Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US (i5-7200U, FHD)

Menos caro… mas ainda caro. A configuração do ThinkPad X1 Yoga atual preserva a maior parte das maiores vantagens da nossa unidade de teste anterior, enquanto abaixa o preço praticamente para a metade. Este é o verdadeiro ponto certo no mercado de PC conversível?
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US (ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 1000 MHz, 21.20.16.4639
Memória
8 GB 
, LPDDR3-1866 (dual-channel, soldered)
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Sim, multi-touch de 10 pontos, native pen support, B140HAN03.6, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Disco rígido
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Conexant SmartAudio HD
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5, Card Reader: microSD, Touch-Fingerabdruckleser Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: girômetro
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17 x 335 x 231
Bateria
56 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (2 x 2 W), Teclado: Teclado de 6-filas (rise & fall), resistente a respingos, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.42 kg, Suprimento de energia: 282 g
Preço
2267 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

335 mm 231 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg333 mm 229 mm 17.4 mm 1.4 kg316.9 mm 218.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg299 mm 219 mm 15.4 mm 1 kg292 mm 208.8 mm 9.76 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
663 MBit/s +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
495 MBit/s
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s -8%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
446 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
678 MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
623 MBit/s
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
613 MBit/s -2%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
500 MBit/s -20%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
312 MBit/s -50%
293.5
cd/m²
313.7
cd/m²
280.1
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
336.5
cd/m²
287.8
cd/m²
314.7
cd/m²
320.9
cd/m²
298.2
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
B140HAN03.6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 336.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 304.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.56 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1346:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
B140HAN03.6, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
LEN4140, OLED, 14.00, 2560x1440
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
BOE06DC, IPS, 12.30, 1920x1280
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 12.50, 1920x1080
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
CMN1374, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080
Display
10%
18%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
57.9
62.8
8%
68.7
19%
65.5
13%
sRGB Coverage
84.4
94
11%
96.8
15%
88.8
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
58.9
64.7
10%
70.4
20%
64.9
10%
Response Times
91%
4%
-36%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 ?(22.4, 23.2)
3.6 ?(1.6, 2)
92%
42.4 ?(20.4, 22)
7%
67 ?(33, 34)
-47%
55.2 ?(21.2, 34)
-21%
Response Time Black / White *
31.2 ?(18, 13.2)
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
90%
30.8 ?(18, 12.8)
1%
39 ?(22, 17)
-25%
27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)
13%
PWM Frequency
240.4 ?(80)
210.1 ?(99)
Screen
8%
7%
-2%
-14%
Brightness middle
336.5
243
-28%
523.2
55%
442
31%
262
-22%
Brightness
305
240
-21%
522
71%
410
34%
256
-16%
Brightness Distribution
83
95
14%
88
6%
86
4%
83
0%
Black Level *
0.25
0.42
-68%
0.22
12%
0.25
-0%
Contrast
1346
1246
-7%
2009
49%
1048
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4
5.3
-33%
4
-0%
5.22
-31%
5.13
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.5
8.9
-37%
8.6
-32%
11.84
-82%
9.46
-46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
3.7
-28%
5.5
-90%
7.88
-172%
6.23
-115%
Gamma
2.22 99%
1.78 124%
2.16 102%
2.51 88%
2.45 90%
CCT
6487 100%
6202 105%
7546 86%
6756 96%
6413 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.4
84.8
127%
64.86
73%
64
71%
57.84
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58.8
100
70%
93.97
60%
97
65%
88.57
51%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
50% / 25%
7% / 7%
-7% / -2%
-3% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.4 ms rise
↘ 23.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
HD Tune
HD Tune
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
160 Points +24%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel Core i7-7600U
156 Points +21%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
152 Points +18%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
144 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
373 Points +16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
346 Points +8%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
329 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel Core i7-7600U
319 Points -1%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.85 Points +27%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.76 Points +21%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
1.64 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.46 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
4.08 Points +14%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.62 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.58 Points
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
3.57 Points 0%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
546 s * -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
500 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
35.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.58 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.46 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
45.66 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
321 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4741 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3860 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3817 Points
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
3774 Points -1%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8
3654 Points -4%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4852 Points +4%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
4803 Points +2%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8
4797 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4687 Points
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3510 Points -25%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5051 Points +10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
4781 Points +4%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4602 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4599 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3817 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4599 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4687 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3311 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
AS SSD
221%
16%
-38%
-47%
Seq Read
1493
2783
86%
1328
-11%
485.8
-67%
486.9
-67%
Seq Write
286.2
1734
506%
223.1
-22%
243.6
-15%
201.9
-29%
4K Read
31.96
56.4
76%
27.6
-14%
23.06
-28%
27.37
-14%
4K Write
91.9
158.1
72%
1.23
-99%
76.7
-17%
52.6
-43%
4K-64 Read
551
2140
288%
1607
192%
358
-35%
286.2
-48%
4K-64 Write
340.4
1196
251%
126.1
-63%
160.9
-53%
120.9
-64%
Score Read
732
2475
238%
1768
142%
430
-41%
362
-51%
Score Write
461
1527
231%
150
-67%
262
-43%
194
-58%
Score Total
1515
5215
244%
2760
82%
906
-40%
736
-51%
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 314.1 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 1213 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 778 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 0.1 ms
Índice de Explosão: 302.6 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 5.3 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1633 Points +5%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1589 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1562 Points
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1553 Points -1%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U
1476 Points -6%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1608 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1566 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1490 Points -7%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1354 Points -16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U
1347 Points -16%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
8850 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
8570 Points
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U
8220 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
8075 Points -6%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
7562 Points -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1084 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1017 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1000 Points -2%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U
972 Points -4%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
49846 Points
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U
44238 Points -11%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
41229 Points -17%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
10136 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1732 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
49899 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6530 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
933 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
374 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 61 33 27 8

Barulho

Ocioso
27.9 / 27.9 / 27.9 dB
Carga
33.6 / 33.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 27.9 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
Noise
-9%
1%
-4%
-4%
off / environment *
27.9
29.3
-5%
28.2
-1%
30.4
-9%
29
-4%
Idle Minimum *
27.9
29.3
-5%
28.2
-1%
30.5
-9%
29
-4%
Idle Average *
27.9
31.1
-11%
28.2
-1%
30.5
-9%
29
-4%
Idle Maximum *
27.9
33.3
-19%
28.2
-1%
30.5
-9%
29
-4%
Load Average *
33.6
33.3
1%
30.4
10%
31.2
7%
33.6
-0%
Load Maximum *
33.6
38.9
-16%
34
-1%
31.3
7%
35.8
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 32 °C45.4 °C30.6 °C 
 27.2 °C40.4 °C26.8 °C 
 26.8 °C26 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C
27.8 °C40 °C28.6 °C
24.8 °C31.8 °C26.4 °C
23 °C24.6 °C24.4 °C
Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 27.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.3 °C / 2.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.640.840.62536.435.836.43135.734.935.74034.534.234.55033.933.733.96333.835.433.88031.832.131.810031.73131.712531.230.431.216036.129.836.12004028.84025047.627.647.631553.127.453.140055.526.655.55006025.66063057.825.457.880060.425.260.4100056.724.656.7125056.524.356.5160065.223.965.2200059.323.959.3250058.223.858.2315057.823.657.8400061.823.361.8500064.823.464.8630056.723.356.780006723.3671000059.523.359.51250051.523.251.51600046.123.346.1SPL73.236.373.2N32.22.732.2median 56.7median 24.3median 56.7Delta6.41.76.431.830.331.83232.23236.335.136.329.328.329.328.431.428.427.627.527.626.725.826.725.825.325.825.624.125.624.923.524.926.122.126.138.421.738.448.421.148.454.620.654.654.52054.555.919.455.961.218.761.257.618.657.658.51858.562.51862.564.717.664.765.417.765.462.317.862.362.118.262.159.418.359.457.118.457.155.218.455.249.818.649.855.718.555.755.918.655.973.130.673.129.21.429.2median 55.9median 18.6median 55.910.2110.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015USToshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 7.4 / 7.6 Watt
Carga midlight 31.3 / 34.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14.00
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.30
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Power Consumption
-28%
8%
25%
10%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
4.9
-11%
2.85
35%
3.4
23%
3.2
27%
Idle Average *
7.4
7.6
-3%
6.76
9%
5.8
22%
5.5
26%
Idle Maximum *
7.6
13.8
-82%
6.91
9%
6.7
12%
6.5
14%
Load Average *
31.3
33.4
-7%
32.88
-5%
21.4
32%
29.7
5%
Load Maximum *
34.4
46.5
-35%
37.41
-9%
21.6
37%
41.3
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 47min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 15min
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime
-17%
-1%
18%
54%
Reader / Idle
753
784
4%
1075
43%
1001
33%
1387
84%
WiFi v1.3
647
368
-43%
486
-25%
719
11%
630
-3%
Load
135
120
-11%
105
-22%
150
11%
244
81%

Pro

+ Design inteligente da carcaça e do teclado
+ Construção rígida
+ Rápido desempenho do sistema
+ Excelente teclado e touchpad
+ Seleção de portas muito pobre para sua classe
+ Sensor de digitais muito veloz e preciso
+ Tela brilhante e atraente que deixa a desejar na gama de cores
+ Stylus ativo incluído
+ 3 anos de garantia padrão

Contra

- Ainda bastante caro
- A tela é altamente refletiva.
- Extensibilidade limitada
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga

O ThinkPad X1 Yoga não é uma máquina barata, sem importar como esteja equipada, com preços acima de $2.000 para a maioria das configurações (hoje: $2.267). No entanto, com um custo de mais de $1.500 a manos que  que o nosso candidado de teste Core i7/OLED, esta unidade provavelmente parece muito mais alcançável para o usuário comercial médio. E essa não é a única coisa que torna potencialmente ainda mais atraente do que o seu par WQHD: também não há uma redução de desempenho sustentada pela CPU, é mais silencioso, a duração da bateria é consideravelmente mais longa na maioria dos casos, e as termais estão muito mais na linha. Também não há PWM em jogo, ao contrário do que descobrimos na nossa unidade de revisão OLED.

Não há realmente algo muito errado com o ThinkPad X1 Yoga; se o conversível em com dobradiça de 360 graus é o que você está procurando, realmente deve estar em sua lista de desejos.

Na verdade, além da falta de OLED e resolução WQHD (Este é Full HD), CPU ligeiramente menos capaz e SSD mais lento, estes são praticamente a mesma máquina. E por isso, não há muito errado com o ThinkPad X1 Yoga: é uma peça de tecnologia completa, silenciosa, legal, ágil e atraente. Se um conversível com dobradiça de 360 graus é o que você está procurando, ele realmente deve estar em sua lista de desejos.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US - 07/29/2017 v6(old)
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
92%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
64 / 80 → 80%
Peso
70 / 35-78 → 81%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
91 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
97%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
60 / 85 → 71%
Médio
81%
89%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US (i5-7200U, FHD)
Steve Schardein, 2017-08- 2 (Update: 2017-08-12)