Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018 (Core i5-8250U, FHD)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US (ThinkPad X1 Yoga Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh, 4 cores, hyperthreaded, 15 W TDP
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 1024 MB VRAM, Análises do: 400 MHz, Memoría: 1064 MHz, GPU integrada, Intel UHD Graphics 620 23.20.16.4905
Memória
7.9 GB
, LPDDR3 1200MHz
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Yes, native pen support, Lenovo LEN40A9, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB
, PCIe NVMe SSD, 475 GB livre
peso
1.426 kg, Suprimento de energia: 287 g
Preço
1860 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lenovo LEN40A9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 276.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 239.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.67 cd/m²iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 267.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.81
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.146
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Lenovo LEN40A9, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Lenovo 40AE / B140QAN02.0, IPS Dolby Vision HDR, 14.00, 2560x1440 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 AU Optronics B139HAN03.0, IPS, 13.90, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.30, 2736x1824 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 40% | 4% | -20% | 5% | 13% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 60.9 | 86.5 42% | 62.5 3% | 47.32 -22% | 65.5 8% | 67.6 11% | 64.4 6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.4 | 100 16% | 91.7 6% | 71.1 -18% | 88.8 3% | 99 15% | 84.6 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.9 | 99.4 61% | 64.1 4% | 48.83 -21% | 64.9 5% | 69.1 12% | 61.8 0% |
| Response Times | -12% | -12% | -17% | -16% | -3% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.4 ? | 56.8 ? -41% | 46 ? -14% | 48 ? -19% | 55.2 ? -37% | 42 ? -4% | 44 ? -9% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 24 ? 17% | 31.6 ? -10% | 32.8 ? -14% | 27.2 ? 6% | 29 ? -1% | 33 ? -15% |
| PWM Frequency | 1042 ? | 21000 | 200 ? | ||||
| Screen | 18% | -57% | -57% | -44% | 13% | -33% | |
| Brightness middle | 267.2 | 562 110% | 297.9 11% | 322.6 21% | 262 -2% | 417 56% | 302 13% |
| Brightness | 239 | 522 118% | 278 16% | 306 28% | 256 7% | 401 68% | 288 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 75 | 86 15% | 81 8% | 91 21% | 83 11% | 88 17% | 90 20% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.3 -11% | 0.44 -63% | 0.19 30% | 0.25 7% | 0.29 -7% | 0.57 -111% |
| Contrast | 990 | 1873 89% | 677 -32% | 1698 72% | 1048 6% | 1438 45% | 530 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.8 20% | 5.1 -46% | 7.7 -120% | 5.13 -47% | 3.63 -4% | 5.17 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.4 | 5.8 9% | 11 -72% | 11.1 -73% | 9.46 -48% | 6.74 -5% | 7.68 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.81 | ||||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 4.5 -246% | 6.7 -415% | 7.9 -508% | 6.23 -379% | 2.18 -68% | 3.26 -151% |
| Gamma | 2.146 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.9 76% | 2.88 76% | 2.45 90% | 3.09 71% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6523 100% | 7205 90% | 6839 95% | 7044 92% | 6413 101% | 6767 96% | 7142 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 88.9 59% | 64.1 14% | 44.1 -21% | 57.84 3% | 63 13% | 55 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 100 16% | 91.7 7% | 69.9 -19% | 88.57 3% | 99 15% | 85 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
18% | -22% /
-39% | -31% /
-44% | -18% /
-30% | 8% /
11% | -15% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3946 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4879 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4823 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3461 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -6% | -29% | -86% | -6942% | -81% | 13% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 607 | 319.2 -47% | 726 20% | 178.5 -71% | 389 -36% | 186.1 -69% | 1057 ? 74% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 233.5 | 463.3 98% | 263.8 13% | 110.6 -53% | 141 -40% | 118.6 -49% | 454 ? 94% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 917 | 1341 46% | 950 4% | 255.9 -72% | 572 -38% | 324.1 -65% | 1755 ? 91% |
| Score Total | 3594 | 2536 -29% | 1495 -58% | 736 -80% | 908 -75% | 3966 ? 10% | |
| Score Write | 1359 | 608 -55% | 375 -72% | 194 -86% | 236 -83% | 1780 ? 31% | |
| Score Read | 1487 | 1316 -11% | 752 -49% | 362 -76% | 441 -70% | 1451 ? -2% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.028 24% | 0.037 -0% | 0.075 -103% | 23 -62062% | 0.086 -132% | 0.08337 ? -125% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.043 | 0.044 -2% | 0.045 -5% | 0.143 -233% | 0.071 -65% | 0.123 -186% | 0.05092 ? -18% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1072 | 391.3 -63% | 204.7 -81% | 120.9 -89% | 75 -93% | 146.4 -86% | 1504 ? 40% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1216 | 1039 -15% | 586 -52% | 286.2 -76% | 1222 0% | 368.3 -70% | 1203 ? -1% |
| 4K Write | 102.3 | 128.1 25% | 96.9 -5% | 52.6 -49% | 50.7 -50% | 112 ? 9% | |
| 4K Read | 49.11 | 48.46 -1% | 37.69 -23% | 27.37 -44% | 26.93 -45% | 50.5 ? 3% | |
| Seq Write | 1840 | 885 -52% | 735 -60% | 201.9 -89% | 156.7 -91% | 388.2 -79% | 1637 ? -11% |
| Seq Read | 2218 | 2282 3% | 1283 -42% | 486.9 -78% | 1037 -53% | 459.9 -79% | 1976 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3409 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2007 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
288.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
198.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1232 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1253 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
122.1 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 12344 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2040 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9206 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1119 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 56 | 35 | 30 | 10 |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 37 | 16 | 7 | 6 |
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 65 | 44 | 25 | 10 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 27.8 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.9 / 39.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -1% | -1% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 27.8 | 29.1 -5% | 28 -1% | 29 -4% | 30.4 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 29.1 -5% | 28 -1% | 29 -4% | 30.4 -9% |
| Idle Average * | 27.8 | 29.1 -5% | 28.8 -4% | 29 -4% | 30.4 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.8 | 31.3 -13% | 30.3 -9% | 29 -4% | 32 -15% |
| Load Average * | 33.9 | 37.6 -11% | 34.5 -2% | 33.6 1% | 31.7 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.9 | 37.6 6% | 34.3 14% | 35.8 10% | 35.9 10% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.33 / 0.36 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 5.4 / 7.5 Watt |
| Carga |
40.1 / 57.1 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS Dolby Vision HDR, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.90 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -37% | 7% | 30% | 12% | 2% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 3.4 -13% | 3.1 -3% | 3.1 -3% | 3.2 -7% | 3.6 -20% | 3.3 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 5.4 | 8.8 -63% | 6.6 -22% | 4.3 20% | 5.5 -2% | 8.1 -50% | 6.3 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 11.9 -59% | 7 7% | 4.9 35% | 6.5 13% | 8.7 -16% | 11 -47% |
| Load Average * | 40.1 | 50.4 -26% | 35.2 12% | 24.3 39% | 29.7 26% | 25.5 36% | 30 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 57.1 | 71.2 -25% | 34.6 39% | 22.8 60% | 41.3 28% | 23.5 59% | 35.4 38% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | 15% | 5% | 31% | 8% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1218 | 1203 -1% | 1655 36% | 971 -20% | 1387 14% | 1054 -13% | 1131 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 651 | 517 -21% | 685 5% | 686 5% | 630 -3% | 744 14% | 566 -13% |
| Load | 135 | 91 -33% | 140 4% | 175 30% | 244 81% | 168 24% | 125 -7% |
Pro
+ Excelente qualidade de construção
+ Modos versáteis
+ Teclado bem balanceado
+ Boas opções de segurança
+ Ótima seleção de portas com 2 Thunderbolt 3
+ TrackPoint preciso e confortável
+ Boa precisão das cores
+ Sem PWM
+ Armazenamento muito veloz
+ Excelente desempenho sem muito sacrifício no ruído e no aquecimento
+ Chassi muito fino e portável
+ Ótima duração da bateria
+ O stylus incluído é recarregado pelo portátil
+ O teclado retrátil funciona bem
Contra
- Caro
- Cobertura do espaço de cor medíocre
- Pesado para um 2-em-1
- Tela muito escura
- Problemas com o reflexo
- Alto-falantes finos e nada agradáveis
- Um pouco desconfortável de usar no modo tablet devido ao tamanho
- A ausência das teclas de volume dedicadas dificulta o ajuste do volume no modo tablet
Mantivemos a variante HDR Core i7 do 2018 X1 Yoga em uma luz positiva. Elogiamos seu chassi bem construído, bom desempenho e operação silenciosa, mas tivemos alguns problemas com seu alto preço. Por $2400, esse modelo do X1 Yoga pode estar fora da faixa de preços da maioria dos usuários. Por $600 a menos, o modelo Core i5 FHD é melhor para o orçamento, mantendo a maioria das sutilezas do modelo mais caro.
A diferença de desempenho entre o Core i5-8250U e o Core i7-8550U é insignificante na melhor das hipóteses. Como tal, a maioria dos usuários não verá nenhuma mudança perceptível, afogando o desempenho da CPU. Em vez de investir em um processador um pouco mais rápido, os compradores em potencial devem investir esse dinheiro na tela HDR WQHD, que é cerca de $170 a mais. O painel mais caro dobra o brilho e possui um contraste e reprodução de cor quase inigualáveis. A melhor configuração disponível seria um emparelhamento do Core i5-8250U e da tela WQHD HDR.
A variante do Core i5 do X1 Yoga retém as melhores peças de seu irmão mais caro enquanto corta custos. Por $600 a menos, o Yoga Core i5 FHD X1 oferece desempenho similar envolto no mesmo excelente chassi. Se você está à procura de um conversível de classe executiva e pode abrir mão de um aumento de 5% na capacidade de processamento da tela HDR, essa é a máquina que você deve ter.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
-
04/15/2018 v6(old)
Sam Medley
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
