Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)

Manuel Masiero, 01/03/2017

Nova edição. O smartphone de gama média, Galaxy J7 da Samsung recebeu uma "nova cara". O resultado é o Galaxy J7 (2016), que vem com uma carcaça mais elegante, mais desempenho e uma bateria maior, em comparação com seu predecessor. Nossa análise mostra se valeu a pena a atualização.

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (Galaxy Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa 1.6 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.63 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD (até 128 GB), NFC, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, ANT+, Wi-Fi Direct, Smart Switch, App2SD, Android Beam, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40), Downloads/Uploads with a maximum of 150/50 MBit/s, Micro-SIM, Head-SAR 0.349 W/kg, Body-SAR 1.390 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 151.7 x 76
Bateria
12.71 Wh, 3300 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 23 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix F/1.9, autofoco, flash LED, fotos de até 4.128 x 3.096 pixels, gravação de vídeo de até 1.920 x 1.080 pixels/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix F/1.9, fotos de até 2.576 x 1.932 pixels, gravação de vídeo de até 1.920 x 1.080 pixels
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um alto falante na traseira., Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo Micro-USB, fones, informação de garantia, Google Apps, Microsoft Apps, Samsung Apps (S Planner, S Health, Galaxy Apps), UKW-Radio, Facebook, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
169 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
42.9 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
43.1 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Whole route
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Whole route
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Turning point
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Turning point
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Bridge
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
302
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 305 cd/m² Médio: 288.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.05
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Screen
-36%
-29%
-79%
-25%
Brightness
289
521
80%
468
62%
475
64%
291
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
88
-3%
81
-11%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.74
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.9
4.88
-68%
4.1
-41%
6.8
-134%
4.7
-62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
5.2
-148%
4.9
-133%
7
-233%
3
-43%
Gamma
2.05 117%
2.26 106%
2.5 96%
2.35 102%
2.03 118%
CCT
6228 104%
7766 84%
7116 91%
8151 80%
6291 103%
Contrast
1244
682
849

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 875 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
45234 Points ∼25%
Honor 5X
37152 Points ∼20% -18%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼27% +11%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points ∼26% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼15% -40%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3277 Points ∼12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
680 Points ∼12%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1681 Points ∼66%
Huawei P9 Lite
1370 Points ∼54% -19%
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points ∼48% -26%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
242 Points ∼4%
Huawei P9 Lite
305 Points ∼6% +26%
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points ∼6% +26%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
299 Points ∼8%
Huawei P9 Lite
369 Points ∼10% +23%
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points ∼11% +41%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
303 Points ∼12%
Honor 5X
1089 Points ∼42% +259%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼53% +353%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points ∼49% +316%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼27% +134%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1687 Points ∼22%
Honor 5X
103 Points ∼1% -94%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼6% -72%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points ∼7% -69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1% -98%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
394 Points ∼8%
Honor 5X
129 Points ∼3% -67%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼11% +41%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points ∼12% +53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12949 Points ∼19%
Honor 5X
8174 Points ∼12% -37%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼20% +6%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points ∼18% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7746 Points ∼2%
Honor 5X
7764 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% +46%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points ∼2% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
8505 Points ∼4%
Honor 5X
7852 Points ∼4% -8%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼6% +38%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points ∼6% +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12 fps ∼1%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼1% +17%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% +58%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps ∼1% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -57%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
19 fps ∼4%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼3% -26%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼4% 0%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps ∼6% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼2% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9.4 fps ∼2%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps ∼1% -43%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% -17%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps ∼1% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
4.9 fps ∼2%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps ∼3% +20%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼4% +71%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps ∼7% +206%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -22%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3.2 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼1% +41%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps ∼1% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7.2 fps ∼4%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼3% -32%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps ∼6% +53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3691 Points ∼45%
Honor 5X
3794 Points ∼47% +3%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼66% +45%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points ∼58% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼51% +12%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
624 Points ∼40%
Honor 5X
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼50% +23%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points ∼46% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36% -12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
512 Points ∼6%
Honor 5X
763 Points ∼9% +49%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼10% +60%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points ∼8% +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4% -39%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1319 Points ∼34%
Honor 5X
787 Points ∼20% -40%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼35% +2%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points ∼28% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼17% -51%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
2127 Points ∼32%
Honor 5X
1378 Points ∼21% -35%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼37% +15%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points ∼35% +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
973 Points ∼30%
Honor 5X
297 Points ∼9% -69%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼36% +23%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points ∼32% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼18% -40%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
3905 Points ∼8%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
3595 Points ∼7% -8%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
4756 Points ∼10% +22%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
4046 Points ∼8% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
2730 Points ∼6% -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
9670.9 ms * ∼16%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
12510 ms * ∼21% -29%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
9396.5 ms * ∼16% +3%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
9609.8 ms * ∼16% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
13046 ms * ∼22% -35%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
66 Points ∼11%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
65 Points ∼11% -2%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points ∼12% +2%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
72 Points ∼13% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼8% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
24.119 Points ∼8%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
21.92 Points ∼7% -9%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
29.03 Points ∼9% +20%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
27.5 Points ∼9% +14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
16.8 Points ∼5% -30%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016Honor 5XHuawei P9 LiteSony Xperia XASamsung Galaxy J5 2016
AndroBench 3-5
5%
16%
10%
5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
25.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-57%
50.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
46.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
60.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
72.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
79.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
6%
Random Write 4KB
10.11
10
-1%
15.35
52%
10.6
5%
11.6
15%
Random Read 4KB
22.33
17
-24%
38.22
71%
22.05
-1%
21
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
46.24
78
69%
46.24
0%
68.64
48%
72
56%
Sequential Read 256KB
189.35
144
-24%
283.55
50%
240.43
27%
147
-22%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (min)
 3475 Quad, Mali-T720
12
   ...
Huawei Nova
 625, Adreno 506
30
OnePlus 3T
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
30
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
 Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
30
Huawei Mate 9
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 29.1 °C29.3 °C28.9 °C 
 30.1 °C29.6 °C29.2 °C 
 29.7 °C29.9 °C29.2 °C 
Máximo: 30.1 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C
29.1 °C28.5 °C28.6 °C
29 °C29.2 °C28.9 °C
29.9 °C30.5 °C31 °C
Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6472525.431.43125.332.44032.9315033.643.76331.634.78028.430.21002730.412520.824.71602231.520021.336.825020.84831521.250.440019.456.650019.560.463017.766.480017.973100017.873.5125017.374.7160017.473.9200016.774.1250017.275315018.276.8400017.976.8500017.679630017.780800017.875.61000017.966.11250018.163.41600018.255.8SPL3087.5N1.369.7median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J7 2016median 66.4Delta1.312.737.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2Samsung Galaxy J5 2016median 42.6median 17.7median 65.213.911.21.613.940.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72Huawei P9 Litemedian 53.9median 17.7median 7211.19.91.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.71 / 1.83 Watt
Carga midlight 2.37 / 3.31 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Power Consumption
-57%
-35%
-22%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.87
-30%
0.73
-9%
0.72
-7%
0.61
9%
Idle Average *
1.71
2.08
-22%
2.09
-22%
1.5
12%
1.41
18%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
2.22
-21%
2.11
-15%
1.57
14%
1.51
17%
Load Average *
2.37
5.26
-122%
4.15
-75%
3.48
-47%
2.56
-8%
Load Maximum *
3.31
6.34
-92%
5.05
-53%
6.04
-82%
3.1
6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 50min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
17h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
11h 21min
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-54%
-46%
-66%
-36%
Reader / Idle
2030
1053
-48%
1404
-31%
775
-62%
1599
-21%
Load
681
144
-79%
272
-60%
170
-75%
402
-41%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
1025
643
-37%
604
-41%
353
-66%
643
-37%
H.264
1220
602
-51%
568
-53%
460
-62%
658
-46%

Pro

+ Carcaça estável
+ Android 6.0.1
+ Tela AMOLED de alto contraste
+ Longa duração do sistema
+ Jogos fluentes
+ Quase sem emissões de calor.
+ Bateria removível
+ Duração da bateria muito longa

Contra

- WLAN lento
- Sem sensor de brilho
- Sem leitor de digitais
- Qualidade de voz medíocre
- Câmera traseira apenas média
- Flickering da tela

Com o Galaxy J7 (2016), a Samsung aprimorou o seu smartphone de gama média de 5,5 polegadas de forma sutil e efetiva. Um destaque da edição 2016 é a carcaça de metal, que adiciona ao smartphone uma sensação táctil de maior qualidade e mais rigidez quando comparado com seu predecessor. O desempenho também foi melhorado com a modificação do SoC Snapdragon 615 octa-core  para o Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa e a atualização da RAM de 1,5 para 2 GB. Outros pontos positivos: A nova edição vem com o SO Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow mais atual, em vez do Android 5.1. 

A atualização valeu a pena: Se estiver procurando um bom smartphone de gama média acessível, o Galaxy J7 (2016) poderia ser o candidato correto.

As virtudes do predecessor, como uma tela Super AMOLED, a câmera traseira de 13 MP, a câmera frontal de 5 MP, e uma bateria removível, foram preservadas. No entanto, esta última tem inclusive mais capacidade no Galaxy J7 (2016) e fornece ao smartphone uma excelente duração da bateria.

Infelizmente, o Galaxy J7 (2016) também tem alguns pontos fracos. As lentas velocidades de Wi-Fi, a falta de um sensor de brilho, a medíocre qualidade de voz, e uma câmera principal apenas média precisa ser mencionada. Um leitor de digitais também poderia ter sido incluído nesta faixa de preços. Usuários mais sensíveis também poderiam perceber um pouco do perturbante flickering da tela em certas configurações do brilho. Basicamente, estes são mais ou menos os mesmos pontos que já criticamos no Galaxy J5 (2016). Portanto, se você deseja economizar 50 Euros (~$52) e pode viver com uma tela um pouco menor (5,2 em vez de 5,5-polegadas) bem como com um SoC mais lento, então o Galaxy J5 (2016) também poderia ser interessante.

In review: Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016). Review unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016). Review unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

With the Galaxy J7 (2016), Samsung has overhauled its mid-range 5.5-inch smartphone in a subtle, but effective way. One highlight of the 2016 edition is the metal case, which provides the smartphone with higher-quality haptics and more sturdiness when compared to its predecessor. The performance has  also been taken up a notch by switching from the octa-core Snapdragon 615 SoC to the Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa and upgrading the RAM from 1.5 to 2 GB. Another plus point: The new edition comes with the more current Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow OS instead of Android 5.1. 

The overhaul has been worth it: If you are looking for a good, affordable mid-range smartphone, the Galaxy J7 (2016) could be the right candidate.

The virtues of the predecessor, such as a Super AMOLED display, the 13 MP rear camera, the 5 MP front camera, and a removable battery, have been preserved. However, the latter has even more capacity on the Galaxy J7 (2016) and gives the smartphone excellent battery life.

Unfortunately, the Galaxy J7 (2016) also has a few weak points. The slow Wi-Fi speeds, a missing brightness sensor, the mediocre voice quality, and a qualitatively only average main camera need to be mentioned here. A fingerprint sensor could have also been included in this price range. More sensitive user could also perceive some disturbing screen flickering at certain brightness settings. Basically, these are more or less the same points we have already criticised with the Galaxy J5 (2016). So, if you want to save 50 Euros (~$52) and can live with a slightly smaller display (5.2 instead of 5.5-inch) as well as a slower SoC, then the Galaxy J5 (2016) could also be interesting.

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 - 12/06/2016 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
91%
Bateria
100%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
17 / 63 → 26%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 58%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
67%
Médio
73%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - página inicial > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
Manuel Masiero, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-18)