Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4

Andreas Kilian (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/26/2016

Evolução. O sucessor do MediaPad M2 de 2015 finalmente está aqui: por favor, deem as boas-vindas ao MediaPad M3. O novo modelo pode ter dimensões iguais às do predecessor, mas possui uma tela maior de resolução mais alta, um processador mais potente e um sensor de digitais. Vamos verificar o que a Huawei tem para oferecer em nossa análise.

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (MediaPad Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 950 2.3 GHz
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
8.4 polegadas 16:10, 2560x1600 pixel 359 PPI, IPS, Ângulos de visão 80°/80°/80°/80° (topo/lado inferior/esquerda/direita), Cores: 16 milhões de cores, Contraste: 1,500:1, Brightness: 400 nits, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.04 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para headset de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro e Hall sensor, Giroscópio, Bússola, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 215.5 x 124.2
Bateria
19.5 Wh, 5100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (Auto-focus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fixfokus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, ferramenta slot, protetor de tela, EMUI 4.1, Tablet-Manager, HiCare, Microsoft Apps, Facebook, Shazam, News Republic, Twitter, Booking.com, Instagram, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
310 g, Suprimento de energia: 61 g
Preço
349 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
515 MBit/s ∼100% +146%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
326 MBit/s ∼63% +56%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
209 MBit/s ∼41%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
121 MBit/s ∼23% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
435 MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
264 MBit/s ∼61% +26%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
209 MBit/s ∼48%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
112 MBit/s ∼26% -46%
MediaPad M3 – Route
MediaPad M3 – Route
MediaPad M3 – Underpass
MediaPad M3 – Underpass
MediaPad M3 – Turning point
MediaPad M3 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Route
Garmin Edge 500 – Route
Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
438
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 468 cd/m² Médio: 445.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.78 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 460 cd/m²
Contraste: 1022:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.33
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M2
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Apple iPad Mini 4
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Screen
Brightness
445
445
0%
364
-18%
348
-22%
402
-10%
421
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
88
-2%
88
-2%
91
1%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.45
0.47
-4%
0.57
-27%
0.4
11%
0.58
-29%
Contrast
1022
985
-4%
677
-34%
1063
4%
709
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.2
6.25
-1%
3.3
47%
1.67
73%
4.98
20%
2.15
65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
6.16
5%
1.7
74%
1.75
73%
5.2
20%
2.72
58%
Gamma
2.33 103%
2.43 99%
2.42 99%
2.27 106%
2.65 91%
2.29 105%
CCT
8056 81%
7921 82%
6397 102%
6361 102%
7249 90%
7012 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
95.4

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 276 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.1 ms).
Geekbench 4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3144 Points ∼41%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3121 Points ∼41% -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points ∼25%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2691 Points ∼13% -49%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points ∼34%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1480 Points ∼29% -14%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼47%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
71734 Points ∼39% -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points ∼40% -16%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼64%
Huawei MediaPad M2
4358 Points ∼54% -16%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6018 Points ∼74% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
5564 Points ∼68% +7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points ∼65% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼66%
Huawei MediaPad M2
754 Points ∼49% -26%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
873 Points ∼57% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
952 Points ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points ∼62% -7%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1059 Points ∼69% +4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
820 Points ∼10% -37%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1651 Points ∼19% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
876 Points ∼10% -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points ∼19% +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2668 Points ∼31% +105%
System (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼54%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1870 Points ∼28% -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2076 Points ∼32% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
2764 Points ∼42% -23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points ∼29% -46%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3132 Points ∼48% -13%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼55%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1093 Points ∼33% -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1475 Points ∼45% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1044 Points ∼32% -42%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points ∼43% -21%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1681 Points ∼51% -7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad M2
15 fps ∼1% -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
34 fps ∼3% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
24 fps ∼2% -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps ∼3% +10%
Apple iPad Mini 4
47.8 fps ∼4% +65%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M2
14 fps ∼3% -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
27 fps ∼6% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
29 fps ∼6% +26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% -43%
Apple iPad Mini 4
37 fps ∼8% +61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps ∼1% -40%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
15 fps ∼3% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
10.4 fps ∼2% -20%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2% -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
21.5 fps ∼4% +65%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps ∼3% -13%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11 fps ∼5% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
11 fps ∼5% +22%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼3% -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
15.3 fps ∼7% +70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
9.5 fps ∼3% +23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼4% +69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.1 fps ∼3% +45%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼4% +50%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points ∼91%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1019 Points ∼40% -56%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1450 Points ∼57% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1559 Points ∼61% -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1572 Points ∼62% -32%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points ∼15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
55 Points ∼1% -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
781 Points ∼15% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
612 Points ∼11% -26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1261 Points ∼23% +52%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points ∼25%
Huawei MediaPad M2
70 Points ∼2% -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
870 Points ∼22% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
707 Points ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1319 Points ∼34% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points ∼23%
Huawei MediaPad M2
10447 Points ∼15% -33%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11568 Points ∼17% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
17240 Points ∼25% +11%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points ∼30% +30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9844 Points ∼15% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11984 Points ∼3% -46%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
22306 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
20006 Points ∼4% -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points ∼6% +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4
25254 Points ∼6% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points ∼10%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11605 Points ∼6% -43%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18491 Points ∼10% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
19317 Points ∼10% -5%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points ∼13% +26%
Apple iPad Mini 4
18737 Points ∼10% -7%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M2 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
2822.9 ms * ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
11543.5 ms * ∼19% -309%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
3803.2 ms * ∼6% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
6512 ms * ∼11% -131%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 (Chrome 48)
4420.4 ms * ∼7% -57%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
2557 ms * ∼4% +9%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
11404 Points ∼25%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
3866 Points ∼9% -66%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
8349 Points ∼18% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
7097 Points ∼16% -38%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 (Chrome 48)
7994 Points ∼18% -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
9962 Points ∼22% -13%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
136 Points ∼24%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
67 Points ∼12% -51%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
103 Points ∼18% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
79 Points ∼14% -42%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
144 Points ∼25% +6%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
53.7 Points ∼17%
Huawei MediaPad M2 (Android 5.1)
23 Points ∼7% -57%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (Chrome 53)
45.9 Points ∼14% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE (Chrome 45)
40.298 Points ∼13% -25%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 (Chrome 48)
43.039 Points ∼13% -20%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchHuawei MediaPad M2Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001ASamsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTEXiaomi MiPad 2Apple iPad Mini 4
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
23.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
31.35
13.44
-57%
6.91
-78%
9.68
-69%
13.96
-55%
Random Read 4KB
32.04
25.09
-22%
52.02
62%
25.53
-20%
24.42
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB
117.15
40.72
-65%
116.62
0%
47.45
-59%
56.37
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
249.68
144.99
-42%
252.3
1%
248.34
-1%
147.85
-41%
BaseMark OS II
Memory
2212
1235
-44%
1590
-28%
593
-73%
1379
-38%
902
-59%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high20 fps
 very low29 fps
comparado com
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (min)
 3475 Quad, Mali-T720
12
   ...
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
 400 MSM8928, Adreno 305
18
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
20
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
20
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
 617 MSM8952, Adreno 405
20
Honor 5X
 616 MSM8939v2, Adreno 405
21
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high44 fps
comparado com
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
 410 APQ8016, Adreno 306
35
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
35
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4
44
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720 MP2
46
BlackBerry Priv
 808 MSM8992, Adreno 418
47
   ...
Huawei Mate 9 (max)
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
60
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C31.7 °C34.4 °C 
 32.6 °C32 °C34 °C 
 33 °C32.2 °C34.8 °C 
Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C
29.8 °C30.9 °C31.4 °C
29.7 °C30.5 °C31.7 °C
29.7 °C31.4 °C32.9 °C
Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
MediaPad M3 Wärmebild
MediaPad M3 Wärmebild
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.638.82525.437.23125.328.94032.930.85033.641.76331.632.88028.429.21002722.612520.828.61602242.920021.349.925020.851.131521.260.140019.46750019.570.463017.771.480017.972.6100017.875.5125017.375.3160017.475.5200016.775.3250017.277.8315018.281.7400017.979.3500017.670.9630017.765.9800017.867.71000017.962.71250018.151.91600018.247.7SPL3088N1.369.4median 17.9Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchmedian 67.7Delta1.312.331.640.525.431.725.333.432.935.333.649.431.63428.426.22727.120.827.82234.821.343.120.849.121.254.719.458.219.56617.765.317.967.317.872.317.370.617.468.316.767.317.272.718.270.817.974.117.676.517.779.317.87917.973.118.160.418.252.33085.71.362.7median 17.9Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001Amedian 67.31.311.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 25% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 17%, average was 23%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 17%, average was 23%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.38 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.51 / 3.64 / 3.68 Watt
Carga midlight 6.95 / 9.11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2
4.800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
5124 mAh
Power Consumption
14%
14%
-13%
-44%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.51
1.4
7%
1.01
33%
2
-32%
3.33
-121%
0.8
47%
Idle Average *
3.64
3.3
9%
2.71
26%
3.6
1%
5.01
-38%
3.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
3.68
3.4
8%
2.75
25%
4
-9%
5.19
-41%
3.9
-6%
Load Average *
6.95
5.5
21%
7.28
-5%
8.2
-18%
8.32
-20%
6.1
12%
Load Maximum *
9.11
7
23%
10.02
-10%
9.9
-9%
9.33
-2%
8
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 30min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 28min
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2
4.800 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
4680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
5124 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-4%
10%
-23%
8%
Reader / Idle
1110
1546
39%
1147
3%
1399
26%
1488
34%
Load
268
343
28%
263
-2%
265
-1%
242
-10%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
546
525
-4%
470
-14%
442
-19%
421
-23%
539
-1%
H.264
583
727
25%
574
-2%
780
34%
643
10%

Pro

+ Bom acabamento
+ Carcaça de metal rígida
+ Slot micro-SD
+ Funcionalidade USB OTG
+ Tela de alta resolução e brilhante
+ Prático leitor de digitais.
+ Bons alto falantes estéreo
+ Baixas emissões de calor.
+ Ótimo desempenho do navegador
+ Capa protetora de tela incluída

Contra

- A GPU é sobrecarregada ao rodar jogos muito exigentes
- Apenas Micro USB 2.0 disponível
- Sem flash LED
- Sem headset
- Sem NFC
In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.
In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

O Huawei MediaPad M2 foi um aparelho confiável com alguns pontos fracos. O fabricante continuou neste caminho e construiu uma nova geração sobre as fundações confiáveis do predecessor. Com a sua sólida carcaça de metal e bons alto falantes, este prático tablet coincide com o seu predecessor de muitas maneiras. No entanto, a Huawei fez melhorias estratégicas: a câmera principal e o SoC são mais poderosos e a tela IPS tem uma resolução mais alta. Infelizmente, as últimas duas adições vêm com efeitos secundários não desejáveis: os jogos nem sempre conseguem rodar fluentemente com a resolução nativa e a bateria (apesar de ter 300 mAh a mais de capacidade) é esgotada mais rápido que antes em certas disciplinas. Afortunadamente, o tablet oferece ótimas durações da bateria durante a navegação pela web (teste de bateria WLAN). Apreciamos a adição do sensor de digitais, dado que facilita muito o desbloqueio do aparelho.

O MediaPad M3 é um tablet prático, que tem algumas fraquezas. Graças ao ótimo acabamento, o painel brilhante e de alta resolução e o veloz desempenho do navegador, este tablet pode servir bem aos usuários em suas tarefas diárias.

Se ainda não estiver convencido, recomendamos gastar um pouco mais de dinheiro com o Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0. Esse tablet oferece um contraste fino e uma tela AMOLED de alto contraste em um formato 4:3. No entanto, o tablet não oferece uma câmera frontal de alta qualidade.

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch - 11/16/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
72 / 80 → 90%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
43 / 65 → 66%
Peso
86 / 88 → 96%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 68 → 61%
Desempenho da aplicação
58 / 76 → 76%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
65 / 85 → 76%
Médio
75%
87%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - Home > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4
Andreas Kilian, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-15)