Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Galaxy A9 2016

Especificações do Portátil

Samsung Galaxy A9 2016
Samsung Galaxy A9 2016 (Galaxy Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
unknown
Pantalha
6.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Brilhante: sim
peso
200 g

 

Price comparison

Pontuação Média: 82% - bom
Média de 3 pontos (das 4 análises)
preço: 80%, desempenho: 87%, características: - %, pantalha: 87% mobilidade: 92%, processamento: 87%, ergonomia: - %, emissões: - %

Análises para o Samsung Galaxy A9 2016

75% Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) Review
Origem: Phone Arena Inglês EN→PT Archive.org version
The Galaxy A9 is an enormous, yet elegant smartphone. Looking across the board, it has no glaring weaknesses – its performance actually reflecting its price point rather well. You're not getting the best of the best here, but rather a very nice smartphone that won't disappoint in any area – it's just very good, not great. I think it's a fair deal, considering you won't be paying top dollar.
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito longa, Data: 05/12/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 75%
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) review
Origem: GSM Arena Inglês EN→PT Archive.org version
Samsung has put a lot of work into the new Galaxy A series and it's clear it wants to recreate the flagship success of the S and Note phones, except in a more attractive price bracket. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) will be the face of the series - its size is an instant attention-grabber and its specs are better than the other A models. Sometimes the A9 has slightly better specs, other times the gap is significant. The clearest example is the chipset, it's essentially twice as fast as the S615 used in the A5 and A7 that we tested earlier. Here are our other impressions of the A9, summarized.
Análise única, Disponível online, Muito longa, Data: 02/19/2016
90% A premium mid-range smartphone that is a worthy flagship competitor
Origem: Android Authority Inglês EN→PT Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A9 can be found on Amazon priced at close to the $600 mark, which is quite steep, but given the flagship features this device provides, it does make sense. Available color options include silver, white, gold, and pink gold.
Análise única, Disponível online, Média, Data: 02/11/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 90% desempenho: 87% pantalha: 88% mobilidade: 96% processamento: 93%
81% Samsung Galaxy A9 2016 recensione
Origem: Andrea Galeazzi Italiano IT→PT Archive.org version
Análise única, Disponível online, Média, Data: 11/28/2016
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 81% preço: 80% pantalha: 85% mobilidade: 88% processamento: 80%

Comentario

unknown:

Muitos jogos são dificilmente executados com estes adaptadores gráficos ou se executam muito lentamente.


>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de de Placas de Vídeo e a Benchmark Lista.


652 MSM8976:
>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de Processadores Móveis.


 

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Portáteis de um fabricante diferente e com CPU diferente

Crosscall Stellar-M6
unknown, unknown
Vivo X200 Mini
unknown, unknown
Blackview BV5300 Plus
unknown, unknown
Crosscall Core-Z5
unknown, unknown
Blu C5 Max
unknown, unknown
Blu C5L Max
unknown, unknown
Vivo S15e
unknown, unknown
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
unknown, unknown
BQ RU BQ 5765L Clever
unknown, unknown
Blu G51S
unknown, unknown
Ulefone Note 6
unknown, unknown
realme Q3 Pro
unknown, unknown
realme X7
unknown, unknown
Vivo S6 5G
unknown, unknown
Nokia C2
unknown, unknown
Huawei Nova 7i
unknown, OMAP 4460
Ulefone Armor 7
unknown, unknown
Doogee S95 Pro
unknown, unknown
Wiko Y70
unknown, Spreadtrum SC7731
Honor 20s
unknown, unknown
Huawei Nova 6 SE
unknown, unknown
Vivo X30 Pro
unknown, unknown
Vivo Y7s
unknown, unknown
Huawei Nova 5
unknown, unknown
Vivo V17 Neo
unknown, unknown
Oppo Reno Z
unknown, unknown
BQ RU BQ 6040L Magic
unknown, unknown
Wiko View 3 Lite
unknown, unknown
Vivo S1 Pro
unknown, unknown
Comparação de preços
Stefan Hinum, 2016-04- 3 (Update: 2016-04- 3)