Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zenbook UX330UA

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/09/2016

Elegante e duradouro. O novo Zenbook da Asus herda as melhores qualidades da série, como uma excelente carcaça e peso baixo. Além dos dispositivos de entrada um pouco medíocres, não apresenta muitas desvantagens especialmente nas fantásticas durações da bateria.

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (Zenbook UX330 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 300 - 1050 MHz, Memória compartilhada, 20.19.15.4474
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual-channel
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Áudio de entrada/saída combinado, conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.5 x 323 x 222.3
Bateria
57 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p CMOS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, lado inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 176 g
Preço
1100 EUR

 

Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Asus Zenbook UX330UA

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais 
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size Comparison

Left: USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Left: USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Right: Micro-HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, USB 3.0, power
Right: Micro-HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, USB 3.0, power
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
71.2 MB/s ∼100% +135%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
31.4 MB/s ∼44% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
30.3 MB/s ∼43%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.33 MB/s ∼100% +118%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
38.3 MB/s ∼47% +3%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
37.3 MB/s ∼46%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (I219-V)
609 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (I219-V)
421 MBit/s ∼80%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s ∼61% -23%
357
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 360 cd/m² Médio: 337.2 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 360 cd/m²
Contraste: 1636:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.23 | - Ø
90% sRGB (Argyll) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.5
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13-9350
SHP1420, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Samsung 133YL04-P02, , 3200x1800, 13.3
Response Times
-16%
196%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32
52.4
-64%
38
-19%
Response Time Black / White *
25
23.6
6%
27
-8%
PWM Frequency
200
220
10%
1429
615%
Screen
-4%
-12%
-25%
Brightness
337
276
-18%
326
-3%
352
4%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
87
1%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.22
0.191
13%
0.36
-64%
0.69
-214%
Contrast
1636
1453
-11%
956
-42%
565
-65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.21
4.88
6%
6.09
-17%
3.04
42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.23
4.26
32%
5.36
14%
2.88
54%
Gamma
2.5 96%
2.59 93%
2.01 119%
2.43 99%
CCT
6506 100%
6562 99%
7230 90%
6848 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
41.6
-29%
62.25
6%
55
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
65.79
-27%
97.54
8%
85
-6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -4%
-14% / -13%
86% / 35%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. AdobeRGB
Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. AdobeRGB
Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. sRGB
Asus Zenbook UX330UA vs. sRGB
Pixel grid
Pixel grid

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 250 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 456 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 10420) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Core i7-6560U
130 Points ∼68% +5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Core i7-6500U
124 Points ∼65%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼61% -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75
100 Points ∼53% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel Core i7-6500U
319 Points ∼19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Core i7-6560U
318 Points ∼19% 0%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel Core i5-6200U
287 Points ∼17% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel Core m7-6Y75
214 Points ∼13% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
124 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
319 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4680 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4355 Points ∼67%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
4078 Points ∼63% -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3472 Points ∼53% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3883 Points ∼68% +10%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3527 Points ∼62%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
2983 Points ∼53% -15%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
2614 Points ∼46% -26%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3527 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4355 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Dell XPS 13-9350
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
63%
106%
40%
Write 4k QD32
228.9
151.5
-34%
311.3
36%
242.3
6%
Read 4k QD32
142.2
244.7
72%
548.6
286%
288.9
103%
Write 4k
75.12
113
50%
144.9
93%
90.66
21%
Read 4k
18.89
38.52
104%
42.43
125%
28.57
51%
Write 512
275.2
308.6
12%
311
13%
396.2
44%
Read 512
265.9
683.8
157%
612.6
130%
404.8
52%
Write Seq
309.4
307.7
-1%
309.6
0%
423.7
37%
Read Seq
447.6
1097
145%
1193
167%
475.2
6%
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Sequential Read: 447.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 309.4 MB/s
512K Read: 265.9 MB/s
512K Write: 275.2 MB/s
4K Read: 18.89 MB/s
4K Write: 75.12 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 142.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 228.9 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U
2101 Points ∼4% +43%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1469 Points ∼3%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1398 Points ∼3% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
1083 Points ∼2% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
929 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
507 Points ∼1%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U
11531 Points ∼7% +48%
Dell XPS 13-9350
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7966 Points ∼5% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7801 Points ∼5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
4286 Points ∼3% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
1626 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60466 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6081 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 57.931.126.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 48.325.822.4fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 13.9fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB
Carga
37.4 / 41.4 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 30.3 °C42.7 °C31.9 °C 
 26.1 °C39.4 °C27.5 °C 
 24.2 °C24.1 °C24.3 °C 
Máximo: 42.7 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C
29.8 °C38.3 °C34.7 °C
28.4 °C31.6 °C30.5 °C
26 °C27.7 °C26.8 °C
Máximo: 38.3 °C
Médio: 30.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.738.141.7254035.8403138.534.838.54039.333.639.35040.832.940.86342.735.242.78043.930.743.910045.428.945.412545.827.845.816047.526.547.520051.727.651.725055.824.955.831558.72558.740058.92358.950061.122.661.163063.121.463.180065.621.165.6100062.720.262.7125061.419.961.4160066.419.566.420007019.270250069.819.669.8315068.819.368.8400072.919.372.9500075.519.375.5630076.819.376.8800072.119.272.11000067.218.967.2125006418.6641600060.118.960.1SPL82.932.482.9N531.853median 63.1Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059Tmedian 19.9median 63.1Delta5.82.85.835.835.335.336.338.236.936.938.636.3353535.337.635.735.735.734.133.833.835.633.332.932.937.433.436.836.836.938.2404037.238.7383840.739.831.231.247.546.429.929.955.451.630.230.260.356.730.130.166.359.9282868.56026.526.568.556.725.825.865.353.924.924.96452.825.125.162.348.1242458.348.923.923.959.251.223.423.460.75523.423.464.253.723.223.262.748.723.223.258.349.923.423.459.450.723.423.460.743.922.722.752.640.922.622.651.638.922.722.749.738.822.222.247.3median 49.9Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISKmedian 24median 24median 59.45.12.82.85.734.933.546.634.932.633.442.732.638.538.539.438.532.532.932.732.533.33333.133.328.429.530.528.427.729.129.127.726.826.328.326.826.726.52926.725.324.227.825.3242427.72423.424.934.523.423.828.541.423.827.33447.527.327.43447.827.42531.1452525.832.746.725.830.738.152.230.734.141.355.934.142.550.164.942.539.346.661.239.336.944.25936.93845.460.33833.440.755.733.428.435.350.128.42429.6442426.832.947.626.828.434.449.328.431.837.751.531.831.437.551.431.447.955.27047.94.87.920.54.8median 27.4Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055Tmedian 34median 47.8median 27.44.15.75.64.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (17.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3 / 6.3 / 7.5 Watt
Carga midlight 36 / 31.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Power Consumption
-15%
-1%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
3
3.3
-10%
4.2
-40%
6.4
-113%
Idle Average *
6.3
7.4
-17%
8.4
-33%
6.6
-5%
Idle Maximum *
7.5
8.2
-9%
8.9
-19%
6.8
9%
Load Average *
36
36.5
-1%
15.9
56%
27.5
24%
Load Maximum *
31.5
43.7
-39%
22.5
29%
32.4
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 25min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 55min
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh
Dell XPS 13-9350
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-30%
2%
Reader / Idle
1225
782
-36%
810
-34%
1013
-17%
Load
115
150
30%
89
-23%
182
58%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
612
451
-26%
418
-32%
402
-34%
H.264
486
418

Pro

+ Muitas configurações disponíveis
+ Leve e fino
+ Carcaça elegante e robusta
+ Construção muito boa, porém, imperfeita
+ USB 3.1 Tipo-C Gen.
+ Portas posicionadas de forma ergonômica
+ Muito bom desempenho do WiFi
+ Tela muito brilhante e com alto contraste
+ Boa adequação para exteriores
+ Silencioso e frio
+ Frugal durante o modo inativo
+ Fantástica duração da bateria

Contra

- Conectividade limitada
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
- Sem Ethernet
- PWM
- Sem escotilha de manutenção, parafusos torx
- A bateria não pode ser removida desde o exterior
- Touchpad medíocre
- O SSD poderia ser mais veloz
in review: Asus Zenbook UX330UA. Test model courtesy of CampusPoint
in review: Asus Zenbook UX330UA. Test model courtesy of CampusPoint

Embora o novo Asus Zenbook UX360UA-FC059T com um preço de aproximadamente 1100 Euros no momento do teste não passe da marca dos 90 por cento, mais uma vez é um portátil que o escritor gostaria de chamar de seu.

A excelente carcaça chama a atenção, e o peso baixo e as durações extremamente longas se relacionam com um fato móvel excelente. A tela também é totalmente convincente.

Ele oferece um muito bom desempenho do WiFi, as portas posicionadas de forma ideal, e operação silenciosa e fria. Ele também é alimentado impecavelmente e funciona como deveria.

É claro que existem alguns pontos de crítica menores: O teclado poderia ser de melhor qualidade, e não conseguimos nos adaptar bem às propriedades de deslizamento ou às teclas do touchpad. O fraco leitor de cartões de memória é realmente supérfluo; o fabricante somente teve que gastar pouco dinheiro por uma solução adequada.

Nós outorgamos ao novo Zenbook uma recomendação de compra ambígua. Os compradores que se empolgam pela carcaça e que podem viver com um desempenho mais baixo e durações de bateria um pouco mais curtas deveriam dar uma olhada no Zenbook UX305CA com um painel 4K. No entanto, os rivais um pouco mais massivos, pesados, e não tão duradouros da Dell e Lenovo atingiram muito boas pontuações de 90 e 86 %, e ambos possuem suas fortalezas. Por isso, podemos dizer que montamos um campo de teste exaustivo aqui.

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T - 11/04/2016 v5.1
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
82 /  98 → 84%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
50 / 80 → 62%
Peso
73 / 78 → 88%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 68 → 90%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
88%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
64 / 85 → 75%
Médio
76%
85%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - Home > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zenbook UX330UA
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2016-11-26)