Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook UX360UA

Candidato instável. O conversível basicamente bom e muito duradouro da gama premium tropeça - entre outras coisas - com suas dobradiças redesenhadas. O fabricante terá que rever este recurso, dado que uma tela que se balança atrapalha o uso no modo portátil. Isso é tudo o que deve ser criticado, dado que o novo ZenBook tem muito o que oferecer.
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Processador
Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1050 MHz, Memoría: 1600 MHz, memória compartilhada, 20.19.15.4416
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR3, 1600 MHz, dual-channel, soldada, sem bancos de memória livres
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 10-pontos, AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), 512 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Conector de entrada/saída de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.9 x 321 x 219
Bateria
57 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, lado inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim
peso
1.2 kg
Preço
1200 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA
Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA

Size Comparison

343.8 mm 230.4 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg324.8 mm 224.4 mm 20.4 mm 1.6 kg330 mm 228 mm 12.8 mm 1.2 kg323 mm 220 mm 13.9 mm 1.3 kg321 mm 219 mm 13.9 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right: SD-card, audio in/out, USB 3.1 Typ C, HDMI, USB 3.0, power-in
Right: SD-card, audio in/out, USB 3.1 Typ C, HDMI, USB 3.0, power-in
Left: USB 3.0, vent, volume control, power button
Left: USB 3.0, vent, volume control, power button
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
 
31 MB/s
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
 
14.3 MB/s -54%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
 
37 MB/s
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
 
25.2 MB/s -32%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
439 MBit/s -13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
323 MBit/s -39%
314
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 344 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344 cd/m²
Contraste: 1274:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.67 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.30
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
LGD04A5, , 1920x1280, 12.00
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
LEN40E6 N125HCE-GN1, , 1920x1080, 12.50
Display
6%
-20%
-33%
Display P3 Coverage
64.8
69.6
7%
52.9
-18%
42.98
-34%
sRGB Coverage
93.1
98
5%
71.8
-23%
62.8
-33%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66
70.7
7%
52.6
-20%
44.55
-32%
Response Times
606%
-54%
-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
29 ?(11, 18)
36 ?(12, 24)
-24%
51 ?(19, 32)
-76%
64 ?(30, 34)
-121%
Response Time Black / White *
19 ?(7, 12)
30 ?(8, 22)
-58%
25 ?(4, 21)
-32%
30 ?(5, 25, Nano Seconds ns)
-58%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(40)
1000 ?(10)
1900%
Screen
17%
-15%
-26%
Brightness middle
344
320
-7%
353
3%
371
8%
Brightness
326
308
-6%
347
6%
335
3%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
91
6%
84
-2%
Black Level *
0.27
0.17
37%
0.44
-63%
0.29
-7%
Contrast
1274
1882
48%
802
-37%
1279
0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.53
3.18
42%
6.09
-10%
8.51
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.01
9.91
1%
20.43
-104%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.67
4.13
38%
6.24
6%
9.23
-38%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.03 108%
2.41 91%
2.24 98%
CCT
7012 93%
6752 96%
7238 90%
6759 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
65
8%
46
-23%
41
-32%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
98
5%
71
-24%
62
-33%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
210% / 126%
-30% / -22%
-50% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ZenBook UX360UA vs. AdobeRGB
Asus ZenBook UX360UA vs. AdobeRGB
Asus ZenBook UX360UA vs. sRGB
Asus ZenBook UX360UA vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18080 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Core i7-6500U
123 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel Core i7-6500U
104 Points -15%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
62 Points -50%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel Core i7-6500U
321 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Core i7-6500U
317 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
264 Points -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
172 Points -46%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
123 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
317 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
3435 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3263 Points -5%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3161 Points -8%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2116 Points -38%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4368 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
4315 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3971 Points -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3435 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4315 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Lite-On CV1-8B256
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Liteon L8H-256V2G
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
3%
-15%
-1%
Read Seq
452.1
507
12%
517
14%
468.9
4%
Write Seq
421.3
354.4
-16%
270.1
-36%
297.3
-29%
Read 512
288.6
355.3
23%
369.2
28%
397.9
38%
Write 512
310.7
353.9
14%
264.6
-15%
297.1
-4%
Read 4k
28.52
32.66
15%
23.48
-18%
33.11
16%
Write 4k
72.1
81.6
13%
57.4
-20%
85.1
18%
Read 4k QD32
389.6
277.6
-29%
223.4
-43%
398.3
2%
Write 4k QD32
285.3
261.2
-8%
195.8
-31%
136.6
-52%
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Sequential Read: 452.1 MB/s
Sequential Write: 421.3 MB/s
512K Read: 288.6 MB/s
512K Write: 310.7 MB/s
4K Read: 28.52 MB/s
4K Write: 72.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 389.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 285.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1489 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1415 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1197 Points -20%
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7917 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7843 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
6759 Points -15%
3DMark 11 Performance
1651 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
65139 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5832 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 49.5 29.2 24.5
Battlefield 4 (2013) 32.2 24.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 13.6

Barulho

Ocioso
30.5 / 32.1 / 32.3 dB
HDD
32 dB
DVD
37.6 / dB
Carga
36.1 / 36.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Inatividade
 23.6 °C24.6 °C24.6 °C 
 23.4 °C24.1 °C24.2 °C 
 23.3 °C23.2 °C24.8 °C 
Máximo: 24.8 °C
Médio: 24 °C
25 °C24.7 °C24.6 °C
24.5 °C24.4 °C23.7 °C
24.1 °C23.8 °C23.4 °C
Máximo: 25 °C
Médio: 24.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.132.232.12532.634.432.63132.932.832.94031.631.531.65030.136.530.16328.527.828.58031.626.431.610039.724.939.712544.425.244.41604225.44220038.923.838.925049.82249.831555.421.655.440058.120.658.150058.619.858.663055.619.455.680059.518.559.5100066.118.166.1125063.417.863.4160062.417.762.4200065.817.865.8250062.617.762.6315062.717.862.7400061.61861.6500063.61863.6630062.818.262.8800061.918.261.91000059.118.359.1125005918.1591600052.418.152.4SPL74.730.574.7N34.81.534.8median 59.1median 18.2median 59.1Delta5.71.25.732.234.231.730.131.832.831.431.830.433.826.827.626.827.926.126.62627.22527.124.324.822.725.12232.921.34120.653.719.65519.156.118.862.218.660.118.864.218.360.218.664.518.666.418.767.218.864.718.967.219.166.71961.918.856.218.756.631.276.11.634.3median 19median 56.61.312.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159THP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.22 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6.9 / 7.9 / 8.3 Watt
Carga midlight 30.1 / 29.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.30
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.00
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50
Power Consumption
-18%
8%
22%
Idle Minimum *
6.9
6.2
10%
6
13%
3.6
48%
Idle Average *
7.9
8
-1%
8
-1%
6.3
20%
Idle Maximum *
8.3
11.6
-40%
10.6
-28%
7.6
8%
Load Average *
30.1
40
-33%
21.5
29%
27.2
10%
Load Maximum *
29.6
36.6
-24%
22
26%
22.8
23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 25min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 49min
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 43 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime
-42%
-28%
-35%
Reader / Idle
1165
669
-43%
681
-42%
943
-19%
WiFi v1.3
581
382
-34%
364
-37%
346
-40%
Load
169
85
-50%
161
-5%
92
-46%
H.264
393

Pro

+ Diversas configurações disponíveis
+ Especialmente compacto, leve e fino
+ Carcaça sólida com visual de alta qualidade
+ Belas superfícies
+ Bom desempenho do WiFi
+ Tela brilhante com alto contraste e ângulos de visão estáveis
+ Muito silencioso e frio
+ Excelente duração da bateria

Contra

- Dobradiças não suficientemente fortes para o modo portátil
- Moderadamente sensível às impressões digitais
- O usuário não pode fazer manutenção sem desmontar
- Poucas interfaces
- Lento leitor de cartões
- Asus FlipLock defeituoso
- Propriedades de deslizamento menos que ideais do ClickPad
- Adequação limitada para exteriores
In review: Asus ZenBook UX360UA. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Asus ZenBook UX360UA. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Nossos testes avaliam aquilo que recebemos - neste caso, um novo aparelho da loja online. Infelizmente, o conversível é degradado até tal grau, devido a suas dobradiças. É quase inútil no modo portátil ou em ambientes agitados como no carro ou no trem. Além disso, a tela normalmente também não consegue manter o ângulo no uso estacionário. As deduções afetaram a avaliação final de forma considerável. Solicitamos à Asus a comentar isto. O relatório será atualizado sobre este assunto. Nossos testes avaliam aquilo que recebemos - neste caso, um novo aparelho da loja online. Infelizmente, o conversível é degradado até tal grau, devido a suas dobradiças. É quase inútil no modo portátil ou em ambientes agitados como no carro ou no trem. Inclusive durante o uso estacionário, a tela frequentemente não consegue manter o ângulo. As deduções afetaram a avaliação final de forma considerável. Solicitamos à Asus a comentar isto. O relatório será atualizado sobre este assunto.

Perto, mas não conseguiu.  Suas dobradiças, às vezes, inúteis não permitem que outorguemos uma recomendação de compra para o Asus ZenBook Flip UX360UA leve e fino, apesar do seu desempenho convincente.

Fora isso, não há muitos motivos para reclamar. Achamos que a ausência de uma opção para a manutenção, piora as coisas, mas isto também é típico nesta categoria. Permanece inconcebível por que os parafusos Torx tinham de ser usados. A velocidade do leitor de cartões é inadequada, considerando o preço. E o testador teve uma quantidade incomum de problemas com as propriedades de deslizamento do touchpad.

A carcaça elegante, sólida e muito leve, definitivamente é um ponto positivo. Isto também é verdade para a tela, o ruído e a temperatura baixa do sistema, e, sobretudo, a excelente duração da bateria.

Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T - 10/17/2016 v5.1(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
66 / 98 → 67%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
69%
Conectividade
47 / 80 → 59%
Peso
73 / 35-78 → 88%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 68 → 82%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 87 → 97%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
90%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
61 / 85 → 71%
Médio
74%
82%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Asus ZenBook UX360UA
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-10-30 (Update: 2016-11- 4)