Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 3T

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/03/2017

Carro-chefe 2.0. Depois de menos de 6 meses, a OnePlus introduziu o sucessor de seu smartphone de gama alta OnePlus 3, o OnePlus 3T. Vamos descobrir do que é capaz a versão melhorada e se a atualização vale a pena.

OnePlus 3T (3 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4 GHz
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Multi-touch de pontos, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, Optic-AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.61 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Digitais, Hall, Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Proximidade, Luz ambiente, eCompass, BeiDou
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (banda 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 6 (banda 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.35 x 152.7 x 74.7
Bateria
0 Wh, 3400 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 298, 1.12 µm, OIS, reconhecimento facial autofoco (PDAF), f/2.0, Vídeo UHD, Suporte para RAW, Auto HDR)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Samsung 3P8SP, 1.0 µm, EIS, Fixed Focus, f/2.0, 1080p Video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono speaker, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, OxygenOS 3.5, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
158 g, Suprimento de energia: 100 g
Preço
439 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
532 MBit/s ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
320 MBit/s ∼60% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼53% +9%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
279 MBit/s ∼52% +9%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
485 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼69% +7%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
323 MBit/s ∼67% +3%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼65%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
185 MBit/s ∼38% -41%
OnePlus 3T: Overview
OnePlus 3T: Overview
OnePlus 3T: Forest
OnePlus 3T: Forest
OnePlus 3T: Bridge
OnePlus 3T: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Forest
Garmin Edge 500: Forest
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
468
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 471 cd/m² Médio: 429.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.76 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.23
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
Screen
46%
30%
27%
23%
37%
Brightness
430
519
21%
434
1%
563
31%
431
0%
351
-18%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
93
11%
91
8%
84
0%
98
17%
Black Level *
0.34
0.36
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.1
1.3
82%
2.8
61%
4.4
38%
4.1
42%
2.04
71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
1.9
72%
3.7
46%
4.8
29%
3.3
51%
1.63
76%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.26 106%
2.31 104%
2.2 109%
2.1 114%
2.07 116%
CCT
7866 83%
6818 95%
7164 91%
6175 105%
6550 99%
6391 102%
Contrast
1635
1236
1532
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.15
77.78
89.38
86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.71
99.44
100
99.35

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 244 Hz10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 244 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 244 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 276 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼77% -11%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼72% -18%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼52% -40%
OnePlus 3 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼69% -20%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼20%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼26% +32%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼23% +16%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼19% -3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼37%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼68% +86%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼34% -7%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼34% -7%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼68%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼66% -2%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼98% +45%
OnePlus 3
1892 Points ∼74% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼79% +17%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼54% +19%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼15% -66%
OnePlus 3
2864 Points ∼53% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼41% -8%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼64% +12%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼25% -56%
OnePlus 3
2571 Points ∼66% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼56% -2%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼59% +5%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼58% +4%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼97% +73%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼69% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼78% +38%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼52% +23%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% +38%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼14% -67%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼39% -9%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼53%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼61% +15%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼65% +23%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼25% -52%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼70% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼56% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼33%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼23% -31%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼30% -9%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼23% -31%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼29% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼14% +85%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% -13%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼5% -37%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼8% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼20% +22%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% -12%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼10% -36%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼16% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼15% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼10% +21%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% -20%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼4% -56%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼8% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼7% -8%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼13% -2%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -27%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼9% -27%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼11% +32%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% -15%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% -61%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% -13%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼20%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼26% +30%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼11% -47%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼8% -58%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼20% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼12% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼11%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼14% +32%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼8% -25%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼3% -69%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼10% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼9% -12%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼34% +86%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% -56%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼6% -66%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% -53%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼70%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼71% +3%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼87% +25%
OnePlus 3 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼87% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼59% -15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼99% +72%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% +4%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼67% +15%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼72% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼62% +7%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼80% +55%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +13%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼18% -64%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼56% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼20% -61%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼33% -36%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼46% -9%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼68% +34%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼53% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼58% +15%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼93% +95%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -10%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼60% +26%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼54% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼64% +35%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼91% +35%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼67% -1%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼62% -9%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼76% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼61% -10%

Legend

 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
24875 Points ∼55% +154%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
8905 Points ∼20% -9%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
11783 Points ∼26% +20%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼20% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼29% +34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1113.4 ms * ∼2% +59%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -16%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
2922.6 ms * ∼5% -7%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼5% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
135 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
202 Points ∼35% +50%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19% -20%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
128 Points ∼22% -5%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼21% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼29% +23%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
165.86 Points ∼52% +204%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
52.1 Points ∼16% -4%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
68.4 Points ∼21% +25%
OnePlus 3 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼17% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼23% +36%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 3TApple iPhone 7HTC 10Huawei P9OnePlus 3Samsung Galaxy S7
AndroBench 3-5
-56%
-49%
-19%
-27%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
55.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
72.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Random Write 4KB
74.39
15.89
-79%
47.45
-36%
18.23
-75%
16.01
-78%
Random Read 4KB
123.57
29.92
-76%
39
-68%
137.62
11%
85.9
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
165.3
115.56
-30%
72.19
-56%
153.3
-7%
145.72
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB
436.43
275.09
-37%
281.26
-36%
408.71
-6%
483.82
11%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (min)
 3475 Quad, Mali-T720
12
   ...
Sony Xperia XZ
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30
Huawei Nova
 625, Adreno 506
30
OnePlus 3T
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
30
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
 Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high59 fps
Carga Máxima
 36.9 °C33.7 °C32.9 °C 
 39.4 °C33.9 °C32.5 °C 
 39.2 °C34.2 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 35 °C
34.7 °C35.8 °C37.5 °C
34.7 °C36 °C36.7 °C
34.6 °C36.2 °C37.4 °C
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 36 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.128.726.1252625.2263125.42725.44025.829.325.85025.226.125.26323.123.823.18033.430.833.410036.13336.112535.428.935.416034.724.734.720043.324.943.325049.71949.731553.319.153.340056.520.456.550059.318.159.363063.617.563.680064.71764.7100068.815.968.8125069.114.569.1160070.713.770.7200072.614.372.6250075.813.475.8315074.213.674.2400075.513.375.5500074.312.974.3630071.812.771.8800071.81371.81000072.212.772.21250066.61366.6160005512.755SPL84.427.584.4N56.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.6Delta9.83.69.840.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3OnePlus 3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.929.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9Apple iPhone 7median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.12 / 0.28 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.77 / 1.81 Watt
Carga midlight 6.67 / 10.98 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
0%
3%
15%
26%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.54
11%
0.68
-11%
0.77
-26%
0.57
7%
0.68
-11%
Idle Average *
1.77
1.51
15%
1.49
16%
2.36
-33%
1.24
30%
1.02
42%
Idle Maximum *
1.81
1.54
15%
1.91
-6%
2.37
-31%
1.36
25%
1.14
37%
Load Average *
6.67
3.75
44%
7.4
-11%
3.09
54%
5.92
11%
4.73
29%
Load Maximum *
10.98
5.01
54%
9.71
12%
5.35
51%
10.53
4%
7.16
35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 43min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
8h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 42min
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-19%
-9%
16%
4%
Reader / Idle
1423
1770
24%
1273
-11%
1514
6%
1338
-6%
1810
27%
Load
282
126
-55%
203
-28%
206
-27%
268
-5%
242
-14%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
494
517
5%
413
-16%
569
15%
840
70%
456
-8%
H.264
810
722
-11%
648
-20%
568
-30%
847
5%
892
10%

Pro

+ Chassi de alta qualidade
+ Desempenho de gama alta sem afogamento
+ Boa câmera
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ WLAN veloz
+ Dual-SIM
+ Alavanca de notificações
+ USB Tipo C
+ Até 128 GB de armazenamento interno
+ Boa qualidade de voz com supressão de ruído
+ Boa tela
+ Carga rápida
+ Longas durações da bateria

Contra

- Somente LTE Cat. 6
- Frequências diferentes dependendo da região
- Sem expansão para armazenamento
- Sem rádio FM
- A webcam não é tão nítida como antes
- Sem infravermelhos
- Alto falantes com um pouco de estática
- Sem fones na caixa
In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.
In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

O OnePlus 3T é um digno sucessor do OnePlus 3. No entanto, a tarefa não foi desafiante para o fabricante porque o modelo anterior já era um dos melhores smartphones Android de gama alta. As modificações para o OnePlus 3T também são bastante pequenas, portanto, este ainda é o caso aqui.

Atualização bem sucedida: O OnePlus 3T é apenas uma pequena atualização do OnePlus 3 e, portanto, um dos melhores smartphones de gama alta, assim como o anterior.

Se você já possui o OnePlus 3, não precisa do OnePlus 3T, mas todos os outros podem adquiri-lo. Os compradores provavelmente gostem de que finalmente haja uma versão de 128 GB do smartphone. Ele é apenas 40 Euros (~$42) mais caro que a versão de 64 GB na loja online do fabricante, portanto, é realmente interessante devido à ausência do leitor de cartões microSD O SoC um pouco mais veloz é uma boa adição, mas a diferença é bastante pequena na prática devido às temperaturas similares.

A OnePlus equipou o novo 3T com uma bateria maior a larger, mas ela está quase no mesmo nível do OnePlus 3 devido ao maior consumo de energia. Não queremos complicar muito com o teste WLAN, porque o anterior modelo tinha o mesmo problema no início, que foi resolvido com uma atualização do OxygenOS. Uma atualização para Android 7 foi anunciada parar Dezembro.

OnePlus 3T - 12/12/2016 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 93%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
48 / 60 → 80%
Peso
92%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
63 / 70 → 90%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
77%
Médio
78%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - Home > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 3T
Manuel Masiero, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-18)