Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL502VS

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/09/2016

Que comecem os jogos. A Asus nos enviou um dos primeiros portáteis de 15-polegadas com a extremamente veloz GPU Pascal GeForce GTX 1070. O leitor informado espera grandes ganhos no desempenho e não está decepcionado. O fabricante se foca na continuidade para os outros aspectos do sistema, o que normalmente é a decisão correta.

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T (Strix GL502VS Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 372.53, kein Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, ambos slots em uso
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB 
, m.2-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB @ 7200 rpm, 2,5-Zoll-HDD
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinaso de 3,5 mm estéreo, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 390 x 266
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (1280 x 720P @ 30fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo (3 W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Abraçadeira de cabos, ROG Gaming Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 570 g
Preço
2000 EUR

 

Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Asus ROG Strix GL502VS Maintenance

Size Comparison

Left side: AC power, Ethernet (fold-out), DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C
Left side: AC power, Ethernet (fold-out), DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C
Right side: Audio in/out, 2x USB 3.0, SD-card, Kensington
Right side: Audio in/out, 2x USB 3.0, SD-card, Kensington
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
648 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
559 MBit/s ∼100% +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
468 MBit/s ∼84%
290
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 315 cd/m² Médio: 289.9 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 315 cd/m²
Contraste: 984:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.17 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
83% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
8%
-9%
-3%
-65%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (16, 22)
34 (14, 20)
11%
43 (18, 25)
-13%
37 (15, 22)
3%
56.4 (22.4, 34)
-48%
32 (12.4, 19.6)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
23 (5, 18)
22 (5, 17)
4%
24 (4, 20)
-4%
25 (5, 20)
-9%
41.6 (6.8, 34.8)
-81%
25.6 (5.2, 20.4)
-11%
PWM Frequency
201.6 (99)
Screen
7%
-5%
4%
-9%
3%
Brightness middle
315
273
-13%
302
-4%
312
-1%
296.8
-6%
347.2
10%
Brightness
290
278
-4%
287
-1%
293
1%
282
-3%
327
13%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
91
7%
87
2%
86
1%
88
4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.27
16%
0.36
-13%
0.32
-0%
0.347
-8%
0.348
-9%
Contrast
984
1011
3%
839
-15%
975
-1%
855
-13%
998
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.88
3.67
25%
4.93
-1%
4.45
9%
5.24
-7%
4.53
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.88
8.33
6%
12.34
-39%
8.5
4%
11.36
-28%
11.01
-24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.17
2.73
35%
3.47
17%
3.05
27%
6.76
-62%
2.84
32%
Gamma
2.53 95%
2.49 96%
2.16 111%
2.58 93%
2.24 107%
2.05 117%
CCT
6683 97%
7029 92%
6622 98%
6495 100%
8467 77%
6664 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
55
0%
54
-2%
55
0%
62.8
14%
54.7
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
84
1%
82
-1%
84
1%
98.1
18%
84.1
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 7%
-7% / -6%
1% / 3%
-37% / -19%
3% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
Intel Core i7-6820HK
150 Points ∼72% +2%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼71%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
145 Points ∼70% -1%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
145 Points ∼70% -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼69% -3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
142 Points ∼69% -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points ∼23% +5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
677 Points ∼22% 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼22% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼22%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points ∼22% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
670 Points ∼22% -1%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.3 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
676 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
147 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points ∼77%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4924 Points ∼76% -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4766 Points ∼73% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
4716 Points ∼72% -6%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points ∼76%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4541 Points ∼75% -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4413 Points ∼72% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3700 Points ∼61% -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4651 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5011 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
Lite-On CV1-8B128
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
38%
48%
222%
7%
26%
Write 4k QD32
256.3
162.2
-37%
329.1
28%
418.5
63%
182.1
-29%
263.1
3%
Read 4k QD32
149.4
350.3
134%
358.6
140%
687.1
360%
312.6
109%
347.8
133%
Write 4k
75.74
98.84
30%
92.53
22%
173
128%
77.18
2%
50.19
-34%
Read 4k
21.44
21.86
2%
32.46
51%
54.63
155%
30.04
40%
26.43
23%
Write 512
287.8
471.2
64%
422.3
47%
731.6
154%
182.6
-37%
400
39%
Read 512
294.8
444.7
51%
415.9
41%
971.8
230%
318.6
8%
281.1
-5%
Write Seq
312.4
485.5
55%
455.3
46%
1331
326%
184.1
-41%
454.8
46%
Read Seq
485.4
523
8%
509.8
5%
2249
363%
494.5
2%
496.8
2%
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Sequential Read: 485.4 MB/s
Sequential Write: 312.4 MB/s
512K Read: 294.8 MB/s
512K Write: 287.8 MB/s
4K Read: 21.44 MB/s
4K Write: 75.74 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 149.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 256.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
22195 Points ∼44% +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
22022 Points ∼43%
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6820HK
12517 Points ∼25% -43%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -43%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
9845 Points ∼19% -55%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% -55%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
17066 Points ∼42% +3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
16525 Points ∼41%
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6820HK
9671 Points ∼24% -41%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24% -42%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7624 Points ∼19% -54%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% -56%
3DMark 11 Performance
15822 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22943 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12909 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
88.7 fps ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
84.6 fps ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps ∼62% -38%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼48% -52%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
104 fps ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
102 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
59.6 fps ∼57% -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
48.5 fps ∼47% -53%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
138 fps ∼100% +4%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
132.7 fps ∼96%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
58 fps ∼100% +5%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
55.2 fps ∼95%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
103 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
102.4 fps ∼99%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
125.1 fps ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
117 fps ∼94% -6%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
56 fps ∼45% -55%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
130.1 fps ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
123 fps ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57 fps ∼44% -56%
Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
92.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
92 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
101 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
99.6 fps ∼99%
baixo média alto ultra
Battlefield 4 (2013) 192.2132.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 165.9102.455.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 10488.7fps
Doom (2016) 130.1125.1fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 99.692fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 33 / 34 dB
Carga
39 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 48 °C46.3 °C46.1 °C 
 35.9 °C46.2 °C40 °C 
 29.4 °C30.6 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C
46.1 °C44.4 °C46.8 °C
37.3 °C39.3 °C38.1 °C
32.2 °C30.8 °C26.7 °C
Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 38 °C
alimentação elétrica  45.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.943.12535.734.63130.530.64035.3365032.334.26334.733.18032.83310029.930.312525.933.616022.842.720023.656.525023.559.531520.859.740019.264.150019.465.363018.763.880018.363.3100018.264.8125018.663.3160018.963.4200017.863.6250017.364.5315017.163400017.164.1500017.269.7630017.368.7800017.160.51000017.255.41250017.151.41600017.249.7SPL30.376.9N1.441median 18.3Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032Tmedian 63.3Delta2.86.141.64638.439.828.231.130.836.431.234.927.934.928.338.327.134.723.340.323.643.221.15421.156.120.259.219.164.319.46518.366.919.365.718.367.219.966.619.469.51874.217.665.417.567.217.363.517.458.817.353.117.357.817.255.717.258.317.151.130.479.11.442.1median 18.3MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21median 59.21.66.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
Power Consumption
-9%
19%
4%
25%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
20
20
-0%
12
40%
15
25%
11.1
44%
20.6
-3%
Idle Average *
24
26
-8%
16
33%
20
17%
14.1
41%
22.1
8%
Idle Maximum *
29
32
-10%
22
24%
27
7%
18.4
37%
22.5
22%
Load Average *
86
100
-16%
96
-12%
98
-14%
96.5
-12%
130.6
-52%
Load Maximum *
183
202
-10%
166
9%
210
-15%
159.5
13%
177.2
3%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 1.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 20 / 24 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 86 / 183 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
62 Wh
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
75.24 Wh
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
 Wh
Schenker XMG P506 PRO
60 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
64 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
64 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
196
246
26%
476
143%
267
36%
356
82%
187
-5%
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 58min

Pro

+ Seleção de portas ampla e moderna
+ Bastante frugal para o desempenho
+ Excelente capacidade de manutenção
+ Bonito e bem construído
+ Muito bom desempenho 3D
+ Bons alto falantes multimídia
+ Dispositivos de entrada, em geral, bons
+ Tela IPS de alto contraste
+ Bom desempenho WLAN
+ HD de 1 TB adicional
+ 8 GB de VRAM GDDR5
+ 32 GB de RAM DDR4
+ Comparativamente leve

Contra

- Os tempos de resposta podem ser lentos demais para gamers ambiciosos
- Rangidos de pare traseira do chassi, sob pressão
- Propriedades deslizantes imperfeitas do touchpad
- Sem acessórios apesar do preço
- Desempenho um pouco medíocre do SSD
- Apenas 2 slots para RAM
- Muito barulhento sob carga máxima
In review: Asus ROG Strix GL502VS. Test model courtesy of Asus Taiwan.
In review: Asus ROG Strix GL502VS. Test model courtesy of Asus Taiwan.

O novo Asus ROG Strix GL502VS deixou uma impressão convincente, em geral. Um dos principais aspectos é o enorme desempenho da Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. Os gamers que não sejam muito sensíveis ao ruído deverão ficar muito contentes com o aparelho.

Já mencionamos na introdução que também existem algumas desvantagens. O chassi rangente poderia deixar uma melhor impressão, mas o modelo de teste é uma das primeiras remessas, portanto, os modelos mais recentes poderiam melhor neste aspecto. Não estamos totalmente satisfeitos com as propriedades de deslizamento do touchpad, nem com a gama de cores limitada da tela IPS muito boa. Os tempos de resposta da tela também podem ser lentos para alguns gamers. A perfeita visibilidade das teclas foi sacrificada pelo design. Incomum, porém, não muito importante com 32 GB de RAM DDR4: Há apenas dois slots SODIMM Os aparelhos de 15-polegadas com este tipo de desempenho não podem ser resfriados sem ruídos e os rivais não provavelmente não sejam amis silenciosos – mas com frequência era um pouco mais barulhento em nossa opinião.

Há muito mais no lado positivo: A carcaça comparativamente leve tem uma bela aparência e e deve atender as expectativas de design dos clientes ROG. A Asus também merece elogios pela seleção de portas moderna e generosa. Ninguém criticará as amplas opções de manutenção. O desempenho também está no nível esperado, portanto, as especificações técnicas estão bem. A boa impressão é completada com um bom teclado e uma tela bastante convincente. Portanto, podemos recomendar o sistema com as limitações mencionadas.

Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T - 08/21/2016 v5.1
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
84%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
71%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Ruído
74 / 90 → 82%
Audio
70%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
76%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL502VS
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-09- 9 (Update: 2016-09-14)