Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P55W v7
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 1920x1080, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG P507 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60 | Gigabyte P55W v6 LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 3% | 2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 64.5 2% | 65.6 3% | 64.5 2% | 63.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82 | 83.4 2% | 84.3 3% | 83.4 2% | 80.6 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 59.9 | 60.9 2% | 61.7 3% | 61 2% | 59 -2% |
| Response Times | -4% | -3% | 6% | -38% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 40 ? -8% | 36.8 ? 1% | 36 ? 3% | 56 ? -51% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 25 ? -0% | 26.4 ? -6% | 23 ? 8% | 31 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 3% | 16% | -1% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 287 | 321 12% | 302 5% | 288 0% | 280 -2% |
| Brightness | 289 | 296 2% | 303 5% | 292 1% | 294 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 87 0% | 87 0% | 82 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.169 42% | 0.3 -3% | 0.46 -59% |
| Contrast | 990 | 973 -2% | 1787 81% | 960 -3% | 609 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.92 | 4.42 10% | 4.61 6% | 5.1 -4% | 4.48 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11 | 9.78 11% | 9.98 9% | 9.44 14% | 10.16 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.66 | 3.34 9% | 3.32 9% | 4.43 -21% | 2.69 27% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.46 89% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6482 100% | 6213 105% | 6358 102% | 6687 97% | 6455 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 55 2% | 55.4 3% | 55 2% | 53 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 83 1% | 84.4 3% | 83 1% | 80 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
2% | 5% /
11% | 2% /
0% | -15% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4013 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5317 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256 | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG P507 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte P55W v6 Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 249% | 227% | -6% | |
| Read Seq | 466.2 | 462.5 -1% | 1696 264% | 1857 298% | 511 10% |
| Write Seq | 261.9 | 462.7 77% | 1584 505% | 1240 373% | 161.1 -38% |
| Read 512 | 252.5 | 335 33% | 1044 313% | 971 285% | 338 34% |
| Write 512 | 254.8 | 407.1 60% | 1562 513% | 1239 386% | 160.8 -37% |
| Read 4k | 25.4 | 25.61 1% | 50.8 100% | 54.1 113% | 26.2 3% |
| Write 4k | 55 | 86.3 57% | 139.2 153% | 167.4 204% | 76.7 39% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 358.5 | 246.7 -31% | 591 65% | 695 94% | 264.7 -26% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 240.1 | 301.5 26% | 422.8 76% | 386.8 61% | 160.3 -33% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11778 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21839 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9669 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 70.4 | 38.4 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 72.6 | 61.8 | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 77.6 | 73.6 | ||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 80.2 | 60.2 | 46.5 | |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 98.5 | 83 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 35 dB |
| HDD |
| 34 dB |
| DVD |
| 37 / dB |
| Carga |
| 39 / 50 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.2 °C / -29.2 F).
Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG P507 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8 / 13 / 18 Watt |
| Carga |
76 / 143 Watt |
   
| |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -35% | -97% | -21% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 16 -100% | 25.4 -218% | 11 -38% | 8 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 19 -46% | 30.3 -133% | 16 -23% | 13 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 18 | 23 -28% | 31.5 -75% | 21 -17% | 17 6% |
| Load Average * | 76 | 68 11% | 111.8 -47% | 80 -5% | 71 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 143 | 157 -10% | 163.2 -14% | 174 -22% | 165 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -36% | -73% | -14% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 789 | 315 -60% | 137 -83% | 409 -48% | 610 -23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 346 | 220 -36% | 101 -71% | 274 -21% | 352 2% |
| Load | 98 | 87 -11% | 35 -64% | 123 26% | 95 -3% |
| H.264 | 235 | 338 |
Pro
Contra
A Gigabyte mais uma vez fez recortes nos lugares corretos e coloca um bom portátil de jogos na corrida, com o P55W v7. Omitir recursos, como Thunderbolt 3 e G-Sync, torna possível para os compradores, economizar algumas centenas de Euros - e isto sem compromissos no desempenho.
Apenas pelo preço relativamente baixo, nós particularmente gostamos dos dispositivos de entrada e, com algumas restrições, o painel IPS. isto também se aplica à sólida carcaça de plástico com sua placa inferior fácil de remover. O posicionamento das interfaces, os tempos de resposta relativamente lentos da tela, e o SSD não muito convincente, não são tão favoráveis. Os ruídos de alta frequência durante o uso intenso são a única desvantagem do Gigabyte P55W v7. No entanto, este fenômeno poderia ser um caso isolado. Por isso, ele consegue facilmente uma recomendação de compra, mas com uma clausula de verificação do som.
Gigabyte P55W v7
-
02/28/2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn