Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL

Zen dos desejos? O novo tablet da Asus com o tamanho de um iPad Mini não oferece apenas bons recursos, incluindo modem WWAN e alto falantes estéreo, mas também é comparativamente acessível. Será que a concorrência mais cara tem um problema?
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (ZenPad Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
Memória
4 GB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
7.90 polegadas 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 324 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.6 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: G-Sensor, Bússola, Hall, Proximidade, Giroscópio, Miracast, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, 4G (Bandas: 1 3 5 7 18 20 26 28 38 41), 3G (850/900/2100MHz), SAR Head: 1.420 W/kg, SAR Body: 0.955 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.57 x 205.4 x 136.4
Bateria
18 Wh, 4680 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 11 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (autofoco f/2.0, vídeos 1080p @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix Foco fixo f/2.2, vídeos 720p @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 na frente, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, ZenUI, Asus Apps, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Puffin Browser, 12 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless
peso
320 g, Suprimento de energia: 79 g
Preço
0 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front landscape mode
Front landscape mode
Front portrait mode
Rear
Main camera
SIM- & microSD-slots
Power button and volume rocker
USB Type-C port
Power adapter

Size Comparison

214.8 mm 124 mm 7.8 mm 330 g205.4 mm 136.4 mm 7.57 mm 320 g203.2 mm 134.5 mm 6.6 mm 298 g203.2 mm 134.8 mm 6.1 mm 304 g200.4 mm 132.6 mm 6.95 mm 332 g198.6 mm 134.8 mm 5.6 mm 272 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s +84%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
264 MBit/s
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s -30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s +63%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 MBit/s
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -63%
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Overview
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Overview
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Crossing
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Crossing
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Turning point
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
381
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 386 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 363.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.57 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 386 cd/m²
Contraste: 677:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.42
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.90
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
IPS, 2048x1536, 8.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8.00
Huawei MediaPad M2
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8.00
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.90
Apple iPad Mini 4
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.90
Screen
Brightness middle
386
369
-4%
347
-10%
463
20%
425
10%
411
6%
Brightness
364
346
-5%
348
-4%
445
22%
402
10%
421
16%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
88
0%
92
5%
91
3%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.57
0.37
35%
0.47
18%
0.4
30%
0.58
-2%
Contrast
677
997
47%
985
45%
1063
57%
709
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.3
5.58
-69%
1.67
49%
6.25
-89%
4.98
-51%
2.15
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.1
6.61
7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
4.67
-175%
1.75
-3%
6.16
-262%
5.2
-206%
2.72
-60%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.25 98%
2.27 97%
2.43 91%
2.65 83%
2.29 96%
CCT
6397 102%
7927 82%
6361 102%
7921 82%
7249 90%
7012 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70
95.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Grayscale (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Balance, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Balance, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
2885 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
3468 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
931 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2
823 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3628 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4195 Points +16%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
3170 Points -13%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3097 Points -15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1514 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1233 Points -19%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
990 Points -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1714 Points +13%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
71734 Points
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points +2%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6018 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
6419 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
5564 Points -8%
Huawei MediaPad M2
4358 Points -28%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
873 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
952 Points +9%
Huawei MediaPad M2
754 Points -14%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points +9%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1059 Points +21%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1651 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
1321 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
876 Points -47%
Huawei MediaPad M2
820 Points -50%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points -3%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2668 Points +62%
System (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2076 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
1630 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
2764 Points +33%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1870 Points -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points -7%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3132 Points +51%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1475 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1044 Points -29%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1093 Points -26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points -4%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1681 Points +14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
27 fps
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
19 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
29 fps +7%
Huawei MediaPad M2
14 fps -48%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps -52%
Apple iPad Mini 4
37 fps +37%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
34 fps
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
28 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
24 fps -29%
Huawei MediaPad M2
15 fps -56%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps -6%
Apple iPad Mini 4
47.8 fps +41%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
15 fps
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
12 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
10.4 fps -31%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps -48%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps -44%
Apple iPad Mini 4
21.5 fps +43%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11 fps
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
9.9 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
11 fps 0%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps -29%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps -43%
Apple iPad Mini 4
15.3 fps +39%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
9.5 fps
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
6.9 fps -27%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps -100%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps +37%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.1 fps
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
4.7 fps -23%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps -100%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18491 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
20201 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
19317 Points +4%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11605 Points -37%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points +38%
Apple iPad Mini 4
18737 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
22306 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
14670 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
20006 Points -10%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11984 Points -46%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points +23%
Apple iPad Mini 4
25254 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11568 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
9031 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
17240 Points +49%
Huawei MediaPad M2
10447 Points -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points +74%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9844 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1385 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1586 Points +15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
56 Points -96%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1580 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1310 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
830 Points -37%
Huawei MediaPad M2
71 Points -95%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1300 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1326 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
929 Points -30%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1353 Points +2%

Legend

 
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA Intel Atom Z3580, PowerVR G6430, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M2 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3803 ms *
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
4910 ms * -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
6512 ms * -71%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11544 ms * -204%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
4420 ms * -16%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2557 ms * +33%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
8349 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
8431 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
7097 Points -15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
3866 Points -54%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
7994 Points -4%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9962 Points +19%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
103 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
121 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
79 Points -23%
Huawei MediaPad M2
67 Points -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
144 Points +40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
45.9 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
40.3 Points -12%
Huawei MediaPad M2
23 Points -50%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
43.04 Points -6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
52 MB/s
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
27.5 MB/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
25.53 MB/s -51%
Huawei MediaPad M2
25.09 MB/s -52%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
24.42 MB/s -53%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.91 MB/s
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
9.8 MB/s +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
9.68 MB/s +40%
Huawei MediaPad M2
13.44 MB/s +95%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13.96 MB/s +102%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
116.6 MB/s
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
75.6 MB/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
47.45 MB/s -59%
Huawei MediaPad M2
40.72 MB/s -65%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
56.4 MB/s -52%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
252.3 MB/s
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
143 MB/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
248.3 MB/s -2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
145 MB/s -43%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
147.9 MB/s -41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
20.61 MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
39.62 MB/s
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1590 Points
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
632 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
593 Points -63%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1235 Points -22%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1379 Points -13%
Apple iPad Mini 4
902 Points -43%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high20 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high57 fps
Carga Máxima
 38.2 °C38.3 °C34.9 °C 
 37.6 °C38.4 °C35.1 °C 
 38.2 °C36.3 °C35.2 °C 
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 36.9 °C
30.6 °C35.5 °C36.9 °C
33.1 °C36.2 °C39 °C
32.2 °C35.8 °C36.6 °C
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat map Asus ZenPad 3 8.0
Heat map Asus ZenPad 3 8.0
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.52525.431.73125.333.44032.935.35033.649.46331.6348028.426.21002727.112520.827.81602234.820021.343.125020.849.131521.254.740019.458.250019.56663017.765.380017.967.3100017.872.3125017.370.6160017.468.3200016.767.3250017.272.7315018.270.8400017.974.1500017.676.5630017.779.3800017.8791000017.973.11250018.160.41600018.252.3SPL3085.7N1.362.7median 17.9median 67.3Delta1.410.340.735.335.240.739.430.137.839.443.33028.443.346.727.733.846.747.535.639.547.545.426.934.345.445.524.627.345.544.626.330.844.64731.226.24752.943.623.852.956.552.122.956.560.452.122.460.463.854.519.963.866.557.120.466.572.163.818.772.174.667.517.774.677.86917.977.878.9701878.980.47117.880.483.873.51783.885.175.816.985.183.473.317.483.483.473.117.883.483.974.417.583.983.473.517.383.48575.617.38586.6771886.684.674.518.384.681.571.817.981.572.261.217.972.295.185.430.195.1110.763.21.4110.7median 80.4median 70median 17.9median 80.48.69.51.58.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001AXiaomi MiPad 2
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.08 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.01 / 2.71 / 2.75 Watt
Carga midlight 7.28 / 10.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18 Wh
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
15 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
15 Wh
Huawei MediaPad M2
18 Wh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
23 Wh
Apple iPad Mini 4
19 Wh
Power Consumption
-28%
-38%
-6%
-82%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
2.5
-148%
2
-98%
1.4
-39%
3.33
-230%
0.8
21%
Idle Average *
2.71
3.2
-18%
3.6
-33%
3.3
-22%
5.01
-85%
3.6
-33%
Idle Maximum *
2.75
3.2
-16%
4
-45%
3.4
-24%
5.19
-89%
3.9
-42%
Load Average *
7.28
6.3
13%
8.2
-13%
5.5
24%
8.32
-14%
6.1
16%
Load Maximum *
10.02
7.1
29%
9.9
1%
7
30%
9.33
7%
8
20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 07min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 53)
7h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 34min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 23min
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18 Wh
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
15 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
15 Wh
Huawei MediaPad M2
18 Wh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
23 Wh
Apple iPad Mini 4
19 Wh
Battery Runtime
-25%
13%
26%
-10%
12%
Reader / Idle
1147
677
-41%
1399
22%
1546
35%
1488
30%
H.264
574
450
-22%
780
36%
727
27%
643
12%
WiFi v1.3
470
340
-28%
442
-6%
525
12%
421
-10%
539
15%
Load
263
240
-9%
265
1%
343
30%
242
-8%

Pro

+ Boa qualidade de construção
+ Slot de cartão microSD
+ USB Type-C com suporte para OTG
+ Modem LTE integrado
+ WLAN veloz
+ Tela muito nítida com boas cores
+ Sem afogamentos no teste de estresse
+ ZenUI com muito recursos adicionais…

Contra

- …e muitos bugs do software
- Carcaça não muito estável
- Modem WWAN sem suporte para 2G
- Webcam medíocre
- Sem NFC
- Sem leitor de digitais
- O cartão micro-SD não pode ser formatado como armazenamento interno
In review: Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 (Z581KL). Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 (Z581KL). Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.

A Asus conseguiu melhorar algumas desvantagens do ZenPad S 8.0 com o novo ZenPad 3 8.0, incluindo o afogamento sob cargas de trabalho contínuas, bem como as durações da bateria abaixo da média. É lamentável que o antigo design excepcional tenha sido simplificado sem resultar em uma vantagem para a estabilidade do chassi, que ainda é apenas média. A qualidade da construção, por outro lado, não causa críticas.

Os recursos do modelo de teste conseguem competir com muitos rivais mais caros, mas o NFC, bem como o leitor de digitais estão ausentes, os quais estão presentes, por exemplo, no Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0. A qualidade da webcam também é decepcionante – nós a elogiamos para o ZenPad S 8.0. O maior problema do modelo de teste é o software: A interface ZenUI adiciona diversos recursos, mas infelizmente há muitos bugs, portanto, deduzimos u ponto da avaliação final. Afortunadamente ainda há uma chance de que a Asus atualize os aplicativos correspondentes nas seguntes semanas.

O ZenPad 3 8.0 é um tablet bem equipado por um preço comparativamente baixo, mas não estabelece novos pontos de referência em categoria alguma. Observamos que muitos pequenos bugs do software também afetam a experiência do usuário durante a análise.

Se você puder renunciar à funcionalidade LTE e ainda desejar o aparelho da Asus, deveria dar uma olhada no ZenPad S 8.0 antes de adquirir o modelo de teste. Este último é muito similar ao nosso modelo de teste, mas vem com 64 GB de armazenamento interno, uma câmera melhor, bem como um design exclusivo por um preço similar – especialmente porque este tablet roda Android 6.0. Se contar com mais dinheiro, o Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 com sua ótima tela AMOLED também deveria ser uma alternativa interessante ao modelo de teste.

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A - 10/24/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
70%
Teclado
71 / 80 → 89%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
45 / 65 → 69%
Peso
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
45 / 68 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
55 / 76 → 73%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
62 / 85 → 73%
Impressão
-1%
Médio
68%
85%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL
Andreas Kilian, 2016-10-30 (Update: 2016-11- 4)