Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Revisão: Poderosa estação de trabalho com pontos fracos

Estação de trabalho de 2 kg (4,4 lbs). A estação de trabalho Asus marca alguns pontos importantes em nossa revisão graças a um nível muito alto de desempenho, display de 4K e 16 GB de VRAM. Além disso, nosso dispositivo de revisão apresenta 32 GB de RAM e um SSD de 1 TB. Entretanto, não há uma porta Thunderbolt 3.

Sascha Mölck (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), 11/12/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

O Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 é uma estação de trabalho de 15,6 polegadas, que é alimentada pelo Core i7-9750H e pelo Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q. Os dispositivos concorrentes incluem: o Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020, o Dell Precision 7550 e o MSI WS66 10TMT.

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83 %	11/2020	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	2 kg	18.9 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
83 %	09/2020	MSI WS66 10TMT-207US i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	2.3 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
88 %	08/2020	Dell Precision 7550 W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	2.8 kg	27.36 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
87 %	08/2020	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	2.2 kg	13.98 mm	15.60"	3840x2160

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Case & Connectivity - Sem Thunderbolt 3 para o W500G5T

A caixa metálica do Asus StudioBook parece muito superior e vem no esquema de cores conhecido como Star Grey. Não há lacunas ou frestas em nenhum lugar. Tanto a tampa do display quanto o chassi são muito rígidos. A bateria é embutida. Para chegar aos componentes internos, os usuários terão que remover a tampa inferior

A estação de trabalho tem três portas USB Tipo A (2x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2) e uma porta USB Tipo C (USB 3.2 Gen 2). A porta USB-C pode emitir um sinal DisplayPort (com um adaptador que é vendido separadamente). Junto com a porta HDMI, nosso dispositivo de revisão oferece duas saídas de vídeo. Não há leitor de cartão SD

O StudioBook suporta os seguintes padrões IEEE: 802.11a, b, g, n, ac e ax. Ele também vem com um módulo Bluetooth 5.0. As velocidades de transferência de dados que medimos sob as condições ideais (nenhum outro dispositivo com Wi-Fi nas proximidades, uma curta distância entre o notebook e o PC servidor; Router: Netgear Nighthawk AX12) são muito bons

Size Comparison

Dell Precision 7550 Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 ❌

Anschlussausstattung

Lado esquerdo: Tomada de alimentação, porta Gigabit Ethernet, saída HDMI, porta USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Tipo A), tomada de microfone, tomada de fone de ouvido

Lado direito: Porta USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Tipo C), duas portas USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Tipo A), fechadura Kensington

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1595 (1327^min - 1824^max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1476 (1355^min - 1581^max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1346 (1260^min - 1382^max) MBit/s ∼84%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=109)	1093 MBit/s ∼69% -19%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1011 (507^min - 1065^max) MBit/s ∼63% -25%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1368 (735^min - 1454^max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1353 (1259^min - 1416^max) MBit/s ∼99%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1316 (579^min - 1479^max) MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1640, n=110)	1171 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	899 (873^min - 913^max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1352 (1259-1416)

MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (873-913)

Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1315 (579-1479)

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1368 (735-1454)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (1260-1382)

MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1355-1581)

Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (507-1065)

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (1327-1824)

Dispositivos de entrada - O StudioBook oferece uma luz de fundo de teclado

O Asus StudioBook vem com um teclado no estilo de um veículo, que oferece uma curta distância de viagem. Os teclados têm uma superfície lisa. Ao digitar, o teclado apresenta alguma flexibilidade. No geral, o StudioBook tem um bom teclado. O Clickpad multi-toque (10,5x7,3 cm - 4,1x2,9 in) oferece espaço suficiente para gestos. A superfície lisa facilita o deslizamento dos dedos. O tapete tem um ponto de acionamento claro e uma distância de viagem curta

Display - Painel IPS 4K

A tela de 15,6 polegadas do StudioBook opera com uma resolução nativa de 3840x2160 pixels. A tela oferece uma relação de contraste de 930:1. Nós vemos uma relação de contraste acima de 1000:1 como boa. A luminosidade da tela de 334,8 cd/m² é bastante boa. Os tempos de resposta do painel 60-Hz poderiam ter sido mais rápidos. Positivo: O display não sofre com a cintilação do PWM


329 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	330 cd/m²
329 cd/m²	344 cd/m²	341 cd/m²
319 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	340 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 344 cd/m² Médio: 334.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 337 cd/m²
Contraste: 930:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.12 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
94.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.62% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.06% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	MSI WS66 10TMT-207US AU Optronics B156HAB03.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Precision 7550 AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display		-22%	1%	9%
Display P3 Coverage	82.06	62.81 -23%	82.09 0%	99.87 22%
sRGB Coverage	97.62	86.89 -11%	99.6 2%	100 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94.98	63.59 -33%	96.76 2%	97.31 2%
Response Times		21%	8%	91%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	58 (27, 31)	44.8 (21.2, 23.6) 23%	51.2 (24.4, 26.8) 12%	4 (2, 2) 93%
Response Time Black / White *	35 (20, 15)	28.8 (17.2, 11.6) 18%	34 (20, 14) 3%	4 (2, 2) 89%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-25%	-33%	192%
Brightness middle	344	374.5 9%	473.5 38%	380 10%
Brightness	335	363 8%	461 38%	388 16%
Brightness Distribution	93	91 -2%	90 -3%	93 0%
Black Level *	0.37	0.42 -14%	0.55 -49%	0.018 95%
Contrast	930	892 -4%	861 -7%	21111 2170%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.76	4.05 -130%	4.8 -173%	5.47 -211%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	4.31	8.17 -90%	8.73 -103%	8.19 -90%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3.12	2.6 17%	5.6 -79%	5.3 -70%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.34 ^94%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6563 ^99%	7027 ^93%	7549 ^86%	6128 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	85	56.4 -34%	86.4 2%	86 1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98	86.3 -12%	99.7 2%	100 2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *		4.36	3.08	3.04
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-9% / -19%	-8% / -21%	97% / 142%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15324 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Logo de saída da caixa, o display certificado Pantone oferece uma reprodução de cores muito boa. O desvio de cor do DeltaE 2000 é de 1,8 (DeltaE menos de 3 é o valor ideal). O mostrador não sofre de um molde azulado. A tela se sai muito bem quando se trata de cobertura de espaço colorido. O painel cobre 98% do sRGB e 85% do AdobeRGB

CalMAN - Rastreamento em escala de cinza

O painel IPS do W500G5T oferece ângulos de visão muito estáveis. É por isso que o conteúdo da tela pode ser lido a partir de qualquer posição. No exterior, o dispositivo só pode ser usado quando o sol não brilha muito

O StudioBook ao ar livre (sob um céu encoberto).

Desempenho - Poderoso o suficiente para todas as aplicações

O Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T é uma estação de trabalho fina e compacta com uma tela de 15,6 polegadas. Ele pode lidar com todas as aplicações atuais. Nosso dispositivo de revisão de varejo por cerca de 5000 Euros (~$5908) e representa a configuração mais cara

Configurações do sistema

A concessionária ProArt Creator Hub oferece dois planos de energia. Conduzimos a maioria de nossos benchmarks usando o plano de energia Normal. Entretanto, realizamos alguns benchmarks com o plano de energia Rendering também. Os usuários podem alternar entre os dois planos de energia pressionando F11 ou no ProArt Creator Hub. Entretanto, ele não é pré-instalado, mas pode ser facilmente baixado do Microsoft Store.

Processador

O StudioBook vem com o Core i7-9750H, que é uma CPU hexa-core baseada na arquitetura Coffee Lake Refresh. O processador tem uma taxa de relógio base de 2,6 GHz. Graças à tecnologia Turbo Boost da Intel, a taxa de clock pode ser aumentada até 4 GHz para todos os seis núcleos e até 4,5 GHz para um único núcleo. O chip Intel suporta Hyper-threading, o que significa que cada núcleo pode processar dois fios ao mesmo tempo

Na seção multi-core do benchmark Cinebench R15, a CPU funciona a 4 GHz quando conectada. Quando funcionando com bateria, a freqüência da CPU flutua entre 800 MHz e 4 GHz. As taxas de relógio flutuam entre 4 e 4,5 GHz no benchmark de um só núcleo

Verificamos se o Turbo boost pode ser usado durante um longo período de tempo, executando o benchmark Cinebench multi-core em um loop contínuo por 30 minutos. A tecnologia de turboalimentação é utilizada em nível médio. No modo Rendering, que você pode ativar no ProArt Creator Hub, a CPU é capaz de manter velocidades de relógio mais altas.

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1024 (977.33-1282.22)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Rendering: Ø1269 (1260.16-1286.11)

MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1668 (1647.11-1843.74)

Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1606 (1577.91-1652.14)

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1016 (1009.67-1136.43)

Relógios de CPU durante o loop contínuo CB15

Relógios de CPU durante o loop contínuo CB15 (modo de renderização)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

188 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1282 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

175.25 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.62 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	210 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	208 Points ∼99% +11%
Average of class Workstation (155 - 236, n=43, last 2 years)	200 Points ∼95% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	193 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	188 Points ∼90%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	188 Points ∼90% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82)	184 Points ∼88% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	1714 (1647.11^min - 1843.74^max) Points ∼100% +34%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	1652 (1577.91^min - 1652.14^max) Points ∼96% +29%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	1286 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	1282 Points ∼75%
Average of class Workstation (452 - 1920, n=44, last 2 years)	1255 Points ∼73% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85)	1182 Points ∼69% -8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	1111 Points ∼65% -13%

Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	435.2 Seconds * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (342 - 495, n=21)	433 Seconds * ∼99% +1%
Average of class Workstation (250 - 719, n=35, last 2 years)	431 Seconds * ∼99% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	386.2 Seconds * ∼89% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	342.1 Seconds * ∼79% +21%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	281 Seconds * ∼65% +35%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	273 Seconds * ∼63% +37%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	5495 MIPS ∼100% +13%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	5335 MIPS ∼97% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	5310 MIPS ∼97% +9%
Average of class Workstation (4417 - 5773, n=36, last 2 years)	5193 MIPS ∼95% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	4865 MIPS ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4580 - 5090, n=21)	4846 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	4695 MIPS ∼85% -3%
7z b 4
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	48730 MIPS ∼100% +50%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	48044 MIPS ∼99% +48%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	38363 MIPS ∼79% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	34535 MIPS ∼71% +6%
Average of class Workstation (18860 - 50050, n=36, last 2 years)	34439 MIPS ∼71% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	32555 MIPS ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28512 - 35174, n=21)	32357 MIPS ∼66% -1%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	500 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Workstation (374 - 610, n=38, last 2 years)	492 Points ∼98% +6%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	488 Points ∼98% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	473 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	462 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (416 - 486, n=55)	443 Points ∼89% -4%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	4161 Points ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	3930 Points ∼94% +25%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	3133 Points ∼75%
Average of class Workstation (988 - 4660, n=39, last 2 years)	2888 Points ∼69% -8%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	2800 Points ∼67% -11%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (2017 - 3133, n=55)	2564 Points ∼62% -18%

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Workstation (1124 - 1702, n=31, last 2 years)	1347 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	1341 Points ∼100% +11%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	1331 Points ∼99% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	1289 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	1207 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1117 - 1251, n=13)	1190 Points ∼88% -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	8378 Points ∼100% +44%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	8347 Points ∼100% +44%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	7189 Points ∼86% +24%
Average of class Workstation (3852 - 9100, n=32, last 2 years)	6500 Points ∼78% +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	5813 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4859 - 6262, n=13)	5597 Points ∼67% -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	13.1 fps ∼100% +58%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	13 fps ∼99% +57%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	10.7 fps ∼82% +29%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	10.1 fps ∼77% +22%
Average of class Workstation (5.2 - 14.6, n=35, last 2 years)	9.56 fps ∼73% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (7.1 - 10.7, n=21)	8.72 fps ∼67% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	8.3 fps ∼63%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	59.96 s * ∼100% -0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	59.75 s * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (54.5 - 64.7, n=9)	59 s * ∼98% +1%
Average of class Workstation (41.3 - 106, n=31, last 2 years)	54 s * ∼90% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	47.15 s * ∼79% +21%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	46.5 s * ∼78% +22%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	44 s * ∼73% +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	0.658 sec * ∼100% -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H	0.643 sec * ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (0.608 - 0.695, n=14)	0.643 sec * ∼98% -0%
Average of class Workstation (0.543 - 0.695, n=30, last 2 years)	0.596 sec * ∼91% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H	0.586 sec * ∼89% +9%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.574 sec * ∼87% +11%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M	0.57 sec * ∼87% +11%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho do sistema

O StudioBook se sente muito responsivo. Ele oferece potência computacional suficiente para todas as aplicações atuais. Os bons resultados nos benchmarks da PCMark confirmam esta impressão

O notebook tem um slot de memória, que é ocupado por um módulo de 16 GB. Outro módulo de 16 GB de RAM é soldado.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3524 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3985 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4436 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4877 pontos
Ajuda

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	5904 Points ∼67% +21%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5846 Points ∼67% +20%
Average of class Workstation (3092 - 6939, n=40, last 2 years)	5360 Points ∼61% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (4877 - 5317, n=2)	5097 Points ∼58% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4884 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4877 Points ∼56%
Essentials
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	10829 Points ∼94% +23%
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	9811 Points ∼85% +11%
Average of class Workstation (6389 - 10829, n=40, last 2 years)	9335 Points ∼81% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	8890 Points ∼77% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (8809 - 8970, n=2)	8890 Points ∼77% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8809 Points ∼77%
Productivity
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	8877 Points ∼80% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7796 Points ∼70% +8%
Average of class Workstation (5392 - 9317, n=40, last 2 years)	7748 Points ∼69% +8%
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	7735 Points ∼69% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7205 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (6892 - 7205, n=2)	7049 Points ∼63% -2%
Digital Content Creation
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	7360 Points ∼47% +48%
Average of class Workstation (2329 - 10441, n=40, last 2 years)	5945 Points ∼38% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (4962 - 6601, n=2)	5782 Points ∼37% +17%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5640 Points ∼36% +14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4962 Points ∼32%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4563 Points ∼29% -8%

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	4418 Points ∼70% +25%
Average of class Workstation (3311 - 4487, n=25, last 2 years)	3913 Points ∼62% +11%
Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	3781 Points ∼60% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	3654 Points ∼58% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (3524 - 3551, n=2)	3538 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3524 Points ∼56%

Latências DPC

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	1938.1 μs * ∼100%

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

Asus utiliza um SSD NVMe da Samsung. O SSD vem no fator de forma M.2-2280 e tem uma capacidade de 1 TB. Um SSD NVMe adicional pode ser instalado. O RAID 0 é suportado

Um SSD NVMe serve como a unidade do sistema.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3502 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2390 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 397.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 340.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2431 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2387 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.38 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 1107 MB/s

	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	MSI WS66 10TMT-207US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	Dell Precision 7550 SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB	Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Average of class Workstation
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		3%	-13%	-2%	-14%	-6%
Write 4K	1107	185.8 -83%	121 -89%	132.9 -88%	166 (92.4 - 1107, n=25) -85%	167 (86.3 - 1107, n=36, last 2 years) -85%
Read 4K	43.38	47.21 9%	42.16 -3%	46.73 8%	44.6 (37 - 52.6, n=25) 3%	50 (31.1 - 74.9, n=36, last 2 years) 15%
Write Seq	2387	2874 20%	2150 -10%	2214 -7%	1982 (981 - 2389, n=25) -17%	2043 (1185 - 3320, n=36, last 2 years) -14%
Read Seq	2431	1786 -27%	1755 -28%	2018 -17%	1764 (976 - 2543, n=25) -27%	2028 (1132 - 2994, n=36, last 2 years) -17%
Write 4K Q32T1	340.7	466.8 37%	395.3 16%	478.9 41%	395 (205 - 603, n=25) 16%	452 (312 - 666, n=36, last 2 years) 33%
Read 4K Q32T1	397.8	562.8 41%	381.8 -4%	540.2 36%	434 (270 - 592, n=25) 9%	462 (289 - 745, n=36, last 2 years) 16%
Write Seq Q32T1	2390	3091 29%	2730 14%	2975 24%	2351 (1706 - 2404, n=25) -2%	2575 (853 - 3742, n=36, last 2 years) 8%
Read Seq Q32T1	3502	3395 -3%	3468 -1%	3195 -9%	3234 (1758 - 3505, n=25) -8%	3321 (2201 - 5097, n=36, last 2 years) -5%
AS SSD		8%	-31%	-12%	-9%	-16%
Seq Read	2702.12	2321.37 -14%	2027.61 -25%	1982.19 -27%	1993 (870 - 3002, n=26) -26%	2546 (1097 - 5105, n=38, last 2 years) -6%
Seq Write	2347.81	2619.99 12%	1192.77 -49%	2251.61 -4%	2036 (1220 - 2424, n=26) -13%	1692 (908 - 2640, n=38, last 2 years) -28%
4K Read	37.59	48.57 29%	42.31 13%	47.13 25%	46.4 (27 - 56.8, n=26) 23%	47.7 (22.5 - 69.6, n=38, last 2 years) 27%
4K Write	107.12	165.06 54%	105.49 -2%	88.16 -18%	110 (10.3 - 146, n=26) 3%	126 (10.3 - 212, n=38, last 2 years) 18%
4K-64 Read	1490.62	1712.16 15%	1128.12 -24%	1480.51 -1%	1502 (693 - 1873, n=26) 1%	1306 (631 - 2160, n=38, last 2 years) -12%
4K-64 Write	1793.98	2174.26 21%	1537.04 -14%	1841.59 3%	1625 (992 - 1882, n=26) -9%	1535 (539 - 2314, n=38, last 2 years) -14%
Access Time Read *	0.046	0.057 -24%	0.069 -50%	0.087 -89%	0.0516 (0.033 - 0.089, n=26) -12%	0.0655 (0.038 - 0.156, n=36, last 2 years) -42%
Access Time Write *	0.034	0.068 -100%	0.106 -212%	0.04 -18%	0.0558 (0.026 - 0.208, n=26) -64%	0.0734 (0.019 - 0.99, n=38, last 2 years) -116%
Score Read	1798	1993 11%	1373 -24%	1726 -4%	1747 (966 - 2221, n=26) -3%	1608 (940 - 2670, n=38, last 2 years) -11%
Score Write	2136	2601 22%	1762 -18%	2155 1%	1942 (1323 - 2249, n=26) -9%	1832 (832 - 2601, n=38, last 2 years) -14%
Score Total	4835	5630 16%	3801 -21%	4781 -1%	4588 (2742 - 5565, n=26) -5%	4226 (2206 - 5885, n=38, last 2 years) -13%
Copy ISO MB/s	2302.06	2588.93 12%	1768.18 -23%	1981.66 -14%	2280 (1375 - 3193, n=18) -1%	2260 (1191 - 3142, n=22, last 2 years) -2%
Copy Program MB/s	564.27	790.95 40%	627.09 11%	501.25 -11%	558 (198 - 874, n=18) -1%	541 (106 - 1074, n=22, last 2 years) -4%
Copy Game MB/s	1336.11	1624.51 22%	1476.6 11%	1139.5 -15%	1302 (865 - 1677, n=18) -3%	1220 (357 - 1929, n=22, last 2 years) -9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 6%	-22% / -24%	-7% / -8%	-12% / -10%	-11% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø3270 (2472.63-3356.07)

MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø3406 (2690.44-3422.34)

Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB: Ø3251 (1331.55-3434.09)

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3028 (2495.82-3053.66)

Placa Gráfica

O Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q é a versão profissional da GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q. Ela apresenta 16.384 GB de VRAM. Os resultados do 3DMark estão em um nível normal para este tipo de GPU. Não observamos um aumento de desempenho no modo Rendering. O gráfico UHD 630 integrado no Core i7-9750H está habilitado e a tecnologia Optimus da NVIDIA é utilizada

Nvidia especifica um relógio de base de 600 MHz e um relógio de impulso de 1350 MHz para esta GPU. Relógios mais altos são possíveis desde que a GPU não atinja um limite térmico ou de potência. O relógio máximo é de 1849 MHz. Na referência com o Witcher 3vimos as velocidades médias do relógio de 1200 MHz e 1270 MHz (em modo Rendering )

3D Mark 11 (plugado, modo de renderização)

3D Mark 11 (plugado, modo de renderização, velocidade do ventilador ajustada ao máximo)

3DMark 11 Performance		20824 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		29456 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16986 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6972 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	27607 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	27290 Points ∼99% +4%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (24156 - 28524, n=9)	26602 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	26550 Points ∼96% +1%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	26242 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	26219 Points ∼95%
Average of class Workstation (3870 - 32999, n=42, last 2 years)	16715 Points ∼61% -36%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	20164 Points ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	19924 Points ∼99% +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (18247 - 21115, n=10)	19825 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	19616 Points ∼97%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	19353 Points ∼96% -1%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	19342 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Workstation (3030 - 24354, n=41, last 2 years)	12562 Points ∼62% -36%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	126073 Points ∼100% +125%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (50993 - 126073, n=7)	78524 Points ∼62% +40%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	71388 Points ∼57% +28%
Average of class Workstation (18131 - 133756, n=28, last 2 years)	57509 Points ∼46% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	55927 Points ∼44%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	50993 Points ∼40% -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	7645 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7459 Points ∼98% +3%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (6999 - 7977, n=10)	7432 Points ∼97% +3%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	7349 Points ∼96% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H (Rendering)	7331 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	7234 Points ∼95%
Average of class Workstation (918 - 9956, n=42, last 2 years)	4745 Points ∼62% -34%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	156.91 fps ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	138.42 fps ∼88% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	135.9 fps ∼87% +15%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (107 - 157, n=8)	126 fps ∼80% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	118.27 fps ∼75%
Average of class Workstation (28.8 - 230, n=21, last 2 years)	110 fps ∼70% -7%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	165.01 fps ∼100% +33%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	152.9 fps ∼93% +23%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (121 - 165, n=8)	140 fps ∼85% +12%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	127.52 fps ∼77% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	124.52 fps ∼75%
Average of class Workstation (10.5 - 258, n=21, last 2 years)	104 fps ∼63% -16%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	98.84 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	96.9 fps ∼98% +9%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	96.14 fps ∼97% +8%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (89 - 100, n=8)	95.8 fps ∼97% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	89 fps ∼90%
Average of class Workstation (11.8 - 126, n=21, last 2 years)	71.2 fps ∼72% -20%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	66.4 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	65.81 fps ∼99% +14%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	63.34 fps ∼95% +10%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (57.8 - 66.4, n=8)	62.6 fps ∼94% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	57.83 fps ∼87%
Average of class Workstation (9.7 - 109, n=21, last 2 years)	46.7 fps ∼70% -19%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	105.42 fps ∼100% +43%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	92.7 fps ∼88% +26%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (70.3 - 105, n=8)	83.4 fps ∼79% +13%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	76.36 fps ∼72% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	73.82 fps ∼70%
Average of class Workstation (17 - 179, n=21, last 2 years)	73 fps ∼69% -1%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	14.82 fps ∼100% +7%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (13.3 - 16.1, n=8)	14.5 fps ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	14.4 fps ∼97% +4%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	13.93 fps ∼94% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	13.82 fps ∼93%
Average of class Workstation (0.61 - 26, n=21, last 2 years)	10.8 fps ∼73% -22%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	145.14 fps ∼100% +27%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	136.01 fps ∼94% +19%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (114 - 145, n=8)	127 fps ∼88% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	122.7 fps ∼85% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	114.13 fps ∼79%
Average of class Workstation (25.2 - 172, n=21, last 2 years)	102 fps ∼70% -11%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	154.88 fps ∼100% +37%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	133.7 fps ∼86% +18%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (113 - 155, n=8)	126 fps ∼81% +11%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	125 fps ∼81% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	113.08 fps ∼73%
Average of class Workstation (21.6 - 220, n=21, last 2 years)	105 fps ∼68% -7%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	184.2 fps ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (159 - 184, n=4)	176 fps ∼96% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	158.88 fps ∼86%
Average of class Workstation (23.6 - 236, n=11, last 2 years)	130 fps ∼71% -18%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	158.94 fps ∼100% +33%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	150.44 fps ∼95% +26%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	138.3 fps ∼87% +16%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (120 - 159, n=8)	135 fps ∼85% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	119.66 fps ∼75%
Average of class Workstation (37.3 - 217, n=40, last 2 years)	108 fps ∼68% -10%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	306.13 fps ∼100% +25%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	295.24 fps ∼96% +21%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	292.9 fps ∼96% +20%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (244 - 306, n=8)	287 fps ∼94% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	244.13 fps ∼80%
Average of class Workstation (18.9 - 465, n=39, last 2 years)	166 fps ∼54% -32%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	98.74 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	97.2 fps ∼98% +9%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	95.24 fps ∼96% +7%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (89.2 - 98.7, n=8)	95.2 fps ∼96% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	89.2 fps ∼90%
Average of class Workstation (12.6 - 127, n=38, last 2 years)	60.5 fps ∼61% -32%
Medical (medical-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	102.53 fps ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	99.1 fps ∼97% +11%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	97.67 fps ∼95% +10%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (79 - 103, n=8)	89.8 fps ∼88% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	88.89 fps ∼87%
Average of class Workstation (6.8 - 133, n=39, last 2 years)	56.4 fps ∼55% -37%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	231.32 fps ∼100% +29%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	214.3 fps ∼93% +19%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	210.39 fps ∼91% +17%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (180 - 231, n=8)	206 fps ∼89% +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	179.51 fps ∼78%
Average of class Workstation (30.8 - 341, n=39, last 2 years)	137 fps ∼59% -24%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	38.34 fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (35.4 - 39.9, n=8)	37.3 fps ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	36.9 fps ∼96% +4%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	36.8 fps ∼96% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	35.39 fps ∼92%
Average of class Workstation (0.72 - 57.3, n=39, last 2 years)	22.5 fps ∼59% -36%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	238.42 fps ∼100% +31%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	231.9 fps ∼97% +27%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	224.9 fps ∼94% +24%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (182 - 238, n=8)	218 fps ∼91% +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	181.9 fps ∼76%
Average of class Workstation (27.8 - 320, n=39, last 2 years)	138 fps ∼58% -24%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	259.66 fps ∼100% +39%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	242.87 fps ∼94% +30%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	225 fps ∼87% +20%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (187 - 260, n=8)	222 fps ∼85% +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	186.86 fps ∼72%
Average of class Workstation (27.7 - 339, n=39, last 2 years)	150 fps ∼58% -20%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	180.9 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK	178.3 fps ∼99% +13%
Dell Precision 7550 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	176.18 fps ∼97% +12%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (157 - 182, n=8)	175 fps ∼97% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	157.31 fps ∼87%
Average of class Workstation (20 - 232, n=40, last 2 years)	116 fps ∼64% -26%

Desempenho nos jogos

O laptop Asus pode rodar todos os jogos atuais sem problemas. Ele pode normalmente alcançar taxas de quadros jogáveis a 1080p nas configurações mais altas. A GPU luta para lidar com resoluções acima de 1080p. Para alcançar taxas de quadros jogáveis a 4K, os usuários terão que baixar as configurações de gráficos

Embora não haja diferença entre o modo Normal e o modo Rendering no benchmark 3DMark, o modo Rendering proporciona um ligeiro aumento na performance quando se joga. Neste modo, a GPU é capaz de alcançar relógios um pouco mais altos no teste de esforço de jogo com o Witcher 3

The Witcher 3 | Death Stranding | Horizon Zero Dawn | Doom Eternal

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (Rendering)	85.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	84.6 fps ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	83.6 fps ∼98% -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (71 - 88.5, n=10)	81.9 fps ∼96% -3%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	81.1 (77^min - 87^max) fps ∼95% -4%
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	77.3 (73^min - 82^max) fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Workstation (8.4 - 110, n=38, last 2 years)	52.7 fps ∼62% -38%

Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	101.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (97.4 - 102, n=2)	99.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Average of class Workstation (76 - 120, n=4, last 2 years)	98.7 fps ∼97% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	97.4 fps ∼96%

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (rendering)	89 fps ∼100% +3%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (86 - 89, n=2)	87.5 fps ∼98% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	86 fps ∼97%
Average of class Workstation (56 - 89, n=4, last 2 years)	78.5 fps ∼88% -9%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (Rendering)	145.3 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (138 - 145, n=3)	141 fps ∼97% +2%
Average of class Workstation (103 - 181, n=5, last 2 years)	141 fps ∼97% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	140.6 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	137.8 fps ∼95%

Usamos o videogame conhecido como O Witcher 3 para verificar se as taxas de quadros podem ser mantidas consistentemente durante um período de tempo prolongado. Para isso, executamos o jogo nas configurações mais altas a 1080p por uma hora. Durante toda a execução do jogo, o personagem controlado pelo jogador simplesmente fica parado. Não há quedas na taxa de quadros a serem relatadas

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Revisão: Poderosa estação de trabalho com pontos fracos

Os Top 10

Case &amp; Connectivity - Sem Thunderbolt 3 para o W500G5T

Size Comparison

Anschlussausstattung

Dispositivos de entrada - O StudioBook oferece uma luz de fundo de teclado

Display - Painel IPS 4K

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Desempenho - Poderoso o suficiente para todas as aplicações

Configurações do sistema

Processador

Desempenho do sistema

Latências DPC

Dispositivos de armazenamento

Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa Gráfica

Desempenho nos jogos

Case & Connectivity - Sem Thunderbolt 3 para o W500G5T