Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone X

Sem revolução. A Apple lança o iPhone X para o 10mo aniversário do iPhone, que é vendido adicionalmente com os iPhones "convencionais". O destaque é, obviamente, a tela OLED com marcos muito finos. O conceito funciona muito bem na prática e não sentimos falta do botão Home.
Apple iPhone X (iPhone Serie)
Processador
Apple A11 Bionic 6 x - 2.4 GHz, Monsoon / Mistral
Placa gráfica
Apple A11 Bionic GPU
Memória
3 GB 
, Samsung LPDDR4x
Pantalha
5.80 polegadas 2:1, 2436 x 1125 pixel 463 PPI, Capacitiva, Apple True Tone Super Retina HD, HDR, Super AMOLED, Vidro resistente arranhões, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 64GB or 256GB, 58.7 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Porta Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Giroscópio de 3 eixos, acelerômetro, giro, proximidade, bússola, barômetro, Lightning
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, e2100 MHz), LTE (FDD band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, e 66; TDD: 34, 38, 39, 40, e 41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 143.6 x 70.9
Bateria
2716 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 60 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual 12 MP, f/1.8 & f/2.4, 2x optical zoom, quad-LED flash, 2160p@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, 1080p@30fps, 720p@240fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, EarPods with Lightning Connector, Adaptador Lightning para conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, cabo Lightning para USB, Adaptador de força USB, panfletos, 12 Meses Garantia, Face ID, carregamento sem fio (Qi), certificação IP67, Head SAR: 0.98 W/kg, fanless
peso
174 g, Suprimento de energia: 46 g
Preço
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158.4 mm 78.1 mm 7.5 mm 202 g157.9 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 175 g154.2 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 178 g151.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 158 g148.9 mm 68.1 mm 8 mm 155 g148.9 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 163 g148 mm 73.4 mm 7.4 mm 156 g143.6 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 174 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8
651 MBit/s +43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
627 (490min - 666max) MBit/s +38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
225 MBit/s -51%
Sony Xperia XZ1
500 MBit/s +10%
Apple iPhone X
456 MBit/s
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
374 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone X
939 MBit/s
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
914 MBit/s -3%
Sony Xperia XZ1
489 MBit/s -48%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
355 (105min - 550max) MBit/s -62%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
338 MBit/s -64%
Samsung Galaxy S8
329 MBit/s -65%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Apple iPhone X: Overview
Apple iPhone X: Overview
Apple iPhone X: Forest section
Apple iPhone X: Forest section
Apple iPhone X: Bridge crossing
Apple iPhone X: Bridge crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Forest section
Garmin Edge 500: Forest section
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge crossing

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Test chart main camera iPhone X
ColorChecker Passport: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of every patch.
629
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Apple True Tone Super Retina HD, HDR tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 629 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 606.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.87 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 600 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.80
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.50
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6.00
Screen
-6%
-52%
-23%
-48%
-17%
Brightness middle
600
559
-7%
566
-6%
426
-29%
578
-4%
629
5%
Brightness
606
538
-11%
564
-7%
431
-29%
568
-6%
636
5%
Brightness Distribution
94
90
-4%
94
0%
93
-1%
92
-2%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.38
0.62
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.3
-8%
2.7
-125%
1.6
-33%
2.8
-133%
1.7
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
2.7
10%
5.4
-80%
4.1
-37%
5.1
-70%
3.6
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.8
-13%
3.1
-94%
1.7
-6%
2.8
-75%
2.4
-50%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
2.15 102%
2.25 98%
2.15 102%
2.15 102%
CCT
6707 97%
6797 96%
6335 103%
6329 103%
6728 97%
6337 103%
Contrast
1471
932
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.85 ms rise
↘ 0.81 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.4 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Viewing angles reference image
Viewing angles reference image
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points +10%
LG G6
151751 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points -15%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points -16%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points
LG G6
2496 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points -10%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points -6%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points
LG G6
3646 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points -48%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points -49%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points -42%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points -43%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points -43%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points
LG G6
1930 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points +154%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points +240%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points +44%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points +140%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points +263%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points +183%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points
LG G6
5138 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points -60%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points -36%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points -34%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points -34%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points -35%
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points
LG G6
1073 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points -30%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points -29%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points -26%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points 0%
LG G6
1831 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points -52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points -55%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points -56%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points -55%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points -54%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points -55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points +3%
LG G6
4369 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points -34%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points -39%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points -34%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points -37%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG G6
7080 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
8310 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points
OnePlus 5
8005 Points
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points 0%
LG G6
29276 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points -50%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points -52%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points -51%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points -39%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points +1%
LG G6
32128 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points -67%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points -70%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points -57%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points -52%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points -48%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points 0%
LG G6
22335 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points -21%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G6
3282 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points
OnePlus 5
4219 Points
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G6
4121 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points
OnePlus 5
4765 Points
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G6
1961 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points
OnePlus 5
3012 Points
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points -11%
LG G6
2669 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points +17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points +16%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points -11%
LG G6
2980 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points -23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points +14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points +12%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points +8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points -11%
LG G6
1955 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points +22%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points +24%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points +28%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points +28%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps +101%
LG G6
46 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps +1%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -1%
OnePlus 5
60 fps +1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps +1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps -6%
LG G6
75 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps -41%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps -37%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps -37%
OnePlus 5
115 fps -35%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps +35%
LG G6
27 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps -35%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps -40%
OnePlus 5
56 fps -4%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps -21%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps -20%
LG G6
38 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps -42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps -39%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -33%
OnePlus 5
61 fps -31%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps +28%
LG G6
16 fps -64%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps -48%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps -14%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps -55%
OnePlus 5
41 fps -7%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps -16%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps 0%
LG G6
29 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps -24%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps -16%
OnePlus 5
42 fps -14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps -28%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps
LG G6
11 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13 fps -53%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps -21%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps -53%
OnePlus 5
25 fps -10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps -10%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps
LG G6
20 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
25 fps -21%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps -34%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps -25%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps -25%
OnePlus 5
25 fps -21%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps -28%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points
LG G6
647 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1295 Points -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points -54%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points -50%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points 0%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.6 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.8 Points -71%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.7 Points -71%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.3 Points -73%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.6 Points -75%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.6 Points -75%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points -63%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points -66%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points -68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points -70%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points -71%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points -74%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3591 ms * -400%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434 ms * -378%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3268 ms * -355%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2622 ms * -265%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464 ms * -243%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1887 ms * -163%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1877 ms * -161%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
720 ms * -0%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms *
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points +2%
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points -45%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points -45%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points -52%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
159 Points -55%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points -55%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points -66%

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high59 fps
Carga Máxima
 34 °C37 °C35 °C 
 34 °C38 °C37 °C 
 33 °C39 °C38 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C
37 °C45 °C44 °C
36 °C37 °C39 °C
33 °C35 °C35 °C
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C
Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini, AMPROBE TMD-50
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.638.22533.633.13131.232.14030.832.15030.734.36334358030.939.410028.736.412526.247.91602651.920025.354.82502557.231523.359.640022.362.550021.164.863020.167.780019.568.1100020.166.2125019.669.3160018.87320001874.8250017.877.3315017.676400017.675.5500017.773.5630017.873.880001871.41000017.765.41250017.853.51600017.848.5SPL31.285.3N1.661.7median 19.5median 66.2Delta2.38.531.635.825.440.125.335.532.931.933.631.631.638.928.433.82727.220.828.62236.421.342.620.851.521.258.619.465.719.571.417.770.717.968.317.870.717.370.317.462.516.760.817.258.318.265.317.967.817.672.417.770.617.871.517.97318.164.518.249.33081.41.351.2median 17.9median 65.31.410.635.237.832.934.237.235.631.737.139.64028.327.927.32626.924.326.723.72433.420.941.220.951.919.551.218.560.317.55617.555.915.755.115.865.716.669.515.874.215.47715.574.91673.315.870.41670.816.373.116.372.916.273.516.468.816.455.828.684.41.154.7median 16.4median 65.72.210.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone XHTC U11Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Apple iPhone X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC U11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.66 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.03 / 2.4 / 2.6 Watt
Carga midlight 2.96 / 6.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 34min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 00min
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
28%
13%
30%
62%
29%
12%
Reader / Idle
1292
2085
61%
1629
26%
1565
21%
1744
35%
1754
36%
1534
19%
H.264
634
733
16%
698
10%
742
17%
929
47%
802
26%
623
-2%
WiFi v1.3
564
657
16%
585
4%
736
30%
818
45%
695
23%
518
-8%
Load
180
211
17%
202
12%
275
53%
398
121%
236
31%
247
37%

Pro

+ Ótima tela com True Tone
+ SoC poderoso
+ Belo design
+ Ótima qualidade de construção
+ Desempenho veloz do Wi-Fi
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Câmera dupla muito boa
+ IP67

Contra

- Comparativamente pesado
- O armazenamento não pode ser expandido
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Funcionalidade NFC altamente limitada
- Sem conector estéreo
In review: Apple iPhone X
In review: Apple iPhone X

As especificações e características do Apple iPhone X são muito semelhantes às do iPhone 8 Plus, mas isto não é algo ruim. As diferenças são importantes e dizem respeito ao visual. A Apple não usa apenas um painel 2:1 pela primeira vez, também é o maior painel em um iPhone até agora e o primeiro baseado na tecnologia OLED. A tela é muito boa, mas o design bastante incomum é certamente uma questão de gosto.

A falta de um botão Home e Touch ID é a segunda grande mudança. Ambos foram subtituidos pelo Face ID. Ele analisa o rosto, mas considerando as possibilidades se os dados forem mal utilizados, o recurso deve ser visto criticamente do ponto de vista da privacidade. A Apple diz que a informação só é armazenada no iPhone e os aplicativos só podem fazer consultas se a identidade é correta, mas no final é uma questão de confiança. Este ceticismo também foi um tópico quando o leitor de digitais foi lançado, mas ninguém se preocupa com isso agora, porque esse recurso facilita nossas vidas. O Face ID é realmente muito confortável e já funciona muito bem. 

Tecnologia poderosa, novo design e Face ID - este é o iPhone X. Mas isso não é suficiente para ganhar a coroa dos smartphones.

Você também recebe uma boa câmera, que tira fotos decentes e certamente é a referência quando deseja gravar vídeos com o seu smartphone. A Apple atualmente é o único fabricante com gravação Ultra HD a 60 FPS. O smartphone também gerencia uma boa relação tela-corpo e o iPhone X não é tão volumoso quanto o iPhone 8 Plus, mas ainda é pesado. Caso contrário, você recebe todas as especificações que espera de um moderno smartphone de gama alta. Você ainda não pode expandir o armazenamento, mas não esperávamos isso. Há também mais e mais smartphones Android sem slot microSD. Achamos que as durações da bateria têm muito espaço para melhorias. Você passará o dia, mas não muito mais. O iPhone X também é o último em nosso grupo de comparação. O Huawei Mate 10 Pro, por exemplo, é muito melhor neste quesito.

Depois está o preço. O iPhone X está  partir de 1149 Euros ($999), e você deve pagar 1319 Euros ($1149) pela versão de 256 GB. Para comparação: A Apple vende o iPhone 8 básico por 799 Euros ($699), e o 8 Plus por 909 Euros ($799). No final, a Apple cobra um preço premium por um novo design e Face ID, mas isso não justifica uma atualização dos modelos iPhone 8 ou 7.

Apple iPhone X - 11/22/2017 v6(old)
Patrick Afschar, Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff, Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 96%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
68 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
89%
Médio
81%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone X
Patrick Afschar, Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff, Daniel Schmidt, 2017-11-28 (Update: 2017-12- 7)