Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M)

Name: Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Brand: Acer

Muito hardware por pouco dinheiro. Graças a uma GeForce GTX 950M e a um moderno processador Kaby Lake, o Acer Aspire E5-575G deve reproduzir inclusive jogos sofisticados fluentemente - e isto a um preço competitivo de apenas 600 Euros ($673). Qual é o truque?

Till Schönborn, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D (Aspire E15 E5 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 928 MHz, Memoría: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 362.03, Optimus

Memória

8 GB

, 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 1 de 2 slots ocupado

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, Iluminação de fundo de LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm, Slot M.2 vazio

Placa de Som

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29.2 x 382 x 259

Bateria

62 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Linux

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Fonte de alimentação de 90-watts, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.4 kg, Suprimento de energia: 460 g

Preço

630 Euro

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook
Aspire E15 E5 (Serie)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	77.6 MB/s +48%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1	57.4 MB/s +9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	52.6 MB/s
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873	24.2 MB/s -54%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2	13 MB/s -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	88.8 MB/s +10%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	80.9 MB/s
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873	27.5 MB/s -66%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2	25 MB/s -69%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	317 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	293 MBit/s


164 cd/m²	167 cd/m²	166 cd/m²
162 cd/m²	176 cd/m²	166 cd/m²
177 cd/m²	178 cd/m²	162 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei CMN15C4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 178 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 168.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 177 cd/m²
Contraste: 374:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.97 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Innolux N156HGE-EAL, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 ChiMei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) CMN15BA, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 LG LP156WF6-SPK1, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		100%	101%	26%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	38.57	84.2 118%	84.9 120%	48.96 27%	39.48 2%
sRGB Coverage	57.4	99.7 74%	99.8 74%	70.9 24%	59 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.89	82.7 107%	83.3 109%	50.3 26%	40.81 2%
Response Times		-5%	-15%		4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39 ?(21, 18)	44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU) -13%	44 ?(25, 19, short plateau) -13%		36 ?(13, 23) 8%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(19, 5)	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) 4%	28 ?(11, 17, short plateau) -17%		24 ?(8, 16) -0%
PWM Frequency		1000 ?(80)	200 ?(90)		50 ?(50)
Screen		13%	27%	51%	22%
Brightness middle	176	234 33%	249 41%	389 121%	291 65%
Brightness	169	219 30%	240 42%	353 109%	270 60%
Brightness Distribution	91	80 -12%	86 -5%	83 -9%	85 -7%
Black Level *	0.47	0.48 -2%	0.48 -2%	0.31 34%	0.38 19%
Contrast	374	488 30%	519 39%	1255 236%	766 105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.83	11.8 -34%	10.15 -15%	11.53 -31%	8.6 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.01	20.69 -48%			17.39 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.97	13.3 -48%	12.13 -35%	13.46 -50%	8.5 5%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.47 ^89%	2.48 ^89%	2.3 ^96%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	10234 ^64%	17098 ^38%	13445 ^48%	12024 ^54%	6184 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.8	74 101%	74 101%	46 25%	32 -13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.3	100 75%	100 75%	71 24%	59 3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		36% / 28%	38% / 37%	39% / 45%	9% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	141 Points +9%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points +9%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	136 Points +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	119 Points -8%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points +105%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points +103%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	465 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	347 Points +5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	300 Points -9%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	295 Points -11%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -13%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points +14%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	1.57 Points +6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	1.48 Points 0%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	1.46 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.35 Points -9%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	1.33 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.48 Points +102%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.41 Points +100%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	5.36 Points +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	3.83 Points +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	3.7 Points
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	3.33 Points -10%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.24 Points -12%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	3.19 Points -14%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	149 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	120.4 fps +7%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	112.1 fps
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	101.3 fps -10%
Pass 2
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	31 fps +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	22.62 fps +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	21.68 fps
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	19.04 fps -12%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4620

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11301

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5022

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.7 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

53.8 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.48 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

75 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB	Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		5491%	29%	14969%	15639%
Read Seq	95.3	433.2 355%	108.1 13%	503 428%	509 434%
Write Seq	85.6	131.9 54%	105.6 23%	302.9 254%	459.4 437%
Read 512	29.32	250 753%	35.32 20%	424.5 1348%	413.8 1311%
Write 512	25.93	90.6 249%	46.13 78%	302.2 1065%	383.6 1379%
Read 4k	0.366	30.69 8285%	0.413 13%	33.57 9072%	45.35 12291%
Write 4k	0.726	51.2 6952%	0.9 24%	90.6 12379%	100.1 13688%
Read 4k QD32	0.647	112.2 17242%	0.895 38%	353.7 54568%	356.1 54939%
Write 4k QD32	0.722	73.2 10039%	0.884 22%	294.1 40634%	294.1 40634%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ABD100

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 39.8 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 111.2 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 86 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 18.1 ms

Índice de Explosão: 113.3 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 10 %

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3390 Points +7%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	3266 Points +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	4498 Points +11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4047 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3970 Points -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3162 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3696 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4047 pontos
Ajuda

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5452 Points +28%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4482 Points +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U	4350 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4251 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4239 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2759 Points -35%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	27162 Points +21%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	22439 Points
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	21715 Points -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	21635 Points -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U	20061 Points -11%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U	17980 Points -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4249 Points +19%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3574 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	3555 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3238 Points -9%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U	3102 Points -13%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2816 Points -21%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		18647 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		4212 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		45360 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9392 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3218 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		1614 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Battlefield 4

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	35.8 fps +13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	31.6 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	30.6 (29^min - 34^max) fps -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	28.8 fps -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	29.6 fps +57%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	21.1 fps +12%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	18.8 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	18.2 (17^min - 21^max) fps -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	16.9 fps -10%

BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	110 fps +27%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC GeForce GTX 950M, 6300HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB	87.6 fps +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	86.7 fps
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	85.3 (14.66^min - 145.45^max) fps -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	69.5 (11.6^min - 138^max) fps -20%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	45.8 fps +31%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	35.7 (8.8^min - 109.06^max) fps +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	35 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	24 (5.7^min - 45.5^max) fps -31%

Battlefield 4
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	63.1 fps +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	61 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	46.2 fps -24%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	28.5 fps +6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	26.9 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	18.9 fps -30%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	126.8	96.8	86.7	35
Battlefield 4 (2013)	109.7	78.6	61	26.9
Dirt Rally (2015)	144.1	79.3	45.2	24.6
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)	33.8	30.6	18.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	45.2	31.6	18.8	16.9
The Division (2016)	63.8	41.5	20.4	15.4
Hitman 2016 (2016)	34.6	34.1	11.6
Overwatch (2016)	152.7	107.4	71.5	32.8
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	69.3	51.6	23.6	18.3
No Man's Sky (2016)	35.6	29.4	18.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	30.9	24.5	14.2

Barulho

Ocioso		30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB
HDD		31.2 dB
Carga		33.4 / 40.1 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.6 °C	41 °C	33.2 °C
42.3 °C	48.1 °C	33.1 °C
36.7 °C	41.8 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 48.1 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C


30.8 °C	42.1 °C	60.8 °C
31.5 °C	50.7 °C	44.1 °C
34.8 °C	37.4 °C	34.5 °C

Máximo: 60.8 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 55.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.8 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.25 / 1 Watt
Ocioso	6 / 8.1 / 9.8 Watt
Carga	52.5 / 81.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-27%	-40%	-65%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	6	8.3 -38%	8.7 -45%	10.2 -70%	5.6 7%
Idle Average *	8.1	12.1 -49%	14.5 -79%	15.6 -93%	10.9 -35%
Idle Maximum *	9.8	15.4 -57%	15.6 -59%	17 -73%	10.6 -8%
Load Average *	52.5	56 -7%	61 -16%	79 -50%	61 -16%
Load Maximum *	81.6	70 14%	82 -0%	115.2 -41%	60 26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 47min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 15min

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 56 Wh	Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		12%	-33%	-40%	-14%	-20%
Reader / Idle	767	667 -13%	521 -32%		715 -7%	535 -30%
H.264	460	335 -27%	114 -75%		241 -48%	305 -34%
WiFi v1.3	451	386 -14%	230 -49%	270 -40%	255 -43%	303 -33%
Load	75	152 103%	93 24%		108 44%	87 16%

Pro

+ Excelente razão preço-desempenho

+ Boa configuração

+ Processador veloz

+ Placa de vídeo apta para jogos

+ Resolução Full HD

+ USB Tipo C

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Slot M.2 livre

+ WiFi ac

Contra

- Brilho muito baixo da tela

- Sem sistema operacional Windows

- Disco rígido lento

- Afogamentos no teste de estresse

In review: Acer Aspire E5-575G. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Não deveria ser uma surpresa que um aparelho de gama alta sem compromissos não possa ser esperado da categoria de portáteis da faixa dos 600-Euros (~$673). A Acer, no entanto, oferece um aparelho com uma configuração sólida e apta para jogos para o mercado mainstream com o seu Aspire E15 E5-575G-549D. O seu preço baixo envolve algumas medidas de austeridade mais ou menos dolorosas. Obviamente não havia espaço para uma carcaça de metal, SSD veloz ou painel IPS brilhante o orçamento - mas um moderno processador Kaby Lake, veloz GPU de gama média, bem como 8 GB de memória DDR 4 e um grande disco rígido ainda eram viáveis. Esta configuração torna o Aspire incondicionalmente adequado para jogos, embora a resolução nativa da tela possa ser utilizada apenas para alguns casos. No entanto, todos os jogos mais recentes são jogáveis somente com algumas perdas visuais - coisa que não é necessariamente um problema para um portátil.

Podemos dar ao Aspire uma pontuação muito boa em termos de qualidade de construção e de dispositivos de entrada. Além do muito baixo brilho da tela, no geral, o aparelho dificilmente mostra grandes fraquezas e inclusive surpreende com fortalezas inesperadas em alguns aspectos: Sete a oito horas de duração de bateria ou o veloz Wi-Fi ac (apesar de apenas 1x1 TX/RX) não são encontrados em alguns modelos ainda mais caros. Por isso, podemos resumir assim:

Os compradores à procura de um acessível portátil multimídia, com reservas de desempenho para jogos atuais, não errarão com o Acer Aspire E5-575G. No entanto, o Aspire não é adequado para exteriores devido á sua tela muito escura.

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D - 2016-09-23 09/23/2016 v5.1^(old)
Till Schönborn

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

82%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

51 / 81 → 63%

Peso

60 / 20-67 → 85%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

70%

Desempenho do jogos

74 / 85 → 87%

Desempenho da aplicação

79 / 92 → 85%

Temperatura

85%

Ruído

91 / 95 → 96%

Audio

56%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Médio

73%

80%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M)

Till Schönborn, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-30)