Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10
Yoga Tab 3 Pro (Yoga Serie)
Processador
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4 x 1.4 - 2.2 GHz, Cherry Trail
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Memória
2048 MB
Pantalha
10.10 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel, tela táctil capacitiva, superfície Any Pen, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 21.54 GB livre
peso
665 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 484 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 434.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.95 cd/m²iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 429 cd/m²
Contraste: 1226:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.64 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.42
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 PowerVR G6200, MT8135, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | 2% | -1% | 22% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 429 | 363 -15% | 458 7% | 423 -1% | 358 -17% | 487 14% |
| Brightness | 434 | 344 -21% | 434 0% | 427 -2% | 357 -18% | 510 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 87 6% | 86 5% | 92 12% | 86 5% | 91 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.34 3% | 0.43 -23% | 0.61 -74% | 0.39 -11% | |
| Contrast | 1226 | 1068 -13% | 1065 -13% | 693 -43% | 1249 2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.61 | 3.25 30% | 4.18 9% | 2.86 38% | 1.78 61% | 5.24 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.28 | 5.68 39% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.64 | 2.78 58% | 4.54 32% | 2.37 64% | 1.38 79% | 7.95 -20% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.43 91% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6929 94% | 6722 97% | 7083 92% | 6941 94% | 6366 102% | 6565 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 47 fps | ||
| very low | 58 fps | ||
| Temple Run 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| default | 34 fps | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.13 / 0.22 Watt |
| Ocioso |  8.6 / 11.26 / 11.3 Watt |
| Carga |
14.57 / 14.9 Watt |
    
| |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Amazon Fire HD 10 inch 2015 PowerVR G6200, MT8135, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 52% | -18% | -13% | -17% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1261 | 2830 124% | 1142 -9% | 1364 8% | 918 -27% | 2090 66% |
| H.264 | 644 | 740 15% | 624 -3% | 562 -13% | 651 1% | 740 15% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 558 | 776 39% | 450 -19% | 393 -30% | 638 14% | |
| Load | 323 | 415 28% | 188 -42% | 212 -34% | 291 -10% | 294 -9% |
| WiFi | 630 |
Pro
+ SoC veloz
+ Projetor integrado
+ Boa construção
+ Tecnologia AnyPen
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ À prova de respingos (IP 21)
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ LTE
+ Kickstand flexível
+ Tela de alto contraste...
Contra
- ... que poderia ter uma maior precisão de cores
- Câmeras fracas
- Slot de cartão frouxo
- Alto consumo de energia em modo inativo
- Slot microSD lento
A Lenovo chama o Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 (YT3-X90L) de o tablet de vídeos supremo. O projetor integrado certamente é um belo recurso. No entanto, principalmente o conteúdo projetado precisaria de maior resolução para criar uma verdadeira sensação de cinema. De outra forma, o pequeno projetor DLP é absolutamente suficiente em uma sala escura, mas não consegue substituir um modelo de alta qualidade.
O tablet da Lenovo tem outras coisas para oferecer: O LTE, uma tela de alto contraste, bons alto falantes e bom desempenho, fazem com que os corações dos fanáticos da multimídia batam mais rápido. Os modos de uso flexíveis, a tecnologia AnyPen e a boa duração da bateria enfatizam estas ambições ainda mais.
os compradores à procura de um tablet multimídia flexível e de alto desempenho, encontrarão isso mesmo no Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10.
O Yoga Tab 3 Pro não faz nada muito mal. Apesar de tudo, o pacote total não é suficiente para atingir uma pontuação muito boa. Isto deve-se principalmente ao desempenho que não está no padrão mais alto possível e as câmeras oferecem uma qualidade de imagem um pouco medíocre. A Lenovo também poderia melhorar um pouco a carcaça, particularmente em detalhes como a lapela do slot do cartão.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
-
03/16/2016 v5(old)
Daniel Schmidt
Tablet - Médio equilibrado