Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD)

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/22/2019

O retorno. Vaio está de volta! Depois de alguns anos em que o antigo PC empresarial da Sony operava quase exclusivamente no mercado japonês, a conhecida marca de PCs retorna aos mercados ocidentais. O novo Vaio SX14 tenta impressionar os usuários corporativos e de escritório com seu design leve, quase sem marcos e sua excelente seleção de portas.

VAIO SX14
Processador
Intel Core i5-8265U
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3-2133, soldado
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, HV140FHM-N61, IPS LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD, Touch-FP-Leser Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, Telit LM940, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.9 x 320.4 x 222.7
Bateria
38 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.92 megapixel
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Vaio Control Center, Vaio Clipping Tool, Microsoft Office Trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.008 kg, Suprimento de energia: 286 g
Preço
2000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size & weight comparison

323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg320.4 mm 222.7 mm 17.9 mm 1 kg321 mm 216 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg309 mm 212.5 mm 15.5 mm 920 g305 mm 208 mm 16.5 mm 1.3 kg
right: SD card-reader, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type C, HDMI, RJ45, VGA
right: SD card-reader, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type C, HDMI, RJ45, VGA
left: charging port, Kensington lock slot, 2x USB 3.0 type A, combo audio
left: charging port, Kensington lock slot, 2x USB 3.0 type A, combo audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
578 MBit/s ∼91% +5%
VAIO SX14
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
550 (min: 434, max: 580) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 950, n=113)
532 MBit/s ∼84% -3%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
525 MBit/s ∼83% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
667 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
VAIO SX14
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
610 (min: 575, max: 631) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 949, n=113)
523 MBit/s ∼78% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
511 MBit/s ∼77% -16%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
463 MBit/s ∼69% -24%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø549 (434-580)
VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (575-631)
250
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
HV140FHM-N61
5.6
Máximo: 285 cd/m² Médio: 261.9 cd/m² Minimum: 281 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
Contraste: 1108:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
VAIO SX14
HV140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7390
LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
AU Optronics AUO353D / B140HAN03.5, , 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Sharp LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
17%
13%
-2%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (22, 21)
40 (18, 22)
7%
36.8 (18, 18.8)
14%
48.8 (18, 30.8)
-13%
43 (21, 22)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (19, 15)
25 (14, 11)
26%
30.4 (18.8, 11.6)
11%
30.8 (8, 22.8)
9%
29 (16, 13)
15%
PWM Frequency
2000 (90)
217 (20)
-89%
Screen
25%
10%
-15%
14%
Brightness middle
277
298
8%
303.8
10%
319
15%
344
24%
Brightness
262
287
10%
289
10%
294
12%
320
22%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
86
0%
87
1%
77
-10%
Black Level *
0.25
0.2
20%
0.31
-24%
0.26
-4%
0.31
-24%
Contrast
1108
1490
34%
980
-12%
1227
11%
1110
0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.05
2.19
57%
2.9
43%
7.1
-41%
2.72
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.63
4.39
49%
5.79
33%
13.7
-59%
5.92
31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.25
1.97
68%
3.7
41%
9.61
-54%
2.74
56%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.43 91%
2.118 104%
2.33 94%
2.38 92%
CCT
7227 90%
6571 99%
6323 103%
6021 108%
6794 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
62
0%
63
2%
54.01
-13%
61
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
95
0%
95
0%
83.02
-13%
94
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.67
1.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)
21% / 24%
12% / 11%
-9% / -12%
-6% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9471 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
VAIO SX14 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø577 (571-626)
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø504 (501.01-528.9)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U; undervolted: Ø657 (651.36-692.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø606 (601.59-638.02)
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø611 (578.18-626.37)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
176 Points ∼100% +8%
VAIO SX14
Intel Core i5-8265U
163 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (111 - 163, n=22)
154 Points ∼88% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼85% -8%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼82% -12%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼72% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 184, n=264)
115 Points ∼65% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
VAIO SX14
Intel Core i5-8265U
640 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
619 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (483 - 750, n=24)
603 Points ∼94% -6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
529 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 721, n=274)
333 Points ∼52% -48%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼50% -50%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
52.45 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
640 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
163 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3126 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3068 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3062 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2620 - 3210, n=18)
2977 Points ∼95% -5%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2711 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (534 - 3704, n=80)
2417 Points ∼77% -23%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7142 Points ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6727 Points ∼94% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5836 - 6556, n=18)
6220 Points ∼87% 0%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6215 Points ∼87%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
6079 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=80)
5197 Points ∼73% -16%
Essentials
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8253 Points ∼100% +4%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7949 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7278 - 8689, n=18)
7903 Points ∼96% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7849 Points ∼95% -1%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
7149 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 8549, n=80)
6728 Points ∼82% -15%
Score
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4053 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3905 Points ∼96% +2%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3846 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3573 - 3985, n=18)
3775 Points ∼93% -2%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3514 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4344, n=83)
3111 Points ∼77% -19%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5197 Points ∼100% +6%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4919 Points ∼95%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4747 Points ∼91% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4302 - 4927, n=16)
4743 Points ∼91% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4664 Points ∼90% -5%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4630 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=205)
4032 Points ∼78% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3886 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3752 Points ∼97% +7%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
3714 Points ∼96% +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3676 Points ∼95% +5%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 4244, n=17)
3517 Points ∼91% +1%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3496 Points ∼90%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4182, n=233)
3028 Points ∼78% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3496 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4919 pontos
Ajuda
VAIO SX14
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7390
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
14%
8%
-52%
-0%
Write 4K
101.8
131.86
30%
139.4
37%
80.49
-21%
108 (50.2 - 137, n=18)
6%
Read 4K
37.63
44.6
19%
43.18
15%
26.14
-31%
41.5 (35.3 - 63.7, n=18)
10%
Write Seq
1384
1824.25
32%
1075
-22%
396.8
-71%
1390 (991 - 1687, n=17)
0%
Read Seq
2061
2162.98
5%
1639
-20%
473.1
-77%
1570 (755 - 2089, n=17)
-24%
Write 4K Q32T1
489.3
338.15
-31%
662
35%
264.2
-46%
353 (205 - 568, n=18)
-28%
Read 4K Q32T1
281.2
351.85
25%
413.9
47%
244
-13%
380 (229 - 645, n=18)
35%
Write Seq Q32T1
1515
1972.1
30%
1195
-21%
464.6
-69%
1513 (1380 - 1712, n=18)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3324
3387.2
2%
3116
-6%
525.2
-84%
3286 (1529 - 3516, n=18)
-1%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Sequential Read: 2410 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1392 MB/s
512K Read: 1624 MB/s
512K Write: 1429 MB/s
4K Read: 59.67 MB/s
4K Write: 132.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 421.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 672.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1901 Points ∼100% +1%
VAIO SX14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1880 Points ∼99%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=154)
1706 Points ∼90% -9%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1697 Points ∼89% -10%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1657 Points ∼87% -12%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1557 Points ∼82% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 4905, n=353)
1260 Points ∼66% -33%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
VAIO SX14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1294 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1283 Points ∼99% -1%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1169 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=123)
1117 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=233)
1036 Points ∼80% -20%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
977 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
975 Points ∼75% -25%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
VAIO SX14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10724 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
10123 Points ∼94% -6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9291 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=141)
9107 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8433 Points ∼79% -21%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
8247 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 22615, n=261)
7544 Points ∼70% -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
2114 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9208 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1176 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 78.739.733.510.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 17.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 24.514.9fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.5 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB
Carga
43.3 / 43.9 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.340.532.632.433.32532.238.131.530.432.23134.539.135.53034.54034.632.834.131.134.65030.830.630.329.530.86328.629.829.62928.68028.12727.426.828.110026.127.125.126.726.112525.227.525.924.825.216024.824.724.524.224.82002424.823.723.92425022.723.622.622.522.731523.423.622.121.723.440024.725.321.320.924.750025.225.921.519.825.263029.729.421.719.629.780029.530.520.818.629.5100030.531.12118.530.5125030.330.720.617.930.3160032.432.921.417.732.4200032.232.820.917.532.2250033.233.819.717.533.2315031.63219.217.731.6400034.635.119.417.834.6500034.235.218.717.934.2630027.228.118.71827.2800022.82318.718.322.81000021.620.418.818.221.61250019.219.118.818.219.21600018.918.918.918.318.9SPL43.343.932.330.543.3N3.94.11.61.33.9median 26.1median 27.5median 20.9median 18.3median 26.1Delta3.641.62.13.633.333.232.233.733.33636.935.334.1363937.737.935.73937.132.134.930.537.132.734.134.537.632.731.327.929.328.731.329.926.926.826.229.926.626.3262626.628.425.726.326.728.42523.924.524.8252323.523.723.62322.722.82323.222.722.521.721.522.622.522.122.722.122.722.121.120.620.32021.120.720.719.419.320.720.520.418.818.720.520.819.918.318.120.820.52018.31820.522.521.51817.922.522.821.918.11822.823.1221817.923.122.822.118.218.222.822.12118.418.522.121.12018.718.621.120.219.718.818.720.219.719.61918.919.719.519.419.11919.519.319.419.219.119.319.519.519.519.419.533.833313133.81.81.71.41.41.8median 22.1median 21median 19.1median 19median 22.11.21.11.71.91.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseVAIO SX14Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Carga Máxima
 35.9 °C35.4 °C31.6 °C 
 35.4 °C38.7 °C31.7 °C 
 27.6 °C27.9 °C28.1 °C 
Máximo: 38.7 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
32 °C37 °C41 °C
29.7 °C42 °C29.1 °C
27.6 °C28.4 °C24.7 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  50.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.434.82531.830.431.83136.53036.54033.131.133.15031.429.531.46329.82929.88027.426.827.410027.426.727.412525.724.825.716025.524.225.520024.723.924.725026.922.526.931533.821.733.840040.720.940.750050.419.850.463056.519.656.580064.718.664.7100067.918.567.912506617.966160065.117.765.1200064.117.564.1250065.717.565.7315063.817.763.8400065.417.865.4500061.717.961.7630058.61858.6800062.718.362.71000062.618.262.61250059.318.259.31600051.618.351.6SPL7630.576N32.61.332.6median 59.3median 18.3median 59.3Delta12.72.112.734.83330.328.135.438.130.332.226.631.825.827.624.725.123.926.524.833.424.141.923.94821.85120.155.318.261.117.366.61770.316.578.416.57515.868.915.770.615.467.615.569.21672.916.268.616.7701771.217.272.217.470.917.365.817.256.228.983.61.258.7median 17.2median 68.61.88.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVAIO SX14Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
VAIO SX14 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.28 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 7.9 / 8 Watt
Carga midlight 38 / 44.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
VAIO SX14
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Dell Latitude 7390
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-18%
11%
20%
29%
4%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.8
14%
3.3
25%
3.1
30%
2.4
45%
3.9 (1 - 12.4, n=162)
11%
6.69 (1 - 36, n=589)
-52%
Idle Average *
7.9
8.9
-13%
5.9
25%
6.1
23%
5.5
30%
7.14 (4.3 - 15.5, n=162)
10%
9.9 (2.06 - 39, n=589)
-25%
Idle Maximum *
8
11.9
-49%
6.2
22%
6.8
15%
6
25%
9 (5.2 - 16.6, n=162)
-13%
12.2 (3.9 - 55, n=589)
-53%
Load Average *
38
47.5
-25%
43.2
-14%
27.4
28%
31
18%
35.4 (12.9 - 51.6, n=162)
7%
33.5 (6.3 - 75, n=579)
12%
Load Maximum *
44.9
52.5
-17%
45.2
-1%
43.7
3%
32.6
27%
43.7 (22 - 79, n=162)
3%
40.6 (7.6 - 111, n=582)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
5h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 36min
VAIO SX14
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Dell Latitude 7390
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
57%
96%
59%
45%
21%
Reader / Idle
605
1328
120%
1137
88%
1167
93%
616 (87 - 2557, n=547)
2%
H.264
390
566
45%
433
11%
463 (182 - 950, n=110)
19%
WiFi v1.3
339
519
53%
664
96%
531
57%
506
49%
466 (206 - 805, n=206)
37%
Load
96
106
10%
126
31%
123
28%
121 (40 - 347, n=554)
26%

Pro

+ Chassi leve e estável
+ Teclado confortável
+ Tela com boa cobertura de gama de cores
+ Seleção de portas ampla (VGA, RJ45, Leitor de cartões SD)
+ Padrão LTE em cada modelo na Alemanha
+ Bom desempenho da CPU
+ O chassi não esquenta sob uso intenso

Contra

- Duração ruim da bateria
- Controle da ventoinha irritante
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Touchpad muito pequeno
- Alto-falantes ruins
- Sem teclado ISO
- Preço alto
in review: The Vaio SX14
in review: The Vaio SX14

O Vaio SX14 deve ser o grande retorno do Vaio ao mercado de PC ocidental. Este retorno é uma história de sucesso? Em alguns aspectos sim, mas infelizmente o Vaio cometeu dois grandes erros. 

Vamos nos concentrar nos aspectos positivos do sucessor do Sony Vaio moderno primeiro. Nós gostamos muito do chassi extremamente leve, que também tem um certo nível de estabilidade, apesar de sua leveza. Também gostamos do teclado confortável. A tela mate não é muito brilhante, mas possui uma cobertura suficientemente alta da gama de cores sRGB para permitir a edição de fotos. A seleção de portas é abundante. A porta VGA em particular é algo que você não vai encontrar na maioria dos outros portáteis atualmente. Também é louvável que todos os modelos (pelo menos aqui na Alemanha) apresentem LTE - que não é o caso de todos os concorrentes. Por último, mas não menos importante, o Vaio SX14 oferece um bom desempenho da CPU e mantém-se frio no exterior, mesmo sob uso intenso.

Um portátil ultra leve com internet móvel e muitas portas - isso soa como uma excelente máquina de trabalho móvel, mas de que adianta a grande conectividade em movimento se o dispositivo tiver uma bateria com pouca duração? Infelizmente, a bateria interna é muito pequena e nem consegue manter o Vaio SX14 funcionando por 5 horas no teste de WiFi. Parece que Vaio colocou muita ênfase no baixo peso, propositalmente colocando uma bateria menor para economizar peso. Isso significa que o Vaio não é utilizável por muito tempo em movimento sem um banco de energia. A segunda grande desvantagem é o controle do ventilador: Achamos extremamente irritante que o ventilador sempre funcione, não importa se o dispositivo está ocioso ou sob uso intenso. Isto é simplesmente desnecessário. Com esses problemas em mente, os problemas remanescentes do Vaio SX14, como a falta da porta Thunderbolt 3, o touchpad pequeno, os alto-falantes ruins, a opção de teclado ISO ausente e o alto preço parecem pequenos.

A duração da bateria ruim e um ventilador irritante resultam em um xeque-mate contra o Vaio SX14 - apesar de suas qualidades inegáveis.

Gostaríamos de recomendar o Vaio SX14. O design compacto e leve é muito atraente. Infelizmente, nós simplesmente não podemos fazê-lo, devido à duração ruim da bateria e controle irritante do ventilador. Uma pena, porque esse dispositivo tem muito potencial. O Vaio só precisa revisar o controle do ventilador e colocar uma bateria maior na próxima versão - mesmo que isso resulte em um peso ligeiramente maior.

VAIO SX14 - 04/30/2019 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
88 /  98 → 90%
Teclado
84%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
72 / 80 → 90%
Peso
75 / 35-78 → 93%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
77%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
93 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
81%
Audio
41 / 91 → 45%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Médio
75%
85%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD)
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-25)