Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil HP 15z-ba000

Enroscado em azul. O HP 15z é um portátil de15,6-polegadas feito para cobrir necessidades básicas. Embora não consiga se destacar da multidão, ele oferece desempenho "apenas suficiente" para tarefas do dia a dia e não apresenta deficiências muito significantes além um preço um pouco elevado.
HP 15z-ba000 (15z Serie)
Processador
AMD A6-7310 4 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Carrizo-L
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), Análises do: 800 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, 15.301.2301.1002
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR3L-1600
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:10, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, no, BOE06A4, TN, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
AMD K16.3 IMC
Disco rígido
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, 128 GB 
Placa de Som
ATI/AMD Kaveri - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm audio combo-jack, Card Reader: SD multi-formato, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8101 (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidade ótica
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.1 x 384 x 254.5
Bateria
31 Wh, 2831 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.048 kg, Suprimento de energia: 252 g
Preço
520 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

382 mm 256 mm 29.2 mm 2.2 kg384.3 mm 254.6 mm 24.3 mm 2.1 kg384 mm 254.5 mm 24.1 mm 2 kg380 mm 259.9 mm 23.5 mm 2.2 kg379 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: no connectivity
Front: no connectivity
Rear: no connectivity
Rear: no connectivity
Left side: power, RJ-45, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0
Left side: power, RJ-45, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0
Right side: SD card reader, USB 2.0, DVD-RW, Kensington lock slot
Right side: SD card reader, USB 2.0, DVD-RW, Kensington lock slot
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
 
57.8 MB/s +130%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
 
26.6 MB/s +6%
HP 15z-ba000
 
25.1 MB/s
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
 
19.8 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
 
16.5 MB/s -34%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
 
89.2 MB/s +163%
HP 15z-ba000
 
33.9 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
 
28.07 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
 
26 MB/s -23%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
 
25.6 MB/s -24%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 MBit/s +1178%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
276 MBit/s +519%
HP 15z-ba000
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
44.6 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Broadcom 802.11ac
397 MBit/s +697%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
334 MBit/s +571%
HP 15z-ba000
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
49.8 MBit/s
247.5
cd/m²
243.6
cd/m²
237.6
cd/m²
242.1
cd/m²
244.5
cd/m²
226.2
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
232.9
cd/m²
197.8
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE06A4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 247.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 232 cd/m² Minimum: 14.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 244.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.385 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57.71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
HP 15z-ba000
BOE06A4, TN, 15.60, 1366x768
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
AU Optronics AUO38ED / AUO B156HTN03.8, TN, 15.60, 1920x1080
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
ChiMei, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
156AT37-T01 (SDC4141), TN, 15.60, 1366x768
Display
-4%
13%
-4%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
38.58
37.21
-4%
43.63
13%
37.06
-4%
36.7
-5%
sRGB Coverage
57.7
56
-3%
65.1
13%
55.8
-3%
55.3
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.86
38.44
-4%
45.1
13%
38.29
-4%
37.92
-5%
Response Times
11%
21%
-8%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.2 ?(18.4, 22.8)
42.4 ?(21.2, 21.2)
-3%
42 ?(22, 20)
-2%
27 ?(7, 20)
34%
22 ?(12, 10)
47%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 ?(14.8, 18.8)
25.6 ?(8.4, 17.2)
24%
24 ?(8, 16)
29%
22 ?(11, 11)
35%
20 ?(8, 12)
40%
PWM Frequency
595 ?(99)
806 ?(90)
35%
50 ?(80)
-92%
200 ?(90)
-66%
Screen
-14%
-6%
-3%
-21%
Brightness middle
244.5
213.4
-13%
220
-10%
200
-18%
251
3%
Brightness
232
209
-10%
203
-12%
198
-15%
236
2%
Brightness Distribution
80
86
8%
83
4%
83
4%
85
6%
Black Level *
0.385
0.351
9%
0.49
-27%
0.28
27%
0.44
-14%
Contrast
635
608
-4%
449
-29%
714
12%
570
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.62
13.35
-55%
8.95
-4%
10.63
-23%
14.58
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.38
21.79
-25%
15.89
9%
15.69
10%
24.59
-41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.8
13.59
-39%
10.59
-8%
11.19
-14%
16.8
-71%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.7 81%
2.51 88%
1.78 124%
2.33 94%
CCT
11391 57%
18870 34%
12049 54%
11258 58%
27039 24%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39.86
38.44
-4%
41
3%
35
-12%
35
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.71
56.01
-3%
65
13%
56
-3%
56
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -8%
9% / 3%
-5% / -4%
-6% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 595 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 595 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 595 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
10902 Points +149%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
10803 Points +147%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points +98%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
6897 Points +58%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
4373 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
4984 Points +183%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
4984 Points +183%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points +135%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
3113 Points +77%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
1761 Points
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
1.5 Points +159%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points +121%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
0.92 Points +59%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
0.58 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
3.57 Points +72%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points +35%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
2.28 Points +10%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
2.08 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points +198%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points +198%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points +145%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
81 Points +84%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
44 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
321 Points +170%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points +162%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points +116%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Intel Core i3-5005U
206 Points +73%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
119 Points
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
HP 15z-ba000
AMD A6-7310
1430 s *
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Core i5-6267U
710 s * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2657
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
4373
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1761
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
15.2 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.58 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
15.93 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
119 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
44 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3665 Points +87%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
3497 Points +78%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3237 Points +65%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
2752 Points +40%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2437 Points +24%
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
1960 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4408 Points +49%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
4281 Points +45%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
4249 Points +44%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3410 Points +16%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
3272 Points +11%
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
2952 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4403 Points +109%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
3825 Points +82%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3735 Points +78%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
2969 Points +41%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2496 Points +19%
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
2104 Points
PCMark 7 Score
3288 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1960 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2104 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2952 pontos
Ajuda
HP 15z-ba000
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-89%
-85%
-82%
-87%
Read Seq
397.9
100.8
-75%
101
-75%
115.9
-71%
105.6
-73%
Write Seq
171.4
57.4
-67%
99.6
-42%
113.3
-34%
93.4
-46%
Read 512
367.5
31.19
-92%
38.12
-90%
39.02
-89%
31.7
-91%
Write 512
172.3
38.67
-78%
42.22
-75%
55.6
-68%
27.54
-84%
Read 4k
26.11
0.509
-98%
0.522
-98%
0.44
-98%
0.374
-99%
Write 4k
52.3
0.615
-99%
1.29
-98%
1.188
-98%
0.72
-99%
Read 4k QD32
164.3
0.351
-100%
1.116
-99%
1.125
-99%
0.694
-100%
Write 4k QD32
132.8
0.605
-100%
1.287
-99%
1.245
-99%
0.646
-100%
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 222.3 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 329.4 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 295.8 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 0.108 ms
Índice de Explosão: 196.2 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 13 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2421 Points +217%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6500U
1835 Points +140%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1834 Points +140%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U
1666 Points +118%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310
763 Points
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U
757 Points -1%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U
641 Points -16%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2157 Points +183%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6500U
1598 Points +110%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1525 Points +100%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U
1422 Points +87%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310
761 Points
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U
721 Points -5%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U
701 Points -8%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
11093 Points +262%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U
7453 Points +143%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
5592 Points +82%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U
4844 Points +58%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U
4015 Points +31%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310
3068 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U
1172 Points +125%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1114 Points +114%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1010 Points +94%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U
575 Points +11%
HP 15z-ba000
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310
520 Points
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U
463 Points -11%
3DMark 11 Performance
837 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2459 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
493 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5.1 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
8.9 fps +75%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
3.4 fps -33%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
15 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
38.2 fps +155%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
23.3 fps +55%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
34.8 fps +132%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
29.89 fps +99%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
10.1 fps -33%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
17.7 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
44.8 fps +153%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
28.1 fps +59%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
41.8 fps +136%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35.31 fps +99%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
12.1 fps -32%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
32.9 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
74.2 fps +126%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
49.2 fps +50%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
76.9 fps +134%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
62.4 fps +90%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
24.9 fps -24%
Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
6.2 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
5 fps -19%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
13.9 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
23.9 fps +72%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
9.3 fps -33%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
18.7 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
31.7 fps +70%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
16.5 fps -12%
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
35.7 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
63.1 fps +77%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
35.4 fps -1%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
6.7 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
12.6 fps +88%
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
11.9 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
20.6 fps +73%
Metro: Last Light
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
4 fps
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
8.2 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
18.4 fps +124%
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
11.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
32.4 fps +187%
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
26.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
42.9 fps +63%
Anno 2070
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:on AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5.1 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
7.1 fps +39%
1366x768 High Preset AA:on AF:2x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
13.2 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
14.8 fps +12%
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:on (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
20.9 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
23.1 fps +11%
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
47.2 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU
43.1 fps -9%
baixo média alto ultra
Anno 2070 (2011) 47.2 20.9 13.2 5.1
Tomb Raider (2013) 35.7 18.7 13.9 6.2
BioShock Infinite (2013) 32.9 17.7 15 5.1
Metro: Last Light (2013) 26.3 11.3 8.2 4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 11.9 6.7

Barulho

Ocioso
31.6 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB
Carga
37.2 / 38.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Noise
-1%
-11%
-6%
-3%
off / environment *
28.6
28.8
-1%
31.2
-9%
31.2
-9%
31.3
-9%
Idle Minimum *
31.6
31
2%
33.2
-5%
32.6
-3%
32.1
-2%
Idle Average *
31.6
31
2%
33.2
-5%
32.6
-3%
32.1
-2%
Idle Maximum *
31.6
31
2%
34.6
-9%
33.8
-7%
33.1
-5%
Load Average *
37.2
39.1
-5%
45
-21%
40.2
-8%
37.8
-2%
Load Maximum *
38.2
41
-7%
45.2
-18%
40.4
-6%
37.7
1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 27.6 °C28.6 °C20 °C 
 26.6 °C28.4 °C20 °C 
 25.8 °C28.6 °C20.2 °C 
Máximo: 28.6 °C
Médio: 25.1 °C
24.2 °C26.6 °C38.8 °C
24.4 °C29.2 °C37.2 °C
24.6 °C28 °C43.2 °C
Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.539.22535.936.13133.234.14032.534.75033.832.56331.633.28031.23310029.932.81252930.616027.930.220027.536.325026.945.331525.853.640026.748.550025.548.363024.955.680024.759.3100025.362125026.160.7160027.161.4200024.562.6250023.768.1315023.268.4400022.772.8500022.766.7630022.764.3800022.768.41000022.870.41250022.767.81600022.767.2SPL36.678.8N2.739.9median 24.9median 61.4Delta2.210.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP 15z-ba000Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP 15z-ba000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.13 / 0.48 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.22 / 5.67 / 7.82 Watt
Carga midlight 19.67 / 26.72 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP 15z-ba000
A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, TN, 1366x768, 15.60
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
5005U, GeForce 920M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1366x768, 15.60
Power Consumption
-120%
-26%
-55%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
5.22
11.84
-127%
4
23%
7
-34%
4.2
20%
Idle Average *
5.67
14.16
-150%
6.5
-15%
8
-41%
6.6
-16%
Idle Maximum *
7.82
14.46
-85%
7
10%
8.4
-7%
7.5
4%
Load Average *
19.67
51.69
-163%
36
-83%
38.8
-97%
36.3
-85%
Load Maximum *
26.72
46.56
-74%
43.6
-63%
52.8
-98%
36.5
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 31min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 55min
HP 15z-ba000
A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), 31 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 37 Wh
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE
5005U, GeForce 920M, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime
-40%
23%
34%
49%
Reader / Idle
511
273
-47%
667
31%
WiFi v1.3
247
180
-27%
342
38%
332
34%
367
49%
Load
115
61
-47%
115
0%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho para o "home office"
+ Unidade SSD
+ Baixo peso
+ Tela TN acima da média
+ Não esquenta e não se torna muito barulhento
+ Duração da bateria suficientemente boa, apesar da bateria pequena
+ Bateria substituível

Contra

- Apenas uma porta USB 3.0
- Se sente bastante barato ao toque
- As dobradiças da tela não são suficientemente rígidas
- A tela refletiva limita o uso em exteriores
- Tampa propensa a manchas
- Não exatamente uma barganha
In review: HP 15z-ba000. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP 15z-ba000. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

O HP 15z tem um visual atraente, funciona frio, a duração da bateria é razoável para uma carga e - graças ao SSD - oferece desempenho perceptível bom o suficiente, apesar das pontuações dos núcleos sintéticos. A APU AMD não é muito veloz - por isso estamos agradecidos pelos 8 GB de RAM e o SSD, que fazem sua parte para melhorar o desempenho. A tela TN é, de fato, surpreendentemente boa e bastante brilhante, para começar. O teclado também não decepciona, mas leva um pouco de tempo se acostumar ao touchpad. No entanto, quase qualquer placa de vídeo integrada da Intel superaria a Radeon R4 - e inclusive GPUs dedicada de nível de entrada, como a GeForce 920M no Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE oferece o dobro de taxas de fotogramas que o chip integrado Radeon.

Para tarefas básicas como o processamento de texto ou assistir vídeos, o Hp 15z não é uma má escolha. Os "power users" e inclusive os jogadores muito casuais deveriam procurar outra coisa.

Versões do Aspire E5-575G, que acabamos de analisar - por exemplo com CPU Core i5-6200U, 8GB de memória, HD de 1 TB, e GPU GeForce 940MX dedicada - pode ser encontrada por cerca de $500. A menos que a HP ou os revendedores diminuam o preço de forma significante, o 15z não é exatamente uma barganha.

HP 15z-ba000 - 10/02/2016 v5.1(old)
Bernhard Pechlaner

Acabamento
50 / 98 → 51%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
53%
Conectividade
31 / 81 → 39%
Peso
63 / 20-67 → 91%
Bateria
76%
Pantalha
72%
Desempenho do jogos
51 / 85 → 60%
Desempenho da aplicação
57 / 92 → 62%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
50%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Médio
63%
69%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP 15z-ba000
Bernhard Pechlaner, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2020-06- 8)