Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone SE

Name: Apple iPhone SE
Brand: Apple

Anão poderoso. As versões mais econômicas do iPhone não foram um sucesso de verdade até agora. Isto poderia mudar com o iPhone SE, porque é muito veloz, duradouro e preenche um nicho com a sua tela de 4-polegadas.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/06/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone SE (iPhone Serie)

Processador

Apple A9 2 x 1.85 GHz, Cyclone 3

Placa gráfica

Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Análises do: 450 MHz

Memória

2048 MB

, LPDDR4

Pantalha

4.00 polegadas 16:9, 1136 x 640 pixel 326 PPI, 10-dedos, IPS, Retina, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 54.9 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Fingerabdruck 1. Generation Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de luz, Sensor de proximidade, Bússola, Leitor de digitais, Porta Lightning, NFC apenas para Apple Pay

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B29); LTE Advanced 150/50 Mbit/s; SAR-value: 0,72 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 123.8 x 58.6

Bateria

6.21 Wh, 1624 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 14 h

Sistema Operativo

Apple iOS 9

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix F/2.2, AF, vídeo 2160p
Secondary Camera: 1.2 MPix F/2.4, vídeo 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo para conector Lightning, Fones, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

Released

03/31/2016

peso

113 g, Suprimento de energia: 47 g

Preço

489 Euro

Links

Apple página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Samsung Galaxy S7 Apple iPhone 6S Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Apple iPhone 5c Apple iPhone SE DIN A6 ❌

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


562 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	568 cd/m²
576 cd/m²	603 cd/m²	573 cd/m²
578 cd/m²	597 cd/m²	572 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 603 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 579.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 603 cd/m²
Contraste: 685:1 (Preto: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.13% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Apple iPhone SE A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 5c SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash
Screen		-3%	-6%	2%	-1%	-63%	-6%
Brightness middle	603	552 -8%	583 -3%	386 -36%	350 -42%	547 -9%	572 -5%
Brightness	579	549 -5%	560 -3%	394 -32%	351 -39%	532 -8%	537 -7%
Brightness Distribution	93	87 -6%	91 -2%	88 -5%	98 5%	94 1%	87 -6%
Black Level *	0.88	0.39 56%	0.46 48%			0.54 39%	0.66 25%
Contrast	685	1415 107%	1267 85%			1013 48%	867 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	3.4 -89%	3.55 -97%	1.11 38%	2.04 -13%	7.37 -309%	2.64 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.5			3.35 4%	3.25 7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	4.16 -81%	3.88 -69%	1.34 42%	1.63 29%	8.39 -265%	2.97 -29%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.12 ^104%	2.07 ^106%	2.28 ^96%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	6955 ^93%	7288 ^89%	7280 ^89%	6441 ^101%	6391 ^102%	9074 ^72%	7170 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62.13	62.18 0%	59.05 -5%		86.86 40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	96.74	95.93 -1%	92.8 -4%		99.35 3%	99.9865 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | Geekbench 3 | AnTuTu v6

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	1943 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	1987 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1972 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2094 Points +8%
Apple iPhone 5c	1759 Points -9%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	5445 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	5442 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4818 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7	6055 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 5c	1162 Points -79%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	14016 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	19060 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	18062 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S7	5590 Points -60%
Apple iPhone 5c	3181 Points -77%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	39987 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	95049 Points +138%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	96768 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy S7	35808 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 5c	12892 Points -68%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	49934 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	49848 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	47850 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7	207417 Points +315%
Apple iPhone 5c	24996 Points -50%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	7860 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	8296 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	7975 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	7730 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 5c	3459 Points -56%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	4078 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	2201 Points
Apple iPhone 5c	1273 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	1375 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	703 Points
Apple iPhone 5c	710 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	4386 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	4422 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4429 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7	6401 Points +46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	2533 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	2539 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2538 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2199 Points -13%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE	126969 Points
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	133626 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	35964 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points +1%

Legend

Apple iPhone SE Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 5c Apple A6, PowerVR SGX543MP3, 16 GB iNAND Flash

3DMark | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3316 Points +5%
Apple iPhone SE	3149 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	1878 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	281 Points -91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4557 Points +7%
Apple iPhone SE	4255 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	2353 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	235 Points -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1697 Points +3%
Apple iPhone SE	1649 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	1100 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	916 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2318 Points +1%
Apple iPhone SE	2298 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2170 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	1198 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2601 Points +3%
Apple iPhone SE	2524 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2216 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	1137 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy S7	2022 Points +16%
Apple iPhone SE	1749 Points
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1676 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	1472 Points -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE	29538 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 6S	28419 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	27795 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	26420 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	7229 Points -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone SE	44059 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	42686 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	41615 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	37319 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	6522 Points -85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points +45%
Apple iPhone SE	13717 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	13097 Points -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	13065 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	12854 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	11653 Points -15%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone SE	58.1 fps
Apple iPhone 6S	56 fps -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	45 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	8.4 fps -86%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps 0%
Apple iPhone SE	40 fps
Apple iPhone 6S	39.5 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	25 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	4.1 fps -90%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE	59.2 fps
Apple iPhone 6S	59.1 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	59 fps 0%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	57 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	20 fps -66%
Apple iPhone 5c	13 fps -78%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps +5%
Apple iPhone SE	80.3 fps
Apple iPhone 6S	79.6 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	78.9 fps -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	56 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	12 fps -85%
Apple iPhone 5c	6.8 fps -92%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE	118.8 Points
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	118.7 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S	118.6 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	49 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	22.1 Points -81%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE	16550 Points
Apple iPhone 6S	16200 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	15967 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	5691 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	3566 Points -78%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Apple iPhone 5c	14535 ms * -750%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	11796 ms * -590%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	4210 ms * -146%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2562 ms * -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1743 ms * -2%
Apple iPhone 6S	1715 ms * -0%
Apple iPhone SE	1709 ms *

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	190 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 6S	187 Points +1%
Apple iPhone SE	186 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	166 Points -11%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact	104 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	64 Points -66%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


44.2 °C	42.6 °C	39.1 °C
42 °C	40.1 °C	38.2 °C
39.8 °C	38.5 °C	37.2 °C

Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C


40.3 °C	42.7 °C	42.8 °C
39.5 °C	41.1 °C	40.5 °C
39.2 °C	40.3 °C	39 °C

Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.11 Watt
Ocioso	0.54 / 1.26 / 1.4 Watt
Carga	2.45 / 6.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Apple iPhone SE A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 5S PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Apple iPhone 5c SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Power Consumption		12%	-6%	23%	-38%	-11%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	0.54	0.6 -11%	0.5 7%	0.4 26%	0.6 -11%	0.96 -78%	0.68 -26%
Idle Average *	1.26	0.8 37%	1.6 -27%	1 21%	1.4 -11%	1.39 -10%	1.02 19%
Idle Maximum *	1.4	1.6 -14%	1.9 -36%	1.3 7%	1.7 -21%	1.45 -4%	1.14 19%
Load Average *	2.45	2.3 6%	2.5 -2%	2.2 10%	5.3 -116%	2.65 -8%	4.73 -93%
Load Maximum *	6.46	3.8 41%	4.8 26%	3.3 49%	8.4 -30%	3.51 46%	7.16 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		21h 14min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 27min

	Apple iPhone SE A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Apple iPhone 5c SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Battery Runtime		-13%	-1%	-16%	7%	36%	11%
Reader / Idle	1274	1510 19%	1655 30%	1130 -11%	2249 77%	1978 55%	1810 42%
H.264	759	699 -8%	714 -6%		525 -31%	863 14%	892 18%
WiFi v1.3	673	492 -27%	513 -24%		440 -35%	628 -7%	456 -32%
Load	207	137 -34%	197 -5%	165 -20%	242 17%	376 82%	242 17%
WiFi				862

Pro

+ Chassi sofisticado

+ Compacto e leve

+ Desempenho muito alto

+ Tela brilhante com cores precisas

+ Operação responsiva e fluente

+ Muitos acessórios disponíveis

+ Ótima qualidade do sinal

+ GPS preciso

+ Bom alto falante

+ Boas câmeras

+ Ótimas durações na prática

Contra

- Alto valor de preto

- NFC apenas para Apple Pay

- Microfone com som abafado

- Sem certificação IP

- As superfícies de vidro podem se quebrar com facilidade

- Armazenamento não expansível

- Bateria integrada

In review: iPhone SE. Test model courtesy of Apple Germany.

A Apple ainda adora construir smartphones compactos, embora as últimas gerações tenham crescido de forma considerável. O iPhone SE (que é a abreviatura para Special Edition) volta para as raízes e revive o formato de 4-polegadas, raramente usado hoje em dia. Não apenas as crianças ficarão contentes com isto, mas todo os usuários que preferem este tamanho e não tiveram muitas opções até agora.

O iPhone SE é similar ao iPhone 6S em muitos aspectos e também ultrapassa o iPhone 6 ou 6 Plus, que ainda estão disponíveis, em termos de desempenho, gravações em 4K e as durações da bateria, por exemplo. A estamina inclusive derrota o iPhone 6S e está no mesmo nível com o iPhone 6S Plus. Módulos de comunicação velozes, a boa tela, boas câmeras e bom software são outras vantagens do iPhone SE.

Se estiver procurando um smartphone compacto sem sacrificar desempenho, o iPhone SE será uma ótima opção. O aparelho, é, no entanto, provavelmente muito caro e frágil para usuários conscientes de preços e fanáticos dos exteriores.

Os fanáticos dos exteriores ainda terão problemas coma superfície suscetível a arranhões, o vidro que pode se quebrar facilmente e a ausência da certificação IP. Há muitos acessórios na internet para estes propósitos, mas o iPhone SE é – similar a seus predecessores – mais um bonito aparelho para interiores que uma ferramenta para aventuras. Você ainda não pode expandir o armazenamento ou substituir a bateria.

Se você não gosta da Apple, o iPhone SE não o convencerá, mas todos os outros usuários, mais uma vez, obterão um aparelho bonito e poderoso com uma carcaça compacta e leve.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Apple iPhone SE - 2019-09-27 09/27/2019 v7
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

59 / 75 → 78%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

41 / 70 → 59%

Peso

95%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

21 / 64 → 33%

Desempenho da aplicação

53 / 86 → 62%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

52%

Médio

72%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1618 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone SE

Florian Wimmer, 2016-05- 6 (Update: 2016-05- 9)