Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy View

Gigante branco. Graças à sua tela de 18,4-polegadas, o Samsung Galaxy View se destaca entre a maioria dos tablets. Isto, no entanto, também afeta o peso e o tamanho. Onde você poderia usar esse tablet e será que consegue convencer em termos de tecnologia?
Samsung Galaxy View
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
18.40 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 120 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.06 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.9 x 451.8 x 275.8
Bateria
64.6 Wh, 5700 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD (foco fixo f/2.2, 1080p vídeo @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, Microsoft Apps, Galaxy Apps, Smart Manager, SideSync, S Console, Family Square, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
2.65 kg, Suprimento de energia: 303 g
Preço
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front (Video-App view)
Front (Video-App view)
Rear
Front (home screen)
Logo
Buttons
Ports
microSD-card slot
Power adapter
451.8 mm 275.8 mm 11.9 mm 2.7 kg305.7 mm 220.6 mm 6.9 mm 723 g292 mm 202 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg247 mm 179 mm 4.68 mm 665 g237.3 mm 169 mm 5.6 mm 387 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Samsung Galaxy ViewChuwi Hi12Wiko Lenny 3Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeOnePlus 3
Networking
-78%
-79%
32%
21%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
254
44.8
-82%
303
19%
286
13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
200
43
-78%
49.2
-75%
290
45%
256
28%
414
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 435.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 468 cd/m²
Contraste: 821:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.45
Samsung Galaxy View
IPS, 1920x1080, 18.40
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.70
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30
Screen
11%
21%
37%
6%
26%
Brightness middle
468
334
-29%
358
-24%
399
-15%
429
-8%
389.2
-17%
Brightness
435
341
-22%
357
-18%
393
-10%
434
0%
392
-10%
Brightness Distribution
80
91
14%
86
8%
92
15%
82
3%
92
15%
Black Level *
0.57
0.22
61%
0.35
39%
0.27
53%
Contrast
821
1814
121%
1226
49%
1441
76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5
2.84
43%
1.78
64%
2.96
41%
4.61
8%
3.61
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.3
9.28
-27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
2.91
50%
1.38
76%
3
48%
6.64
-14%
3.8
34%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.01 109%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.42 91%
2.16 102%
CCT
7676 85%
6432 101%
6366 102%
7049 92%
6929 94%
5969 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71.15
63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.87
97

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4131 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4134 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5565 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
5152 Points +25%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
42156 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
184346 Points +337%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
70385 Points +67%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
3754 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3330 Points -11%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
732 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
721 Points -2%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
601 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
733 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points +8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1091 Points +82%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
872 Points +45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
486 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
488 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points +185%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
8422 Points +1633%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1886 Points +288%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
1877 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
2095 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points +53%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
6230 Points +232%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1643 Points -12%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
803 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
808 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points +37%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3282 Points +309%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1325 Points +65%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
14 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
14 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
29 fps +107%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
59.3 fps +324%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
20 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
14 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
38 fps +192%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
163.2 fps +1155%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
34 fps +162%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps +262%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
80.1 fps +1604%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
18 fps +283%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps +145%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33.3 fps +580%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
8.5 fps +73%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
3.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.1 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
83 fps +2577%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
11 fps +255%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
3.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.4 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
54.3 fps +1497%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
5.8 fps +71%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
8072 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8030 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
19867 Points +146%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33812 Points +319%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
20081 Points +149%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
7457 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
7536 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
20482 Points +175%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
51124 Points +586%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
21327 Points +186%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
11358 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10424 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17981 Points +58%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
15473 Points +36%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
16673 Points +47%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy View Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30, Intel HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
11146 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11603 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6483 ms * +42%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1499 ms * +87%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
4472 ms * +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
1556 ms * +86%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4022 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3627 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6885 Points +71%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
19852 Points +394%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
8197 Points +104%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
69 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
68 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
79 Points +14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
215 Points +212%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
111 Points +61%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
24.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
23.1 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
41.12 Points +69%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
142 Points +482%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
41 Points +68%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
21.35 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
22.57 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
25.56 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23.7 MB/s +11%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
10.66 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11.07 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
9.82 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
10.57 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
49.97 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
57.9 MB/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
49.37 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
51 MB/s +2%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
218.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
215.9 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
248.2 MB/s +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
153.7 MB/s -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
51 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
15.93 MB/s -69%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
77.9 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
56.4 MB/s -28%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
760 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
569 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points -22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
2027 Points +167%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1141 Points +50%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high35 fps
 low58 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.1 °C35.1 °C36.2 °C 
 29.2 °C32.9 °C36.5 °C 
 31.4 °C33.4 °C35.5 °C 
Máximo: 36.5 °C
Médio: 33.9 °C
33.9 °C35.1 °C35.8 °C
41.2 °C33.9 °C29.3 °C
40.3 °C34.7 °C31.4 °C
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat distribution front
Heat distribution rear
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.73 / 17.09 / 17.19 Watt
Carga midlight 18.71 / 20.41 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy View
64.6 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
22 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
Power Consumption
77%
59%
38%
7%
Idle Minimum *
4.73
1.68
64%
2.3
51%
2.69
43%
8.6
-82%
Idle Average *
17.09
2.2
87%
4.5
74%
10.95
36%
11.26
34%
Idle Maximum *
17.19
2.33
86%
5
71%
11.14
35%
11.3
34%
Load Average *
18.71
4.09
78%
9.4
50%
11.54
38%
14.57
22%
Load Maximum *
20.41
5.92
71%
10.4
49%
12.8
37%
14.9
27%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 51)
8h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 49min
Samsung Galaxy View
64.6 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
22 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
Battery Runtime
37%
-3%
27%
16%
-27%
Reader / Idle
1026
1615
57%
918
-11%
1933
88%
1261
23%
791
-23%
H.264
534
773
45%
651
22%
630
18%
644
21%
WiFi v1.3
521
546
5%
393
-25%
695
33%
558
7%
488
-6%
Load
289
402
39%
291
1%
195
-33%
323
12%
138
-52%

Pro

+ Tela táctil muito grande
+ Slot Micro-SD veloz
+ USB-OTG e App2SD
+ WLAN veloz
+ Tela brilhante com amplos ângulos de visão
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Stand integrado...

Contra

- ...que é fixo e somente oferece duas posições
- Carcaça feita de metal feita de plástico duro
- Sem suporte para Miracast ou MHL
- Apenas utilizável no modo paisagem (sem sensor de posição)
- Visão geral do aplicativo de vídeo não muito útil
- Webcam de apenas 2.1 MP
- Botões barulhentos
- Distribuição irregular do brilho
- Aplicativos remotos para modelos selecionados
In review: Samsung Galaxy View (SM-T670). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy View (SM-T670). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

O Samsung Galaxy View é um tablet incomum com uma tela táctil singular e extremamente grande de 18,4 polegadas. Também é o aspecto dominante quando você repara na funcionalidade: A mobilidade é afetada pelo peso, dimensões massivas, bem como o stand, que não pode ser removido de forma simples, mas a funcionalidade também é limitada porque você está restrito no modo paisagem e não há uma câmera traseira. Apesar da boa estabilidade, a carcaça ainda não é muito conveniente devido aos materiais de plástico duro, bem como os botões folgados.

A Samsung também ajustou alguns aspectos do software para o Galaxy View, mas eles nem sempre são uma adição útil para a interface do usuário existente do Android. O teclado com um teclado numérico separado é, de fato, muito útil, mas a nova tela inicial com um design de telhas não parece muito sofisticado: os usuários não podem adicionar novos serviços, nem remover links defeituosos.

Os aspectos positivos são o veloz módulo WLAN, as rápidas conexões do slot microSD, bem como as boas durações da bateria, apesar da enorme tela. O aparelho é, portanto, primeiramente interessante para os fanáticos da multimídia à procura de um aparelho que transmita vídeos e que ainda consiga ser carregado até certo grau, é fácil de usar graças aos grandes controles e não precisa de uma tomada tão rápido assim – provavelmente um grupo alvo menor.

Por causa do peso e das grandes dimensões, o Samsung Galaxy View é feito principalmente para os usuários dispostos a sacrificar funcionalidade e mobilidade por uma teça táctil muito grande.   

Se você puder viver com uma tela muito menor, deveria dar uma olhada no Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7. Ele é muito mais poderoso, muito mais leve, e também mais sofisticado com uma boa tela AMOLED por um preço muito menor.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy View - 07/20/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
72%
Teclado
82 / 80 → 100%
Mouse
79%
Conectividade
31 / 65 → 47%
Peso
59 / 40-88 → 40%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
15 / 68 → 23%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 76 → 53%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
66%
71%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy View
Andreas Kilian, 2016-08- 5 (Update: 2016-08- 7)