Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto X4

Alexa, onde você está? O Moto X4 é lançado com uma câmera dupla, proteção IP68 e um design elegante, tentando conquistar o mercado de gama média. No entanto, o suporte prometido para Amazon Alexa, atualmente não está disponível no nosso dispositivo de teste. Será que ainda vale a pena comprar o Moto X4? Nossa análise irá responder essa pergunta.
Motorola Moto X4 (Moto Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, LTPS IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 18.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade,bússola, USB-C, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 148.4 x 73.4
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Câmera dupla, detecção facial autofoco, f2.0, 1.4µm, 8MP wide-angle with 120°, f2.2, 1.12µm, dual LED flash
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f2.0, 1µm, LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono orientado para a frente, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, Moto, device assistance, 24 Meses Garantia, largura de banda (download/​upload): 400Mbps/​75Mbps (LTE); SAR value: 0.815W/​kg (head), 1.54W/​kg (body); IP68-certified, fanless
peso
163 g, Suprimento de energia: 78 g
Preço
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4

Size Comparison

155.4 mm 75.2 mm 7.5 mm 165 g148.4 mm 73.4 mm 9.5 mm 163 g149.1 mm 72.9 mm 8.1 mm 142 g147 mm 71 mm 7.5 mm 155 g145.2 mm 70.5 mm 7.5 mm 168 g135.4 mm 66.2 mm 7.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s +49%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
336 MBit/s
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s -2%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s -33%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
574 MBit/s +70%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s -9%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s -16%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s -34%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Overview
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Overview
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Path
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Path
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Loop
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
498
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 517 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 478.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.37 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 469 cd/m²
Contraste: 1268:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.1
Motorola Moto X4
LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.20
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.70
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
8%
41%
21%
26%
19%
Brightness middle
469
545
16%
574
22%
550
17%
620
32%
656
40%
Brightness
479
526
10%
576
20%
535
12%
586
22%
634
32%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
94
9%
92
7%
89
3%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.37
0.42
-14%
0.42
-14%
0.28
24%
0.4
-8%
Contrast
1268
1298
2%
1310
3%
2214
75%
1640
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.5
4.9
11%
2.4
56%
3.3
40%
4.8
13%
5.3
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.7
8.5
21%
3.8
64%
4.5
58%
8.8
18%
7.8
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.7
5.4
19%
1.9
72%
3.6
46%
5.3
21%
5.2
22%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.31 95%
2.09 105%
2.38 92%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
8064 81%
7610 85%
6502 100%
7226 90%
7473 87%
7905 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 3 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.6 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
70445 Points
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points -35%
Honor 9
150276 Points +113%
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points +158%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points -3%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
5919 Points
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points -16%
Honor 9
7034 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points +28%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points +6%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
4887 Points
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3756 Points -23%
Honor 9
6113 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6686 Points +37%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points +4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1536 Points
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points -35%
Honor 9
2779 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points +140%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points -1%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
3279 Points
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points -33%
Honor 9
4154 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points +79%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points +1%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1405 Points
HTC U11 Life
838 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points -8%
Honor 9
3258 Points +132%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points +189%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1519 Points
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points -65%
Honor 9
4126 Points +172%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points +309%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points -2%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
795 Points
HTC U11 Life
858 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points -16%
Honor 9
1069 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points +59%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points -4%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
870 Points
HTC U11 Life
877 Points +1%
Honor 9
1869 Points +115%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points +123%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
4115 Points
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points +2%
Honor 9
6527 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points +63%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points +1%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
3894 Points
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points +2%
Honor 9
Points -100%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points +1%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
16767 Points
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points -49%
Honor 9
28883 Points +72%
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points +146%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
18355 Points
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points -58%
Honor 9
38979 Points +112%
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points +217%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
12870 Points
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points +1%
Honor 9
15150 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points +58%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1351 Points
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points -64%
Honor 9
2611 Points +93%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points +268%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1259 Points
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points -68%
Honor 9
2990 Points +137%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points +395%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1816 Points
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points -6%
Honor 9
1809 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points +61%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
835 Points
HTC U11 Life
839 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points -63%
Honor 9
2666 Points +219%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points +352%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
724 Points
HTC U11 Life
729 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points -65%
Honor 9
2798 Points +286%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points +462%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1811 Points
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points -8%
Honor 9
2287 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points +66%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
31 fps
HTC U11 Life
29 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps -39%
Honor 9
55 fps +77%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps +94%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps -6%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
30 fps
HTC U11 Life
30 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps -60%
Honor 9
60 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps +297%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
15 fps
HTC U11 Life
14 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps -35%
Honor 9
28 fps +87%
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps +273%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps -7%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
14 fps
HTC U11 Life
14 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps -64%
Honor 9
30 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps +350%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
11 fps
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps -34%
Honor 9
22 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps +282%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps -14%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
9.6 fps
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps -67%
Honor 9
22 fps +129%
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps +348%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps +1%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
5.7 fps
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.9 fps -32%
Honor 9
16 fps +181%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps +356%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps -7%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
5.3 fps
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1.9 fps -64%
Honor 9
15 fps +183%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps +391%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps 0%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
32.14 fps
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
38773 Points
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
733 Points
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
60.1 fps

Legend

 
Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
70.5 Points +129%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points +90%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
30.81 Points
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.99 Points -6%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
23.28 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
11909 Points +136%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points +102%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
5050 Points
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3799 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9669 ms * -15%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * -13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * -12%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
8396 ms *
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * +62%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
2668 ms * +68%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points +24%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points +16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points +10%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
86 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
64 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto X4HTC U11 LifeSamsung Galaxy A3 2017Honor 9Xiaomi Mi 6Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-42%
-1%
96%
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
281.6
268
-5%
199.7
-29%
293
4%
728
159%
287.4
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
120.5
120
0%
45.96
-62%
204
69%
196.7
63%
205.3
70%
Random Read 4KB
45.4
39.3
-13%
22.32
-51%
55.7
23%
143.5
216%
68.6
51%
Random Write 4KB
55.3
50.2
-9%
9.62
-83%
32.7
-41%
25.19
-54%
7.59
-86%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
75.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
68 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-16%
34.64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-42%
66.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.3 °C31.3 °C29.8 °C 
 36.3 °C31.1 °C28.8 °C 
 33.6 °C30 °C27.9 °C 
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
28.2 °C30 °C29.7 °C
27.3 °C29.4 °C29.4 °C
27.2 °C28.7 °C28.3 °C
Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  21.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.62532.9403137.239.44031.734.95039.641.56328.331.28027.333.910026.929.412526.735.51602443.120020.948.925020.954.631519.558.440018.564.450017.568.163017.567.780015.768.9100015.870.4125016.671.8160015.872.4200015.472.1250015.576.531501677.8400015.872.350001673.5630016.370.4800016.376.91000016.2771250016.474.81600016.467SPL28.685.9N1.165median 16.4median 70.4Delta2.27.535.245.132.941.137.238.931.736.639.642.728.33427.33026.930.226.736.32441.720.946.520.950.619.551.718.557.517.556.917.556.615.760.915.870.316.675.715.878.515.479.615.581.21679.415.8781674.416.377.316.381.316.283.816.468.316.455.328.690.21.176median 16.4median 70.32.212.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto X4HTC U11 Life
Motorola Moto X4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.51 / 1.57 Watt
Carga midlight 3.88 / 5.47 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-9%
50%
-48%
-10%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.63
3%
0.37
43%
1.13
-74%
0.45
31%
0.84
-29%
Idle Average *
1.51
2.1
-39%
0.78
48%
2.25
-49%
1.67
-11%
2.31
-53%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
2.15
-37%
0.84
46%
2.3
-46%
1.69
-8%
2.33
-48%
Load Average *
3.88
3.34
14%
1.52
61%
4.89
-26%
4.07
-5%
4.76
-23%
Load Maximum *
5.47
4.83
12%
2.75
50%
7.99
-46%
8.54
-56%
6.39
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 49min
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
51%
-15%
12%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1652
1820
10%
2862
73%
1399
-15%
1665
1%
H.264
688
798
16%
988
44%
564
-18%
698
1%
WiFi v1.3
659
725
10%
668
1%
516
-22%
739
12%
562
-15%
Load
289
303
5%
532
84%
278
-4%
286
-1%

Pro

+ Carcaça muito estável
+ Design elegante
+ Porta de áudio dedicada de 3,5 mm
+ Sensor de digitais utilizável para navegação no menu
+ Múltiplos assistentes de voz sob demanda
+ Wi-Fi veloz
+ GPS preciso
+ Boa qualidade de voz
+ Fotos nítidas da câmera sob boas condições de iluminação
+ Dificilmente esquenta
+ Bom alto falante
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Parte traseira suscetível à sujeira
- Microfone ligeiramente distorcido
- Câmera medíocre em situações de baixa iluminação
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
In review: Motorola Moto X4. Review unit courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Motorola Moto X4. Review unit courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

A Motorola introduziu um smartphone de gama média elegante e de alta qualidade para o mercado, que surpreende com várias ideias novas, como é comum para a Motorola: É bastante inovador que o usuário possa criar um sistema de som Bluetooth de vários alto-falantes através de Wi-Fi de 5 GHz e que o usuário seja assistido não por um, mas por vários assistentes de voz. No entanto, o suporte prometido para Alexa junto com o aplicativo que não foi pré-instalado em nosso dispositivo de teste causou alguma confusão.

Wi-Fi rápido, GPS confiável, carcaça estável, controles fáceis, porém versáteis, câmera decente em boas condições de iluminação, desempenho adequado, bom alto-falante e durações da bateria adequados para uso diário. É assim que os pros deste dispositivo de teste podem ser resumidos, enquanto o Moto X4 tem poucos contras reais: A tela tem uma tonalidade azul visível, o brilho das imagens da câmera tomadas em condições de iluminação ruim é medíocre e o fabricante deve ficar envergonhado pelo fato de que, 6 meses após o lançamento do Android Oreo, ainda existem dispositivos lançados com a versão anterior.

O Motorola X4 é um bom dispositivo de gama média com vários pros e várias ideias inovadoras.

Podemos definitivamente pronunciar uma recomendação de compra para o Moto X4. Os usuários que usam seu smartphone para navegar regularmente estarão particularmente felizes com este dispositivo. Não só isso, mas também os inúmeros outros pros provavelmente fariam a Alexa dizer: "De acordo com a notebookcheck.com, o Motorola Moto X4 é uma recomendação de compra".

Motorola Moto X4 - 01/18/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
47 / 60 → 78%
Peso
91%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 63 → 65%
Desempenho da aplicação
54 / 70 → 77%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
75%
Médio
76%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto X4
Florian Wimmer, 2018-02- 1 (Update: 2018-02- 8)