Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Brand: Samsung

Desejável. O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) é um pacote atraente. Nenhum outro tablet de 10-polegadas com Android 6, LTE e Full-HD no mercado oferece mais por menos. Se o desempenho está no nível ou não é o assunto da nossa análise.

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/16/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Galaxy Tab A Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, A53, Octa-core

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T830 MP2, Análises do: 1600 MHz

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

10.10 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Capacitiva, 10-dedos, WUXGA, TFT, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.5 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 200 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Aceleração, Sensor Hall-effect, sensor de luz ambiente, WiFi Direct, USB OTG, App2SD, ANT+, Samsung Smart Switch

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2300, 2600 MHz), HSPA+ Downloads/Uploads up to 42/5.76 MBit/s, LTE Cat. 4 Downloads/Uploads up to 150/50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 254.2 x 155.3

Bateria

7300 mAh

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix Apature F1.9 , até 3264 x 2448 pixels (4:3) respectivamente 3264 x 1836 pixels (16:9), respectivamente, Full-HD vídeo a 30 fps, flash LED, autofoco
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix Aperture F2.2, up to 1616 x 1212 Pixel (4:3) respectively 1600 x 900 Pixel (16:9), HD video at 30 fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cabo USB, adaptador de força modular, guia de início rápido, Microsoft-, Google and Samsung apps, S Planner, modo infantil, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

525 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g

Preço

349 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	274 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	239 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

LG G5

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

LG G5

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

LG G5


527 cd/m²	509 cd/m²	496 cd/m²
544 cd/m²	542 cd/m²	518 cd/m²
535 cd/m²	506 cd/m²	504 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

WUXGA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 544 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 520.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.07 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 542 cd/m²
Contraste: 797:1 (Preto: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.42

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.10	Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	LG G Pad II 10.1 AH-IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 TFT, 1024x768, 9.70
Screen		-10%	-18%	-4%	-2%
Brightness middle	542	392 -28%	343 -37%	355 -35%	394 -27%
Brightness	520	385 -26%	328 -37%	367 -29%	392 -25%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	88 -3%	89 -2%	80 -12%
Black Level *	0.68	0.59 13%	0.38 44%	0.53 22%	0.51 25%
Contrast	797	664 -17%	903 13%	670 -16%	773 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.2	4.5 -7%	6.86 -63%	3.2 24%	3.59 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.7	7.8 -16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.8	4.8 -0%	6.95 -45%	4.36 9%	4.25 11%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.47 ^89%	2.32 ^95%	2.2 ^100%	2.56 ^86%
CCT	7434 ^87%	7426 ^88%	7249 ^90%	7240 ^90%	7148 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
105 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 58 ms rise
105 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 47 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44191 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	29823 Points -33%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	753 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	681 Points -10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4169 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3046 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	15658 Points +127%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14292 Points +107%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	7786 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6905 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4407 Points -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	15554 Points +153%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	13858 Points +125%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	7737 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6151 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3838 Points -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16050 Points +33%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16031 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12095 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9168 Points -24%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	7964 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	468 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	102 Points -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	388 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	81 Points -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1657 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1040 Points -37%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +100%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	18 fps +64%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +75%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	18 fps +50%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps +93%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.4 fps +87%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8.8 fps +80%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps +78%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5.6 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1.8 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.1 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2.8 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +206%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1.7 fps

PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5281 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4796 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3536 Points -26%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3525 Points -27%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1069 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1015 Points
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	971 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	577 Points -43%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	283 Points -72%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2240 Points
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1955 Points -13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1520 Points -32%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1250 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1050 Points -53%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1362 Points
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	924 Points -32%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	750 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	537 Points -61%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	462 Points -66%
Graphics
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1997 Points +291%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	822 Points +61%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	729 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	511 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	312 Points -39%
Web
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	769 Points +13%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	725 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	682 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	633 Points -7%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9 Points -99%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14064 ms * -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	13257 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9789 ms *
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8253 ms * +16%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5410 ms * +45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6438 Points +67%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4692 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3855 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2925 Points -24%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2672 Points -31%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	109 Points +68%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	65 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47 Points -28%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	23.71 Points
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	18 Points -24%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	215.8 MB/s
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	155.8 MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	144.7 MB/s -33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	142 MB/s -34%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	131 MB/s -39%
Sequential Write 256KB
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	78.2 MB/s +70%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	59.1 MB/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.9 MB/s +28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	56 MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45.88 MB/s
Random Read 4KB
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	23.46 MB/s
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	21.61 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	21.56 MB/s -8%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14.59 MB/s -38%
Random Write 4KB
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12.48 MB/s +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10.01 MB/s
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9.86 MB/s -1%
LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash	9.52 MB/s -5%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6.3 MB/s -37%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	60 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.3 °C	35.4 °C	42.1 °C
38.6 °C	35.4 °C	43.9 °C
38.8 °C	32.7 °C	42.1 °C

Máximo: 43.9 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C


35.3 °C	33.7 °C	38.5 °C
38.1 °C	33.7 °C	38.2 °C
36.6 °C	34.9 °C	39 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.12 Watt
Ocioso	1.18 / 4.65 / 4.74 Watt
Carga	5.75 / 6.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		43h 54min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)		7h 08min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh	Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh	Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 mAh	LG G Pad II 10.1 7400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 mAh
Battery Runtime		-45%	-43%	-13%	-5%
Reader / Idle	2634	1230 -53%	1564 -41%	1676 -36%	2950 12%
H.264	893	593 -34%	532 -40%	1020 14%
WiFi v1.3	826	416 -50%	485 -41%	782 -5%	862 4%
Load	428	248 -42%	221 -48%	325 -24%	297 -31%

Pro

+ Design resistente

+ Tela Full-HD brilhante

+ LTE

+ WLAN de 5 GHz

+ Android 6

+ Slot microSD com App2SD

+ Os jogos rodam ser engasgamentos

+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Apenas 10,5 GB de armazenamento disponível

- Câmeras fracas

- Afogamento sob carga máxima

- Alto falante em um só lado

- Bateria não substituível

In Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016). Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) é mais poderoso que o predecessor Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7. A tela agora tem uma resolução de 1920 x 1200 pixels (16:10) em vez de 1024 x 768 pixels (4:3), embora a tela seja apenas marginalmente maior (10,1-polegadas vs. 9,7-polegadas). O brilho médio de 520,1 cd/m² melhorou muito em comparação com o antigo Galaxy Tab A 9.7 (392 cd/m²). Outro aspecto positivo são o SoC octa-core Exynos 7870 Octa, que faz com que trabalhar com o tablet sob Android 6.0 seja uma experiência fluente. Inclusive os jogos exigentes com os gráficos rodam sem engasgamento algum. Graças à bateria maior, as durações também melhoraram e o Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) dura muito tempo com uma carga.

SoC mais poderoso, tela mais brilhante, resolução Full-HD e uma duração melhorada da bateria - em comparação com o predecessor, o Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) foi melhorado em muitas áreas.

A versão LTE do Galaxy é particularmente interessante por causa de seu baixo preço. Os usuários em procura de um tablet acessível de 10-polegadas com Android 6, LTE, e tela Full-HD realmente não tem outra opção neste momento, dado que o Galaxy é o único jogo na área. Sem LTE, o preço do tablet cai 50 Euros (~$56).

No entanto, alguns compromissos foram necessários para manter o preço lá embaixo. Apenas 10,5 GB do flash drive de 16 GB estão disponíveis para o usuário - não é muito considerando que este tablet supostamente foi feito para multimídia. Os módulos de câmera também são um pouco decepcionantes, dado que a qualidade da imagem é bastante medíocre. O local dos alto falantes no lado inferior é bom - desde que o usuário não mude para o modo paisagem, o que significaria que o som agora somente viria desde um só lado.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 - 2016-08-15 08/15/2016 v5.1^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

82 / 80 → 100%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

36 / 65 → 55%

Peso

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Bateria

96%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

17 / 68 → 25%

Desempenho da aplicação

44 / 76 → 58%

Temperatura

84%

Ruído

100%

Audio

55 / 91 → 60%

Camera

56 / 85 → 66%

Médio

70%

84%

Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)

Manuel Masiero, 2016-09-16 (Update: 2016-09-22)