Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P55W v7

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/06/2017

Quintessential v7. A nova máquina para jogos da Gigabyte está destinada para jogadores que desejam a maior quantidade poder possível por Euro e estiverem dispostos a fazer compromissos na configuração, para isso. Comparado com o predecessor, o P55W v7 pode se gabar principalmente com o desempenho geral um pouco melhor, e um sistema de resfriamento um pouco mais silencioso.

Gigabyte P55W v7 (P55 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.49, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4, 2400 MHz, single-channel, 1 de 2 bancos de memória ocupado, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Liteonit CV3-8D256, 256 GB 
, SATA-3-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 (optional PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5 inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: fones (saída de áudio) + microfone (entrada de áudio), ambos concetores de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Unidade ótica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 34 x 380 x 269
Bateria
63 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, 2 x 2 watts, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 watts, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office 365 teste, diversas ferramentas do fabricante, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.628 kg, Suprimento de energia: 646 g
Preço
1700 EUR

 

Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7
Gigabyte P55W v7

Size Comparison

Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0
Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0
Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power
Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼98%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
660 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s ∼97% +5%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
470 MBit/s ∼93%
270
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 309 cd/m² Médio: 288.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | - Ø
82% sRGB (Argyll) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.32
Gigabyte P55W v7
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG P507
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte P55W v6
LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-4%
-3%
6%
-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (15, 22)
40 (15, 25)
-8%
36.8 (16.4, 20.4)
1%
36 (12, 24)
3%
56 (23, 33)
-51%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (5, 20)
25 (5, 20)
-0%
26.4 (5.2, 21.2)
-6%
23 (5, 18)
8%
31 (8, 23)
-24%
PWM Frequency
Screen
1%
19%
-3%
-9%
Brightness
289
296
2%
303
5%
292
1%
294
2%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
87
0%
87
0%
82
-6%
Black Level *
0.29
0.33
-14%
0.169
42%
0.3
-3%
0.46
-59%
Contrast
990
973
-2%
1787
81%
960
-3%
609
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.92
4.42
10%
4.61
6%
5.1
-4%
4.48
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.66
3.34
9%
3.32
9%
4.43
-21%
2.69
27%
Gamma
2.32 103%
2.4 100%
2.24 107%
2.46 98%
2.37 101%
CCT
6482 100%
6213 105%
6358 102%
6687 97%
6455 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
55
2%
55.4
3%
55
2%
53
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
83
1%
84.4
3%
83
1%
80
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / 0%
8% / 14%
2% / -2%
-24% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8563 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
138 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
658 Points ∼90% -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
156 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
733 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
5317 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
5109 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5046 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4784 Points ∼90% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4741 Points ∼100% +18%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4059 Points ∼86% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4014 Points ∼85% 0%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
4013 Points ∼85%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4013 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5317 pontos
Ajuda
Gigabyte P55W v7
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Schenker XMG P507
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte P55W v6
Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
28%
249%
227%
-6%
Write 4k QD32
240.1
301.5
26%
422.8
76%
386.8
61%
160.3
-33%
Read 4k QD32
358.5
246.7
-31%
590.6
65%
694.7
94%
264.7
-26%
Write 4k
54.98
86.25
57%
139.2
153%
167.4
204%
76.7
40%
Read 4k
25.4
25.61
1%
50.84
100%
54.08
113%
26.2
3%
Write 512
254.8
407.1
60%
1562
513%
1239
386%
160.8
-37%
Read 512
252.5
335
33%
1044
313%
971
285%
338
34%
Write Seq
261.9
462.7
77%
1584
505%
1240
373%
161.1
-38%
Read Seq
466.2
462.5
-1%
1696
264%
1857
298%
511
10%
Liteonit CV3-8D256
Sequential Read: 466.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 261.9 MB/s
512K Read: 252.5 MB/s
512K Write: 254.8 MB/s
4K Read: 25.4 MB/s
4K Write: 54.98 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 358.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 240.1 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11872 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11622 Points ∼98% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11426 Points ∼96%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11422 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11045 Points ∼93% -3%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15466 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15387 Points ∼99% +5%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14792 Points ∼96% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14693 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14222 Points ∼92% -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
11778 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21839 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9669 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 70.438.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 72.661.8fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 77.673.6fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 80.260.246.5fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 98.583fps

Barulho

Ocioso
33 / 34 / 35 dB
HDD
34 dB
DVD
37 / dB
Carga
39 / 50 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 49.6 °C43.6 °C31.1 °C 
 49 °C45.4 °C31.8 °C 
 45.1 °C44.3 °C28.3 °C 
Máximo: 49.6 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C
26.3 °C38.7 °C47.7 °C
29.7 °C44.7 °C47.1 °C
28.5 °C44.5 °C46.3 °C
Máximo: 47.7 °C
Médio: 39.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.548.72535.843.33131.330.44036.537.65033.133.46334.729.88034.234.3100323212526.432.116022.739.820021.852.525022.857.731520.558.640019.958.250019.261.463019.163.580018.558.2100018.665.212501872.4160017.769.6200017.567.3250017.662.9315017.861.540001860.5500018.265.6630018.468.7800018.472.71000018.761.41250018.963.71600019.355.2SPL30.679.2N1.544.6median 18.7Gigabyte P55W v7median 61.4Delta1.84.738.135.744.241.14038.832.337.229.334.231.429.93134.524.335.423.525.626.634.822.343.522.851.721.260.720.36119.260.618.764.818.464.618.667.519.465.818.662.718.863.518.864.718.764.618.863.418.966.918.965.918.953.71949.718.849.318.745.431.276.31.538.8median 18.9Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039Tmedian 611.38.640.442.437.538.237.935.934.834.934.334.632.83331.434.330.235.530.440.628.349.128.35328.358.327.2612763.426.665.32663.625.65625.46325.765.625.162.424.153.124.156.523.762.923.964.923.767.123.664.823.371.723.368.723.462.623.458.336.876.92.840.9median 25.4MSI GE62VR 6RF-001USmedian 62.62.35.837.230.229.929.329.2293328.729.228.126.826.825.928.624.928.324.329.622.437.722.447.120.347.820.750.719.261.718.666.318.965.418.461.618.760.417.863.51862.417.862.818.164.818.164.91858.417.857.71862.518.161.718.160.918.158.8185730.474.71.435.4median 18.1Schenker XMG P507median 60.916.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG P507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 8 / 13 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 76 / 143 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P55W v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P55W v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-35%
-97%
-21%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
8
16
-100%
25.4
-218%
11
-38%
8
-0%
Idle Average *
13
19
-46%
30.3
-133%
16
-23%
13
-0%
Idle Maximum *
18
23
-28%
31.5
-75%
21
-17%
17
6%
Load Average *
76
68
11%
111.8
-47%
80
-5%
71
7%
Load Maximum *
143
157
-10%
163.2
-14%
174
-22%
165
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 9min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
5h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 38min
Gigabyte P55W v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 63 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 51 Wh
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 60 Wh
Gigabyte P55W v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 63 Wh
Battery Runtime
-36%
-73%
-14%
-8%
Reader / Idle
789
315
-60%
137
-83%
409
-48%
610
-23%
WiFi v1.3
346
220
-36%
101
-71%
274
-21%
352
2%
Load
98
87
-11%
35
-64%
123
26%
95
-3%
H.264
235
338

Pro

+ Impecavelmente construído, carcaça aparentemente sólida
+ Duração da bateria relativamente curta
+ Muito (jogo) pelo seu dinheiro
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ USB 3.1 Gen.2 Type-C
+ Painel IPS
+ Sem PWM

Contra

- Assobio ocasional da ventoinha a velocidades altas
- Carcaça plástica com superfícies sensíveis
- Posicionamento desfavorável de interfaces
- SSD comparativamente lento
- Tempos de resposta não ideais
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
Gigabyte P55W v7. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany
Gigabyte P55W v7. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany

A Gigabyte mais uma vez fez recortes nos lugares corretos e coloca um bom portátil de jogos na corrida, com o P55W v7. Omitir recursos, como Thunderbolt 3 e G-Sync, torna possível para os compradores, economizar algumas centenas de Euros - e isto sem compromissos no desempenho.

Apenas pelo preço relativamente baixo, nós particularmente gostamos dos dispositivos de entrada e, com algumas restrições, o painel IPS. isto também se aplica à sólida carcaça de plástico com sua placa inferior fácil de remover. O posicionamento das  interfaces, os tempos de resposta relativamente lentos da tela, e o SSD não muito convincente, não são tão favoráveis. Os ruídos de alta frequência durante o uso intenso são a única desvantagem do Gigabyte P55W v7. No entanto, este fenômeno poderia ser um caso isolado. Por isso, ele consegue facilmente uma recomendação de compra, mas com uma clausula de verificação do som.

Gigabyte P55W v7 - 02/28/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
59 / 66 → 87%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
68%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Médio
78%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P55W v7
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-03- 6 (Update: 2017-03- 7)