Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 5X

Name: Honor 5X
Brand: Honor

Metal direto. O marketing direto da Huawei da marca Honor é sempre bom para uma barganha. Nesta ocasião temos o Honor 5X com um corpo de metal e câmera de alta qualidade em nosso laboratório. Vamos ver se os detalhes do smartphone também são convincentes.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 5X (5 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 8 x 1.7 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 405

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.67 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de movimento, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz, bússola, leitor de digitais

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 151.3 x 76.3

Bateria

11 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, flash LED, vídeos @1080p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante situado na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, HonorClub, HiCare, administrador do telefone, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

158 g, Suprimento de energia: 51 g

Preço

229 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Honor 5X Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Samsung Galaxy J5 OnePlus X DIN A6 ❌

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


475 cd/m²	499 cd/m²	538 cd/m²
500 cd/m²	535 cd/m²	554 cd/m²
509 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	559 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 559 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 521.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.84 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 535 cd/m²
Contraste: 1244:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.26

	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-32%	20%	-4%	-8%
Brightness middle	535	312 -42%	467 -13%	418 -22%	349 -35%
Brightness	521	314 -40%	460 -12%	407 -22%	353 -32%
Brightness Distribution	85	91 7%	95 12%	95 12%	93 9%
Black Level *	0.43		0.3 30%	0.49 -14%
Contrast	1244		1557 25%	853 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.88	6.28 -29%	3.28 33%	3.92 20%	5.22 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.66
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	8.24 -58%	1.89 64%	3.81 27%	3.96 24%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.12 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	7766 ^84%	8145 ^80%	6734 ^97%	7361 ^88%	7308 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	698 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	464 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	526 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	3047 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	1403 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1561 Points -49%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	37152 Points
OnePlus X	52463 Points +41%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5.9 fps
OnePlus X	10 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3.8 fps -36%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	3.8 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3.7 fps -37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5.4 fps
OnePlus X	8.6 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1.8 fps -67%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	1.8 fps -67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1.7 fps -69%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X	14 fps
OnePlus X	23 fps +64%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	9.2 fps -34%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X	14 fps
OnePlus X	21 fps +50%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	5.2 fps -63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.3 fps -62%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 5X	129 Points
OnePlus X	710 Points +450%
Samsung Galaxy J5	53 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	52 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	49 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	103 Points
OnePlus X	643 Points +524%
Samsung Galaxy J5	42 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	41 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	39 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	1089 Points
OnePlus X	1117 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J5	734 Points -33%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	733 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	758 Points -30%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	9609 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	5227 Points -46%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5298 Points -45%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	10045 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	4692 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	4712 Points -53%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	8343 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	8697 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9385 Points +12%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5551 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	2631 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	2580 Points -54%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5056 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	2193 Points -57%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	2135 Points -58%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	8445 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	8732 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9544 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	7852 Points
OnePlus X	15051 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy J5	4345 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	4402 Points -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	7764 Points
OnePlus X	14541 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3782 Points -51%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3789 Points -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	8174 Points
OnePlus X	17156 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy J5	9079 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	10148 Points +24%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5X	297 Points
OnePlus X	1252 Points +322%
Samsung Galaxy J5	534 Points +80%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	646 Points +118%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	515 Points +73%
System (sort by value)
Honor 5X	1378 Points
OnePlus X	2225 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1058 Points -23%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	1077 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1166 Points -15%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 5X	787 Points
OnePlus X	662 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J5	399 Points -49%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	797 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	394 Points -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	763 Points
OnePlus X	1975 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy J5	314 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	316 Points -59%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	315 Points -59%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 5X	9 Points
OnePlus X	843 Points +9267%
Samsung Galaxy J5	615 Points +6733%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	643 Points +7044%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	484 Points +5278%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	3794 Points
OnePlus X	4450 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3966 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3701 Points -2%

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	144 MB/s
OnePlus X	235.5 MB/s +64%
Samsung Galaxy J5	145.5 MB/s +1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	131.4 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	78 MB/s
OnePlus X	49.31 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy J5	39.4 MB/s -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	22.33 MB/s -71%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	17 MB/s
OnePlus X	16.31 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5	19.25 MB/s +13%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	22.79 MB/s +34%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	10 MB/s
OnePlus X	14.22 MB/s +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5	7.2 MB/s -28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.11 MB/s -49%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 5X	12510 ms *
OnePlus X	7264 ms * +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5	14074 ms * -13%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	14680 ms * -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	11843 ms * +5%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	3595 Points
OnePlus X	4810 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3038 Points -15%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	3012 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3296 Points -8%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	21.92 Points
OnePlus X	28 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5	18.42 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	20.83 Points -5%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5X	65 Points
OnePlus X	85 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5	52 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	52 Points -20%

Legend

Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	21 fps
	very low	35 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	32 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.2 °C	38.4 °C	38.4 °C
41.6 °C	38.1 °C	35.8 °C
39.7 °C	37.3 °C	37.5 °C

Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C


35.6 °C	37.3 °C	37.5 °C
35.6 °C	37.1 °C	37 °C
35.3 °C	36.9 °C	36.3 °C

Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.13 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	0.87 / 2.08 / 2.22 Watt
Carga	5.26 / 6.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		17h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 24min

	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		24%	38%	27%	-58%
Reader / Idle	1053	968 -8%	1292 23%	1364 30%
H.264	602	514 -15%	657 9%	677 12%
WiFi v1.3	643	549 -15%	495 -23%	526 -18%	267 -58%
Load	144	339 135%	350 143%	264 83%

Pro

+ Carcaça de metal de alta qualidade

+ Boa razão preço-desempenho

+ Duração da bateria convincente no teste de WiFi

+ Temperatura moderada

+ Tela brilhante

+ Software bom e elegante

+ Boa configuração da câmera

+ Dual-SIM

+ Leitor de digitais com recursos adicionais

Contra

- Recepção média do GPS

- Qualidade pobre das chamadas

- Baixa qualidade do alto falante

- Consumo durante o uso intenso

- Curta duração da bateria sob uso intenso

In review: Honor 5X. Test model courtesy of Honor Germany.

A Huawei, de fato, compilou um bom pacote. Um aparelho de alto desempenho colocado dentro de uma carcaça elegante, e tudo isso por um ótimo preço. O software é elegante e prático, as câmeras tiram boas fotos e uma garantia de 24-meses também está inclusa.

O Honor 5X é uma barganha com algumas desvantagens que precisam ser aceitas: qualidade pobre das chamadas, alto falante médio, e recepção GPS instável. No entanto, a carcaça atraente e tela brilhante compensam por isso.

Outra fraqueza do Honor 5X é a duração da bateria sob uso intenso, o qual nos deixa um pouco indecisos. Por um lado, muitas coisas sobre o smartphone no chamaram a atenção; ele definitivamente possui suas vantagens para o seu preço baixo. Por outro lado, os compradores podem obter um desempenho ainda mais alto por um pequeno acréscimo ou em um modelo do ano passado, e eles, então não terão que lidar com as deficiências existentes (e evitáveis) do Honor 5X.

Os consumidores conscientes de preços deveriam dar uma olhada no Honor 5X porque muitos de seus recursos são únicos nesta faixa de preços (tamanho da tela, desempenho, qualidade da carcaça). Os compradores que possam gastar um pouco mais encontrarão alternativas bastante convincentes.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Honor 5X - 2016-03-07 03/07/2016 v5^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

83%

Teclado

70 / 75 → 93%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

42 / 60 → 70%

Peso

92%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

13 / 63 → 20%

Desempenho da aplicação

30 / 70 → 43%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

75%

Médio

70%

84%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Read about the changes in the new rating version 5

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 5X

Florian Wimmer, 2016-03-15 (Update: 2016-11-23)