Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng

Name: HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Brand: HP

Bom pacote. O Hewlett Packard Pavilion 15-aw004ng é um portátil interessante. O aparelho de 15,6 polegadas possui uma tela FHD mate, um SSD e uma configuração com duas placas de vídeo AMD. O preço para todas estas características boas: 550 Euros. Um preço desses para um pacote como este consegue convencer a maioria dos compradores a procurar outras opções, quando se encontram com certas falhas como durações de bateria abaixo da média e uma garantia de um ano.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA (Pavilion 15-cx Serie)

Processador

AMD A10-9600P 4 x 2.4 - 3.3 GHz, Bristol Ridge

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon R8 M445DX - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1021 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, Crimson 16.7.3, CrossFire

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2132, Dual-Channel, two slots (occupied)

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei, TN LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

AMD CZ FCH

Placa de Som

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

hp DVDRW SU228HB

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22.5 x 382 x 242

Bateria

41 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 12, McAfee LiveSafe-Internet Security (avaliação), MS Office (avaliação), 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.99 kg, Suprimento de energia: 338 g

Preço

599 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Asus F555UB-XO043T Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275	68.7 MB/s +20%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	57.3 MB/s
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ	16.7 MB/s -71%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	16.5 MB/s -71%
Asus F555UB-XO043T	13.4 MB/s -77%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G	11.2 MB/s -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275	88.1 MB/s +3%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	85.3 MB/s
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ	33.2 MB/s -61%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	26 MB/s -70%
Asus F555UB-XO043T	25.5 MB/s -70%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G	10.2 MB/s -88%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	276 MBit/s +188%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	96 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	334 MBit/s +237%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	99 MBit/s


229 cd/m²	237 cd/m²	231 cd/m²
214 cd/m²	240 cd/m²	222 cd/m²
225 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	223 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 240 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 227.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 139 cd/m²
Contraste: 490:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 11.34 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA TN LED, 1920x1080	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G TN LED, 1920x1080	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ TN LED, 1920x1080	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 IPS, 1920x1080	Asus F555UB-XO043T TN LED, 1366x768	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK TN LED, 1366x768
Display		-8%	-1%	47%	-5%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	40.35	37.13 -8%	39.82 -1%	64.1 59%	38.22 -5%	37.06 -8%
sRGB Coverage	60.3	55.9 -7%	59.7 -1%	82.9 37%	57.5 -5%	55.8 -7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.71	38.36 -8%	41.16 -1%	60.6 45%	39.49 -5%	38.29 -8%
Response Times		-3%	-5%	25%	-15%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(19, 22)	45 ?(24, 21) -10%	43 ?(21, 22) -5%	24 ?(12, 12) 41%	46 ?(24, 22) -12%	27 ?(7, 20) 34%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(10, 13)	22 ?(6, 16) 4%	24 ?(8, 16) -4%	21 ?(6, 15) 9%	27 ?(10, 17, Spikes in between) -17%	22 ?(11, 11) 4%
PWM Frequency				50 ?(30)	50 ?(60)	50 ?(80)
Screen		-3%	-3%	46%	9%	5%
Brightness middle	240	200 -17%	238 -1%	294 23%	214 -11%	200 -17%
Brightness	228	196 -14%	221 -3%	285 25%	205 -10%	198 -13%
Brightness Distribution	89	76 -15%	84 -6%	83 -7%	82 -8%	83 -7%
Black Level *	0.49	0.34 31%	0.49 -0%	0.26 47%	0.46 6%	0.28 43%
Contrast	490	588 20%	486 -1%	1131 131%	465 -5%	714 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.96	11.54 -5%	11.19 -2%	5.07 54%	6.52 41%	10.63 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.36	19.36 -5%	19.6 -7%	9.33 49%	9.1 50%	15.69 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.34	12.98 -14%	11.53 -2%	4.25 63%	7.05 38%	11.19 1%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.58 ^85%	2.41 ^91%	2.49 ^88%	2.41 ^91%	1.78 ^124%
CCT	12292 ^53%	14060 ^46%	13057 ^50%	6597 ^99%	8623 ^75%	11258 ^58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	36 -8%	38 -3%	54 38%	36.6 -6%	35 -10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60	56 -7%	60 0%	83 38%	57.8 -4%	56 -7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-5% / -4%	-3% / -2%	39% / 43%	-4% / 3%	5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4769

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

6077

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2520

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

24.74 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.87 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

32.05 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

215 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

75 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +75%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points +53%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points +52%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV Intel Core i3-5010U	87 Points +16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	85 Points +13%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	78 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	75 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	74 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points +45%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +34%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	282 Points +31%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV Intel Core i3-5010U	219 Points +2%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	217 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	215 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	207 Points -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	195 Points -9%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	10803 Points +78%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	9936 Points +64%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	7776 Points +28%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	7222 Points +19%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	6820 Points +12%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	6385 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	6077 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	4984 Points +98%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	4357 Points +73%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	4315 Points +71%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	3114 Points +24%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2520 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	2417 Points -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	2325 Points -8%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	2754 Points +35%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	2577 Points +26%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	2167 Points +6%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2039 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	1944 Points -5%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	6007 Points +10%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	5558 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	5445 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	4550 Points -16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	4540 Points -17%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	212.3 Points +66%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	186.4 Points +46%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	181.3 Points +42%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	127.6 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	109.9 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	3232 ms * -54%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	2267 ms * -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2098 ms *
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	1337 ms * +36%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	1279 ms * +39%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	27029 Points +43%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	26586 Points +41%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	18921 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	15801 Points -16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	10182 Points -46%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		4340 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2904 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3569 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3883 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3497 Points +20%
Asus F555UB-XO043T GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	3305 Points +14%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	2961 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	2904 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	2806 Points -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	2485 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	4281 Points +10%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4095 Points +5%
Asus F555UB-XO043T GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	4091 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	3883 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	3540 Points -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	3290 Points -15%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Sequential Read: 503 MB/s

Sequential Write: 316.6 MB/s

512K Read: 261.9 MB/s

512K Write: 281.2 MB/s

4K Read: 17.04 MB/s

4K Write: 46.55 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 125 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 131.4 MB/s

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	Asus F555UB-XO043T Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-88%	-89%	67%	-89%
Read Seq	503	110.7 -78%	96.3 -81%	490.6 -2%	108.5 -78%
Write Seq	316.6	108.9 -66%	95.9 -70%	304.1 -4%	106.2 -66%
Read 512	261.9	36.71 -86%	36.46 -86%	414.6 58%	34.52 -87%
Write 512	281.2	53.7 -81%	42.75 -85%	299.6 7%	42.45 -85%
Read 4k	17.04	0.415 -98%	0.451 -97%	36.82 116%	0.391 -98%
Write 4k	46.55	1.261 -97%	0.895 -98%	99.5 114%	0.855 -98%
Read 4k QD32	125	1.126 -99%	0.847 -99%	333.4 167%	0.774 -99%
Write 4k QD32	131.4	1.312 -99%	0.892 -99%	236.8 80%	0.852 -99%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		8878 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		6853 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		2979 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		44367 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5225 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1678 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		686 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		315 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P	3819 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	3775 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P	2681 Points -29%
Asus F555UB-XO043T NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2336 Points -38%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	2210 Points -41%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2138 Points -43%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1835 Points -51%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	12483 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P	10534 Points -16%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P	8935 Points -28%
Asus F555UB-XO043T NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U	8405 Points -33%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	8324 Points -33%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	6127 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	2209 Points
Asus F555UB-XO043T NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U	1570 Points -29%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	1497 Points -32%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P	1472 Points -33%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	1205 Points -45%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)	82	77.8	71.7	50.3
Tomb Raider (2013)	83.6	55.7	46.3	21.8
BioShock Infinite (2013)	72.7	42.9	33.7	11.7
Battlefield 4 (2013)	50.1	37.2	23.4	7.7
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)	33.3	21.3	12.2
Alien: Isolation (2014)	51.6	42.7	28
F1 2014 (2014)	59	42	39	24
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)	40.8	27.8	9.6
Battlefield Hardline (2015)	37.7	29.3	14	8.3
GTA V (2015)	54.6	52.4	11.7
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	19	17	7
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	60	37.5	13.3
FIFA 16 (2015)	77.5		53.8	25
Anno 2205 (2015)	36	17.8	7.4
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015)	38.1	26.2	11.7
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)	15.9	13.1	6.6
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	53.5	33.7	13.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	24.4	13.9	7.7
XCOM 2 (2016)	22	8	5.2
Far Cry Primal (2016)	23	10	9
The Division (2016)	23.3	15.1	7.1
Hitman 2016 (2016)	18.6	17.7	10.5
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)	25.6	22.6	11.7	9.5
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	14.2	7	6.2
Doom (2016)	22.4	12.8	8.3
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	26.4	12.8	5.8
No Man's Sky (2016)	21.8	18	10
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	15.1	10.9	5.4

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Asus F555UB-XO043T GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	48.3 fps +13%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	47 fps +10%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	42.9 fps
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng Radeon R7 M440, A10-9600P	42.8 fps 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	41.8 fps -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	26.1 fps -39%

Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	58.4 fps +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	55.7 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	45.3 fps -19%

Battlefield 4 - 1024x768 Low Preset
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng Radeon R7 M440, A10-9600P	51.6 fps +3%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	50.1 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	40 fps -20%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	36.4 fps -27%

FIFA 16 - 1366x768 High Preset AA:2x MS
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	53.8 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	40.4 fps -25%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	fps -100%

GTA V - 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	60.7 fps +11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	54.6 fps

F1 2014 - 1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	46 fps +18%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	39 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	33 fps -15%

Counter-Strike: GO - 1366x768 High AA:2x MS AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	71.7 fps

Barulho

Ocioso		31.7 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB
HDD		32.2 dB
DVD		36.6 / dB
Carga		41 / 42.7 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 6200U, GeForce 930M	Asus F555UB-XO043T 6200U, GeForce 940M	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX
Noise		3%	0%	9%	-4%	-1%
off / environment *	31.2	31.3 -0%	31.3 -0%	22 29%		31.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	31.7	32.4 -2%	33.1 -4%	31.3 1%	34 -7%	32.6 -3%
Idle Average *	31.9	33.2 -4%	33.3 -4%	31.3 2%	34 -7%	32.6 -2%
Idle Maximum *	31.9	33.2 -4%	33.5 -5%	32.2 -1%	34.2 -7%	33.8 -6%
Load Average *	41	36.5 11%	38.9 5%	36.4 11%	38.9 5%	40.2 2%
Load Maximum *	42.7	34.4 19%	38.9 9%	36.6 14%	43.6 -2%	40.4 5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


25 °C	33 °C	33.4 °C
25 °C	28.1 °C	29.1 °C
24 °C	27 °C	25.5 °C

Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 27.8 °C


32.1 °C	32.4 °C	26.1 °C
30.4 °C	32.9 °C	26.3 °C
24.7 °C	27.8 °C	25.9 °C

Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 6200U, GeForce 930M	Asus F555UB-XO043T 6200U, GeForce 940M	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX
Heat		-5%	-4%	-13%	-8%	-10%
Maximum Upper Side *	33.4	34 -2%	36 -8%	42.5 -27%	33.2 1%	38.6 -16%
Maximum Bottom *	32.9	39.6 -20%	39.2 -19%	46.9 -43%	44 -34%	42 -28%
Idle Upper Side *	27.7	27.7 -0%	27.1 2%	25.8 7%	28.2 -2%	28.1 -1%
Idle Bottom *	29.4	29 1%	26.6 10%	26 12%	28.1 4%	28.1 4%

* ... smaller is better

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.65 Watt
Ocioso	5.5 / 8.2 / 9.5 Watt
Carga	44.5 / 58 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 6200U, GeForce 930M	Asus F555UB-XO043T 6200U, GeForce 940M	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX
Power Consumption		-2%	-10%	4%	13%	2%
Idle Minimum *	5.5	6.7 -22%	6.8 -24%	4.7 15%	4.7 15%	7 -27%
Idle Average *	8.2	9.8 -20%	10.5 -28%	9.9 -21%	6.5 21%	8 2%
Idle Maximum *	9.5	10.6 -12%	11 -16%	10.1 -6%	6.8 28%	8.4 12%
Load Average *	44.5	46 -3%	41.6 7%	36 19%	42.7 4%	38.8 13%
Load Maximum *	58	32 45%	51 12%	51 12%	59 -2%	52.8 9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		9h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		4h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 35min

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA 41 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G 37 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ 32 Wh	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 45 Wh	Asus F555UB-XO043T 37 Wh
Battery Runtime		-32%	-32%	33%	37%
Reader / Idle	560	400 -29%	365 -35%
H.264	194		168 -13%
WiFi v1.3	260	168 -35%	183 -30%	345 33%	355 37%
Load	95		49 -48%

Pro

+ Tela mate

+ Resolução FHD

+ SSD veloz

+ Quase não esquenta

Contra

- Apenas 12 meses de garantia

- Sem escotilha de manutenção

- Sem USB Type-C

- Durações de bateria abaixo da média

- Brilho muito baixo com a bateria

In review: HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

O processador AMD do modelo de teste oferece suficiente desempenho para o uso cotidiano. Além disso, o portátil é silencioso a maior parte do tempo e quase não esquenta. Um SSD veloz garante que o sistema funcione fluentemente. Infelizmente o portátil não possui escotilha de manutenção. Para rocar o SSD, a carcaça deve ser aberta. O teclado basta para o uso doméstico e a duração da bateria não é nada especial. O Pavilion poderia ter sido melhor nestas áreas.

Por apenas 550 Euros, o Pavilion 15-aw004ng é um bom poli funcional para usuários de nível de entrada.

Por um preço relativamente baixo, a HP incluiu uma tela FHD e um sistema dual-graphics. Por outro lado, o painel não é muito brilhante e possui ângulos de visão e contraste pobres. Adicionalmente, em termos de desempenho de jogos, o sistema dual-graphics não é tão potente quanto a concorrência da Nvidia. O próprio sistema é coberto por uma garantia de apenas 1 ano. Em resumo, a HP oferece um portátil econômico de 15,6 polegadas com falhas evidentes, o que pode ser adequado para alguns usuários.

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA - 2016-09-22 09/22/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

73 / 98 → 74%

Teclado

73%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

40 / 81 → 49%

Peso

63 / 20-67 → 91%

Bateria

73%

Pantalha

76%

Desempenho do jogos

59 / 85 → 70%

Desempenho da aplicação

71 / 92 → 77%

Temperatura

95%

Ruído

84 / 95 → 88%

Audio

54%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

68%

75%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng

Sascha Mölck, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-30)