Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7 Mini

Name: ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Brand: ZTE

Será que a versão Mini é tudo o que você precisa? Além do modelo carro-chefe Axon 7, o fabricante chinês mais uma vez oferece uma versão Mini do modelo atual. Além do tamanho e dos recursos, o preço também foi reduzido. Mas será que o Axon 7 Mini compete com os rivais fortes?

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/26/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

ZTE Axon 7 Mini (Axon Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 405

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Capacitiva, 10 pontos de toque, AMOLED, Gorilla-Glass 4, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 22 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (compartilhada, até 128GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Proximidade Hall, Giroscópio, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct, DLNA, SAR Body: 0.75 W/kg

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM (Bandas 2/3/5/8), 3G UMTS (Bandas 1/2/4/5/8), 4G LTE Cat.6 (FDD Bandas 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20, TDD Bands 38/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 147.5 x 71

Bateria

2705 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 480 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 550 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.9, PD-Autofocus, Dual-LED flash, Videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2, Fixfocus, Videos @1080p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força USB modular, Cabo USB-C, Headset, Ferramenta SIM, Folhetos de serviço, cartão de garantia, cobertura protetora, MiFavor 4.0, Tools, WPS Office, 36 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

153 g, Suprimento de energia: 69 g

Preço

299 Euro

Links

ZTE página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +510%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	323 MBit/s +488%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s +443%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.9 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +539%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	320 MBit/s +507%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s +433%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s -38%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

ZTE Axon 7 Mini

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950XL

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

ZTE Axon 7 Mini

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950XL

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

ZTE Axon 7 Mini

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950XL

Canon EOS 70D


332 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	349 cd/m²
329 cd/m²	327 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
327 cd/m²	331 cd/m²	342 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 349 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 334.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.79 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.25

	ZTE Axon 7 Mini AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20	BlackBerry DTEK50 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.70	ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Screen		37%	46%	34%	13%	44%	-19%
Brightness middle	327	535 64%	609 86%	505 54%	518 58%	386 18%	409 25%
Brightness	335	511 53%	589 76%	468 40%	475 42%	394 18%	411 23%
Brightness Distribution	94	89 -5%	87 -7%	88 -6%	81 -14%	88 -6%	96 2%
Black Level *		0.89	0.63	0.74	0.61		0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.3	4.3 32%	3.8 40%	4.1 35%	6.8 -8%	1.11 82%	9.4 -49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.4	8.2 28%	8.3 27%	5.8 49%	11.4 -0%	3.35 71%	17.6 -54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.1	3.6 49%	3.1 56%	4.9 31%	7 1%	1.34 81%	11.6 -63%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.06 ^107%	2.5 ^88%	2.35 ^94%	2.12 ^104%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	7637 ^85%	6352 ^102%	6725 ^97%	7116 ^91%	8151 ^80%	6441 ^101%	9597 ^68%
Contrast		601	967	682	849		1076

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	50366 Points +7%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	48331 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	46968 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	45232 Points -4%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	40876 Points -13%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	37070 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	35964 Points -23%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	11769 Points +19%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	11156 Points +13%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	9858 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	9717 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	7229 Points -27%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	6786 Points -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	11318 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	10916 Points +10%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	9913 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	9773 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	6522 Points -34%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	6170 Points -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	13676 Points +41%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	12138 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	11653 Points +21%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	10430 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	9670 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	9527 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	673 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	667 Points -1%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	624 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	603 Points -10%
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	554 Points -18%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	293 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	281 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	606 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	605 Points 0%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	568 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	525 Points -13%
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	473 Points -22%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	245 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	235 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	1373 Points +25%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	1259 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	1102 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	1042 Points -5%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	957 Points -13%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	944 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	916 Points -17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	28 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	20 fps +11%
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	19 fps +6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	18 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	18 fps
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	12 fps -33%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	19 fps +12%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	18 fps +6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	17 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	12 fps -29%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	12 fps -29%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	15 fps +114%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	8.4 fps +20%
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	8.4 fps +20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	7 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	7 fps
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	4.5 fps -36%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps +16%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	7.2 fps +7%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	6.7 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	6.6 fps -1%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	4.5 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	4.1 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	11 fps +144%
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	4.9 fps +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	4.6 fps +2%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	4.5 fps
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	2.9 fps -36%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	4.8 fps +14%
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	4.5 fps +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	4.2 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	4.2 fps
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	2.9 fps -31%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	5339 Points +46%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	5234 Points +43%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	4685 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	4051 Points +11%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	3947 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	3663 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	1197 Points +265%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	1043 Points +218%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	662 Points +102%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	328 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	283 Points -14%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	276 Points -16%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	249 Points -24%
System
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	2438 Points +77%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	2289 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	1380 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	1379 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	1359 Points -1%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	1310 Points -5%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	1188 Points -14%
Memory
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	1346 Points +28%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	1076 Points +2%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	1052 Points
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	790 Points -25%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	675 Points -36%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	604 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	443 Points -58%
Graphics
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	827 Points
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	818 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	805 Points -3%
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	696 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	669 Points -19%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	430 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	415 Points -50%
Web
Huawei P9 Lite Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072	765 Points +7550%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536	756 Points +7460%
Sony Xperia XA Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048	717 Points +7070%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048	10 Points 0%
ZTE Blade V7 MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048	10 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	10 Points
BlackBerry DTEK50 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	9 Points -10%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	698 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
ZTE Axon 7 Mini 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072	2092 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
ZTE Blade V7 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	13761 ms * -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11796 ms * -6%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11109 ms *
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11102 ms * -0%
BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10420 ms * +6%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9610 ms * +13%
Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9397 ms * +15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4756 Points +41%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4046 Points +20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3656 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3566 Points +6%
BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3527 Points +5%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3371 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2689 Points -20%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	72 Points +33%
Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	67 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	64 Points +19%
BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	64 Points +19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	61 Points +13%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	29.03 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	27.5 Points +20%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	23 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.8 Points -1%
BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.69 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.1 Points -4%
ZTE Blade V7 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	18.19 Points -21%

* ... smaller is better

	ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei P9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash	ZTE Blade V7 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		-2%	90%	32%	13%	1%	-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	50.3	48.87 -3%	46.92 -7%	25.1 -50%	50.7 1%		20.89 -58%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.9	74.1 0%	74.4 1%	60.8 -18%	72.9 -1%		43.67 -41%
Random Write 4KB	6.7	8.12 21%	35.79 434%	15.35 129%	10.6 58%	10.27 53%	7.58 13%
Random Read 4KB	14.05	15.76 12%	36.32 159%	38.22 172%	22.05 57%	21.92 56%	28.07 100%
Sequential Write 256KB	122.8	72.8 -41%	43.48 -65%	46.24 -62%	68.6 -44%	27.27 -78%	39.45 -68%
Sequential Read 256KB	230.8	226.6 -2%	271.4 18%	283.5 23%	240.4 4%	168.8 -27%	196.8 -15%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	20 fps
	very low	28 fps

... comparado com

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	35 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39 °C	38.4 °C	33.9 °C
38.4 °C	39.3 °C	33.2 °C
36.7 °C	37.6 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 39.3 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C


32.9 °C	33.3 °C	34.2 °C
32.9 °C	33.9 °C	34.8 °C
31.5 °C	34.2 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

ZTE Axon 7 Mini audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

BlackBerry DTEK50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.06 / 0.13 Watt
Ocioso	0.68 / 0.96 / 1.06 Watt
Carga	3.22 / 6.75 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	ZTE Axon 7 Mini 2705 mAh	BlackBerry DTEK50 2610 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh
Power Consumption		-43%	-45%	-46%	-21%	-11%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	0.78 -15%	0.63 7%	0.73 -7%	0.72 -6%	0.96 -41%	0.73 -7%
Idle Average *	0.96	1.72 -79%	1.91 -99%	2.09 -118%	1.5 -56%	1.39 -45%	0.92 4%
Idle Maximum *	1.06	1.77 -67%	1.96 -85%	2.11 -99%	1.57 -48%	1.45 -37%	0.93 12%
Load Average *	3.22	4.33 -34%	3.88 -20%	4.15 -29%	3.48 -8%	2.65 18%	4.47 -39%
Load Maximum *	6.75	8.21 -22%	8.74 -29%	5.05 25%	6.04 11%	3.51 48%	5.96 12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		21h 27min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 16min

	ZTE Axon 7 Mini 2705 mAh	BlackBerry DTEK50 2610 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh
Battery Runtime		3%	40%	33%	-15%	75%	30%
Reader / Idle	1287	1020 -21%	1226 -5%	1404 9%	775 -40%	1978 54%
H.264	435	472 9%	775 78%	568 31%	460 6%	863 98%
WiFi v1.3	399	404 1%	735 84%	604 51%	353 -12%	628 57%	519 30%
Load	196	244 24%	201 3%	272 39%	170 -13%	376 92%

Pro

+ Chassi de alta qualidade

+ Bons alto falantes

+ Sem afogamentos

+ Expansão de dual-SIM/memória via microSD

+ Boa tela AMOLED

+ Carga rápida

+ Capa protetora incluída

+ Três anos de garantia

+ USB-C...

Contra

- ...mas velocidade 2.0 apenas

- Durações médias da bateria

- O micro-SD não pode ser formatado como armazenamento interno

- Problemas com a conexão à Internet móvel em condições difíceis de recepção

- Módulo WLAN lento sem CA

In review: ZTE Axon 7 Mini. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

A ZTE foi capaz de transportar muitos aspectos positivos de seu smartphone carro-chefe Axon 7 para o Axon 7 Mini menor. Isto inclui o ótimo chassi e os bons alto falantes, mas o painel FHD-AMOLED também é convincente, exceto pelas corres não muito precisas. O software também deixa uma boa impressão e a operação é muito fluente na prática. A ZTE também é muito generosa em termos de acessórios e garantia.

As desvantagens definitivamente incluem o ultrapassado módulo Wi-Fi, bem como os problemas com a conexão à internet móvel. Em situações difíceis, ainda podemos fazer chamadas, mas não podemos utilizar a Internet. Também não sabemos por que os cartões microSD não podem ser formatados como armazenamento interno, apesar do leitor de cartões rápido. Nós também vemos espaço para melhoria em termos de duração de bateria, porque alguns dos rivais simplesmente duram muito mais tempo.

O ZTE Axon 7 Mini é um bom smartphone e não tem nada que esconder de seu irmão maior Axon 7 em algumas áreas. No entanto, a ZTE economizou um pouco de dinheiro em outros aspectos, e, a as vezes ruim conexão à internet móvel, em particular, afeta um pouco à impressão geral.

Já mencionamos que o ZTE Axon 7 Mini compete com muitos smartphones bons na faixa de preços de até 300 Euros (~$316). Nossos aparelhos de comparação são bastante similares em termos de desempenho, e as diferenças normalmente se limitam aos recursos. Graças ao seu ótimo chassi, bons alto falantes e equipamento generoso de memória, o modelo de teste oferece algumas vantagens. Se você puder viver com a, ás vezes, deficiente conexão à internet móvel, o ZTE Axon 7 Mini não é uma má escolha.

ZTE Axon 7 Mini - 2016-11-22 11/22/2016 v5.1^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

90%

Teclado

69 / 75 → 92%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

44 / 60 → 73%

Peso

92%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

81%

Desempenho do jogos

25 / 63 → 39%

Desempenho da aplicação

33 / 70 → 48%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

73 / 91 → 80%

Camera

71%

Médio

73%

84%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1618 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7 Mini

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-15)