Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/09/2016

Herdeiro ao trono? Com o Axon 7, a ZTE está prestes a alcançar a coroa dos smartphones. Além do desempenho top e o excelente equipamento, o Android high-tec de 5,5 polegadas impressiona com o seu sistema de som Dolby Atmos, que pode encher uma sala com o som.

ZTE Axon 7 (Axon Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 534 PPI, AMOLED, WQHD, Gorilla Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, sensor Hall, sensor geomagnético, giroscópio
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900 MHz), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (700, 800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), downloads/uploads até 300/50 Mb/s, SAR 0.348 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 75
Bateria
3250 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 29 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 530 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 400 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix f/1.8, flash dual-LED, PD auto-foco, estabilizador de imagem OIS/EIS, HDR, vídeos máx. 4K/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2/2, foco fixo, vídeos máx. 1080p/30 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonde de alimentação modular, cabo USB Type-C, headset, capa, ferramenta para slot SIM/micro-SD, adaptador micro-USB, guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, MiFavor 4.0, 36 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
449 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
337 MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
320 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
257 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
121 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -90%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
323 MBit/s ∼96% +8%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
298 MBit/s ∼89%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
256 MBit/s ∼76% -14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
112 MBit/s ∼33% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
31.2 MBit/s ∼9% -90%
ZTE Axon 7: Total route
ZTE Axon 7: Total route
ZTE Axon 7: Turning point
ZTE Axon 7: Turning point
ZTE Axon 7: Bridge
ZTE Axon 7: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
314
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 358 cd/m² Médio: 334.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.29
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Screen
-5%
4%
35%
29%
-23%
11%
Brightness
334
633
90%
431
29%
511
53%
351
5%
774
132%
434
30%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
84
-5%
93
6%
98
11%
91
3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.66
0.43
0.36
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.6
4.9
-7%
4.1
11%
2.2
52%
2.04
56%
6.5
-41%
2.8
39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
5.8
-107%
3.3
-18%
2
29%
1.63
42%
8
-186%
3.7
-32%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.26 106%
2.1 114%
2.25 107%
2.07 116%
2.22 108%
2.31 104%
CCT
6612 98%
7840 83%
6550 99%
6768 96%
6391 102%
8699 75%
7164 91%
Contrast
997
1823
1236
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
86.86
68.08
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.35
97.46

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 959 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼66%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼34% -49%
OnePlus 3 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼77% +16%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼33% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼69% +4%
LG G5
124244 Points ∼67% +1%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼72% +8%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3
5645 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S7
6401 Points ∼20%
LG G5
5507 Points ∼17%
HTC 10
5117 Points ∼16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3
2398 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2199 Points ∼46%
LG G5
2396 Points ∼50%
HTC 10
2376 Points ∼50%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼42%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼82% +92%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼69% +63%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼63% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼78% +83%
LG G5
1695 Points ∼66% +54%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼58% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -84%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼9% -84%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼39% -35%
LG G5
4468 Points ∼58% -3%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼55%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% -69%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼70% +27%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼17% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼56% +1%
LG G5
3277 Points ∼67% +21%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼65% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼23% -22%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼32% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼23% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼29% -2%
LG G5
20997 Points ∼30% +3%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼29% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% -45%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼7% +40%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% +37%
LG G5
32109 Points ∼7% +32%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% -40%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼15% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼7% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼15% +24%
LG G5
28730 Points ∼15% +23%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% +17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% -74%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼7% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼2% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼6% -5%
LG G5
74 fps ∼6% -16%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% -17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -60%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +13%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼5% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% 0%
LG G5
47 fps ∼10% -11%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% -75%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% +3%
LG G5
42 fps ∼8% +8%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼4% -65%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼20% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼4% -64%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼12% -4%
LG G5
30 fps ∼13% +7%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼11% -14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% -80%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼1% -80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼7% -10%
LG G5
31 fps ∼7% 0%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼6% -23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -62%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% +88%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼4% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% -6%
LG G5
17 fps ∼10% +6%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% -12%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼61%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼84% +37%
OnePlus 3 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼87% +43%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼83% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼59% -3%
LG G5
5581 Points ∼69% +12%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼71% +17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% -27%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼72% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼42% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼62% -1%
LG G5
900 Points ∼58% -7%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% -4%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼54%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% -78%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼56% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼12% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼20% -63%
LG G5
4807 Points ∼56% +4%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +8%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼27% -30%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼53% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼21% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼58% +51%
LG G5
1478 Points ∼38% -1%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼46% +19%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% -12%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼54% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼31% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼64% +28%
LG G5
2925 Points ∼44% -12%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -15%
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼66%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼37% -44%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼76% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼31% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼61% -8%
LG G5
2079 Points ∼63% -4%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼67% +1%

Legend

 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Honor 8 unknown, ARM Mali-T880 MP4,
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8062 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼10% -39%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼18% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
4979 Points ∼10% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼27% +63%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
9731 Points ∼20% +21%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
8905 Points ∼18% +10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
3096.5 ms * ∼5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼14% -160%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
8168.9 ms * ∼14% -164%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +17%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
3461.1 ms * ∼6% -12%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
111 Points ∼19%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
84 Points ∼15% -24%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼21% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
83 Points ∼14% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼29% +50%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19% -3%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19% -3%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7 (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
44.754 Points ∼0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼0% -30%
OnePlus 3 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼0% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53)
31.8 Points ∼0% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼0% +65%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
49.7 Points ∼0% +11%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
52.1 Points ∼0% +16%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Axon 7Huawei Honor 8Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLOnePlus 3Lenovo Moto Z PlaySamsung Galaxy S7LG G5HTC 10
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
7%
3%
-3%
-6%
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
50.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
53.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
4%
45.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
74.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
72.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
78.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
6%
Random Write 4KB
16.22
7.4
-54%
18.23
12%
45.58
181%
16.01
-1%
16.22
0%
15.89
-2%
Random Read 4KB
121.07
74
-39%
137.62
14%
38.78
-68%
85.9
-29%
89.26
-26%
29.92
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
150.92
188
25%
153.3
2%
73.14
-52%
145.72
-3%
141.26
-6%
115.56
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
406.49
282
-31%
408.71
1%
254.78
-37%
483.82
19%
427.65
5%
275.09
-32%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
comparado com
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
28
LG G4
 808 MSM8992, Adreno 418
28.3
ZTE Axon 7
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
29
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
 7880, Mali-T830 MP3
29
HTC One A9s
 Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2
29
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
comparado com
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Lenovo Moto Z
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
60
Sony Xperia X Compact
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
60
ZTE Axon 7
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
60
   ...
Huawei Mate 9 (max)
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
60
Carga Máxima
 39.1 °C39.5 °C37.5 °C 
 38.6 °C39.4 °C36.5 °C 
 37.3 °C38.4 °C36.1 °C 
Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 38 °C
35 °C36.8 °C37.3 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C37.4 °C
35.3 °C37.2 °C37.3 °C
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.72525.432.83125.3294032.935.25033.649.76331.632.38028.429.31002725.712520.8281602239.120021.346.825020.855.631521.259.440019.463.250019.569.463017.772.580017.973.7100017.875.1125017.375.9160017.476.1200016.777.9250017.277.5315018.277.7400017.976.5500017.673.7630017.768.2800017.861.21000017.953.51250018.156.11600018.251SPL3087.1N1.366.1median 17.9ZTE Axon 7median 68.2Delta1.311.735.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 68.2Samsung Galaxy S7median 51median 17.9median 68.210.711.12.410.733.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1LG G5median 48.9median 17.7median 71.19.86.81.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.64 / 0.84 / 0.87 Watt
Carga midlight 6.02 / 10.45 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-47%
-18%
29%
-1%
-40%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.83
-30%
0.57
11%
0.51
20%
0.68
-6%
0.55
14%
0.68
-6%
Idle Average *
0.84
2.11
-151%
1.24
-48%
0.87
-4%
1.02
-21%
1.37
-63%
1.49
-77%
Idle Maximum *
0.87
2.12
-144%
1.36
-56%
0.9
-3%
1.14
-31%
2.25
-159%
1.91
-120%
Load Average *
6.02
3.41
43%
5.92
2%
1.69
72%
4.73
21%
6.24
-4%
7.4
-23%
Load Maximum *
10.45
5.46
48%
10.53
-1%
4
62%
7.16
31%
9.12
13%
9.71
7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 55min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
6h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 05min
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
39%
28%
95%
10%
-2%
-13%
Reader / Idle
1735
1502
-13%
1338
-23%
2540
46%
1810
4%
1833
6%
1273
-27%
Load
245
352
44%
268
9%
652
166%
242
-1%
267
9%
203
-17%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
411
797
94%
840
104%
824
100%
456
11%
387
-6%
413
0%
H.264
704
905
29%
847
20%
1190
69%
892
27%
600
-15%
648
-8%

Pro

+ Android 6.0
+ Painel AMOLED QHD
+ USB Tipo C
+ Leitor de digitais
+ Muito bom módulo de câmera
+ Desempenho muito alto
+ Sem afogamentos
+ Excelente som Dolby Surround
+ Recurso de carga rápida

Contra

- Incomum MiFavor 4.0 UI
- Somente velocidade de USB 2.0
- PWM flickering
- Bateria não removível
- Duração da bateria apenas medíocre
In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.
In review: ZTE Axon 7. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.

A ZTE não prometeu muito: O Axon 7 se enfrenta com facilidades a smartphones de gama superior, como o Samsung Galaxy S7 mesmo que em última instância, não consiga chegar ao nível desses aparelhos. O smartphone ZTE não possui o recurso final para isto - uma veloz porta USB, armazenamento interno maior, e carregamento sem fio, teriam resultado em um pontuação um pouco mais alta. No entanto, isto não diminui a excelente configuração e o pacote de desempenho que o usuário recebe com o Axon 7.

O ZTE Axon 7 não é apenas um digno oponente para smartphones de gama alta como o Samsung Galaxy S7, ele também convence com um excelente som Dolby surround.

Gostamos particularmente da carcaça de alta qualidade, painel QHD nítido, muito bom módulo de câmera e o desempenho mais que suficiente para cada smartphone na situação de teste. E qualquer um à procura de um smartphone com um som realmente bom, terá que optar pelo ZTE Axon 7 porque acusticamente ele supera seus rivais, e por muito, com o seu som Dolby-Atmos.

O ZTE Axon 7 também deve aceitar algumas críticas, embora não haja muito o que criticar. Alguns usuários podem não gostar do visual da interface MiFavor 4.0 - mas o visual pode ser modificado para que seja quase igual ao do Android padrão, mediante uma app. Uma porta USB mais veloz teria combinado bem com o Axon 7, bem como uma duração de bateria um pouco melhor e uma bateria removível.

ZTE Axon 7 - 10/31/2016 v5.1
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
79%
Médio
79%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7
Manuel Masiero, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2016-11-26)