Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Jumper EZBook 3 (N3350, FHD)

Klaus Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/04/2017

Clone do MacBook Air. A Jumper atualiza o seu EZBook para a mais recente plataforma Apollo Lake com um SoC dual-core Celeron N3350. Um painel Full HD mate, peso baixo e, sobre tudo, seu baixo preço prometem um pacote total interessante. Descubra quais compromissos este pequeno portátil deve fazer, em nosso relatório.

Jumper EZbook 3
Processador
Intel Celeron N3350 1.1 GHz
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 500, Análises do: 450 MHz, 4590
Memória
4096 MB 
, DDR3 800 MHz ?-15-15-34
Pantalha
14.1 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 156 PPI, MS_9003, TN LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Apollo Lake
Disco rígido
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, 64 GB 
, 38 GB livre
Placa de Som
RealTek ALC269 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: headset, Card Reader: micro-SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0 (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21 x 330 x 220
Bateria
38 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 7.6V, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 4 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
Released
02/01/2017
peso
1.225 kg, Suprimento de energia: 111 g
Preço
343 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Right: headset, USB 2.0, micro-SD
Right: headset, USB 2.0, micro-SD
Left: power, USB 3.0, mini-HDMI
Left: power, USB 3.0, mini-HDMI
Samsung T3 USB SSD in left USB 3.0 port
Samsung T3 USB SSD in left USB 3.0 port
Samsung T3 USB SSD in right USB 2.0 port
Samsung T3 USB SSD in right USB 2.0 port
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
49.23 MB/s ∼100% +155%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.7 MB/s ∼46% +18%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20.56 MB/s ∼42% +7%
Jumper EZbook 3
19.3 MB/s ∼39%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.1 MB/s ∼39% -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.06 MB/s ∼100% +199%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37 MB/s ∼45% +35%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34.5 MB/s ∼42% +26%
Jumper EZbook 3
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
27.4 MB/s ∼33%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼32% -3%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
323 MBit/s ∼100% +276%
Jumper EZbook 3
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
86 MBit/s ∼27%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (I210-T1)
71 MBit/s ∼22% -17%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
40.6 MBit/s ∼13% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
469 MBit/s ∼100% +501%
Jumper EZbook 3
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
78 MBit/s ∼17%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (I210-T1)
72 MBit/s ∼15% -8%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
41.6 MBit/s ∼9% -47%
352
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 384 cd/m² Médio: 341.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 300:1 (Preto: 1.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.2
Jumper EZbook 3
MS_9003, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Chi Mei N140BGA-EA3, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
APPA027, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Teclast Tbook 10s
LCD, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
VOYO VBook V3
Chi Mei N116HSE, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Samsung LTN140W1-L01, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6
Response Times
-43%
-76%
-58%
-126%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46
32
30%
41.2
10%
40
13%
49
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
11.6
30
-159%
30.4
-162%
26.4
-128%
40
-245%
PWM Frequency
200
200
0%
Screen
23%
72%
58%
49%
72%
Brightness
341
247
-28%
358
5%
280
-18%
200
-41%
370
9%
Brightness Distribution
76
80
5%
88
16%
82
8%
72
-5%
89
17%
Black Level *
1.28
0.57
55%
0.47
63%
0.29
77%
0.24
81%
0.37
71%
Contrast
300
474
58%
823
174%
962
221%
813
171%
1038
246%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.7
3.01
65%
1.6
82%
6.7
23%
5
43%
5.8
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.1
12.73
-15%
1
91%
6.8
39%
5.98
46%
5.1
54%
Gamma
2.2 109%
2.36 102%
2.26 106%
2.27 106%
2.17 111%
2.4 100%
CCT
12445 52%
14629 44%
6680 97%
8466 77%
6764 96%
7125 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
61.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
82.2
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-10% / 1%
-2% / 35%
0% / 29%
-39% / 5%
72% / 72%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.7 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4352 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10 Bootcamp)
91 Points ∼100% +98%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (OS X)
90 Points ∼99% +96%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
89 Points ∼98% +93%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼58% +15%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
46 Points ∼51%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
41 Points ∼45% -11%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
35 Points ∼38% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10 Bootcamp)
218 Points ∼100% +160%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
211 Points ∼97% +151%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼76% +96%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
152 Points ∼70% +81%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
84 Points ∼39%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Intel Celeron N3050
65 Points ∼30% -23%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2654
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2941
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1503
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.6 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
46 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
84 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
10.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼54% +61%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2801 Points ∼43% +27%
Jumper EZbook 3
HD Graphics 500, N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
2207 Points ∼34%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1595 Points ∼24% -28%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1464 Points ∼22% -34%
Teclast Tbook 10s
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1329 Points ∼20% -40%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B
2976 Points ∼50% +87%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼43% +60%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2114 Points ∼35% +33%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2073 Points ∼35% +30%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼28% +4%
Jumper EZbook 3
HD Graphics 500, N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
1592 Points ∼27%
Teclast Tbook 10s
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1088 Points ∼18% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1592 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2207 pontos
Ajuda
Jumper EZbook 3
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
128 GB eMMC Flash
Chuwi Hi12
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
1814%
265%
155%
134%
-32%
-38%
Write 4k QD32
2.74
223.9
8072%
15.41
462%
12.66
362%
12.1
342%
1.239
-55%
1.003
-63%
Read 4k QD32
16.4
271.9
1558%
98.9
503%
35.12
114%
35.3
115%
1.03
-94%
0.898
-95%
Write 4k
2.47
24.87
907%
14.67
494%
13.04
428%
11.4
362%
1.171
-53%
1.026
-58%
Read 4k
5.07
16.28
221%
15.95
215%
13.2
160%
17.9
253%
0.419
-92%
0.407
-92%
Write 512
41.3
736.6
1684%
41.49
0%
75.61
83%
44.8
8%
49.35
19%
39.03
-5%
Read 512
133
671.5
405%
283.9
113%
153.8
16%
132
-1%
36.63
-72%
33.53
-75%
Write Seq
50
660.1
1220%
124.2
148%
85.04
70%
50
0%
107.5
115%
106.1
112%
Read Seq
151
820.9
444%
428
183%
166.5
10%
141
-7%
109.6
-27%
106
-30%
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
Sequential Read: 151 MB/s
Sequential Write: 50 MB/s
512K Read: 133 MB/s
512K Write: 41.3 MB/s
4K Read: 5.07 MB/s
4K Write: 2.47 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 16.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 2.74 MB/s
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450475500525550575600625650675700725750775800825850875900925950975100010251050107511001125115011751200122512501275130013251350137514001425145014751500152515501575160016251650167517001725175017751800182518501875190019251950197520002025205020752100Tooltip
3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1001 Points ∼100% +119%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU
847 Points ∼85% +85%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
583 Points ∼58% +27%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
496 Points ∼50% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
463 Points ∼46% +1%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
458 Points ∼46%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
298 Points ∼30% -35%
3DMark 06 Standard
3393 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
505 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2074 pontos
Ajuda
World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), Intel Celeron 2970M
41.4 (min: 21) fps ∼100% +117%
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-6410
28.6 fps ∼69% +50%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
19.1 (min: 7) fps ∼46%
Acer Extensa 2519-C7DC
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
16.8 fps ∼41% -12%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
13.9 (min: 7) fps ∼34% -27%
baixo média alto ultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 46fps
Diablo III (2012) 12.7fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 14fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 15.9fps
World of Warships (2015) 19.1fps
Carga Máxima
 41 °C37 °C29 °C 
 39 °C34 °C29 °C 
 32 °C32 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
29 °C38 °C42 °C
30 °C34 °C38 °C
29 °C30 °C30 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.342.72534.235.53135.134.2403433.45033.433.26332.430.48030.928.510034.533.712536.325.816030.125.720038.923.92503823.331543.822.640050.721.350054.320.363058.219.980068.719.310007318.812507018.6160066.118.1200066.717.8250069.717.7315070.917.8400070.817.9500068.11863006418800063.618.5100006222.51250056.519.61600055.118.3SPL80.431.2N44.61.6median 62Jumper EZbook 3median 19.3Delta11.72.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Jumper EZbook 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.13 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.18 / 6.14 / 6.4 Watt
Carga midlight 13.3 / 13.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Jumper EZbook 3
N3350, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
N4200, HD Graphics 505, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Power Consumption
23%
-3%
-11%
-21%
-32%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
3.18
1.4
56%
3.9
-23%
2
37%
4.1
-29%
4.5
-42%
5.3
-67%
Idle Average *
6.14
4.82
21%
6.4
-4%
2.06
66%
8.3
-35%
7.6
-24%
7.1
-16%
Idle Maximum *
6.4
5.43
15%
6.5
-2%
6.94
-8%
8.6
-34%
8.5
-33%
8.2
-28%
Load Average *
13.3
11.61
13%
11.1
17%
22.52
-69%
13.5
-2%
17.4
-31%
15.5
-17%
Load Maximum *
13.6
12.48
8%
13.8
-1%
24.87
-83%
14.5
-7%
17.6
-29%
18.9
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
7h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 54min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 55 Wh (Edge 38)
661 min ∼100% +57%
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03
5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh
620 min ∼94% +48%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
554 min ∼84% +32%
Jumper EZbook 3
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh
420 min ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13.3 inch)
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh
389 min ∼59% -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh
354 min ∼54% -16%
VOYO VBook V3
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail),  Wh
208 min ∼31% -50%

Pro

+ Preço baixo (em leilões)
+ Painel mate Full HD brilhante
+ Resfriamento silencioso
+ SoC energeticamente eficiente

Contra

- Ângulos de visão pobres
- Plástico sensível a arranhões
- Processador lento retrasa o desempenho do sistema
- PWM em 200Hz até 99 % do brilho
- Bateria precisa de muito tempo para carregar
- Webcam de baixa qualidade posicionada de forma desfavorável
Jumper EZBook 3
Jumper EZBook 3

O EZBook 3 é um portátil acessível e leve com uma tela mate brilhante, resfriamento silencioso (por ser passivo), e visual atraente. Como é habitual, algumas concessões devem ser feitas nesta faixa de preços. Construção e materiais de construção medíocres, ângulos de visão limitados, PWM a 200 Hz, desempenho muito baixo, e uma duração de bateria moderada são as desvantagens que devem ser aceitas. Embora o touchpad e o teclado estejam longe do seu padrão supremo a imitar, o MacBook Air, eles são bastante úteis para o trabalho ocasional. Como muitos produtos feitos na China, o EZBook 3 atualmente não possui um CE label (e os testes envolvidos), e o comprador é quase completamente dependente da loja onde comprou o portátil, em casos de garantia. O suporte para controlador também não está disponível. No entanto, pelo menos é possível usar diretamente os controladores gráficos da Intel.

O Jumper EZBook 3 atualmente está disponível em prata na Gearbest por 194,25 Euros (~$210) do armazém da UE (lista: 343 Euros, ~$370). Este preço provavelmente será muito atraente para os usuários que podem viver com as desvantagens mencionadas.

Jumper EZbook 3 - 03/24/2017 v6
Klaus Hinum

Acabamento
62 /  98 → 63%
Teclado
72%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
36 / 80 → 45%
Peso
72 / 78 → 87%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
74%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 68 → 62%
Desempenho da aplicação
49 / 87 → 56%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
66%
77%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Jumper EZBook 3 (N3350, FHD)
Klaus Hinum, 2017-04- 4 (Update: 2017-05-23)