Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia X

Name: Sony Xperia X
Brand: Sony

Ambicioso. O Sony Xperia X tem como objetivo ser um smartphone top de linha e um artista fotográfico e um só aparelho. Embora o sistema Android de 5-polegadas traga muitos recursos e alto desempenho, ele não consegue cumprir totalmente com as coisas que alega.

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia X (Xperia Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 510

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, LCD, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 19.8 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones, Card Reader: Micro-SDHC/-SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, barômetro, bússola, giroscópio, magnetômetro, pedômetro, detecção de movimento, sensor de proximidade, DLNA, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct, App2SD

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), HSUPA até 5,76 MBit/s, HSDPA até 42,2 MBit/s, LTE Cat 6 até 300 MBit/s download, 50 MBit/s upload, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 143 x 69

Bateria

2620 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 23 MPix f/2.0, gravação de vídeo em até 1080p, flash LED, autofocus
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, video recording up to 1080p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cabo USB, fonte de alimentação modular, fones, guia de início rápido, Xperia apps, Google apps, AVG protection, SIM toolkit, FM radio, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

152 g, Suprimento de energia: 25 g

Preço

599 Euro

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 MBit/s +17%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s +2%
Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	244 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 MBit/s +17%
Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	219 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s -6%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia X

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia X

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia X

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D


389 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	383 cd/m²
398 cd/m²	404 cd/m²	379 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	404 cd/m²	372 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 392.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.83 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 404 cd/m²
Contraste: 594:1 (Preto: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.23

	Sony Xperia X LCD, 1920x1080, 5.00	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20	Sony Xperia Z5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Google Nexus 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Apple iPhone SE IPS, 1136x640, 4.00	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen		53%	23%	54%	39%	21%
Brightness middle	404	582 44%	669 66%	503 25%	603 49%	419 4%
Brightness	392	563 44%	624 59%	498 27%	579 48%	431 10%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	85 -7%	97 7%	93 2%	84 -8%
Black Level *	0.68	0.38 44%	0.68 -0%	0.38 44%	0.88 -29%
Contrast	594	1532 158%	984 66%	1324 123%	685 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.1	4.4 38%	7.96 -12%	2.09 71%	1.8 75%	4.1 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.2	7.4 44%			3.5 73%	12 9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.7	4.8 51%	10.95 -13%	2.12 78%	2.3 76%	3.3 66%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.61 ^84%	2.27 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	9502 ^68%	6175 ^105%	7402 ^88%	6621 ^98%	6955 ^93%	6550 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		77.78			62.13	89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.44			96.74	100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 38 ms rise
65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	77650 Points
Huawei P9	95743 Points +23%
Apple iPhone SE	126969 Points +64%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points +83%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1484 Points
Huawei P9	1767 Points +19%
Sony Xperia Z5	1325 Points -11%
Google Nexus 5X	1246 Points -16%
Apple iPhone SE	2533 Points +71%
OnePlus 3	2398 Points +62%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	3853 Points
Huawei P9	6522 Points +69%
Sony Xperia Z5	4414 Points +15%
Google Nexus 5X	3530 Points -8%
Apple iPhone SE	4386 Points +14%
OnePlus 3	5645 Points +47%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	17404 Points
Huawei P9	19854 Points +14%
Sony Xperia Z5	24980 Points +44%
Google Nexus 5X	18898 Points +9%
Apple iPhone SE	29538 Points +70%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points +74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	21087 Points
Huawei P9	21577 Points +2%
Sony Xperia Z5	37738 Points +79%
Google Nexus 5X	22180 Points +5%
Apple iPhone SE	44059 Points +109%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points +61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	10801 Points
Huawei P9	15517 Points +44%
Sony Xperia Z5	11442 Points +6%
Google Nexus 5X	12451 Points +15%
Apple iPhone SE	13717 Points +27%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1381 Points
OnePlus 3	3595 Points +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1354 Points
OnePlus 3	4804 Points +255%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1486 Points
OnePlus 3	1912 Points +29%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	33 fps
Huawei P9	43 fps +30%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +48%
Google Nexus 5X	38 fps +15%
Apple iPhone SE	59.2 fps +79%
OnePlus 3	60 fps +82%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	30 fps
Huawei P9	40 fps +33%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +63%
Google Nexus 5X	37 fps +23%
Apple iPhone SE	80.3 fps +168%
OnePlus 3	89 fps +197%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	15 fps
Huawei P9	19 fps +27%
Sony Xperia Z5	26 fps +73%
Google Nexus 5X	17 fps +13%
Apple iPhone SE	58.1 fps +287%
OnePlus 3	46 fps +207%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	9.2 fps
Huawei P9	18 fps +96%
Sony Xperia Z5	24 fps +161%
Google Nexus 5X	16 fps +74%
Apple iPhone SE	40 fps +335%
OnePlus 3	47 fps +411%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	10 fps
Huawei P9	11 fps +10%
Sony Xperia Z5	18 fps +80%
Apple iPhone SE	57.9 fps +479%
OnePlus 3	30 fps +200%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	4.6 fps
Huawei P9	10 fps +117%
Sony Xperia Z5	16 fps +248%
Apple iPhone SE	28.1 fps +511%
OnePlus 3	31 fps +574%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	4379 Points
Huawei P9	7058 Points +61%
Sony Xperia Z5	5184 Points +18%
Google Nexus 5X	4324 Points -1%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points +62%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1450 Points
Huawei P9	2025 Points +40%
Sony Xperia Z5	1437 Points -1%
Google Nexus 5X	1318 Points -9%
Apple iPhone SE	2287 Points +58%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +72%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	2564 Points
Huawei P9	3930 Points +53%
Sony Xperia Z5	2360 Points -8%
Google Nexus 5X	1730 Points -33%
Apple iPhone SE	5179 Points +102%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +38%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1408 Points
Huawei P9	2627 Points +87%
Sony Xperia Z5	865 Points -39%
Google Nexus 5X	1115 Points -21%
Apple iPhone SE	1032 Points -27%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points +46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	1581 Points
Huawei P9	1583 Points 0%
Sony Xperia Z5	3095 Points +96%
Google Nexus 5X	2038 Points +29%
Apple iPhone SE	4175 Points +164%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +204%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	774 Points
Huawei P9	1029 Points +33%
Sony Xperia Z5	675 Points -13%
Google Nexus 5X	769 Points -1%
Apple iPhone SE	1226 Points +58%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +44%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	8388 Points
Huawei P9	11783 Points +40%
Sony Xperia Z5	8627 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X	8202 Points -2%
Apple iPhone SE	16550 Points +97%
OnePlus 3	9155 Points +9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	3677 ms *
Huawei P9	2923 ms * +21%
Sony Xperia Z5	5693 ms * -55%
Google Nexus 5X	4734 ms * -29%
Apple iPhone SE	1709 ms * +54%
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * +21%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	50.9 Points
Huawei P9	68.4 Points +34%
Sony Xperia Z5	37 Points -27%
Google Nexus 5X	45 Points -12%
Apple iPhone SE	118.8 Points +133%
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points +7%

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	184.3 MB/s
Huawei P9	281.3 MB/s +53%
Sony Xperia Z5	219.8 MB/s +19%
Google Nexus 5X	245.2 MB/s +33%
OnePlus 3	408.7 MB/s +122%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	117.4 MB/s
Huawei P9	72.2 MB/s -39%
Sony Xperia Z5	115.5 MB/s -2%
Google Nexus 5X	98.6 MB/s -16%
OnePlus 3	153.3 MB/s +31%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	36.28 MB/s
Huawei P9	39 MB/s +7%
Sony Xperia Z5	3.59 MB/s -90%
Google Nexus 5X	24.8 MB/s -32%
OnePlus 3	137.6 MB/s +279%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	10.26 MB/s
Huawei P9	47.45 MB/s +362%
Sony Xperia Z5	11.46 MB/s +12%
Google Nexus 5X	12.21 MB/s +19%
OnePlus 3	18.23 MB/s +78%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	17.67 MB/s
Huawei P9	55 MB/s +211%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia X	12.82 MB/s
Huawei P9	24.83 MB/s +94%

Legend

Sony Xperia X Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone SE Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 64 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	60 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.3 °C	40.3 °C	40.3 °C
39.8 °C	40.2 °C	39.7 °C
39.2 °C	38.9 °C	37.8 °C

Máximo: 40.3 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C


35.3 °C	37.5 °C	38.5 °C
35.7 °C	37.5 °C	38.1 °C
34.1 °C	37.4 °C	37.6 °C

Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 36.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.13 / 0.25 Watt
Ocioso	0.56 / 1.69 / 1.75 Watt
Carga	6.01 / 7.03 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 33min

	Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia Z5 mAh	Google Nexus 5X mAh	Apple iPhone SE 1624 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		15%	13%	15%	26%	48%
Reader / Idle	1240	1514 22%	1669 35%	1775 43%	1274 3%	1338 8%
H.264	518	568 10%	600 16%	555 7%	759 47%	847 64%
WiFi v1.3	434	569 31%	438 1%	412 -5%	673 55%	840 94%
Load	213	206 -3%	213 0%	245 15%	207 -3%	268 26%

Pro

+ Chassi elegante

+ Sensor de digitais

+ 20 GB de armazenamento livres

+ Android 6.0

+ WiFi 802.11ac e LTE

+ Alta qualidade de voz

+ Boa câmera

+ Tela brilhante

+ Alto desempenho do sistema

+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Caro

- Sem gravação de vídeos em 4K

- Afogamentos sob uso intenso

- Taxas pobres de transferência de micro SD

- Bateria não removível

- Adaptador de força de carga rápida apenas por um acréscimo

In review: Sony Xperia X. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

O Sony Xperia X faz muitas coisas bem, mas não consegue cumprir com tudo o que anunciou para ser um smartphone top de linha. Apesar de tudo, existem muitos argumentos em favor do telefone de Android de 5-polegadas. Ele oferece uma carcaça elegante feira de alumínio e plástico, que também se sente premium ao toque, embora o chassi não consiga manter o nível do seu Xperia Z5 predecessor. Por outro lado, o telefone em com uma tela Full HD brilhante e com ângulos de visão estáveis, um sensor de digitais, o mais recente Android 6.0, 20 GB de armazenamento livre, bons recursos de comunicação, e o veloz Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 como seu centro nervoso. Muito compradores potenciais podem não se surpreender com que seja um SoC de gama média, apesar do preço de classe superior. O nosso modelo de teste custa 480 Euros (~$534). Isto é um pouco exagerado. Finalmente, o Xperia X não se diferencia muito do Xperia Z5, que agora é muito mais barato.

O Sony Xperia X é um smartphone sólido como uma rocha, mas muito caro, que, à diferença do seu predecessor Xperia Z5 de gama alta, poder ser considerado apenas como um modelo de gama média.

As duas câmeras com 23 MP e 13 MP são os pontos mais destacados. Ambas possuem um rápido disparador do obturador, podem gravar vídeos 1080p (câmera principal: a 60 fps), e fornecem qualidade de imagem acima da média. Além disso, existem recursos úteis como o previsível foco automático, que melhora a nitidez ao gravar objetos em movimento. Apesar de tudo, o desempenho não é suficientemente bom para o campo da alta fotografia, dado que a desvantagem se trona visível ao olhar mais de perto. Em resumo, o Sony Xperia X é um smartphone sólido como rocha - nada menos, mas infelizmente nada mais do que isso.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Sony Xperia X - 2016-07-28 07/28/2016 v5.1^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

70 / 75 → 93%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 76%

Peso

92%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

39 / 63 → 61%

Desempenho da aplicação

52 / 70 → 75%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

74%

Médio

75%

85%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia X

Manuel Masiero, 2016-08- 5 (Update: 2016-08- 7)