Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível HP Elite Dragonfly Business: Menos de 1 kg apenas com a bateria menor
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.3 % | 04/2020 | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % | 12/2019 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.4 % | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 411 cd/m²
Contraste: 1868:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -4% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69 | 69.6 1% | 65.2 -6% | 69.9 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.9 -1% | 97 -2% | 99.2 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.9 | 71.5 1% | 67.3 -5% | 71.5 1% |
| Response Times | -5% | 6% | 18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 ? | 60.8 ? -0% | 59.2 ? 3% | 47.6 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.8 ? | 36.8 ? -9% | 30.8 ? 9% | 29.2 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | |||
| Screen | -44% | -56% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 411 | 447.4 9% | 319 -22% | 549.8 34% |
| Brightness | 388 | 420 8% | 306 -21% | 520 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 90 3% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.31 -41% | 0.15 32% | 0.39 -77% |
| Contrast | 1868 | 1443 -23% | 2127 14% | 1410 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.23 -135% | 6.1 -239% | 2.12 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 9.34 -128% | 9.7 -137% | 3.66 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.32 -32% | 1 -0% | 1.37 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 6.1 -144% | 8.6 -244% | 2.6 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.62 84% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6448 101% | 6136 106% | 6613 98% | 6884 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.7 | 64.8 0% | 61.9 -4% | 65.4 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | 98.9 0% | 96.8 -3% | 99.7 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-31% | -18% /
-39% | 4% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3563 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4647 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4548 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3636 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1956 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 57515 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1091 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 417 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 55.6 | 32.3 | 27.7 | 9.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.1 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 66.4 | 40.2 | 18.7 | 16.9 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 11.7 | 9.84 | 9.25 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 30 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) | ||
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -2% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 29.5 | 28.5 3% | 29.2 1% | 28.1 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 28.5 3% | 29.2 1% | 28.1 5% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 28.5 5% | 29.2 3% | 28.1 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 28.5 6% | 29.2 4% | 28.1 7% |
| Load Average * | 31.6 | 28.5 10% | 35 -11% | 31.7 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.6 | 35.3 -12% | 35 -11% | 43.4 -37% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.3 | 43.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.36 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.1 / 8.1 Watt |
| Carga |
35.6 / 44.7 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | -20% | 1% | -11% | -45% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.9 -11% | 3.46 1% | 2.6 26% | 3.81 ? -9% | 5.44 ? -55% |
| Idle Average * | 5.1 | 6.3 -24% | 5.88 -15% | 5.3 -4% | 6.94 ? -36% | 8.27 ? -62% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 6.8 16% | 9.12 -13% | 7 14% | 8.75 ? -8% | 10.8 ? -33% |
| Load Average * | 35.6 | 32.6 8% | 45.6 -28% | 43.1 -21% | 35 ? 2% | 46.7 ? -31% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 59 -32% | 65.9 -47% | 49 -10% | 47.5 ? -6% | 65.4 ? -46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 25.6 | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | -27% | -11% | -9% | |
| H.264 | 717 | 600 -16% | 769 ? 7% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 605 | 594 -2% | 492 -19% | 537 -11% | 564 ? -7% |
| Load | 166 | 160 -4% | 91 -45% | 121.7 ? -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2223 | 1112 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – O Elite Dragonfly é um conversível empresarial muito bom
O Elite Dragonfly é um verddeiro EliteBook? Após nossa análise abrangente, podemos responder a essa pergunta com um "sim" definitivo. Você obtém um chassi de alta qualidade e robusto, recursos abrangentes de segurança, bem como opções familiares de serviços, incluindo longa disponibilidade de peças de reposição. O conversível premium da HP também pode convencer em muitos outros aspectos, começando com excelentes dispositivos de entrada, módulos de comunicação rápidos, incluindo LTE e bateria de longa duração. No entanto, este último é reservado para o modelo com bateria maior, o que aumenta o peso para mais de 1 kg. Ainda assim, achamos que esse é um bom compromisso.
Também não há muitas críticas para as portas, porque você também recebe uma porta USB tipo A normal e uma saída HDMI em tamanho real, além dos conectores USB-C finos. Ainda achamos que existem maneiras de otimizar a situação das portas: O layout (USB-C mais para trás e ideal para os dois lados) e um leitor SD, pelo menos para cartões microSD.
O HP Elite Dragonfly é um conversível empresarial muito bom Definitivamente, existem algumas desvantagens, mas elas não são realmente importantes. Portanto, recomendamos o Elite Dragonfly se você estiver procurando por um conversível empresarial.
Existem outras desvantagens, incluindo a configuração TDP muito conservadora do processador. O desempenho é reduzido após alguns segundos, mas isso ainda é completamente suficiente para tarefas comuns do escritório. Você deve saber que existem dispositivos melhores se precisar de muito desempenho da CPU. O ventilador é muito silencioso em troca, mesmo que pensemos que ele reage à carga muito rapidamente.
Nossa recomendação é principalmente para nossa configuração de teste com o Core i5, a tela táctil padrão de 1080p e a bateria maior. Você pode reduzir o peso com a bateria menor, mas preferimos tempos de duração de bateria mais longos em um dispositivo móvel. Esse também é um problema da tela 4K opcional, pois consumirá muito mais energia. Também estamos muito felizes com a tela táctil padrão de 1080p, apenas os tempos de resposta lentos (você se acostumará com eles) e as superfícies refletivas são desvantagens.
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
-
04/03/2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Pricecompare
