Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Microsoft Surface Go (Pentium, 64GB eMMC)

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

Affordable Surface! O Microsoft Surface Go é um tablet muito mais acessível do que qualquer outro dispositivo Surface anterior. No entanto, isso tem um preço: desempenho significativamente reduzido.

Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Análises do: 300 - 850 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 23.20.16.4974
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
10 polegadas 3:2, 1800 x 1200 pixel 216 PPI, Multitouch 10-pontos, Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 42.8 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: microSDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: ambient light sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, Surface Connect
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4 (a/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 245 x 175
Bateria
28 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix Skype HD video
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix autofocus camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: Opcional: Surface Go signature type cover, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
523 g, Suprimento de energia: 152 g
Preço
449 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
Microsoft Surface Go
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.8 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=99)
58.5 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
57 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
24.5 MB/s ∼36% -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Convertible
  (24 - 246, n=97)
74.8 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
36.3 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
 
36.1 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
581 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
560 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Convertible
  (38.3 - 678, n=105)
474 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
336 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
312 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
308 MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
289 MBit/s ∼50% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
573 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Average of class Convertible
  (39.2 - 685, n=105)
485 MBit/s ∼85% +2%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
476 MBit/s ∼83%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
334 MBit/s ∼58% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
272 MBit/s ∼47% -43%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
264 MBit/s ∼46% -45%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
235 MBit/s ∼41% -51%
Signature Type Covers keyboard
Signature Type Covers keyboard
Signature Type Covers keyboard (backlit)
Signature Type Covers keyboard (backlit)
Signature Type Covers touchpad
Signature Type Covers touchpad
437
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 456 cd/m² Médio: 426 cd/m² Minimum: 8.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 446 cd/m²
Contraste: 1471:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
AU Optronics AUO20D4, IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Trekstor Primetab T13B
LC133LF4L01, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
YF102, MS_9003, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
XR122EA2T, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
BOE CQ NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-15%
1%
599%
626%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (22, 22)
29 (16, 13)
34%
38 (19, 19)
14%
32 (14, 18)
27%
37 (18, 19)
16%
42 (22, 20)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 (11.6, 14)
28 (15, 13)
-9%
29 (19, 10)
-13%
24 (13, 11)
6%
25 (14, 12)
2%
34 (20, 14)
-33%
PWM Frequency
1020 (99)
294 (80)
-71%
19000 (90)
1763%
20000 (90)
1861%
960 (90)
-6%
Screen
-61%
-155%
-106%
-49%
-94%
Brightness middle
456
530
16%
324
-29%
251
-45%
364
-20%
253
-45%
Brightness
426
491
15%
333
-22%
244
-43%
341
-20%
239
-44%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
87
-1%
79
-10%
85
-3%
76
-14%
Black Level *
0.31
0.46
-48%
0.39
-26%
0.33
-6%
0.47
-52%
0.21
32%
Contrast
1471
1152
-22%
831
-44%
761
-48%
774
-47%
1205
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
4.33
-233%
8.42
-548%
5.34
-311%
3.4
-162%
4.29
-230%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3
7.32
-144%
15.11
-404%
9.91
-230%
7.61
-154%
8.74
-191%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
1.85
-68%
5.93
-439%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
3.51
-151%
9.18
-556%
6.04
-331%
1.7
-21%
1.49
-6%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.36 93%
2.34 94%
3.23 68%
2.36 93%
2.29 96%
CCT
6687 97%
7007 93%
8841 74%
7491 87%
6750 96%
6611 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.3
50
-20%
62
0%
51
-18%
59
-5%
38
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.8
77
-20%
95
-2%
81
-16%
91
-6%
59
-39%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-38% / -50%
-77% / -131%
247% / 57%
289% / 107%
-53% / -76%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: grayscale (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: grayscale (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: saturation (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: saturation (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: saturation (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1020 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1020 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1020 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8741 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Utility
Intel Extreme Utility (Benchmark)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 177, n=259)
100 Points ∼100% +54%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
65 Points ∼65% 0%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Intel Pentium N4200
52 Points ∼52% -20%
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Intel Pentium N4200
51 Points ∼51% -22%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
Intel Pentium N4200
51 Points ∼51% -22%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
31 Points ∼31% -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
28 Points ∼28% -57%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 761, n=266)
270 Points ∼100% +65%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼61%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
164 Points ∼61% 0%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Intel Pentium N4200
161 Points ∼60% -2%
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Intel Pentium N4200
159 Points ∼59% -3%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
Intel Pentium N4200
129 Points ∼48% -21%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
100 Points ∼37% -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
92 Points ∼34% -44%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (0.24 - 2.01, n=207)
1.093 Points ∼100% +46%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
0.75 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
0.75 Points ∼69% 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (0.45 - 8.56, n=216)
2.71 Points ∼100% +51%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1.8 Points ∼66%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
1.8 Points ∼66% 0%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (919 - 8397, n=116)
4465 Points ∼100% +37%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
3264 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
3264 Points ∼73% 0%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (1689 - 31667, n=115)
9390 Points ∼100% +30%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
7213 Points ∼77%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
7213 Points ∼77% 0%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Convertible
  (33.5 - 288, n=140)
167 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
87 Points ∼52% 0%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
86.989 Points ∼52%
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Intel Pentium N4200
78.773 Points ∼47% -9%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Intel Pentium N4200
78.274 Points ∼47% -10%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
Intel Pentium N4200
56.41 Points ∼34% -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
44.442 Points ∼27% -49%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
42.637 Points ∼26% -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Convertible
  (3067 - 42822, n=151)
20995 Points ∼100% +77%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
11875 Points ∼57%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
11875 Points ∼57% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
3077.3 ms * ∼100%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
 
3077 ms * ∼100% -0%
Average of class Convertible
  (809 - 9177, n=160)
2586 ms * ∼84% +16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4302
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
3264 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
7213 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4470 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2521
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5586
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
19.69 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
19.94 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
1.69 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
65 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
164 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
32.32 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=235)
2726 Points ∼100% +268%
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
HD Graphics 505, N4200, Hynix HCG4a2 64 GB
2066 Points ∼76% +179%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1966 Points ∼72% +165%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1587 Points ∼58% +114%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SEM64G
1485 Points ∼54% +100%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, SanDisk DF4128
1264 Points ∼46% +71%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼27%
Average Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
741 Points ∼27% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
741 pontos
Ajuda
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
128 GB eMMC Flash
Trekstor Primetab T13B
SanDisk SEM64G
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
SanDisk DF4128
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Hynix HCG4a2 64 GB
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
128 GB eMMC Flash
Average 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-48%
-71%
-56%
5%
12%
-51%
Write 4k QD32
33.64
10.67
-68%
3.808
-89%
11.5
-66%
33.54
0%
22.65
-33%
11.2 (1.775 - 37.3, n=28)
-67%
Read 4k QD32
34.45
30.03
-13%
11
-68%
32.71
-5%
30.39
-12%
28.6
-17%
24.4 (7.36 - 47.8, n=28)
-29%
Write 4k
24.27
9.877
-59%
2.929
-88%
8.555
-65%
26.31
8%
19.36
-20%
8.69 (1.504 - 24.3, n=28)
-64%
Read 4k
19.06
9.935
-48%
4.327
-77%
6.705
-65%
11.43
-40%
24.11
26%
11.7 (4.93 - 19.1, n=28)
-39%
Write 512
107.1
44.39
-59%
23.89
-78%
39.86
-63%
140
31%
178.5
67%
44.3 (9.1 - 107, n=28)
-59%
Read 512
190.6
121
-37%
99.22
-48%
68.59
-64%
231.6
22%
218.4
15%
115 (69.1 - 191, n=28)
-40%
Write Seq
122.4
54.09
-56%
41.03
-66%
54.53
-55%
149.3
22%
191.5
56%
53.7 (27.9 - 122, n=28)
-56%
Read Seq
259.6
139
-46%
123.6
-52%
92.68
-64%
272.2
5%
263.1
1%
128 (74.8 - 260, n=28)
-51%
64 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 259.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 122.4 MB/s
512K Read: 190.6 MB/s
512K Write: 107.1 MB/s
4K Read: 19.06 MB/s
4K Write: 24.27 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 34.45 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 33.64 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1257 Points ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
1257 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=289)
1163 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
726 Points ∼58% -42%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
606 Points ∼48% -52%
Trekstor Primetab T13B
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
527 Points ∼42% -58%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
349 Points ∼28% -72%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
297 Points ∼24% -76%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=206)
951 Points ∼100% +16%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
819 Points ∼86%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
819 Points ∼86% 0%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
408 Points ∼43% -50%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
6602 Points ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
6602 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=250)
6316 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
3183 Points ∼48% -52%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
2000 Points ∼30% -70%
 
3DMark 11 Performance
1334 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
39091 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4186 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
738 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
345 pontos
Ajuda
#ff7777;">0 game wont start (unsupportet resolution)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 38.322.417.5fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 25.318.412.1fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 10.56.3fps
Stress test: Prime95 solo
Stress test: Prime95 solo
Stress test: FurMark solo
Stress test: FurMark solo
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Carga Máxima
 41.2 °C44 °C42.8 °C 
 38.9 °C42.3 °C39.1 °C 
 33.6 °C37.1 °C37.7 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
40.3 °C43 °C40 °C
34.1 °C38.8 °C34.8 °C
31.5 °C31.9 °C30.9 °C
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Trekstor Primetab T13B
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SEM64G
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, SanDisk DF4128
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
HD Graphics 505, N4200, Hynix HCG4a2 64 GB
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Heat
-0%
-13%
-2%
-11%
-12%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
38.7
12%
42
5%
36.6
17%
39.4
10%
40
9%
Maximum Bottom *
43
36.3
16%
41.8
3%
38.9
10%
38.6
10%
39.5
8%
Idle Upper Side *
26
30.6
-18%
35.8
-38%
30
-15%
36.5
-40%
34.1
-31%
Idle Bottom *
24.4
27.1
-11%
30.1
-23%
29.6
-21%
30.2
-24%
33
-35%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.134.22526.4263125.828.74025.324.95023.728.36321.222.78020.62210021.526.812520.432.816020.541.520019.844.525020.243.131520.144.440019.950.450018.756.163018.859.480017.965.4100018.162.8125017.159.8160016.556.5200015.955.1250015.654.9315015.552.2400015.257.5500015.253.2630014.951.4800014.745.81000014.636.11250014.234.71600014.139.4SPL28.669.8N1.123.9median 17.1Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003median 51.4Delta2.17.538.334.438.336.23936.235.842.235.831.135.431.129.937.829.929.929.629.928.228.828.228.928.328.934.725.634.740.923.340.941.722.741.735.621.535.642.520.842.556.520.456.556.419.356.457.218.557.257.818.257.864.517.964.560.617.960.659.217.759.261.717.861.760.317.760.359.818.159.866.618.266.671.118.371.17018.57058.618.658.65318.65349.218.449.253.218.553.276.530.676.535.71.435.7median 57.2Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022Tmedian 18.5median 57.26.61.86.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.35 / 0.78 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.88 / 4.8 / 7.5 Watt
Carga midlight 16.9 / 23.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Trekstor Primetab T13B
N4200, HD Graphics 505, SanDisk SEM64G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), SanDisk DF4128, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
N4200, HD Graphics 505, Hynix HCG4a2 64 GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
17%
-23%
18%
-32%
6%
0%
-48%
Idle Minimum *
2.88
2.5
13%
3.9
-35%
3
-4%
4.1
-42%
4.26
-48%
2.88
-0%
4.81 (2.2 - 23, n=328)
-67%
Idle Average *
4.8
5.7
-19%
9.3
-94%
5.3
-10%
9.3
-94%
7.1
-48%
4.8
-0%
7.97 (4.2 - 32.3, n=328)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
7.5
5.9
21%
10.9
-45%
6.4
15%
9.8
-31%
7.44
1%
7.5
-0%
9.44 (5.15 - 61, n=328)
-26%
Load Average *
16.9
12
29%
12.6
25%
10.9
36%
18.9
-12%
1.4
92%
16.9
-0%
26.1 (1.4 - 94, n=327)
-54%
Load Maximum *
23.8
13.9
42%
15.6
34%
11
54%
19
20%
15.6
34%
23.8
-0%
30.3 (11.2 - 117, n=327)
-27%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
7h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 00min
Maximum battery life
Maximum battery life
Minimum battery life
Minimum battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
Wi-Fi battery life
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Charging
Charging
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32 Wh
Trekstor Primetab T13B
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 37 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 33.3 Wh
Acer Switch 3 SW312-31-P5VG
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 39 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
47%
-46%
3%
-31%
-13%
-1%
Reader / Idle
771
759 (117 - 1985, n=271)
-2%
H.264
384
447 (206 - 1070, n=99)
16%
WiFi v1.3
448
658
47%
244
-46%
461
3%
309
-31%
391
-13%
444 (153 - 1010, n=204)
-1%
Load
180
149 (49 - 677, n=259)
-17%

Pro

+ Materiais de qualidade premium
+ Carcaça perfeita
+ Chassi muito robusto
+ Sem afogamento térmico
+ Tela de alto contraste e brilhante
+ Desvios DeltaE 2000 muito baixos
+ Boa cobertura de espaço de cores
+ Sem embaçamento
+ Leitor de cartões MicroSD
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Silencioso

Contra

- Armazenamento interno pequeno (64 GB)
- Apenas uma porta USB-C
- PWM
- Acessórios caros
Microsoft Surface Go. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.
Microsoft Surface Go. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

O Microsoft Surface Go é um tablet compacto de alta qualidade disponível a um preço baixo. No entanto, não se deixe enganar pelo preço se você pretende usar o tablet como um portátil completo. Neste caso, os acessórios adicionais somarão rapidamente.

Nossa impressão geral foi de que este é realmente um tablet de alta qualidade excepcionalmente bem feito. A carcaça de magnésio não era apenas surpreendentemente leve, mas também muito resistente, e suas texturas de superfície se sentiram confortáveis de segurar. Ficamos particularmente impressionados com a tela, que agregou muito valor a esse dispositivo econômico.

Pentium 4415Y da Intel foi rápido o suficiente para um tablet, e a GPU interna foi capaz de reproduzir vídeos de 2160p sem problemas e sem esforço. Independentemente do preço, este é um grande feito e certamente será importante para muitos compradores em potencial.

O Surface Go da Microsoft é um tablet Windows excepcionalmente bem construído a um preço comparativamente baixo (para um tablet Surface). No entanto, os acessórios caros podem se tornar um fator decisivo para alguns usuários.

Por que a Microsoft optou por apenas 64 GB de memória eMMC no SKU de nível de entrada, permanece um mistério para nós. Consequentemente, os potenciais compradores são quase forçados a gastar outros $150 no SKU de 128 GB.

No final do dia, é a decisão individual de cada pessoa se 64 GB são suficientes ou não. Pelo menos o Go possui um leitor de cartão microSD para aqueles que decidem optar pela opção mais barata.

Considerando a solução de resfriamento passiva do Go, achamos o desempenho do dispositivo particularmente atraente durante o nosso teste de estresse. Mesmo sob uso intenso, não encontramos vestígios de afogamento térmico. Apesar de uma bateria bastante pequena, a duração da bateria do tablet também foi surpreendentemente boa.

Nossa maior reclamação são os acessórios quase obrigatórios e caros, como o Surface Go Signature Type Cover, que será muito difícil de resistir e provavelmente será comprado junto com o próprio tablet em muitos casos.

Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 - 09/26/2018 v6
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
76%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
53 / 80 → 66%
Peso
83 / 35-78 → 100%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
52 / 68 → 77%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 87 → 57%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Médio
76%
87%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Microsoft Surface Go (Pentium, 64GB eMMC)
Sebastian Bade, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)