Breve Análise do Conversível Fujitsu Lifebook T937 (i7, 512 GB)

Name: Breve Análise do Conversível Fujitsu Lifebook T937 (i7, 512 GB)
Item: Fujitsu Lifebook T937
Rating: 85
Author: Florian Schaar

Florian Schaar (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/18/2017

Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Security Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

Virado de cabeça. Um portátil empresarial com um pacote completo sem preocupações - já visível desde o momento de abrir a caixa. Mas os acessórios abundantes não conseguem esconder as fraquezas.

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS Fujitsu Lifebook T937 HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu Lifebook T937	121 MB/s ∼100%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET	77.8 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1	64 MB/s ∼53% -47%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Fujitsu Lifebook T937	178.4 MB/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1	86.9 MB/s ∼49% -51%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET	86.6 MB/s ∼49% -51%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	665 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Wireless-AC 7265	560 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	506 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	312 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Wireless-AC 7265	685 MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	518 MBit/s ∼76%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	474 MBit/s ∼69% -8%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	446 MBit/s ∼65% -14%


224 cd/m²	219 cd/m²	208 cd/m²
230 cd/m²	236 cd/m²	207 cd/m²
228 cd/m²	205 cd/m²	211 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 236 cd/m² Médio: 218.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 236 cd/m²
Contraste: 1311:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
62% sRGB (Argyll) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.48

Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Sharp SHP141B , , 1920x1080, 13.3	Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.6	Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS VVX14T058J10, , 2560x1440, 14	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Response Times		4%	13%	8%	22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	46 (22, 24)	42.4 (20.4, 22) 8%	30 (14, 16) 35%	38 (15.2, 22.8) 17%	35 (16, 19) 24%
Response Time Black / White *	32 (18, 14)	30.8 (18, 12.8) 4%	29 (8, 21) 9%	30.4 (6, 24.4) 5%	26 (7, 19) 19%
PWM Frequency	212 (30)	210.1 (99) -1%	200 (90) -6%	219 (99) 3%
Screen		11%	3%	-24%	-31%
Brightness middle	236	523.2 122%	316 34%	284.7 21%	326 38%
Brightness	219	522 138%	307 40%	272 24%	304 39%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	91 5%	89 2%	81 -7%
Black Level *	0.18	0.42 -133%	0.29 -61%	0.383 -113%	0.29 -61%
Contrast	1311	1246 -5%	1090 -17%	743 -43%	1124 -14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.25	4 6%	3.91 8%	5.24 -23%	6.49 -53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.4	8.6 -16%	7.9 -7%	11.22 -52%	15.95 -116%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.5	5.5 -120%	5.37 -115%	7.32 -193%	6.16 -146%
Gamma	2.48 ^97%	2.16 ^111%	2.36 ^102%	2.22 ^108%	2.32 ^103%
CCT	7082 ^92%	7546 ^86%	7812 ^83%	6277 ^104%	7575 ^86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	64.86 66%	72 85%	70.17 80%	42 8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	62	93.97 52%	98 58%	94.68 53%	65 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		8% / 9%	8% / 5%	-8% / -17%	-5% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

212 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 212 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 212 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10570 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-7600U	152 Points ∼74% +36%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	139 Points ∼67% +24%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS Intel Core i7-6500U	128 Points ∼62% +14%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	117 Points ∼57% +4%
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Intel Core i7-7600U	112 Points ∼54%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Core i7-7500U	329 Points ∼11% +36%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-7600U	329 Points ∼11% +36%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS Intel Core i7-6500U	307 Points ∼10% +27%
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Intel Core i7-7600U	242 (min: 180, max: 250) Points ∼8%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T Intel Core i7-6500U	221 Points ∼8% -9%

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4824 Points ∼74% +13%
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 HD Graphics 620, 7600U	4286 Points ∼66%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	3986 Points ∼61% -7%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	3830 Points ∼59% -11%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3510 Points ∼54% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4741 Points ∼78% +56%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3660 Points ∼60% +20%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	3137 Points ∼51% +3%
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 HD Graphics 620, 7600U	3048 Points ∼50%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	2985 Points ∼49% -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3048 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4029 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4286 pontos
Ajuda

	Fujitsu Lifebook T937	Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		53%	-21%	-7%	74%
Write 4k QD32	255.8	434.5 70%	253.8 -1%	189.2 -26%	491.7 92%
Read 4k QD32	279.3	493.3 77%	245.8 -12%	327.4 17%	567.8 103%
Write 4k	89.58	72.22 -19%	57.65 -36%	81.89 -9%	151.6 69%
Read 4k	34.71	31.75 -9%	26.11 -25%	33.99 -2%	42.87 24%
Write 512		589.3	320.3	377.8	594.4
Read 512		406	303.1	363.1	660.9
Write Seq	526	865.2 64%	402 -24%	443.8 -16%	594.2 13%
Read Seq	548.6	1294 136%	398.9 -27%	512.3 -7%	1315 140%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Sequential Read: 548.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 526 MB/s

4K Read: 34.71 MB/s

4K Write: 89.58 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 279.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 255.8 MB/s

3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3369 pontos
Ajuda

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	56.5 fps ∼100% +68%
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	50.5 fps ∼89% +50%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	45.2 (min: 13.5, max: 89.8) fps ∼80% +34%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	41.9 fps ∼74% +24%
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 HD Graphics 620, 7600U	33.72 fps ∼60%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	33.72	10.98	9.52	7	fps

Barulho

Ocioso		30 / 30 / 30 dB
Carga		37.4 / 37.6 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.2 °C	34.1 °C	24 °C
29.2 °C	27.6 °C	22.6 °C
23.8 °C	23.1 °C	22.6 °C

Máximo: 35.2 °C
Médio: 26.9 °C


24.1 °C	31.5 °C	33.9 °C
22.6 °C	29.8 °C	23.9 °C
21.3 °C	21.7 °C	23.1 °C

Máximo: 33.9 °C
Médio: 25.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 34.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Fujitsu Lifebook T937 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.15 / 0.48 Watt
Ocioso	3 / 6.8 / 7.7 Watt
Carga	30 / 30.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Fujitsu Lifebook T937 7600U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3	Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.6	Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 2560x1440, 14	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET 7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Power Consumption		-3%	-46%	-57%	12%
Idle Minimum *	3	2.85 5%	6.7 -123%	6.82 -127%	2.7 10%
Idle Average *	6.8	6.76 1%	10.3 -51%	8.21 -21%	4.8 29%
Idle Maximum *	7.7	6.91 10%	13.5 -75%	17.55 -128%	6.6 14%
Load Average *	30	32.88 -10%	26 13%	28.81 4%	28.5 5%
Load Maximum *	30.3	37.41 -23%	28.8 5%	34.07 -12%	29 4%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		17h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		8h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 04min

	Fujitsu Lifebook T937 7600U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh	Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh	Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Yoga 20FQ-000QUS 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh	HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET 7500U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh
Battery Runtime		-15%	-53%	-26%	17%
Reader / Idle	1022	1075 5%	426 -58%	922 -10%	1346 32%
WiFi v1.3	523	486 -7%	223 -57%	356 -32%	566 8%
Load	184	105 -43%	102 -45%	120 -35%	205 11%
H.264			206		532

Pro

+ Excelente acabamento

+ Recursos excepcionais

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Boa capacidade de manutenção

+ Muitos acessórios

+ Boa duração da bateria e bateria removível

+ Tela táctil e caneta funcionam sem problemas

+ Ventilador quase silencioso

+ Baixa temperatura

Contra

- Tela muito escura

- Desempenho abaixo das expectativas

Fujitsu Lifebook T937 - provided by Fujitsu Germany

O Fujitsu Lifebook T937 deixa uma impressão mista no teste. Enquanto muitas características indicam um portátil sólido e com os pés no chão, sem experiências, ainda existem algumas fraquezas que não deveriam acontecer por esse preço. O aparelho não apenas se sai mal nos benchmarks, mas também tem algumas pausas inexplicáveis de tempos em tempos. Em combinação com o touchpad que aparece antiquado e o mecanismo rotativo da tela que parece antigo, você pode vê-lo como um aparelho para mais velhos e também para uma audiência que não é dissuadida pelo alto preço. No entanto, é questionável se sua visão, enfraquecida com a idade, pode compensar o baixo brilho da tela.

Um portátil sólido e nada emocionante, com fraquezas desagradáveis.

Além da tela ser muito escura e dos benchmarks fracos, há apenas pontos positivos para relatar: acabamento sólido, boa duração da bateria, muitas conexões e dispositivos de entrada, e a excelente adição de acessórios. Se você considerar o preço justificado, ainda pode ser o dispositivo ideal para o público-alvo.

Fujitsu Lifebook T937 - 2017-11-1311/13/2017 v6
Florian Schaar

Acabamento

83 / 98 → 85%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

68 / 80 → 85%

Peso

70 / 35-78 → 82%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

49 / 68 → 71%

Desempenho da aplicação

80 / 87 → 91%

Temperatura

96%

Ruído

92%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

41 / 85 → 49%

Médio

76%

85%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado