Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL502VS

Name: Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Brand: Asus

Que comecem os jogos. A Asus nos enviou um dos primeiros portáteis de 15-polegadas com a extremamente veloz GPU Pascal GeForce GTX 1070. O leitor informado espera grandes ganhos no desempenho e não está decepcionado. O fabricante se foca na continuidade para os outros aspectos do sistema, o que normalmente é a decisão correta.

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Taiwan

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T (Strix GL502VS Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 372.53, kein Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, ambos slots em uso

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB

, m.2-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB @ 7200 rpm, 2,5-Zoll-HDD

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinaso de 3,5 mm estéreo, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 390 x 266

Bateria

62 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 cells

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD (1280 x 720P @ 30fps)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo (3 W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Abraçadeira de cabos, ROG Gaming Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 570 g

Preço

2000 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: AC power, Ethernet (fold-out), DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C

Right side: Audio in/out, 2x USB 3.0, SD-card, Kensington

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21	140 MB/s +89%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925	78 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO	76 MB/s +3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T	74 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21	190 MB/s +126%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925	88 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO	86 MB/s +2%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T	84 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	648 MBit/s
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	630 MBit/s -3%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	559 MBit/s +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	468 MBit/s


290 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	277 cd/m²
310 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	296 cd/m²
279 cd/m²	282 cd/m²	269 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 289.9 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 315 cd/m²
Contraste: 984:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.17 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), , 1920x1080, 15.60	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		1%	-1%	1%	11%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	64.5	64.6 0%	63 -2%	65.1 1%	66.7 3%	63 -2%
sRGB Coverage	83.1	84.6 2%	82.2 -1%	83.7 1%	97.7 18%	84.3 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.8	61.8 2%	60.1 -1%	61.2 1%	68.4 13%	61.6 1%
Response Times		8%	-9%	-3%	-65%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(16, 22)	34 ?(14, 20) 11%	43 ?(18, 25) -13%	37 ?(15, 22) 3%	56.4 ?(22.4, 34) -48%	32 ?(12.4, 19.6) 16%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(5, 18)	22 ?(5, 17) 4%	24 ?(4, 20) -4%	25 ?(5, 20) -9%	41.6 ?(6.8, 34.8) -81%	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) -11%
PWM Frequency					201.6 ?(99)
Screen		7%	-5%	4%	-9%	3%
Brightness middle	315	273 -13%	302 -4%	312 -1%	296.8 -6%	347.2 10%
Brightness	290	278 -4%	287 -1%	293 1%	282 -3%	327 13%
Brightness Distribution	85	88 4%	91 7%	87 2%	86 1%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.32	0.27 16%	0.36 -13%	0.32 -0%	0.347 -8%	0.348 -9%
Contrast	984	1011 3%	839 -15%	975 -1%	855 -13%	998 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.88	3.67 25%	4.93 -1%	4.45 9%	5.24 -7%	4.53 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.88	8.33 6%	12.34 -39%	8.5 4%	11.36 -28%	11.01 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.17	2.73 35%	3.47 17%	3.05 27%	6.76 -62%	2.84 32%
Gamma	2.53 ^87%	2.49 ^88%	2.16 ^102%	2.58 ^85%	2.24 ^98%	2.05 ^107%
CCT	6683 ^97%	7029 ^92%	6622 ^98%	6495 ^100%	8467 ^77%	6664 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	55 0%	54 -2%	55 0%	62.8 14%	54.7 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83	84 1%	82 -1%	84 1%	98.1 18%	84.1 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		5% / 6%	-5% / -5%	1% / 3%	-21% / -13%	2% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Intel Core i7-6820HK	150 Points +2%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	147 Points
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	145 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	145 Points -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	143 Points -3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	142 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points 0%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	670 Points -1%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.56 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.3 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

676 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

147 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4651 Points
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4541 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4413 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	3700 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5011 Points
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4924 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4766 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	4716 Points -6%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4651 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5011 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 Lite-On CV1-8B128	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		39%	48%	223%	7%	26%
Read Seq	485.4	523 8%	510 5%	2249 363%	494.5 2%	496.8 2%
Write Seq	312.4	485.5 55%	455.3 46%	1331 326%	184.1 -41%	454.8 46%
Read 512	294.8	444.7 51%	415.9 41%	972 230%	318.6 8%	281.1 -5%
Write 512	287.8	471.2 64%	422.3 47%	732 154%	182.6 -37%	400 39%
Read 4k	21.44	21.86 2%	32.46 51%	54.6 155%	30.04 40%	26.43 23%
Write 4k	75.7	98.8 31%	92.5 22%	173 129%	77.2 2%	50.2 -34%
Read 4k QD32	149.4	350.3 134%	358.6 140%	687 360%	312.6 109%	347.8 133%
Write 4k QD32	256.3	162.2 -37%	329.1 28%	418.5 63%	182.1 -29%	263.1 3%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002

Sequential Read: 485.4 MB/s

Sequential Write: 312.4 MB/s

512K Read: 294.8 MB/s

512K Write: 287.8 MB/s

4K Read: 21.44 MB/s

4K Write: 75.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 149.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 256.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	22195 Points +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	22022 Points
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6820HK	12517 Points -43%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12472 Points -43%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9845 Points -55%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9824 Points -55%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	17066 Points +3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	16525 Points
SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6820HK	9671 Points -41%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	9608 Points -42%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7624 Points -54%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7321 Points -56%

3DMark 11 Performance		15822 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22943 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12909 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider | Battlefield 4 | The Witcher 3 | Doom | Mirror's Edge Catalyst

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	88.7 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	84.6 fps -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps -38%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps -52%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	104 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	102 fps -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	59.6 fps -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	48.5 fps -53%

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	138 fps +4%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	132.7 fps

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	58 fps +5%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	55.2 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	103 fps +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	102.4 fps

Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	125.1 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	117 fps -6%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	56 fps -55%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	130.1 fps
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	123 fps -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57 fps -56%

Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	92.4 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	92 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	101 fps +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	99.6 fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Battlefield 4 (2013)			192.2	132.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)		165.9	102.4	55.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			104	88.7
Doom (2016)			130.1	125.1
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)			99.6	92

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 33 / 34 dB
Carga		39 / 51 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


48 °C	46.3 °C	46.1 °C
35.9 °C	46.2 °C	40 °C
29.4 °C	30.6 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C


46.1 °C	44.4 °C	46.8 °C
37.3 °C	39.3 °C	38.1 °C
32.2 °C	30.8 °C	26.7 °C

Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 38 °C

alimentação elétrica 45.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-9%	19%	4%	25%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	20	20 -0%	12 40%	15 25%	11.1 44%	20.6 -3%
Idle Average *	24	26 -8%	16 33%	20 17%	14.1 41%	22.1 8%
Idle Maximum *	29	32 -10%	22 24%	27 7%	18.4 37%	22.5 22%
Load Average *	86	100 -16%	96 -12%	98 -14%	96.5 -12%	130.6 -52%
Load Maximum *	183	202 -10%	166 9%	210 -15%	159.5 13%	177.2 3%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 1.4 Watt
Ocioso	20 / 24 / 29 Watt
Carga	86 / 183 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 75.24 Wh	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P506 PRO 60 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 64 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	196	246 26%	476 143%	267 36%	356 82%	187 -5%

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		4h 03min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 58min

Pro

+ Seleção de portas ampla e moderna

+ Bastante frugal para o desempenho

+ Excelente capacidade de manutenção

+ Bonito e bem construído

+ Muito bom desempenho 3D

+ Bons alto falantes multimídia

+ Dispositivos de entrada, em geral, bons

+ Tela IPS de alto contraste

+ Bom desempenho WLAN

+ HD de 1 TB adicional

+ 8 GB de VRAM GDDR5

+ 32 GB de RAM DDR4

+ Comparativamente leve

Contra

- Os tempos de resposta podem ser lentos demais para gamers ambiciosos

- Rangidos de pare traseira do chassi, sob pressão

- Propriedades deslizantes imperfeitas do touchpad

- Sem acessórios apesar do preço

- Desempenho um pouco medíocre do SSD

- Apenas 2 slots para RAM

- Muito barulhento sob carga máxima

In review: Asus ROG Strix GL502VS. Test model courtesy of Asus Taiwan.

O novo Asus ROG Strix GL502VS deixou uma impressão convincente, em geral. Um dos principais aspectos é o enorme desempenho da Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. Os gamers que não sejam muito sensíveis ao ruído deverão ficar muito contentes com o aparelho.

Já mencionamos na introdução que também existem algumas desvantagens. O chassi rangente poderia deixar uma melhor impressão, mas o modelo de teste é uma das primeiras remessas, portanto, os modelos mais recentes poderiam melhor neste aspecto. Não estamos totalmente satisfeitos com as propriedades de deslizamento do touchpad, nem com a gama de cores limitada da tela IPS muito boa. Os tempos de resposta da tela também podem ser lentos para alguns gamers. A perfeita visibilidade das teclas foi sacrificada pelo design. Incomum, porém, não muito importante com 32 GB de RAM DDR4: Há apenas dois slots SODIMM Os aparelhos de 15-polegadas com este tipo de desempenho não podem ser resfriados sem ruídos e os rivais não provavelmente não sejam amis silenciosos – mas com frequência era um pouco mais barulhento em nossa opinião.

Há muito mais no lado positivo: A carcaça comparativamente leve tem uma bela aparência e e deve atender as expectativas de design dos clientes ROG. A Asus também merece elogios pela seleção de portas moderna e generosa. Ninguém criticará as amplas opções de manutenção. O desempenho também está no nível esperado, portanto, as especificações técnicas estão bem. A boa impressão é completada com um bom teclado e uma tela bastante convincente. Portanto, podemos recomendar o sistema com as limitações mencionadas.

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T - 2016-08-21 08/21/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 82%

Teclado

84%

Mouse

75%

Conectividade

64 / 81 → 79%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Bateria

71%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

97%

Desempenho da aplicação

93%

Temperatura

85 / 95 → 89%

Ruído

74 / 90 → 82%

Audio

70%

Camera

55 / 85 → 65%

Médio

76%

85%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1618 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL502VS

Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-09- 9 (Update: 2016-09-14)