Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Name: Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Brand: Samsung

Cabeça de metal. Plástico antes, metal agora: A nova edição do Galaxy J5 tem como objetivo deixar uma impressão de maior qualidade. No entanto, os valores interiores permaneceram quase iguais. Será isso suficiente para uma atualização de sucesso?

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Galaxy J5 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 306

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 12.3 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128GB, NFC, Sensores: Bewegungssensor, Annäherungssensor, Lagesensor, USB OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1800/2100), LTE (1,3,5,7,8,20); velocidade máx: 150 MBit/s (download), 50 MBit/s (upload); 0,45 W/kg (head), 1,17 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 145.8 x 72.3

Bateria

11.94 Wh, 3100 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.9, AF, LED flash, vídeos @1080p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/1.9, flash LED

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante na parte traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, S-Planner, Microsoft Office, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

159 g, Suprimento de energia: 48 g

Preço

279 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Huawei P9

HTC 10

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Huawei P9

HTC 10

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Huawei P9

HTC 10

Canon EOS 70D


293 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	286 cd/m²
299 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	288 cd/m²
299 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	289 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 299 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 291.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.01 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.03

	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	LG K10 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Acer Liquid Z630S Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		35%	-51%	-13%	10%	-1%
Brightness middle	289	378 31%	370 28%	350 21%	535 85%	349 21%
Brightness	291	380 31%	355 22%	345 19%	521 79%	353 21%
Brightness Distribution	96	91 -5%	92 -4%	84 -12%	85 -11%	93 -3%
Black Level *			0.28	0.27	0.43
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.7	1.95 59%	6.7 -43%	4.7 -0%	4.88 -4%	5.22 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.3	3.09 58%	17.8 -144%	8.5 -16%	8.66 -19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	1.86 38%	7.9 -163%	5.6 -87%	5.2 -73%	3.96 -32%
Gamma	2.03 ^108%	2.13 ^103%	2.21 ^100%	1.84 ^120%	2.26 ^97%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	6291 ^103%	6376 ^102%	9072 ^72%	6795 ^96%	7766 ^84%	7308 ^89%
Contrast			1321	1296	1244

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

243.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points
LG K10	27383 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	41676 Points +53%
Acer Liquid Z630S	35585 Points +31%
Honor 5X	37152 Points +36%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	473 Points
LG K10	476 Points +1%
Honor 5X	698 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5	464 Points -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1425 Points
LG K10	1448 Points +2%
Honor 5X	3047 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1403 Points -2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points
LG K10	4339 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7903 Points +80%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6868 Points +56%
Honor 5X	7852 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy J5	4345 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points
LG K10	3774 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7542 Points +97%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6250 Points +63%
Honor 5X	7764 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3782 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points
LG K10	9106 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	9495 Points +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S	10508 Points +16%
Honor 5X	8174 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy J5	9079 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points
LG K10	52 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	336 Points +534%
Acer Liquid Z630S	278 Points +425%
Honor 5X	129 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy J5	53 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points
LG K10	41 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	275 Points +555%
Acer Liquid Z630S	229 Points +445%
Honor 5X	103 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy J5	42 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points
LG K10	730 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	1479 Points +109%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1113 Points +57%
Honor 5X	1089 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5	734 Points +4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps
LG K10	9.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps +44%
Acer Liquid Z630S	21 fps +116%
Honor 5X	14 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps
LG K10	5.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps +169%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12 fps +131%
Honor 5X	14 fps +169%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps
LG K10	4.1 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	9 fps +137%
Honor 5X	5.9 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3.8 fps 0%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps
LG K10	1.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps +111%
Acer Liquid Z630S	4.2 fps +133%
Honor 5X	5.4 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1.8 fps 0%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points
LG K10	3999 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	4008 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	3814 Points -8%
Honor 5X	3794 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3966 Points -4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points
LG K10	536 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	810 Points +38%
Acer Liquid Z630S	691 Points +18%
Honor 5X	297 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy J5	534 Points -9%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points
LG K10	1050 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	2153 Points +103%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1614 Points +52%
Honor 5X	1378 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1058 Points 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points
LG K10	453 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	554 Points -14%
Acer Liquid Z630S	540 Points -16%
Honor 5X	787 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy J5	399 Points -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points
LG K10	310 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	488 Points +56%
Acer Liquid Z630S	416 Points +33%
Honor 5X	763 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy J5	314 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points
LG K10	562 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	741 Points +34%
Acer Liquid Z630S	627 Points +14%
Honor 5X	9 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy J5	615 Points +12%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points
LG K10	2838 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3611 Points +32%
Acer Liquid Z630S	2855 Points +5%
Honor 5X	3595 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3038 Points +11%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms *
LG K10	16638 ms * -28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11887 ms * +9%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12876 ms * +1%
Honor 5X	12510 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5	14074 ms * -8%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	47 Points
LG K10	47 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	64 Points +36%
Honor 5X	65 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy J5	52 Points +11%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points
LG K10	17.48 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22 Points +31%
Acer Liquid Z630S	19.03 Points +13%
Honor 5X	21.92 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5	18.42 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	147 MB/s
LG K10	131 MB/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	209.4 MB/s +42%
Acer Liquid Z630S	249 MB/s +69%
Honor 5X	144 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5	145.5 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	72 MB/s
LG K10	78 MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	60.4 MB/s -16%
Acer Liquid Z630S	67.7 MB/s -6%
Honor 5X	78 MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5	39.4 MB/s -45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	21 MB/s
LG K10	9.2 MB/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22.9 MB/s +9%
Acer Liquid Z630S	28.43 MB/s +35%
Honor 5X	17 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy J5	19.25 MB/s -8%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	11.6 MB/s
LG K10	7.5 MB/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11.2 MB/s -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	5.82 MB/s -50%
Honor 5X	10 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy J5	7.2 MB/s -38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	79.8 MB/s
LG K10	75.5 MB/s -5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	46.61 MB/s
LG K10	45 MB/s -3%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	16 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


34.3 °C	34 °C	33.7 °C
36.4 °C	36.1 °C	34.4 °C
36.9 °C	37 °C	34.7 °C

Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C


34.9 °C	34.6 °C	34.6 °C
35.5 °C	36.7 °C	37.9 °C
36 °C	38.2 °C	38.5 °C

Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 36.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 32.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.12 Watt
Ocioso	0.61 / 1.41 / 1.51 Watt
Carga	2.56 / 3.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		26h 39min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)		6h 42min

	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Acer Liquid Z630S Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	LG K10 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		6%	-27%	16%	-28%	-14%
Reader / Idle	1599		1053 -34%	2323 45%	1123 -30%	1292 -19%
H.264	658		602 -9%	672 2%	603 -8%	657 0%
WiFi v1.3	643	681 6%	643 0%	626 -3%	453 -30%	495 -23%
Load	402		144 -64%	483 20%	231 -43%	350 -13%

Pro

+ Tela AOLED de alto contraste

+ Marco de metal

+ Sistema operacional moderno

+ Boa qualidade de recepção

+ Flash LED frontal

+ Armazenamento relativamente veloz

+ Baixo consumo de energia

+ Muito boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Relativamente pesado

- WiFi lento

- Qualidade pobre da voz

- Fotos às vezes pálidas e embaçadas da câmera

- Qualidade moderada do som

- Sem sensor de luz ambiente

- Flickering de alta frequência da tela

É fácil responder à pergunta de se a atualização do Samsung Galaxy J5 foi um sucesso: Sim.

A carcaça de metal outorga uma pressão de qualidade muito superior e tem um visual mais moderno que a carcaça do predecessor. A câmera frontal foi atualizada com um flash LED, a capacidade da memória de trabalho e do dispositivo de armazenamento foram aumentadas, um processador um pouco mais veloz e maior superfície de tela estão instalados agora. Virtudes antigas como o painel AMOLED e bateria removível foi mantida. Além disso, a duração da bateria agora é muito mais longa.

O Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) não é perfeito, mas é realmente um bom smartphone da gama média baixa. Graças a sua longa duração da bateria, o painel AMOLED e o moderno sistema operacional, quem estiver procurando por um smartphone novo e acessível deve tê-lo em conta.

Temos alguns pontos de crítica depois de tudo: As taxas de transmissão em nosso Wi-Fi foram baixas, o aparelho é comparativamente pesado, e a qualidade da voz não é impressionante. O alto falante não nos impressionou, e as imagens da câmera são escura e um pouco embaçadas.

Os compradores que possam viver com isso não estarão muito errados com o Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016). Inclusive pode valer a pena que os proprietários do predecessor se atualizem.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 - 2016-05-11 05/11/2016 v5.1^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

90%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

38 / 60 → 64%

Peso

92%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

5 / 63 → 8%

Desempenho da aplicação

33 / 70 → 47%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

48 / 91 → 52%

Camera

67%

Médio

69%

82%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Florian Wimmer, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2016-11-23)