Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB

Name: Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Brand: Lenovo

Médio. A Lenovo está tentando se destacar entre a multidão de portáteis econômicos disponíveis por 600 Euros (~$633) ou menos. Nós iremos verificar para ver o que o novo IdeaPad 310-15IKB tem a oferecer em nossa análise detalhada.

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/16/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Windows

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB (Ideapad 310 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, 1 de 1 slot ocupado

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NT156FHM-N31, TN LED, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Hynix HFS128G3MND, 128 GB

, HD Toshiba de 1 TB MQ02ABF100 no slot ODD

Placa de Som

Conexant SmartAudio HD

Conexões

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD 4-em-1

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24 x 380 x 260

Bateria

30 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, 6 filas, Numblock, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 168 g

Preço

529 Euro

Links

Lenovo página inicial
Lenovo Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

The bottom of the laptop with the maintenance flaps closed.

The right side of the keyboard has a number pad.

Size Comparison

Medion Akoya P6670 HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK DIN A4 ❌

Right: 2x USB 2.0, ODD slot, Kensington lock

Left: DC-In, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm jack, SD-card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s +367%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB	23.1 MB/s
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	19.1 MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s +906%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	26.1 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB	24.9 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	634 MBit/s +98%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	341 MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	321 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	510 MBit/s +79%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	307 MBit/s +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	285 MBit/s


188 cd/m²	188 cd/m²	184 cd/m²
185 cd/m²	185 cd/m²	182 cd/m²
181 cd/m²	181 cd/m²	179 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE NT156FHM-N31 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 188 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 183.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 185 cd/m²
Contraste: 661:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.83 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.07% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB BOE NT156FHM-N31, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, , 1920x1080, 17.30	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Medion Akoya P6670 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, , 1366x768, 15.60
Display		12%	73%	-4%	0%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	38.07	42.66 12%	71.3 87%	36.51 -4%	38.14 0%	37.06 -3%
sRGB Coverage	57.3	64.1 12%	91.7 60%	55 -4%	57.2 0%	55.8 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.34	44.08 12%	67.1 71%	37.72 -4%	39.43 0%	38.29 -3%
Response Times		-50%	-4%	1%	-2%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 ?(21, 22)	51 ?(18, 33) -19%	42 ?(21, 21) 2%	40 ?(20, 20) 7%	42 ?(18, 24) 2%	27 ?(7, 20) 37%
Response Time Black / White *	21 ?(5, 16)	38 ?(8, 30) -81%	23 ?(6, 17) -10%	22 ?(6, 16) -5%	22 ?(6, 16) -5%	22 ?(11, 11) -5%
PWM Frequency		50 ?(10)	1000 ?(90)		50	50 ?(80)
Screen		36%	30%	-19%	2%	-6%
Brightness middle	185	291 57%	353 91%	219 18%	287 55%	200 8%
Brightness	184	265 44%	320 74%	222 21%	269 46%	198 8%
Brightness Distribution	95	86 -9%	82 -14%	85 -11%	74 -22%	83 -13%
Black Level *	0.28	0.23 18%	0.38 -36%	0.39 -39%	0.65 -132%	0.28 -0%
Contrast	661	1265 91%	929 41%	562 -15%	442 -33%	714 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.07	4.78 41%	5.07 37%	12.67 -57%	5.42 33%	10.63 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.83	9.51 36%	10.12 32%	20.99 -42%	9.54 36%	15.69 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.83	3.49 60%	13.38 -52%	13.82 -57%	5.14 42%	11.19 -27%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.58 ^85%	2.69 ^82%	2.63 ^84%	2.48 ^89%	1.78 ^124%
CCT	10628 ^61%	6013 ^108%	15991 ^41%	15633 ^42%	6952 ^93%	11258 ^58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.2	40 10%	60.1 66%	35 -3%	36 -1%	35 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57	64 12%	91.6 61%	55 -4%	57 0%	56 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / 20%	33% / 34%	-7% / -13%	0% / 1%	2% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	148 Points +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points -9%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	311 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	291 Points -6%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

44.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

311 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256	3778 Points +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3497 Points +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND	3457 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G	3396 Points -2%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3317 Points -4%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	2854 Points -17%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3457 pontos
Ajuda

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Hynix HFS128G3MND	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Medion Akoya P6670 Phison S11-128G	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
AS SSD		24%	-1%	15%	75%
Seq Read	511	479.8 -6%	495.8 -3%	492.2 -4%	1179 131%
Seq Write	200.6	377.8 88%	316.9 58%	385.2 92%	372.8 86%
4K Read	24.49	32.4 32%	19.37 -21%	40.83 67%	29.52 21%
4K Write	63.6	59.7 -6%	75.3 18%	77.2 21%	92 45%
4K-64 Read	302.9	345.5 14%	137.4 -55%	371.3 23%	723 139%
4K-64 Write	145.4	203.7 40%	198.8 37%	271.9 87%	197.7 36%
Access Time Read *	0.117	0.127 -9%	0.111 5%	0.174 -49%	0.055 53%
Access Time Write *	0.116	0.066 43%	0.157 -35%	0.321 -177%	0.035 70%
Score Read	378	426 13%	206 -46%	461 22%	870 130%
Score Write	229	301 31%	306 34%	388 69%	327 43%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Hynix HFS128G3MND

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 540 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 213.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 240.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 198.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 475.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 207.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 15.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 69.4 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Akoya P6670 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2516 Points +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2436 Points +62%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1835 Points +22%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1502 Points
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1257 Points -16%

3DMark 11 Performance		1621 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5728 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		825 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	54.1	31.21	25.79
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	24.62	18.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	19.8

Barulho

Ocioso		30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB
Carga		36.8 / 38.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


29.7 °C	28.9 °C	24 °C
34.1 °C	30.8 °C	24 °C
30.2 °C	28.1 °C	24.2 °C

Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C


24.6 °C	31.6 °C	26.9 °C
24.2 °C	30.4 °C	35.6 °C
23.9 °C	28 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 35.6 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.32 / 0.46 Watt
Ocioso	3.5 / 6.1 / 7 Watt
Carga	31.2 / 42.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Hynix HFS128G3MND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Power Consumption		-22%	12%	-49%	-40%
Idle Minimum *	3.5	3.9 -11%	3.6 -3%	6.7 -91%	7 -100%
Idle Average *	6.1	7.4 -21%	6 2%	9.2 -51%	8 -31%
Idle Maximum *	7	9.5 -36%	6.4 9%	9.7 -39%	8.4 -20%
Load Average *	31.2	41 -31%	26 17%	40.6 -30%	38.8 -24%
Load Maximum *	42.9	48 -12%	28.1 34%	58 -35%	52.8 -23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		10h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		3h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 21min

	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh	HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh
Battery Runtime		20%	30%	22%	44%
Reader / Idle	612		634 4%
WiFi v1.3	230	275 20%	347 51%	280 22%	332 44%
Load	81		109 35%
H.264			313

Pro

+ Econômico

+ Teclado relativamente bom

+ Quase sem emissões de calor.

+ Muito espaço de armazenamento

Contra

- Carcaça econômica tem muito pontos fracos

- Sem USB Tipo C

- Sem teclado iluminado

- Controles pobres do touchpad

- Lento leitor de cartões SD

- Afogamentos sob uso intenso

- Disco rígido barulhento

- Bateria muito pequena

In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB. Test model provided by campuspoint.de

O Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB tem como objetivo ser um poli funcional de escritório e multimídia. No entanto, para ser um verdadeiro portátil multimídia, ele precisa ter uma tela melhor e possivelmente uma GPU mais potente. Por outro lado, o portátil definitivamente é um bom portátil de escritório com certas fraquezas. Se você gosta de trabalhar em paz, então este modelo pode não ser para você, dado que o HD do IdeaPad é um companheiro barulhento constante. Este problema pode ser resolvido trocando o HD por um SSD. As barras/teclas do mouse também são bastante irritantes de usar, mas o teclado é confiável. Trabalhar durante uma viagem não é possível devido á tela pobre e à bateria pequena.

No final do dia, não conseguimos reunir suficientes motivos para recomendar o IdeaPad. Definitivamente é médio e não consegue se destacar entre a multidão.

Por que você deveria comprar o IdeaPad 310-15IKB? A principal motivo é o preço. Este portátil é mais barato que alguns de seus concorrentes. No entanto, por outro lado, você verá que pagando um pouco mais pode obter um painel IPS muito melhor. Este é um ponto especialmente importante, dado que a tela de qualidade pobre do nosso modelo de teste é uma de suas maiores fraquezas.

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB - 2016-11-29 11/29/2016 v5.1^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento

73 / 98 → 74%

Teclado

78%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

40 / 80 → 50%

Peso

62 / 20-67 → 89%

Bateria

74%

Pantalha

73%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 68 → 84%

Desempenho da aplicação

87 / 92 → 94%

Temperatura

95%

Ruído

87%

Audio

50%

Camera

47 / 85 → 56%

Médio

69%

77%

Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB

Benjamin Herzig, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)