Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Honor 10
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 555 cd/m²
Contraste: 1423:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15 | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | Huawei P20 LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.80 | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.60 | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -4% | -36% | 36% | -24% | -8% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 555 | 550 -1% | 528 -5% | 753 36% | 541 -3% | 458 -17% | 656 18% |
| Brightness | 537 | 535 0% | 525 -2% | 748 39% | 538 0% | 463 -14% | 634 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 92 -2% | 89 -5% | 96 2% | 96 2% | 92 -2% | 93 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.42 -8% | 0.51 -31% | 0.37 5% | 0.22 44% | 0.4 -3% | |
| Contrast | 1423 | 1310 -8% | 1035 -27% | 2035 43% | 2082 46% | 1640 15% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 3.3 -43% | 4.7 -104% | 1.3 43% | 5.8 -152% | 4 -74% | 5.3 -130% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 4.5 25% | 8.9 -48% | 2.3 62% | 7.4 -23% | 7.8 -30% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 3.6 8% | 6.4 -64% | 1.7 56% | 2.7 31% | 4.7 -21% | 5.2 -33% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.22 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.07 106% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6212 105% | 7226 90% | 7987 81% | 66.76 9736% | 6570 99% | 7425 88% | 7905 82% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6) | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Motorola Moto G6 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (69 - 69, n=3) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 10 | Honor 9 | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | Nokia 7 Plus | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | Sony Xperia XZ1 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -50% | -61% | -52% | -52% | -24% | 8% | 174% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 828 | 293 -65% | 299.9 -64% | 283.1 -66% | 287.4 -65% | 679 -18% | 760 ? -8% | 1505 ? 82% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 192.1 | 204 6% | 104.2 -46% | 211.6 10% | 205.3 7% | 204.4 6% | 297 ? 55% | 1112 ? 479% |
| Random Read 4KB | 145.9 | 55.7 -62% | 82.6 -43% | 54.7 -63% | 68.6 -53% | 156.6 7% | 152.9 ? 5% | 247 ? 69% |
| Random Write 4KB | 163 | 32.7 -80% | 14.69 -91% | 19.62 -88% | 7.59 -95% | 14.93 -91% | 131.6 ? -19% | 271 ? 66% |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| HD | 32 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high HD | 58 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Honor 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.12 / 2.26 / 2.3 Watt |
| Carga |
5.14 / 7.89 Watt |
    
| |
| Honor 10 3400 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 17% | 39% | 10% | -0% | 2% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.12 | 1.13 -1% | 0.65 42% | 0.67 40% | 0.84 25% | 0.51 54% | 0.978 ? 13% | 0.897 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 2.26 | 2.25 -0% | 1.76 22% | 1.02 55% | 2.31 -2% | 2.16 4% | 2.12 ? 6% | 1.452 ? 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 2.3 -0% | 1.78 23% | 1.1 52% | 2.33 -1% | 2.23 3% | 2.51 ? -9% | 1.629 ? 29% |
| Load Average * | 5.14 | 4.89 5% | 4.47 13% | 3.86 25% | 4.76 7% | 7.45 -45% | 5.01 ? 3% | 5.55 ? -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.89 | 7.99 -1% | 9.13 -16% | 5.97 24% | 6.39 19% | 9.28 -18% | 8.1 ? -3% | 8.31 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 10 3400 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | -16% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1162 | 1399 20% | 750 -35% | 1888 62% | 1546 33% | 1703 47% | 1665 43% |
| H.264 | 662 | 564 -15% | 470 -29% | 810 22% | 908 37% | 706 7% | 698 5% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 663 | 516 -22% | 582 -12% | 818 23% | 646 -3% | 672 1% | 562 -15% |
| Load | 216 | 278 29% | 247 14% | 295 37% | 260 20% | 158 -27% | 286 32% |
Pro
Contra
Com o 10, o Honor está melhor e não oferece apenas uma versão aperfeiçoada do modelo do ano passado, mas também variantes de cor ousadas, chocando a concorrência com um forte preço de entrada de 399 Euros (~$468).
Neste ponto, a comparação direta com o Huawei P20 está se tornando difícil. Embora existam muitas semelhanças na folha de dados, o smartphone muito mais caro da empresa mãe pode fazer tudo, pelo menos, um pouco melhor. Apenas o desempenho do sistema é similar. Com isso, a diferença do preço está bastante justificada em nossa opinião.
Quem estiver procurando um smartphone elegante com uma sensação de gama alta pode optar pelo Honor 10 sem preocupações.
O Honor 10 ainda é um ótimo smartphone. Ele tem uma tela boa e brilhante que também é bastante grande, mas não tão gigante como a de alguns concorrentes. Além de tudo isso está a boa câmera, uma ótima duração de bateria, e um smartphone rápido. Vendo o seu desempenho de sistema, o visual, ou a sensação táctil, você não diria que custa "apenas" 400 Euros.
Também é positivo que ele use o veloz armazenamento UFS-2.1 agora, que o dual-SIM seja oferecido e que o GPS seja muito preciso Por outro lado, o fato de que apenas poucas bandas LTE sejam suportadas causará algumas frustrações nos EUA. No entanto, ainda podemos oferecer uma recomendação clara para o Honor 10.
Honor 10
-
05/23/2018 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt