Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga C630 WOS (Snapdragon)

Steve Schardein, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/14/2019

Truly Mobile. O conversível Lenovo Yoga C630 WOS de $940, equipado com a plataforma de computação móvel Qualcomm Snapdragon 850, promete excepcional duração da bateria, flexibilidade sempre conectada e sempre ativa e desempenho rápido, tudo em um design super leve e resfriado passivamente. Será que consegue cumprir suas promessas?

Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon) (Yoga C630 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 630, 23.18.9200.0
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4X 3733 MHz (soldada)
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Multitouch de 10 pontos, M133NWF4-R0, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Snapdragon 850 Mobile Compute Platform
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio/headset
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm Wi-Fi B/G/N/AC (2x2) (b/g/n/ac), LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13 x 307 x 216
Bateria
60 Wh, 7920 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 32 Bit
Características adicionais
Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.204 kg, Suprimento de energia: 284 g
Preço
940 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connections
Front: No connections
Rear: No connections
Rear: No connections
Left: Nano SIM slot, USB Type-C 3.0 Gen 1 (power delivery)
Left: Nano SIM slot, USB Type-C 3.0 Gen 1 (power delivery)
Right: Power button, combo audio jack, USB Type-C 3.0 Gen 1 (power delivery + DisplayPort)
Right: Power button, combo audio jack, USB Type-C 3.0 Gen 1 (power delivery + DisplayPort)
293.2
cd/m²
288.2
cd/m²
291.2
cd/m²
290.3
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
289.2
cd/m²
272.6
cd/m²
290.2
cd/m²
274.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 303 cd/m² Médio: 288.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 303 cd/m²
Contraste: 1782:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.93 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
Gamma: 1.855
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
M133NWF4-R0, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
AU Optronics B133HAN04.9, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
SHP1484, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
LGD05B4 (LP133WF4-SPB8), IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
LGD0588, IPS, 13.3, 3840x2160
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
11%
-29%
21%
-12%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4 (22, 20.4)
44 (22, 22)
-4%
62.4 (32.4, 30)
-47%
34 (16.4, 17.6)
20%
51.6 (25.6, 26)
-22%
38 (14, 24)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (17.6, 14.4)
24 (13, 11)
25%
45.6 (24.4, 21.2)
-43%
25.2 (13.6, 11.6)
21%
32.4 (16.4, 16)
-1%
23 (5, 18)
28%
PWM Frequency
990.1 (98)
1008 (20)
2%
Screen
6%
19%
-10%
16%
-17%
Brightness middle
303
329
9%
428
41%
301
-1%
329.8
9%
192
-37%
Brightness
288
306
6%
405
41%
295
2%
318
10%
204
-29%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
87
-3%
91
1%
74
-18%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.17
0.3
-76%
0.26
-53%
0.36
-112%
0.25
-47%
0.23
-35%
Contrast
1782
1097
-38%
1646
-8%
836
-53%
1319
-26%
835
-53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.93
4.07
41%
3.8
45%
6.02
13%
2.37
66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.61
7.05
39%
7.2
38%
11.36
2%
4.08
65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.8
2.76
69%
4.4
50%
2.9
67%
2.8
68%
3.99
55%
Gamma
1.855 119%
2.56 86%
2.21 100%
1.96 112%
2.145 103%
2.45 90%
CCT
6248 104%
6915 94%
7067 92%
6408 101%
6441 101%
6380 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
62.8
61.38
67
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
96.4
83.92
98
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.74
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 7%
-5% / 6%
6% / -4%
2% / 10%
1% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990.1 Hz ≤ 98 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 990.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 990.1 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9254 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
7-zip
7-zip
Jetstream
Jetstream
Octane
Octane
wPrime
wPrime
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.76 Points ∼72% +245%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.72 Points ∼70% +237%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.57 Points ∼64% +208%
Global Average -2
  (0.09 - 2.44, n=1985)
1.305 Points ∼53% +156%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.24 - 2.01, n=215)
1.11 Points ∼45% +118%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
0.51 Points ∼21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel Core i5-8250U
6.52 Points ∼24% +493%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
6.29 Points ∼23% +472%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.35 Points ∼20% +386%
Global Average -2
  (0.22 - 27.1, n=2815)
4.16 Points ∼15% +278%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.45 - 8.56, n=224)
2.77 Points ∼10% +152%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
1.1 Points ∼4%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
6418 Points ∼59% +450%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel Core i5-8250U
5528 Points ∼51% +374%
Global Average -2
  (8.85 - 10835, n=3102)
3402 Points ∼31% +192%
Average of class Convertible
  (466 - 7508, n=236)
3325 Points ∼31% +185%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
1166 Points ∼11%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
19873 Points ∼40% +770%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel Core i5-8250U
19802 Points ∼40% +767%
Global Average -2
  (19.7 - 49738, n=3077)
9548 Points ∼19% +318%
Average of class Convertible
  (706 - 24180, n=232)
7647 Points ∼15% +235%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
2284 Points ∼5%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
1456 s * ∼17%
Global Average -2
  (38.5 - 8460, n=1751)
911 s * ∼11% +37%
Average of class Convertible
  (245 - 3227, n=110)
816 s * ∼10% +44%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
435 s * ∼5% +70%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel Core i5-8250U
402.09 s * ∼5% +72%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Global Average -2
  (-1 - 210700, n=25722)
2389 Seconds * ∼11% -42%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
1678 Seconds * ∼7%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.046 - 64540, n=1352)
1588 Seconds * ∼7% +5%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel Core i5-8250U
782.59 Seconds * ∼3% +53%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
601 Seconds * ∼3% +64%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
13897 Points ∼38% +99%
Average of class Convertible
  (2296 - 15196, n=32)
8770 Points ∼24% +26%
Global Average -2
  (1635 - 36198, n=514)
7380 Points ∼20% +6%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
6980 Points ∼19%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
4700 Points ∼74% +110%
Average of class Convertible
  (880 - 4977, n=32)
3351 Points ∼53% +50%
Global Average -2
  (590 - 6339, n=515)
2290 Points ∼36% +3%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
2234 Points ∼35%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
257
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2284
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1166
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.51 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Productivity
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
6653 Points ∼69% +297%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5926 Points ∼61% +254%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
5664 Points ∼58% +238%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
5253 Points ∼54% +214%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7045, n=81)
5074 Points ∼52% +203%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630,
1674 Points ∼17%
Average , Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
1674 Points ∼17% 0%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
9289 Points ∼87% +206%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7988 Points ∼75% +163%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
7376 Points ∼69% +143%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
6855 Points ∼64% +126%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9291, n=81)
6722 Points ∼63% +122%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630,
3034 Points ∼28%
Average , Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
3034 Points ∼28% 0%
Score
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4081 Points ∼53% +199%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3764 Points ∼48% +176%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
3313 Points ∼43% +143%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3160 Points ∼41% +132%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4347, n=82)
3059 Points ∼39% +124%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630,
1363 Points ∼18%
Average , Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
1363 Points ∼18% 0%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4906 Points ∼75% +339%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4901 Points ∼75% +338%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4811 Points ∼74% +330%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
4149 Points ∼64% +271%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=211)
3654 Points ∼56% +227%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630,
1118 Points ∼17%
Average , Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
1118 Points ∼17% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3994 Points ∼66% +197%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3895 Points ∼64% +189%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3780 Points ∼62% +181%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
3306 Points ∼54% +145%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=257)
2748 Points ∼45% +104%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630,
1347 Points ∼22%
Average , Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
1347 Points ∼22% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1347 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1118 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
 
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
Write 4K
20.53
78.41
282%
128.22
525%
148.5
623%
129.5
531%
Read 4K
16.91
30.77
82%
48.09
184%
27.48
63%
37.8
124%
Write Seq
224
264.5
18%
1088.31
386%
395.5
77%
1008
350%
Read Seq
669.2
465.7
-30%
1876.58
180%
1967
194%
1582
136%
Write 4K Q32T1
38.34
262.8
585%
367.07
857%
345
800%
410
969%
Read 4K Q32T1
42.55
283.8
567%
411.88
868%
377.9
788%
493.4
1060%
Write Seq Q32T1
223.2
262.7
18%
1077.6
383%
425.5
91%
1029
361%
Read Seq Q32T1
890.2
558.5
-37%
2770.7
211%
2500
181%
2429
173%
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 890.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 223.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 42.55 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 38.34 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 669.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 224 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 16.91 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 20.53 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
2826 Points ∼7% +244%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1211 Points ∼3% +48%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1100 Points ∼3% +34%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1064 Points ∼3% +30%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=219)
974 Points ∼2% +19%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630,
821 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
821 Points ∼2% 0%
1280x720 Sky Diver Score
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
8645 Points ∼15% +251%
Average of class Convertible
  (417 - 16235, n=70)
3598 Points ∼6% +46%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630,
2463 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
2463 Points ∼4% 0%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
18346 Points ∼10% +189%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
9852 Points ∼5% +55%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
8112 Points ∼4% +28%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=270)
6456 Points ∼3% +2%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630,
6347 Points ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
6347 Points ∼3% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
117190 Points ∼50% +310%
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
82310 Points ∼35% +188%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
72880 Points ∼31% +155%
Average of class Convertible
  (11467 - 159588, n=85)
60954 Points ∼26% +113%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
  (28598 - 65330, n=25)
59831 Points ∼25% +109%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630,
28598 Points ∼12%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173C
16197 Points ∼7% -43%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
55131 Points ∼8% +98%
Average of class Convertible
  (1618 - 81315, n=66)
35528 Points ∼5% +28%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630,
27848 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
27848 Points ∼4% 0%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
79073 Points ∼7% +230%
Average of class Convertible
  (2450 - 81504, n=205)
35996 Points ∼3% +50%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630,
23980 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
23980 Points ∼2% 0%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
23980 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3108 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
770 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Average of class Convertible
  (2.7 - 60, n=131)
10.4 fps ∼100% +160%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630
4 fps ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
4 fps ∼38% 0%
1366x768 High Preset
Average of class Convertible
  (2.1 - 149, n=176)
24.9 fps ∼100% +92%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630
13 fps ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
13 fps ∼52% 0%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Average of class Convertible
  (5.2 - 168, n=192)
28.4 fps ∼100% +103%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630
14 fps ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
14 fps ∼49% 0%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Average of class Convertible
  (8.35 - 247, n=193)
48.6 fps ∼100% +143%
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Qualcomm Adreno 630
20 fps ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 630
 
20 fps ∼41% 0%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 2014134fps
Thief (2014) 6553fps
Carga Máxima
 28.4 °C36 °C31.6 °C 
 24 °C27.6 °C26.8 °C 
 22 °C21.8 °C23 °C 
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 26.8 °C
32.8 °C38.2 °C30 °C
28.2 °C30.6 °C26.8 °C
25.8 °C25.4 °C25.2 °C
Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  30 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (+6.1 °C / 11 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.235.335.2253534.9353131.232.631.24031.531.331.55030.631.230.66330.529.630.5802930.12910028.828.528.812530.628.330.616038.127.538.120039.626.639.625040.825.640.831541.825.741.840045.124.645.15004824.94863049.624.649.680051.123.951.110006123.661125070.523.670.5160074.723.374.7200071.623.371.6250062.123.462.1315057.123.257.1400045.823.145.8500044.223.144.263005723.257800062.42362.41000060.222.960.21250045.222.845.21600029.822.829.8SPL78.935.678.9N31.52.531.5median 48median 23.6median 48Delta10.20.910.234.230.529.729.430.228.43028.227.529.126.82824.925.723.832.12335.121.948.621.752.62157.419.558.119.158.718.262.718.26517.371.917.371.816.772.11672.615.672.715.968.616.168.916.465.916.571.616.973.717.172.617.167.217.163.71755.329.182.81.255.8median 17.1median 65.91.58.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.7% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (28% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.35 / 2.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 7.7 / 7.8 Watt
Carga midlight 13.8 / 19.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
-43%
-51%
-128%
-68%
20%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
2.2
50%
3.14
29%
8.5
-93%
5.9
-34%
3.8
14%
Idle Average *
7.7
5
35%
5.22
32%
11.8
-53%
9.8
-27%
6.2
19%
Idle Maximum *
7.8
8
-3%
6
23%
13.1
-68%
10.6
-36%
6.6
15%
Load Average *
13.8
33
-139%
38.5
-179%
51.1
-270%
36.6
-165%
11
20%
Load Maximum *
19.3
49.4
-156%
50.4
-161%
49
-154%
34.3
-78%
12.7
34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 51min
Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon)
Adreno 630, 60 Wh
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB-81CT
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 53.9 Wh
Battery Runtime
-24%
-9%
-21%
-40%
9%
Reader / Idle
1240
1417
901
WiFi v1.3
711
538
-24%
644
-9%
565
-21%
424
-40%
773
9%
Load
105
119
96
121

Pro

+ Atraente, altamente portátil, construção de metal
+ Operação silenciosa
+ Tempos de sleep/reinício quase instantâneos
+ Modo standby conectado
+ Sólidos dispositivos de entrada
+ Adaptador WWAN padrão
+ Caneta Lenovo Active (opcional)

Contra

- Compatibilidade ARM ainda em suas primeiras fases
- Desempenho x86 muito decepcionante
- Seleção extremamente limitada de portas
- Será dificilmente possível fazer qualquer upgrade/reparo
- Armazenamento UFS 2.1 não pode se comparar com os rápidos SSDs
In review: Lenovo Yoga C630 WOS Convertible. Test model provided by Lenovo
In review: Lenovo Yoga C630 WOS Convertible. Test model provided by Lenovo

O Yoga C630 da Lenovo é mais um passo em direção ao Windows em ARM (ou, neste caso, o Windows no Snapdragon - WOS) como uma opção prática, mas ele não vem sem uma série inevitável de advertências. A principal delas é a compatibilidade, que provavelmente será um problema, pelo menos ocasionalmente, durante a vida útil do sistema, com qualquer usuário diário. Paralelo a isso estão as discrepâncias de desempenho, que só podem ser descritas com precisão como dicotômicas: em aplicativos otimizados para ARM, o chip pode ser bastante rápido, mas todo o resto tende a se arrastar notavelmente mais devagar do que os da Intel. Problematicamente, o preço não reflete necessariamente os possíveis testes apresentados por esses inúmeros trabalhos em andamento: $ 900+ é muito para pedir por um computador que se sente, pelo menos em parte, não completamente pronto para as grandes ligas.

O Yoga C630 possui um conjunto exclusivo de vantagens em relação às máquinas tradicionais x86, como a implementação extra-eficiente do Standby conectado, o formato altamente portátil e o design sem ventilador. Mas a um preço tão alto, lutas duradouras por compatibilidade de aplicativos e discrepâncias substanciais de desempenho entre aplicativos ARM e x86 tornam difícil sua recomendação incondicional.

Também existem algumas outras falhas notáveis. A seleção de portas é notoriamente limitada e a manutenção/atualização é quase impossível (dada a natureza monolítica dos componentes internos). Por fim, uma pequena reclamação é o armazenamento, que, embora mais rápido que um disco rígido ou eMMC, não é realmente comparável à maioria dos SSDs modernos, graças ao atraso de 4K e desempenho de gravação em qualquer profundidade de fila.

No entanto, também há muitos pontos brilhantes, e alguns deles são importantes se você estiver disposto a lidar com os desafios listados acima. Eles são conduzidos pelos tempos quase instantâneos de suspensão/retomada possibilitados pelos recursos do modo de espera conectado (denominado "Sempre ligado, sempre conectado" pela Lenovo), bem como pela capacidade de atualizar e-mails e outros conteúdos enquanto estão no modo de espera. Este recurso apenas, certamente será totalmente atrativo os guerreiros da estrada e para os que dependem de seus portáteis imediatamente.

O próximo passo é o resfriamento passivo, que não apenas torna a máquina silenciosa, mas também reduz a probabilidade de uma falha mecânica (já que hoje em dia o ventilador é o único dispositivo mecânico alimentado restante em um portátil). A portabilidade, por sua vez, vê um grande impulso graças ao formato menor (possível, em parte, graças à pequena placa mãe e à falta de um ventilador) e ao menor peso. E, finalmente, os dispositivos de construção e de entrada são muito bons no geral. Apesar das preocupações de desempenho e compatibilidade, este portátil parece pronto para competir com os pesos pesados da dos Ultrabooks.

Em suma, os Ultrabooks convencionais equipados com processadores Intel têm absolutamente uma grande vantagem de desempenho ainda hoje (em janeiro de 2019). Mas, à medida que os aplicativos otimizados por ARM crescem em número, pode chegar um momento em um futuro não muito distante (no próximo domingo?), em que essas diferenças de desempenho podem começam a diminuir repentinamente. Se as vantagens exclusivas do dispositivo sempre ativo, sem ventoinha e ultrafino, superam as desvantagens de seu desempenho geral esquizofrênico inconsistente e incompatível, é uma decisão que terá que ser tomada individualmente pelo usuário.

Lenovo Yoga C630 (Snapdragon) - 01/03/2019 v6
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
23 / 80 → 29%
Peso
73 / 35-78 → 87%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
49 / 68 → 71%
Desempenho da aplicação
44 / 87 → 50%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
100%
Audio
40 / 91 → 44%
Camera
63 / 85 → 74%
Médio
70%
82%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga C630 WOS (Snapdragon)
Steve Schardein, 2019-01-14 (Update: 2019-01-18)