Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) Duos

Duos dinâmico? A Samsung oferece um acessível smartphone de 5 polegadas com o seu Galaxy J3. Ele ainda oferece suas virtudes tradicionais, como um slot micro-SD integrado e bateria removível. Mas será isso suficiente para sobreviver no setor de baixo custo, altamente competitivo?
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Galaxy J7 Serie)
Processador
Spreadtrum SC9830A 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A7
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Memória
1536 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 4.35 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, giroscópio, WiFi Direct, MirrorLink, USB-OTG, 2x Micro-SIM
Funcionamento em rede
Broadcom 802.11ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM quad-band (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20), SAR body: 0.425 W/Kg, SAR head: 0,477 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 142.3 x 71
Bateria
9.88 Wh, 2600 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 13 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (auto foco f/2.2, vídeos 720p @30 FPS)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo f/2.2, vídeo 720p @ 30 FPS)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono traseiro, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, headset in-ear, Microsoft Office, Galaxy Apps, MyGalaxy, Smart Manager, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
138 g, Suprimento de energia: 46 g
Preço
189 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front
Front
Front
Front
Rear
Rear
Rear
Rear
Smartphone without back cover
Card slot
143 mm 70.6 mm 7.7 mm 133 g143 mm 72 mm 7.6 mm 125 g142.3 mm 71 mm 7.9 mm 138 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g142 mm 70.9 mm 6.9 mm 122 g142 mm 69.5 mm 6.8 mm 120 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500 - total route
Garmin Edge 500 - total route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - total route
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - total route
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - underpass
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - underpass
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - turning point
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
305
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 306 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 298.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 295 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 1.84
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J5
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Huawei P8 lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
ZTE Blade V6
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Coolpad Porto S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
Brightness middle
295
349
18%
365
24%
336
14%
407
38%
349
18%
Brightness
299
353
18%
353
18%
315
5%
403
35%
353
18%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
93
-3%
81
-16%
92
-4%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.42
0.39
0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.8
5.22
10%
5.2
10%
8.29
-43%
7.9
-36%
2.6
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.6
18.2
-112%
8.2
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
3.96
17%
5.85
-22%
8.57
-79%
8.9
-85%
1.8
62%
Gamma
1.84 120%
2.08 106%
2.17 101%
1.96 112%
2.46 89%
2.06 107%
CCT
6252 104%
7308 89%
7252 90%
8172 80%
8332 78%
6542 99%
Contrast
869
862
814
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25
89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points +18%
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points +11%
Coolpad Porto S
2893 Points -14%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points
Coolpad Porto S
25415 Points +3%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points +29%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1280 Points
ZTE Blade V6
1807 Points +41%
Coolpad Porto S
1343 Points +5%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
405 Points
ZTE Blade V6
626 Points +55%
Coolpad Porto S
470 Points +16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
615 Points +8%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points +8%
ZTE Blade V6
699 Points +23%
Coolpad Porto S
599 Points +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points -4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
314 Points +99%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points +92%
ZTE Blade V6
287 Points +82%
Coolpad Porto S
173 Points +9%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points +31%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
1058 Points -7%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points +29%
ZTE Blade V6
1200 Points +6%
Coolpad Porto S
905 Points -20%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points -51%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points +26%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points +62%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points +62%
Coolpad Porto S
458 Points +8%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps +101%
ZTE Blade V6
15 fps +97%
Coolpad Porto S
4.8 fps -37%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps -25%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps +115%
ZTE Blade V6
8.5 fps +85%
Coolpad Porto S
8.6 fps +87%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps -29%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
4345 Points +23%
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points +59%
ZTE Blade V6
5013 Points +42%
Coolpad Porto S
3028 Points -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
3782 Points +25%
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points +70%
ZTE Blade V6
4415 Points +45%
Coolpad Porto S
2590 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
9079 Points +9%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points -1%
ZTE Blade V6
9542 Points +15%
Coolpad Porto S
7413 Points -11%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3938 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
5227 Points +33%
Huawei P8 lite
6010 Points +53%
ZTE Blade V6
6116 Points +55%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3453 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
4692 Points +36%
Huawei P8 lite
5732 Points +66%
ZTE Blade V6
5677 Points +64%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7751 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
8697 Points +12%
Huawei P8 lite
7238 Points -7%
ZTE Blade V6
8390 Points +8%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Porto S Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
18.42 Points +14%
Coolpad Porto S
14.17 Points -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13702 ms *
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * -3%
Huawei P8 lite
15866 ms * -16%
ZTE Blade V6
25141 ms * -83%
Coolpad Porto S
32901 ms * -140%
Microsoft Lumia 650
18237 ms * -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points +7%
Huawei P8 lite
2483 Points -13%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points +5%
Coolpad Porto S
2088 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 650
2574 Points -9%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
39 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points +33%
Huawei P8 lite
47 Points +21%
Microsoft Lumia 650
52 Points +33%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5
7.2 MB/s -24%
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s -12%
ZTE Blade V6
3.66 MB/s -61%
Coolpad Porto S
13.95 MB/s +48%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5
19.25 MB/s +14%
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s +10%
ZTE Blade V6
27.08 MB/s +61%
Coolpad Porto S
22.52 MB/s +34%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5
39.4 MB/s -5%
Huawei P8 lite
52.8 MB/s +28%
ZTE Blade V6
37.37 MB/s -10%
Coolpad Porto S
39.99 MB/s -3%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5
145.5 MB/s +126%
Huawei P8 lite
139.5 MB/s +117%
ZTE Blade V6
269.3 MB/s +318%
Coolpad Porto S
168.2 MB/s +161%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
399 Points +27%
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points +159%
ZTE Blade V6
922 Points +193%
Coolpad Porto S
467 Points +48%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points +83%
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high22 fps
 low54 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high15 fps
 very low27 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.9 °C33.7 °C32.5 °C 
 33.8 °C33.6 °C32.5 °C 
 33.1 °C33.4 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 33.9 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
31 °C32.9 °C35 °C
31.3 °C32.6 °C34.1 °C
29.1 °C32.9 °C32.8 °C
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.39 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.14 / 1.23 Watt
Carga midlight 2.45 / 2.92 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2.600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5
2.600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2.200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2.200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2.000 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2.000 mAh
Power Consumption
-70%
-83%
-59%
-54%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
1.5
-56%
1.4
-46%
1.2
-25%
1.16
-21%
0.7
27%
Idle Average *
1.14
2.2
-93%
2.3
-102%
1.8
-58%
2.21
-94%
1.1
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.23
2.4
-95%
2.5
-103%
2.1
-71%
2.24
-82%
1.18
4%
Load Average *
2.45
3.5
-43%
3.9
-59%
4.1
-67%
3.34
-36%
4.04
-65%
Load Maximum *
2.92
4.8
-64%
6
-105%
5.1
-75%
3.95
-35%
4.07
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 50)
8h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
7h 13min
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2.600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5
2.600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2.200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2.200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2.000 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2.000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-41%
-32%
0%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1212
1292
7%
715
-41%
910
-25%
H.264
590
657
11%
369
-37%
424
-28%
510
-14%
WiFi v1.3
502
495
-1%
351
-30%
400
-20%
504
0%
345
-31%
Load
433
350
-19%
194
-55%
230
-47%
213
-51%

Pro

+ Carcaça bem construída
+ Slot Micro-SD
+ App2SD e USB OTG
+ Dual-SIM ou slot microSD
+ Boa tela
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bateria removível
+ Suporte para LTE

Contra

- Sem sensor de luz
- Sem LED de notificações
- Qualidade média da câmera principal
- Apenas Android 5.1.1
- Módulo GPS com sinal instável
- Microfone silencioso no modo mãos livres
- WiFi somente na banda 2,4 GHz
- Sem suporte para Miracast ou MHL
- Afogamento no teste de estresse
In review: Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - SM-J320F/DS. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - SM-J320F/DS. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

O Galaxy J3 (SM-J320F/DS) parece ser uma versão lite do Galaxy J5 do ano passado que recentemente foi substituído pelo seu similar sucessor, o Galaxy J5 (2016) . A herança do modelo irmão é evidente no bom painel AMOLED e o design muito similar. O último, ainda permite que o usuário substitua facilmente a bateria. Além disso, o handset ganha pontos com uma carcaça rígida e bem construída, embora seja feita de plástico. Outras virtudes são a tela táctil precisa e a longa duração da bateria. O fato de que dois cartões SIM e um cartão micro-SD possam ser inseridos no aparelho, ao mesmo tempo, é algo favorável.

Foi necessário fazer concessões no equipamento da câmera. O modelo de teste oferece apenas um sensor de 8-megapixels na parte traseira, que tira fotos aceitavelmente boas somente com boas condições de iluminação. Também, apenas 4,35 GB de armazenamento é utilizável no estado de entrega, e isso irá se esgotar rapidamente. Afortunadamente, o Galaxy J3 suporta USB OTG e os aplicativos também podem ser movidos para o cartão de memória, assim este problema pode ser contornado em certo grau. Embora o SoC Spreadtrum instalado, regularmente terminou em último lugar em nossos benchmarks, esta desvantagem dificilmente será notada no uso rotineiro: O modelo de teste surpreende com uma operação quase livre de lags.

Samsung criou um smartphone de nível de entrada solidário, com o Galaxy J3 (2016), que oferece muitos pontos positivos, apesar de seu preço moderado. O comprador terá que aceitar recortes notórios em termos de armazenamento integrado e a qualidade média das fotos da câmera principal.

Além disso o Samsung Galaxy J5, muito similar que é um modelo descontinuado, os rivais mencionados na comparação são alternativas dignas para o modelo de teste. No entanto, o comprador terá que aceitar durações de bateria mais curtas, mas encontrará modelos com carcaças de metal, como no (ZTE Blade V6) ou melhor desempenho (Huawei P8 lite entre outros) a um preço similar.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 - 06/17/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
40 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
5 / 63 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
25 / 70 → 36%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
61%
Médio
68%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) Duos
Andreas Kilian, 2016-06-29 (Update: 2016-07- 2)