Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016)

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/16/2016

Sólido como uma rocha. O novo Razer Blade possui uma GTX 1060 em uma excelente carcaça de alumínio. O portátil oferece dispositivos de entrada confiáveis, Thunderbolt 3 e um incrível painel IGZO. Com tudo isto sobre a mesa, o que poderia dar errado? Além de algum problema pequeno, a maior fraqueza foi a sua falta de desempenho para jogos. No entanto, este último agora foi resolvido com uma atualização EC.

Razer Blade (2016) (Blade Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.15, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, integrada
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 3200x1800 pixel 262 PPI, 10 pontos de toque, Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, QHD+, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, 512 GB 
, Slots: 1x m.2 PCIe
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Entrada/saída combinada (conector de 3,5 mm), Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 345 x 235
Bateria
70 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (Dolby Digital Plus), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força: 165 W
peso
1.96 kg, Suprimento de energia: 420 g
Preço
2600 EUR

 

Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)

Size Comparison

Left: power outlet, 2x USB 3.0, audio in/out
Left: power outlet, 2x USB 3.0, audio in/out
Right: USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, Kensington lock
Right: USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
646 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
591 MBit/s ∼100%
337
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 374 cd/m² Médio: 328 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
iluminação: 69 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: 1491:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.91 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.69 | - Ø
97% sRGB (Argyll) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.3
Razer Blade (2016)
Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, 3200x1800, 14
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), IPS, 1920x1080, 14
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-9%
29%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41
56
-37%
31.6
23%
38
7%
Response Time Black / White *
37
30
19%
24.4
34%
23
38%
PWM Frequency
200
Screen
-43%
-31%
-50%
Brightness
328
266
-19%
282
-14%
290
-12%
Brightness Distribution
69
81
17%
83
20%
85
23%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.57
-159%
0.32
-45%
Contrast
1491
1282
-14%
506
-66%
984
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.91
4.98
-161%
2.61
-37%
4.88
-155%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.69
4.08
-141%
1.18
30%
4.17
-147%
Gamma
2.3 104%
2.51 96%
2.24 107%
2.53 95%
CCT
6418 101%
5877 111%
6506 100%
6683 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
54
-14%
56.4
-10%
55
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
83
-14%
86.4
-11%
83
-14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -36%
-1% / -19%
-14% / -35%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (44.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼77% +1%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼77%
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼74% -3%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
130 Points ∼68% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼41% +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼41% +1%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points ∼41% +1%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼40%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
671 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points ∼77% +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points ∼77% +19%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4796 Points ∼74% +14%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4214 Points ∼65%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points ∼78% +36%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4016 Points ∼67% +18%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3417 Points ∼57%
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points ∼56% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3417 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4214 pontos
Ajuda
Razer Blade (2016)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
28%
-63%
-54%
Write 4k QD32
480
287.3
-40%
156.3
-67%
256.3
-47%
Read 4k QD32
573.4
320.5
-44%
247.4
-57%
149.4
-74%
Write 4k
139.6
110.3
-21%
35.31
-75%
75.74
-46%
Read 4k
42.22
43.82
4%
17.68
-58%
21.44
-49%
Write 512
603.5
1285
113%
246.7
-59%
287.8
-52%
Read 512
654.8
1149
75%
223
-66%
294.8
-55%
Write Seq
603.4
1290
114%
299
-50%
312.4
-48%
Read Seq
1296
1634
26%
335.3
-74%
485.4
-63%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Sequential Read: 1296 MB/s
Sequential Write: 603.4 MB/s
512K Read: 654.8 MB/s
512K Write: 603.5 MB/s
4K Read: 42.22 MB/s
4K Write: 139.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 573.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 480 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22022 Points ∼43% +59%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14977 Points ∼29% +8%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13891 Points ∼27%
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points ∼19% -31%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16525 Points ∼42% +52%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11776 Points ∼30% +8%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10890 Points ∼28%
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points ∼19% -32%
3DMark 11 Performance
11139 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9193 pontos
Ajuda
Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
92 fps ∼100% +87%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
49.1 fps ∼53%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.6 fps ∼100% +74%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
57.4 fps ∼58%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
55.2 fps ∼100% +48%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.3 fps ∼68%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.4 fps ∼100% +55%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
66.2 fps ∼65%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66.237.3fps
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 76.5fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 63.657.449.1fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 81.759.956.4fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 52.14744.1fps
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
74.2 fps ∼100% +32%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ (ForceWare 375.95)
56.4 fps ∼76%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
77.2 fps ∼100% +29%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ (ForceWare 375.95)
59.9 fps ∼78%

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 33 / 35 dB
Carga
39 / 51 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Noise
-6%
-5%
0%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
32
-3%
32
-3%
Idle Average *
33
32
3%
32
3%
33
-0%
Idle Maximum *
35
40
-14%
33.5
4%
34
3%
Load Average *
39
47
-21%
50
-28%
39
-0%
Load Maximum *
51
51
-0%
51.5
-1%
51
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 50.1 °C48.5 °C52.7 °C 
 45.2 °C47.3 °C44.4 °C 
 37.5 °C39.1 °C38.1 °C 
Máximo: 52.7 °C
Médio: 44.8 °C
48.4 °C46.7 °C48.2 °C
44.9 °C45.2 °C40 °C
38.2 °C38.7 °C36.2 °C
Máximo: 48.4 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  48.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
-25%
-20%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
52.7
55
-4%
55.6
-6%
48
9%
Maximum Bottom *
48.4
58.7
-21%
62.4
-29%
46.8
3%
Idle Upper Side *
29.3
36.9
-26%
33.2
-13%
33.7
-15%
Idle Bottom *
28.4
41.7
-47%
37.2
-31%
30.5
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.237.92541.143.53138.239.9403135.75030.8356325.931.48025.633.410024.943.312523.550.116026.55620021.359.225021.160.131523.164.140019.765.550019.466.963018.768.480017.672.1100018.970.7125017.566.4160017.767.4200017.668.7250017.968.3315017.963.7400017.863.750001861.463001861.980001853.81000018.152.21250018.145.21600018.138.7SPL30.478.7N1.444.5median 18.1Razer Blade (2016)median 63.7Delta26.936.433.736.43537.133.834.834.134.634.132.532.632.433.13231.230.63129.137.428.745.928.750.527.353.426.955.226.165.425.167.927.265.825.262.724.958.124.459.423.85923.557.523.360.923.564.323.369.523.166.823.169.123.367.123.252.523.437.236.676.72.838.9median 24.9MSI GS43VR 6RE-006USmedian 592.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 9 / 14 / 22 Watt
Carga midlight 72 / 124 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC940
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Power Consumption
-22%
-27%
-58%
Idle Minimum *
9
12
-33%
12.1
-34%
20
-122%
Idle Average *
14
16
-14%
19
-36%
24
-71%
Idle Maximum *
22
22
-0%
19.5
11%
29
-32%
Load Average *
72
90
-25%
106.7
-48%
86
-19%
Load Maximum *
124
170
-37%
159
-28%
183
-48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 03min
Razer Blade (2016)
70 Wh
Schenker Technologies XMG P406
45 Wh
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
61 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
62 Wh
Battery Runtime
-19%
7%
-19%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
243
197
-19%
261
7%
196
-19%

Pro

+ 6 SKUs disponíveis
+ Compacto e relativamente leve
+ Carcaça de alumínio muito rígida
+ Acabamento perfeito
+ Marcante design masculino em um preto nobre
+ Portas localizadas de forma ergonômica
+ Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C
+ HDMI 2.0
+ Muito bom desempenho WLAN
+ Fácil de abrir e fazer manutenção, ventoinhas de fácil acesso
+ O teclado Chroma oferece várias opções de iluminação
+ Macros personalizável
+ Muito bom painel IGZO
+ Baixo consumo de energia (para sua classe)

Contra

- Impressões digitais claramente visíveis
- Layout de teclado incomum
- Rotulado pobre das teclas
- Muitos recursos não podem ser utilizados sem se registrar primeiro (Razer Synapse)
- Botões do mouse abaixo da média
- Flickering PWM até 90% do brilho
- Tempos de resposta lentos
- Superfície refletiva da tela táctil
- Os ângulos de visão são limitados em comparação com a IPS
- Afogamento pesado da CPU com uso intenso (pode ser resolvido via atualização EC)
- Leve zumbido da ventoinha com velocidades médias a altas
- Os alto falantes não são muito bons para a música
In review: Razer Blade (2016). Test model provided by Razer Germany.
In review: Razer Blade (2016). Test model provided by Razer Germany.

Considerando a extensa lista de pros, não podemos evitar nos sentir decepcionados pelo sério afogamento da CPU. O flickering PWM e os lentos tempos de resposta também farão duvidar a alguns compradores potenciais. O registro obrigatório é mais uma inconveniência. Nós aceitaríamos as emissões de ruído graças à fina carcaça do portátil, mas o ruído de alta frequência emitido pelas ventoinhas, definitivamente podem causar problemas aos usuários.

O novo Razer Blade faz bem muitas coisas, mas deixa a desejar em termos de desempenho da CPU e, portanto, perde muito potencial.

Uma grande vantagem, obviamente é o ótimo chassi, realmente não conseguimos imaginar como poderia ser melhorado. O layout pode ser um pouco desconfortável, mas o teclado Chroma é definitivamente um tesouro graças às amplas opções de personalização. Com um veloz ac-WLAN, Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C e HDMI 2.0, o Blade está preparado para o futuro. O portátil para jogos também oferece um brilhante painel IGZO com forte contraste e cores precisas.

<s>Se a Razer resolver os problemas de afogamento, outorgaríamos ao Blade uma pontuação de 84%. Poderia ser muito bem que o nosso modelo de teste estava defeituoso. Infelizmente, sentimos a obrigação de tirar 2% da pontuação (por enquanto).</s>

Atualização 05/12/2016: Como foi mencionado antes, o afogamento da CPU foi corrigido por uma atualização EC. A pontuação é, portanto, é aumentada para os originais 84%.

Razer Blade (2016) - 12/25/2016 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
93 / 98 → 95%
Teclado
76%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
63 / 81 → 77%
Peso
64 / 66 → 96%
Bateria
75%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
89%
Desempenho da aplicação
89%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
76 / 90 → 85%
Audio
66%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Médio
79%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - página inicial > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)