Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV

Tanque diminuto. A HP esteve ocupada atualizando sua linha Pavilion x360, e hoje vamos dar uma olhada no membro mais diminuto, o 11t. Com uma construção sólida, este conversível de 11,6" é tão forte quanto um tanque. Infelizmente, também se sente lento.
Bay Trail Broadwell Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV (Pavilion x360 Serie)
Processador
Intel Pentium N3710 4 x 1.6 - 2.6 GHz, Braswell
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) - 1024 MB VRAM, Análises do: 700 MHz, Integrada, Intel HD Graphics 20.19.15.4364, No
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR3-1600 / PC3-12800
Pantalha
11.60 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, Sim, Multitouch de 10-pontos, LG Philips LGD0497, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
Toshiba MQ01ABF050, 500 GB 
, 500 GB, 5400 RPM, 448 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Heaphone/Microphone combo, Card Reader: Lietor de cartões SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Unidade ótica
Pinoneer BD-ROM BDCTD01RS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.3 x 306.07 x 208.03
Bateria
34.6 Wh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 7.5 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p, 30 fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto falantes para cima, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Nenhum, McAfee Suite de teste, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
1.4107 kg, Suprimento de energia: 198.447 g
Preço
539 USD
Links
HP página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
306.07 mm 208.03 mm 19.3 mm 1.4 kg299 mm 209 mm 21.8 mm 1.4 kg298 mm 211 mm 20.9 mm 1.4 kg289 mm 199 mm 21.9 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
 
49.23 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
 
33.3 MB/s -32%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
 
82.1 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
 
75.9 MB/s -8%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
 
47.3 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
 
41.3 MBit/s
231.5
cd/m²		243.4
cd/m²		222.9
cd/m²
211.1
cd/m²		245.2
cd/m²		200.3
cd/m²
198.9
cd/m²		226
cd/m²		194.4
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LGD0497 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 245.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 219.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 766:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
LG Philips LGD0497, IPS, 11.60, 1366x768		Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
CMN 1130, TN LED, 11.60, 1366x768		Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
AU Optronics B116XW01, TN, 11.60, 1366x768		Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
AU Optronics B116XTN02.3, TN LED, 11.60, 1366x768		Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS
InfoVision M116NWR4 R1, IPS, 11.60, 1366x768
Display
-2%
-9%
-10%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
41.11
40.42
-2%
37.53
-9%
36.86
-10%
41.33
1%
sRGB Coverage
61.8
60.3
-2%
56.4
-9%
55.4
-10%
62.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
42.47
41.82
-2%
38.81
-9%
38.08
-10%
42.7
1%
Response Times
-62%
-23%
-65%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.8 ?(18, 24.8)
80 ?(46, 34)
-87%
58 ?(26, 32)
-36%
63 ?(22, 41, Plateau w. Spike)
-47%
Response Time Black / White *
22 ?(4.4, 17.6)
30 ?(18, 12)
-36%
24 ?(7, 17)
-9%
40 ?(17, 23, Plateau w. Spike)
-82%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(50)
190 ?(90)
Screen
-40%
-52%
-43%
11%
Brightness middle
245.2
221
-10%
261
6%
256
4%
264
8%
Brightness
219
220
0%
248
13%
242
11%
247
13%
Brightness Distribution
79
90
14%
90
14%
89
13%
90
14%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.3
6%
0.68
-113%
0.27
16%
Contrast
766
762
-1%
870
14%
376
-51%
978
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.5
10.31
-87%
12.64
-130%
8.87
-61%
3.75
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
16.9
14.35
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
11.17
-285%
13.75
-374%
9.6
-231%
3.28
-13%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.39 92%
2.88 76%
2.2 100%
2.59 85%
CCT
6157 106%
12620 52%
17914 36%
9857 66%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
39
0%
36
-8%
35
-10%
39
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
60
-3%
57
-8%
55
-11%
62
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-35% / -35%
-31% / -41%
-25% / -34%
-18% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 24.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
3417 Points
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
3054 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel Celeron N3050
1999 Points -41%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
1876 Points -45%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
1307 Points
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
1087 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel Celeron N3050
1068 Points -18%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
779 Points -40%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
0.48 Points
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
0.38 Points -21%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
0.38 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
1.61 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
1.39 Points
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
0.79 Points -43%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
39 Points
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
36 Points -8%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
35 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel Celeron N3050
29 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
134 Points +28%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
105 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel Celeron N3050
60 Points -43%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
48 Points -54%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
1773 s * -142%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
732 s *
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
720 s * +2%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel Pentium N3700
2896 s * -70%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel Celeron N3050
1905 s * -12%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
1706 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1307
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
3417
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2412
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
13.06 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
39 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
105 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
13.06 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
1651 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
1633 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
1335 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
1295 Points -3%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
1813 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
1650 Points -9%
PCMark 7 Score
1758 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1651 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
1813 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1335 pontos
Ajuda
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Toshiba MQ01ABF050		Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680		Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
HBG3e 32G eMMC		Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive		Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS
32 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-1%
1517%
44%
2115%
Read Seq
93.9
84.2
-10%
159.9
70%
118.9
27%
164.5
75%
Write Seq
88
84.5
-4%
42.23
-52%
117.2
33%
67.8
-23%
Read 512
27.01
24.65
-9%
149
452%
38.89
44%
165.1
511%
Write 512
36.08
24.34
-33%
36.68
2%
76
111%
89.7
149%
Read 4k
0.311
0.361
16%
16.19
5106%
0.474
52%
18.05
5704%
Write 4k
0.787
0.863
10%
8.925
1034%
0.99
26%
20.49
2504%
Read 4k QD32
0.633
0.733
16%
29.32
4532%
1.081
71%
32.15
4979%
Write 4k QD32
0.815
0.842
3%
8.927
995%
0.724
-11%
25.44
3021%
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
hddimg
Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 6.1 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 110.3 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 73.3 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 24.9 ms
Índice de Explosão: 119.5 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 35 %
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
463 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
404 Points -13%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
395 Points -15%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700
338 Points -27%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
484 Points +23%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700
461 Points +17%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
415 Points +5%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
395 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
2457 Points +30%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700
2353 Points +24%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
2175 Points +15%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
1897 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
299 Points +29%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700
270 Points +17%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
231 Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
12601 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
508 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
1758 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
216 pontos
Ajuda

Barulho

Ocioso
0 / 0 / 0 dB
HDD
0 dB
Carga
0 / 0 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050		Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680		Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, HBG3e 32G eMMC		Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive		Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Noise
Idle Minimum *
32.4
Idle Average *
32.5
Idle Maximum *
32.5
Load Average *
32.5
Load Maximum *
32.4

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 24.2 °C30.8 °C39 °C 
 25.2 °C30.2 °C36.8 °C 
 21.6 °C23.6 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C
40.8 °C56 °C25 °C
37.8 °C34.2 °C24.8 °C
33.4 °C26.4 °C23.6 °C
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.237.32531.234.53133.432.44032.432.55031.931.16331.130.78030.930.510030.131.712531.832.616027.329.120026.729.425025.838.231525.445.640025.249.750023.951.563023.858.280023.957.6100024.257.6125023.16616002366.8200022.861.7250022.464.1315022.361.9400022.459.3500022.258.5630022.358.7800022.253.71000022.451.91250022.454.51600022.551.6SPL35.273.7N2.429.3median 23.1median 54.5Delta1.67.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.24 / 0.62 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.7 / 8.4 / 9.4 Watt
Carga midlight 14.7 / 17.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Toshiba MQ01ABF050, IPS, 1366x768, 11.60		Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.60		Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), HBG3e 32G eMMC, TN, 1366x768, 11.60		Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.60		Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.60
Power Consumption
12%
46%
10%
41%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
5
35%
2.8
64%
5.6
27%
2.6
66%
Idle Average *
8.4
7.8
7%
4.7
44%
7.7
8%
4.8
43%
Idle Maximum *
9.4
8.7
7%
4.9
48%
7.8
17%
5.1
46%
Load Average *
14.7
14.3
3%
9.9
33%
16
-9%
12.5
15%
Load Maximum *
17.3
16
8%
10.6
39%
16
8%
11.5
34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 35min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 30min
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 34.6 Wh		Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108
N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell),  Wh		Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 50 Wh		Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 30 Wh		Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 38 Wh
Battery Runtime
-19%
147%
12%
Reader / Idle
448
WiFi v1.3
275
222
-19%
680
147%
308
12%
Load
150

Pro

+ Excelente teclado
+ Boa tela IPS
+ Sólida qualidade de construção
+ Trackpad e tela táctil responsivos
+ CPU Quad-Core
+ Operação silenciosa

Contra

- Afogamento da CPU e GPU sob uso intenso
- As temperaturas podem subir
- Manutenção difícil
- Duração média da bateria
- HD lento
- Desempenho geral lento
In review: HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

O HP Pavilion x360 11t deixa sensações confusas. O quad-core Pentium N3710 atualizado é uma adição bem-vinda e traz um desempenho significantemente melhor quando comparado com a concorrência à custas de maior produção de calor. O teclado também é excelente e supera outros aparelhos econômicos. Sua resposta firme e alta responsividade fazem com que a digitação seja agradável. A tela é outro ponto alto, dado que o painel IPS cria uma experiência muito melhor que as telas TN tipicamente encontradas nesta faixa de preços. O chassi é sólido, e o portátil se sente muito bem construído e sólido.

No entanto, os problemas persistem em outras áreas. Enquanto o design sem ventoinha resulta em uma operação silenciosa, as temperaturas são difíceis de controlar. Embora mais poderosas que as da concorrência, tanto a CPU como a GPU se afogam sob uso intenso e, de fato, podem ficar atrás de seus rivais menos poderosos. Além disso, o disco rígido de velocidade realmente lenta de 400 RPM  é um teste para a paciência; os aplicativos demoram muito ara ser inicializados, as multi tarefas podem se tronar uma tortura, e o computador como um todo se sente menos responsivo.

Tomando em conta o nível de preço mais alto de $540 USD, o HP Pavilion x360 11t é difícil de recomendar sobre o Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR mais econômico. Este último oferece desempenho similar, um bom teclado, e uma unidade mais veloz, mas está equipado com uma tela TN de qualidade inferior. A HP frequentemente tem ofertas para seus portáteis (no momento desta análise o portátil estava sendo ofertado por $440 USD), o que poderia tornar o 11t mais atraente.

O HP Pavilion x360 11t tem dificuldade em se destacar entre seus similares. O aparelho se vê bem no papel, mas não consegue atender as expectativas.  Como estão as coisas, o aparelho é apenas adequado e mais nada.

HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV - 01/23/2017 v6(old)
Sam Medley

Acabamento
68 / 98 → 70%
Teclado
64%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
29 / 80 → 37%
Peso
70 / 35-78 → 82%
Bateria
79%
Pantalha
77%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 68 → 60%
Desempenho da aplicação
44 / 87 → 51%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
0%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Médio
62%
73%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Sam Medley, 2017-02- 7 (Update: 2020-06- 8)