Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Fujitsu Lifebook T937 (i7, 512 GB)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET (jseb) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET (jseb) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 236 cd/m²
Contraste: 1311:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.48% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.08% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Sharp SHP141B , , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.30 | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.60 | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS VVX14T058J10, , 2560x1440, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 12.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 53% | 84% | 63% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.08 | 62.8 53% | 81.8 99% | 68.1 66% | 44.45 8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.6 | 94 53% | 98.3 60% | 97.2 58% | 65.5 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.48 | 64.7 52% | 82.2 94% | 70.2 65% | 46.04 8% |
| Response Times | 4% | 13% | 8% | 22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 42.4 ? 8% | 30 ? 35% | 38 ? 17% | 35 ? 24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 30.8 ? 4% | 29 ? 9% | 30.4 ? 5% | 26 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 212 ? | 210.1 ? -1% | 200 ? -6% | 219 ? 3% | |
| Screen | 11% | 3% | -24% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle | 236 | 523.2 122% | 316 34% | 284.7 21% | 326 38% |
| Brightness | 219 | 522 138% | 307 40% | 272 24% | 304 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 91 5% | 89 2% | 81 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.42 -133% | 0.29 -61% | 0.383 -113% | 0.29 -61% |
| Contrast | 1311 | 1246 -5% | 1090 -17% | 743 -43% | 1124 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.25 | 4 6% | 3.91 8% | 5.24 -23% | 6.49 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.4 | 8.6 -16% | 7.9 -7% | 11.22 -52% | 15.95 -116% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 5.5 -120% | 5.37 -115% | 7.32 -193% | 6.16 -146% |
| Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% | 2.22 99% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 7082 92% | 7546 86% | 7812 83% | 6277 104% | 7575 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 64.86 66% | 72 85% | 70.17 80% | 42 8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 93.97 52% | 98 58% | 94.68 53% | 65 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 23% /
18% | 33% /
20% | 16% /
-2% | -1% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 212 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 212 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 212 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3048 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4029 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4286 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 53% | -21% | -7% | 74% | |
| Read Seq | 549 | 1294 136% | 398.9 -27% | 512 -7% | 1315 140% |
| Write Seq | 526 | 865 64% | 402 -24% | 443.8 -16% | 594 13% |
| Read 512 | 406 | 303.1 | 363.1 | 661 | |
| Write 512 | 589 | 320.3 | 377.8 | 594 | |
| Read 4k | 34.71 | 31.75 -9% | 26.11 -25% | 33.99 -2% | 42.87 24% |
| Write 4k | 89.6 | 72.2 -19% | 57.7 -36% | 81.9 -9% | 151.6 69% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 279.3 | 493.3 77% | 245.8 -12% | 327.4 17% | 568 103% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 255.8 | 434.5 70% | 253.8 -1% | 189.2 -26% | 491.7 92% |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3369 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 33.72 | 10.98 | 9.52 | 7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.4 / 37.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.8 °C / 74.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+4.3 °C / 7.8 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.15 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 6.8 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
30 / 30.3 Watt |
   
| |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.30 | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.60 | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | -46% | -57% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 2.85 5% | 6.7 -123% | 6.82 -127% | 2.7 10% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 6.76 1% | 10.3 -51% | 8.21 -21% | 4.8 29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 6.91 10% | 13.5 -75% | 17.55 -128% | 6.6 14% |
| Load Average * | 30 | 32.88 -10% | 26 13% | 28.81 4% | 28.5 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 30.3 | 37.41 -23% | 28.8 5% | 34.07 -12% | 29 4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | -53% | -26% | 17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1022 | 1075 5% | 426 -58% | 922 -10% | 1346 32% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 523 | 486 -7% | 223 -57% | 356 -32% | 566 8% |
| Load | 184 | 105 -43% | 102 -45% | 120 -35% | 205 11% |
| H.264 | 206 | 532 |
Pro
Contra
O Fujitsu Lifebook T937 deixa uma impressão mista no teste. Enquanto muitas características indicam um portátil sólido e com os pés no chão, sem experiências, ainda existem algumas fraquezas que não deveriam acontecer por esse preço. O aparelho não apenas se sai mal nos benchmarks, mas também tem algumas pausas inexplicáveis de tempos em tempos. Em combinação com o touchpad que aparece antiquado e o mecanismo rotativo da tela que parece antigo, você pode vê-lo como um aparelho para mais velhos e também para uma audiência que não é dissuadida pelo alto preço. No entanto, é questionável se sua visão, enfraquecida com a idade, pode compensar o baixo brilho da tela.
Um portátil sólido e nada emocionante, com fraquezas desagradáveis.
Além da tela ser muito escura e dos benchmarks fracos, há apenas pontos positivos para relatar: acabamento sólido, boa duração da bateria, muitas conexões e dispositivos de entrada, e a excelente adição de acessórios. Se você considerar o preço justificado, ainda pode ser o dispositivo ideal para o público-alvo.
Fujitsu Lifebook T937
-
11/13/2017 v6(old)
Florian Schaar