m7-6Y75	177 Points -19%
Dell Latitude 12 E7275, Intel Core m7-6Y75	172 Points -21%
Dell Latitude 11 5175, Intel Core m5-6Y57	171 Points -22%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2550 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3550 pontos
Ajuda

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Apple SSD AP0256

Sequential Read: 754 MB/s

Sequential Write: 638 MB/s

512K Read: 616 MB/s

512K Write: 678 MB/s

4K Read: 14.6 MB/s

4K Write: 20.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 464 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 315 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Intel HD Graphics 6000, 5650U	1333 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1206 Points +2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1186 Points
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1008 Points -15%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	996 Points -16%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57	992 Points -16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31	859 Points -28%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Intel HD Graphics 6000, 5650U	951 Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	810 Points +10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	735 Points
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	725 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31	671 Points -9%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	606 Points -18%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57	565 Points -23%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Intel HD Graphics 6000, 5650U	7495 Points +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	6597 Points +9%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	6298 Points +4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	6078 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31	5512 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57	4658 Points -23%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	4362 Points -28%

3DMark 2001SE Standard		20345 pontos
3DMark 03 Standard		18019 pontos
3DMark 05 Standard		9173 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		6921 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		4672 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1277 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4446 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		682 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	7.4
World of Warships (2015)	32.1	30.2	16.4	11.7
FIFA 16 (2015)	42 severe graphical problems (unplayable slow)
Fallout 4 (2015)	0 severe graphical problems (unplayable)
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)	6.1

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35 °C	39 °C	35 °C
32 °C	33 °C	33 °C
30 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 33 °C


41 °C	44 °C	38 °C
36 °C	37 °C	35 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.9 Watt
Ocioso	2.7 / 2.7 / 7.2 Watt
Carga	22 / 20.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing (Safari 9.1)		8h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 51min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	695 min +39%
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03	620 min +24%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03	539 min +8%
Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2015-03	512 min +2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz	501 min
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz	456 min -9%

Pro

+ Excelente tela Retina

+ Trackpad Force-Touch preciso

+ Qualidade do alto falante notável

+ Chassi de alumínio de gama alta

+ Silencioso devido ao resfriamento passivo, porém, não esquenta muito

Contra

- Uma porta combinada é uma restrição séria

- O curto deslocamento das teclas provoca erros frequentes

- Sem indicador de carga via LED

- Pobre em opções de manutenção e atualização (iFixit 1/10 pontos)

- O desempenho de um só núcleo é um pouco inferior ao de modelos do 2015

Always necessary but not included - adapter for the single USB Type C port

O MacBook de 12-polegadas é e continua sendo um aparelho impressionante. O peso baixo, uma excelente tela, e sua qualidade de construção são propriedades excelentes. No entanto, não mudou muito em comparação com o modelo do 2015. O desempenho gráfico um pouco melhor e as durações de bateria um pouco mais longas não são motivo para a mudança. Devido ao menor desempenho single-core, o Skylake m3 é ainda mais lento que o seu predecessor em vários benchmarks (e em tarefas do dia a dia). Apesar de tudo, o desempenho do subportátil sem ventoinha é suficiente para a maioria dos aplicativos. O Turbo consegue mante a velocidade em 2 GHz se a carga não for persistente durante muito minutos.

Pequeno, leve, limitado. Com o MacBook 12, você terá que aceitar omissões na conectividade, mas obterá excelentes soluções.

A única porta USB Type C do MacBook também é utilizada para carregar o aparelho. Por isso precisará um adaptador complexo e caro. Além disso, a configuração de entrada não é particularmente acessível com 1449 Euros (~$1659). Em nossa opinião, vale a pena gastar 100 Euros (~$114) a mais em um Air de 13-polegadas porque tem uma tela bastante melhor.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz - 2016-04-27 04/27/2016 v5.1^(old)
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner

Acabamento

93 / 98 → 95%

Teclado

85%

Mouse

99%

Conectividade

41 / 80 → 51%

Peso

76 / 35-78 → 95%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

51 / 68 → 74%

Desempenho da aplicação

68 / 87 → 79%

Temperatura

90 / 91 → 99%

Ruído

100%

Audio

87 / 91 → 96%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Médio

78%

91%

Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Apple MacBook 12 (início de 2016) 1,1 GHz

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2016-05- 6 (Update: 2016-05- 9)