Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 14 E5450
| Dell Latitude 14 E5450 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Lite-On LCS-128L9S | Toshiba Tecra Z40t-A1410 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Lenovo Thinkpad T440s 20AQ0069GE HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD2560/0L9 | HP EliteBook 840 G1 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | -0% | -36% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 66.5 0% | 66.9 0% | 41.65 -38% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.2 | 84.8 -9% | 92.8 0% | 62.3 -33% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.2 | 61.9 -9% | 67.8 -1% | 43.08 -37% |
| Screen | -4% | -10% | -67% | |
| Brightness middle | 293 | 281.5 -4% | 310 6% | 280 -4% |
| Brightness | 271 | 273 1% | 282 4% | 280 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 76 -11% | 85 0% | 87 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.291 | 0.236 19% | 0.38 -31% | 0.69 -137% |
| Contrast | 1007 | 1193 18% | 816 -19% | 406 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.81 | 4.9 -29% | 4.56 -20% | 9.41 -147% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.97 | 4.63 -17% | 5.12 -29% | 10.19 -157% |
| Gamma | 2.51 88% | 2.41 91% | 2.66 83% | 2.49 88% |
| CCT | 7368 88% | 6004 108% | 6116 106% | 12671 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.4 | 57.29 -5% | 64 6% | 40 -34% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-4% | -5% /
-8% | -52% /
-58% |
* ... smaller is better
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO133D (B140HAN) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 297 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 270.8 cd/m²iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 220 cd/m²
Contraste: 1007:1 (Preto: 0.291 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.97 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
| PCMark 7 Score | 3469 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2824 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3340 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2338 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Lite-On LCS-128L9S
Sequential Read:
483.4 MB/s
Sequential Write:
336.9 MB/s
512K Read:
380.9 MB/s
512K Write:
335.5 MB/s
4K Read:
25.22 MB/s
4K Write:
74.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
389.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
317.3 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5450 | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G34ET | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad T440s 20AQ0069GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 990 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 41270 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4358 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 564 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 14 E5450 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Lite-On LCS-128L9S | Toshiba Tecra Z40t-A1410 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G34ET HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | HP EliteBook 840 G1 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider | ||||
| 1024x768 Low Preset | 42.2 | 37.2 -12% | 52.4 24% | |
| BioShock Infinite | ||||
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | 30.33 | 29.16 -4% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-4% | -12% /
-12% | 24% /
24% |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 42.2 | 20.6 | 12 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 30.33 | 15.6 | 13.3 | 4.23 |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5450 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Lite-On LCS-128L9S | Toshiba Tecra Z40t-A1410 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | HP EliteBook 850 G1-H5G34ET HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Lenovo Thinkpad T440s 20AQ0069GE HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD2560/0L9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -20% | -7% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.6 | 34.2 -20% | 31.1 -9% | 28 2% |
| Idle Average * | 28.6 | 34.3 -20% | 31.3 -9% | 28 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.6 | 34.5 -21% | 31.3 -9% | 29.8 -4% |
| Load Average * | 33 | 38.8 -18% | 33.3 -1% | 32.9 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.3 | 39.9 -20% | 36.2 -9% | 33.4 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 33 / 33.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-451 (15 cm de distância) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.9 °C / 1.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.9 °C / 1.7 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.5 / 8.4 / 9.6 Watt |
| Carga |
33.4 / 33.7 Watt |
   
| |
Os dispositivos de entrada acima da média foram impressionantes. O teclado é caracterizado por um deslocamento regular e bom. Confirmamos o mesmo no substituto do mouse, o qual poder ser chamado assim com todo direito. Gestos simples e multi-touch são implementados perfeita e imediatamente. Embora o modelo de teste possa ser colocado na categoria empresarial de gama média, a tela IPS instalada atinge boas taxas em contraste e brilho.
Em termos de desempenho, o portátil da Dell enfrentou seus rivais e demonstrou ser um poderoso oponente. O Latitude também foi sólido nas taxas de emissão. Como o Lenovo ThinkPad T440s, a curva de temperatura deve ser melhor.
Infelizmente, a duração da bateria não é suficiente para todo um dia de trabalho. Embora a Dell não ofereça uma bateria maior, há uma solução externa que não é muito barata, a quase 160 Euros (~$198). O portátil Latitude E5450 é recomendável para a rotina empresarial. No entanto, também seria aconselhável olhar outros portáteis similares.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
