Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/16/2016

Provocando a gama média. A HTC com frequência tentou ganhar pontos com visuais elegantes, som de alta resolução, e boas câmeras. Por isso o HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle dual-SIM é uma oferta interessante na gama média. Será que o painel de 720p e um SoC relativamente lento, conseguem deter esta onda?

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Desire Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 1.6 GHz @ 1.6 GHz
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 267 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 19.97 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B40); Bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR rates: 0.38 W/kg (head), 0.62 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 156.9 x 76.9
Bateria
10.3 Wh, 2700 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 24 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 672 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, AF, flash LED, vídeos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.8, vídeos @1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto falantes, HTC BoomSound, Teclado: teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, abraçadeira, Zoe Video, News Republic, Themes, Boost+, 24 Meses Garantia, Áudio de alta resolução de24 bit, USB-OTG, rádio FM, fanless
peso
155 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
299 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
337 MBit/s ∼100% +234%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
101 MBit/s ∼30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
298 MBit/s ∼100% +187%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
104 MBit/s ∼35%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -70%
GPS HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - Overview
GPS HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - Overview
GPS HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - Bridge
GPS HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - Bridge
GPS HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - Woods
GPS HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - Woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
365
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 380 cd/m² Médio: 368.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1462:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | - Ø
96.6% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.29
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
LG Stylus 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.7
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
20%
3%
-4%
-11%
Brightness
369
334
-9%
374
1%
589
60%
633
72%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
92
0%
87
-5%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.26
0.25
4%
0.63
-142%
0.66
-154%
Contrast
1462
1480
1%
967
-34%
997
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.6
4.6
30%
6.1
8%
3.8
42%
4.9
26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
2.8
62%
7
5%
3.1
58%
5.8
22%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.29 105%
2.25 107%
2.06 117%
2.26 106%
CCT
8665 75%
6612 98%
8350 78%
6725 97%
7840 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 44 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 276 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.1 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
24799 Points ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼66% +394%
LG Stylus 2
28232 Points ∼15% +14%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
45232 Points ∼25% +82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼34% +152%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
1100 Points ∼5%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼18% +252%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼19% +267%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
441 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼25% +190%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼16% +86%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
813 Points ∼31%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼42% +35%
LG Stylus 2
728 Points ∼28% -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1042 Points ∼40% +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼82% +160%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
46 Points ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60% +9941%
LG Stylus 2
42 Points ∼1% -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
605 Points ∼8% +1215%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% +1463%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
58 Points ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼55% +4552%
LG Stylus 2
53 Points ∼1% -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
667 Points ∼14% +1050%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% +1352%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼30%
LG Stylus 2
9085 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9527 Points ∼14%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5%
LG Stylus 2
3744 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9773 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4675 Points ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12% +399%
LG Stylus 2
4307 Points ∼2% -8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9717 Points ∼5% +108%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% +199%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
5.7 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼8% +1444%
LG Stylus 2
5.1 fps ∼0% -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
17 fps ∼2% +198%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% +304%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
10 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +430%
LG Stylus 2
4.9 fps ∼1% -51%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
18 fps ∼4% +80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% +110%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +1850%
LG Stylus 2
3.9 fps ∼1% +95%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
6.6 fps ∼1% +230%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% +395%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
4.2 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼12% +567%
LG Stylus 2
1.8 fps ∼1% -57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
7 fps ∼3% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼4% +131%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2383 Points ∼29%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼61% +109%
LG Stylus 2
4030 Points ∼50% +69%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼84% +185%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
573 Points ∼37%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼62% +68%
LG Stylus 2
1008 Points ∼65% +76%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% +23%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
346 Points ∼4%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼54% +1238%
LG Stylus 2
324 Points ∼4% -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
805 Points ∼9% +133%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% +195%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
421 Points ∼11%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼39% +254%
LG Stylus 2
462 Points ∼12% +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
604 Points ∼16% +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼27% +148%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
858 Points ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼50% +285%
LG Stylus 2
914 Points ∼14% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1359 Points ∼21% +58%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% +241%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
517 Points ∼16%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼66% +319%
LG Stylus 2
609 Points ∼19% +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
283 Points ∼9% -45%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼37% +135%

Legend

 
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Stylus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
12145 ms * ∼20%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +75%
LG Stylus 2 (Chrome 51)
12713 ms * ∼21% -5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Chrome 49)
11102 ms * ∼19% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼14% +34%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
2141 Points ∼5%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼18% +277%
LG Stylus 2 (Chrome 51)
2742 Points ∼6% +28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Chrome 49)
3656 Points ∼8% +71%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼11% +129%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
51 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
111 Points ∼19% +118%
LG Stylus 2 (Chrome 51)
51 Points ∼9% 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Chrome 49)
61 Points ∼11% +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
84 Points ∼15% +65%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Chrome 54)
18.22 Points ∼6%
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼14% +146%
LG Stylus 2 (Chrome 51)
17.8 Points ∼6% -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Chrome 49)
22.8 Points ∼7% +25%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼10% +71%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
29.2 MB/s ∼45%
ZTE Axon 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.34 MB/s ∼78% +76%
LG Stylus 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
49.73 MB/s ∼76% +70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46.92 MB/s ∼72% +61%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.07 MB/s ∼77% +71%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
47.7 MB/s ∼57%
ZTE Axon 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.39 MB/s ∼94% +64%
LG Stylus 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
74.9 MB/s ∼90% +57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
74.4 MB/s ∼89% +56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.22 MB/s ∼95% +66%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
7.94 MB/s ∼11%
ZTE Axon 7
16.22 MB/s ∼22% +104%
LG Stylus 2
7.3 MB/s ∼10% -8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
35.79 MB/s ∼48% +351%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼10% -7%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
17.03 MB/s ∼12%
ZTE Axon 7
121.07 MB/s ∼88% +611%
LG Stylus 2
9.8 MB/s ∼7% -42%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
36.32 MB/s ∼26% +113%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼54% +335%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
60.62 MB/s ∼32%
ZTE Axon 7
150.92 MB/s ∼80% +149%
LG Stylus 2
75.9 MB/s ∼40% +25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
43.48 MB/s ∼23% -28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼100% +210%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
149.4 MB/s ∼25%
ZTE Axon 7
406.49 MB/s ∼68% +172%
LG Stylus 2
130.3 MB/s ∼22% -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
271.38 MB/s ∼46% +82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼47% +89%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high18 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.4 °C33.6 °C33.4 °C 
 37.4 °C34.1 °C34.9 °C 
 35.8 °C34 °C33.3 °C 
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
31.8 °C33.3 °C34 °C
32 °C33.1 °C36 °C
31.3 °C34 °C35.2 °C
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.726.528.72525.52725.53124.426.924.44030.230.330.2503125.231632223.1228022.621.722.610025.123.325.112535.731.435.716028.720.728.720040.12040.125049.620.449.631554.821.154.84005719.65750057.220.957.263056.520.156.580057.92157.9100059.617.959.6125062.217.662.2160065.616.665.6200067.316.767.3250066.215.266.2315063.316.263.3400062.315.262.3500064.31464.3630061.613.861.6800059.213.659.2100006013.660125006113.8611600056.313.456.3SPL75.329.375.3N34.21.234.2median 59.2HTC Desire 10 Lifestylemedian 17.6median 59.2Delta6.62.86.631.636.725.432.825.32932.935.233.649.731.632.328.429.32725.720.8282239.121.346.820.855.621.259.419.463.219.569.417.772.517.973.717.875.117.375.917.476.116.777.917.277.518.277.717.976.517.673.717.768.217.861.217.953.518.156.118.2513087.11.366.1median 17.9ZTE Axon 7median 68.21.311.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 45min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
9h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 54min
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
2700 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
LG Stylus 2
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
5%
6%
34%
Reader / Idle
1485
1735
17%
1225
-18%
1226
-17%
1502
1%
Load
234
245
5%
258
10%
201
-14%
352
50%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
574
411
-28%
663
16%
735
28%
797
39%
H.264
622
704
13%
697
12%
775
25%
905
45%

Pro

+ Carcaça mate, relativamente elegante
+ Boa configuração de memória
+ Dual-SIM
+ Bom GPS
+ Dispositivos de entrada confiáveis
+ Bom contraste da tela
+ Baixa temperatura
+ Som de alta resolução
+ Excelentes alto falantes

Contra

- Range quando flexionado
- Microfone inferior
- Qualidade pobre das chamadas
- Não é possível atualizar para Android 7
- Câmeras abaixo da média
- Tela de baixa resolução
- SoC desatualizado e de baixo desempenho
- Acesso lento ao armazenamento
In review: HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle. Test model courtesy of HTC Germany.
In review: HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle. Test model courtesy of HTC Germany.

A HTC tomou algumas atualizações "provocadoras" para o seu Desire 10 Lifestyle. Isto torna o smartphone em um aparelho que pode não ser adequado para qualquer usuário, mas oferece uma ótima experiência de som por pouco dinheiro.

Mas primeiro o primeiro. Estamos na gama média e, portanto, não é surpreendente que a HTC tivesse que fazer alguns compromissos para incorporar recursos de gama alta como som de alta resolução de 24-bits no modelo de teste. A tela não tem uma resolução particularmente alta e não é muito brilhante. A duração da bateria é apenas medíocre e as taxas de desempenho estão evidentemente abaixo do padrão na faixa de preços. As câmeras não são convincentes e não se espera uma atualização para a mais recente versão Android, em vista da tecnologia desatualizada. Os usuários que valorizam a boa qualidade das chamadas terão que procurar outras opções.

O HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle pode ser descrito como um bom reprodutor de áudio de alta resolução com recursos de smartphone. Infelizmente, os aspectos como desempenho, câmeras, qualidade das chamadas e software estão, evidentemente abaixo da média.

Então, quais coisas positivas podem ser ditas? O HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle oferece uma bastante boa configuração de memória, uma carcaça relativamente bem construída, e o módulo GPS também faz um trabalho suficientemente bom. Os dispositivos de entrada são confiáveis, e também está, é claro, o som: Os alto falantes são muito bons e a saída do som via o headset é audivelmente mais completa que em outros smartphones.

Mas será isto suficiente? Provavelmente apenas para os audiófilos que não querem ou não podem pagar pelo HTC 10. Todos os outros vão ter um smartphone que apresenta um desempenho abaixo da média em muitos outros aspectos e realmente só pode servir com um som emocionante. Um genuíno reprodutor de áudio de alta resolução, por exemplo, da Sony, custa quase o mesmo que o HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle. Este fato por si só prova que não muito foi deixado no orçamento para os outros recursos.

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - 12/09/2016 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
92%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
5 / 63 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
25 / 70 → 36%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
61%
Médio
69%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - Home > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Florian Wimmer, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)