Notebookcheck

Breve análise do Portátil MSI CX62 7QL

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/18/2017

Frio, porém, lento. Não deixe que o chassi do GE62 lhe engane - o CX62 é muito fraco para a maioria dos jogos e sua tela TN de768p é horrível.

MSI CX62 7QL
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2.5 GHz
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Análises do: 1122 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, DDR3, 359.37, Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, SK Hynix, PC4-17000, 15-15-15-36
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 100 PPI, TN LED, Name: 156WHU, Dell P/N: K96D2, ID: LGD04AF
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, 1024 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: SDXC reader
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidade ótica
Asus Slimtype DVD A DU8AESH
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29 x 383 x 260
Bateria
41 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 6-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD 1080p30
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 4x 2 W speakers, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Norton Security, MSI Shift OSD, Help Desk, Battery Calibration, SCM, Music Maker Jam, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.22 kg, Suprimento de energia: 372 g
Preço
700 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, SD reader, AC adapter
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, SD reader, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4, mDP, USB Type-C Gen. 1, 2x 3.5 mm microphone/earphones
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4, mDP, USB Type-C Gen. 1, 2x 3.5 mm microphone/earphones
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
60.9 MB/s ∼100% +153%
MSI CX62 7QL
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.1 MB/s ∼40%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.1 MB/s ∼31% -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88.39 MB/s ∼100% +277%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼31% +15%
MSI CX62 7QL
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.46 MB/s ∼27%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼100% +255%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
184 MBit/s ∼28%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
52.9 MBit/s ∼8% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼100% +134%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
282 MBit/s ∼43%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
56 MBit/s ∼8% -80%
212.5
cd/m²
191.9
cd/m²
181
cd/m²
213.9
cd/m²
196.1
cd/m²
184
cd/m²
208.3
cd/m²
189.6
cd/m²
183.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 213.9 cd/m² Médio: 195.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.53 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 196.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 261:1 (Preto: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 12.6 | - Ø
60.6% sRGB (Argyll) 38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.18
MSI CX62 7QL
TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
BOE0693, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2), TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-2%
1%
14%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50.4
42
17%
53
-5%
40
21%
43
15%
Response Time Black / White *
28
33.6
-20%
26
7%
26
7%
23
18%
PWM Frequency
198.4
50
1000
Screen
60%
79%
68%
36%
Brightness
196
174
-11%
212
8%
316
61%
202
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
69
-19%
78
-8%
80
-6%
83
-2%
Black Level *
0.75
0.18
76%
0.18
76%
0.35
53%
0.48
36%
Contrast
261
1036
297%
1311
402%
931
257%
450
72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.9
5.7
48%
3.92
64%
5.49
50%
9.98
8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.6
4.4
65%
2.35
81%
4.84
62%
10.91
13%
Gamma
2.18 110%
2.35 102%
2.34 103%
2.23 108%
2.31 104%
CCT
14195 46%
6963 93%
6161 106%
5971 109%
13185 49%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.4
44.71
16%
40
4%
53
38%
75
95%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60.6
64.95
7%
63
4%
80
32%
100
65%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
29% / 48%
40% / 63%
41% / 58%
27% / 32%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 26.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 276 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼77% +13%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼71% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼68% +1%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼68%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points ∼61% -11%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points ∼57% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
99 Points ∼52% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼41% +104%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
Intel Core i7-7500U
349 Points ∼21% +5%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points ∼20%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
326 Points ∼20% -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼17% -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼16% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
223 Points ∼13% -33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.66 Points ∼20% +13%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼18% +2%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.47 Points ∼18% 0%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼18%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points ∼16% -10%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points ∼16% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.14 Points ∼14% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼42% +103%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.9 Points ∼22% +6%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.68 Points ∼21%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.61 Points ∼20% -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.19 Points ∼18% -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points ∼16% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.49 Points ∼14% -32%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼70% +3%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Core i5-7200U
4991 Points ∼68%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
4917 Points ∼67% -1%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
4359 Points ∼59% -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points ∼56% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
3725 Points ∼51% -25%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼58% +80%
MSI CX62 7QL
Intel Core i5-7200U
11198 Points ∼32%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
11024 Points ∼32% -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
9852 Points ∼28% -12%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points ∼25% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
7580 Points ∼22% -32%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
790 s * ∼9%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
Intel Core i7-7500U
476 s * ∼6%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
849 Seconds * ∼4%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
Intel Core i7-7500U
599 Seconds * ∼3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6800
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11198
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4991
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
45.01 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.47 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
52.76 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
332 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4951 Points ∼76% +13%
MSI CX62 7QL
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
4364 Points ∼67%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4341 Points ∼67% -1%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4340 Points ∼67% -1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4375 Points ∼51% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4118 Points ∼48% +2%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4089 Points ∼48% +1%
MSI CX62 7QL
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
4035 Points ∼47%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Radeon R7 M460, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3694 Points ∼65% +3%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
3603 Points ∼64% 0%
MSI CX62 7QL
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3594 Points ∼63%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3424 Points ∼60% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3370 Points ∼59% -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3594 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4035 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4364 pontos
Ajuda
MSI CX62 7QL
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-18%
8589%
5300%
6073%
Write 4k QD32
1.296
0.893
-31%
237.3
18210%
234
17956%
168.3
12886%
Read 4k QD32
1.172
0.81
-31%
384.8
32733%
149
12613%
257
21828%
Write 4k
1.282
1.008
-21%
106.7
8223%
74.86
5739%
93.03
7157%
Read 4k
0.48
0.429
-11%
36.01
7402%
22.43
4573%
21.81
4444%
Write 512
55.82
40.02
-28%
316.5
467%
280.1
402%
417.3
648%
Read 512
38.42
34.08
-11%
409.8
967%
279.2
627%
409.1
965%
Write Seq
113.3
105.2
-7%
508
348%
325.5
187%
442.7
291%
Read Seq
113.7
109.5
-4%
528.9
365%
459.3
304%
530.2
366%
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 27.5 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 109 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 83.3 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 16.8 ms
Índice de Explosão: 184.2 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 3 %
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼11% +148%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +115%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
1903 Points ∼5% +14%
MSI CX62 7QL
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
1664 Points ∼4%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
1621 Points ∼4% -3%
Dell Latitude 3550-0123
NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U
1360 Points ∼3% -18%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
704 Points ∼2% -58%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼16% +181%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
22439 Points ∼14% +143%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
14594 Points ∼9% +58%
MSI CX62 7QL
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
9252 Points ∼6%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
9056 Points ∼6% -2%
Dell Latitude 3550-0123
NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U
7966 Points ∼5% -14%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6243 Points ∼4% -33%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼36% +126%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼33% +108%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
2784 Points ∼23% +41%
MSI CX62 7QL
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
1977 Points ∼16%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
1858 Points ∼15% -6%
Dell Latitude 3550-0123
NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U
1677 Points ∼14% -15%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1125 Points ∼9% -43%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% +100%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +76%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
3220 Points ∼6% +34%
MSI CX62 7QL
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2411 Points ∼5%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
2206 Points ∼4% -9%
Dell Latitude 3550-0123
NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U
1961 Points ∼4% -19%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1413 Points ∼3% -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
2529 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
65002 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6847 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1473 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
753 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 97.254.344fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 51.339.528.5fps
Thief (2014) 50.729.3fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 28fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6058fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 34.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 40.123.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 19.4fps
Overwatch (2016) 73.551.4fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB
Carga
37.4 / 51.4 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
MSI CX62 7QL
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Radeon R7 M460, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
Noise
2%
8%
0%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
32.1
32.2
-0%
30.2
6%
31.6
2%
35
-9%
Idle Average *
32.2
32.2
-0%
30.2
6%
31.6
2%
36
-12%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
33.7
-5%
31
4%
33.4
-4%
37
-15%
Load Average *
37.4
39.4
-5%
38
-2%
41.7
-11%
41
-10%
Load Maximum *
51.4
42.2
18%
38.6
25%
44.8
13%
46
11%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34.8 °C24.6 °C24.8 °C 
 31.6 °C38.4 °C25.6 °C 
 27.8 °C32.2 °C23 °C 
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C
23.2 °C25.2 °C35.8 °C
23.2 °C30.2 °C29.4 °C
23.8 °C24 °C29.2 °C
Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 27.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.536.12535.733.23134.934.64031.333.35030.431.96329.632.48030.430.610028.829.812528.730.916027.32920027.13525025.644.331524.8434002543.850024.345.663023.952.68002456100024.158.8125024.669.1160024.174.9200023.169.1250022.767.8315022.567.1400023.166500022.862.9630022.656.5800022.6551000022.648.61250022.7511600022.756.8SPL35.679.3N2.535.2median 24MSI CX62 7QLmedian 55Delta1.39.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
MSI CX62 7QL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.32 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6.3 / 7 / 7.2 Watt
Carga midlight 35.1 / 61.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI CX62 7QL
7200U, GeForce 940MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-15%
6%
-36%
-110%
Idle Minimum *
6.3
6.16
2%
3.9
38%
5
21%
10
-59%
Idle Average *
7
8.48
-21%
7.8
-11%
8.9
-27%
14
-100%
Idle Maximum *
7.2
9.62
-34%
8.4
-17%
11.8
-64%
19
-164%
Load Average *
35.1
41.63
-19%
37
-5%
55
-57%
82
-134%
Load Maximum *
61.2
63.22
-3%
46
25%
93
-52%
118
-93%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 13min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 05min
MSI CX62 7QL
7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 41.4 Wh
Battery Runtime
-22%
13%
20%
-44%
Reader / Idle
613
438
-29%
816
33%
339
-45%
Load
125
106
-15%
95
-24%
71
-43%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
283
220
-22%
320
13%
430
52%
158
-44%

Pro

+ Temperaturas de operação frias e baixas temperaturas do núcleo
+ 2 baias de armazenamento c/ suporte para M.2 NVMe
+ Unidade ótica e USB Type-C Gen. 1
+ Teclado numérico e botões do mouse dedicados
+ Boas cores depois da calibração
+ Sem afogamento da CPU ou GPU
+ Silencioso sob uso leve
+ Touchpad responsivo
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção

Contra

- Painel TN pobre e de baixa resolução; contraste muito baixo
- O chassi se sente barato, oco, e flexível
- A manutenção feita pelo usuário final anulará a garantia
- Alto falantes pobres, quase sem baixos
- Ruído pulsante da ventoinha durante os jogos
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Grosso e pesado
- A tampa se flexiona facilmente
In review: MSI CX62 7QL
In review: MSI CX62 7QL

O desempenho do CX62 é insuficiente quando consideramos o tamanho robusto e o peso. A CPU ULV Kaby Lake e a GeForce 940MX de nível de entrada são uma má combinação para qualquer trabalho exigente, fora da multitarefas do navegador e do streaming multimídia. Os jogos são bastante limitados para configurações muito baixas a 768p, especialmente para títulos 3D modernos enquanto a ventoinha do sistema tem uma irritante tendência para pulsar quando está sob uso intenso. O chassi, embora seja visualmente igual ao respeitável GE62, se sente mais flexível e barato ao toque. Para finalizar, a tela TN está mal calibrada na condição de fábrica, com níveis de contraste fracos e uma iluminação escura.

As poucas qualidades redentoras do portátil são o seu slot NVMe M.2 e as baixas temperaturas de operação. Esta última deve acelerar a resposta do sistema imensamente sobre a nossa configuração com HD, embora uma atualização feita pelo usuário final, infelizmente, iria anular a garantia. Enquanto isso, as baixas temperaturas do núcleo não deveriam ser surpreendentes, dado que o chassi grosso vem da série G para jogos, onde as CPUs e GPUs de níveis de TDP muito mais altos são comuns. Isto permite que o CX62 mantenha velocidades Turbo Boost e rode com temperaturas mais frias que a maioria dos sistemas com processadores ULV similares.

O CX62 é essencialmente um portátil para jogos enfraquecido com hardware de um portátil multimídia econômico. Existem muito recortes e os usuários estarão melhor gastando um pouco mais em um verdadeiro Ultrabook com desempenho de CPU e opções de tela iguais ou melhores.

MSI CX62 7QL - 01/16/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
66 / 98 → 67%
Teclado
69%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
53 / 81 → 65%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
71%
Desempenho do jogos
65 / 85 → 77%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 92 → 85%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
79 / 95 → 83%
Audio
50%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
69%
76%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - Home > Análises > Análises > Breve análise do Portátil MSI CX62 7QL
Allen Ngo, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-02- 3)