Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB

Benjamin Herzig (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/16/2016

Médio. A Lenovo está tentando se destacar entre a multidão de portáteis econômicos disponíveis por 600 Euros (~$633) ou menos. Nós iremos verificar para ver o que o novo IdeaPad 310-15IKB tem a oferecer em nossa análise detalhada.

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB (Ideapad 310 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2.5 GHz
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2133, 1 de 1 slot ocupado
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NT156FHM-N31, TN LED, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Hynix HFS128G3MND, 128 GB 
, HD Toshiba de 1 TB MQ02ABF100 no slot ODD
Placa de Som
Conexant SmartAudio HD
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD 4-em-1
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24 x 380 x 260
Bateria
30 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, 6 filas, Numblock, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 168 g
Preço
529 Euro

 

Max opening angle
The case of the laptop...
...is made entirely of plastic.
The display cover.
The bottom of the laptop with the maintenance flaps closed.
The touchpad has poor controls.
The right side of the keyboard has a number pad.
Closer look: webcam.
The hard-drive slot has a 1 TB HDD.

Size Comparison

Right: 2x USB 2.0, ODD slot, Kensington lock
Right: 2x USB 2.0, ODD slot, Kensington lock
Left: DC-In, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm jack, SD-card reader
Left: DC-In, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm jack, SD-card reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
107.8 MB/s ∼100% +367%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.1 MB/s ∼21%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.1 MB/s ∼18% -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
250.6 MB/s ∼100% +906%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.1 MB/s ∼10% +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.9 MB/s ∼10%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
634 MBit/s ∼100% +98%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (RTL GBE)
341 MBit/s ∼54% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
321 MBit/s ∼51%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air (13,3")
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
510 MBit/s ∼100% +79%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (RTL GBE)
307 MBit/s ∼60% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
285 MBit/s ∼56%
Keyboard
Keyboard
188
cd/m²
188
cd/m²
184
cd/m²
185
cd/m²
185
cd/m²
182
cd/m²
181
cd/m²
181
cd/m²
179
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 188 cd/m² Médio: 183.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 185 cd/m²
Contraste: 661:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.07 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.83 | - Ø
57% sRGB (Argyll) 36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.47
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
BOE NT156FHM-N31, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, , 1920x1080, 17.3
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Medion Akoya P6670
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, , 1366x768, 15.6
Response Times
-50%
-4%
1%
-2%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43
51
-19%
42
2%
40
7%
42
2%
27
37%
Response Time Black / White *
21
38
-81%
23
-10%
22
-5%
22
-5%
22
-5%
PWM Frequency
50
1000
50
50
Screen
33%
22%
-21%
-8%
-8%
Brightness
184
265
44%
320
74%
222
21%
269
46%
198
8%
Brightness Distribution
95
86
-9%
82
-14%
85
-11%
74
-22%
83
-13%
Black Level *
0.28
0.23
18%
0.38
-36%
0.39
-39%
0.65
-132%
0.28
-0%
Contrast
661
1265
91%
929
41%
562
-15%
442
-33%
714
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.07
4.78
41%
5.07
37%
12.67
-57%
5.42
33%
10.63
-32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.83
3.49
60%
13.38
-52%
13.82
-57%
5.14
42%
11.19
-27%
Gamma
2.47 97%
2.58 93%
2.69 89%
2.63 91%
2.48 97%
1.78 135%
CCT
10628 61%
6013 108%
15991 41%
15633 42%
6952 93%
11258 58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.2
40
10%
60.1
66%
35
-3%
36
-1%
35
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
64
12%
91.6
61%
55
-4%
57
0%
56
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / 17%
9% / 17%
-10% / -16%
-5% / -7%
4% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Gray levels (calibrated)
Gray levels (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Gray levels (calibrated)
Gray levels (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Colors (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 875 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points ∼76% +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points ∼68% +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66%
Medion Akoya P6670
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points ∼60% -9%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points ∼60% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼18% +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Intel Core i7-6500U
312 Points ∼17% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
311 Points ∼17%
Medion Akoya P6670
Intel Core i5-6200U
291 Points ∼16% -6%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼15% -7%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
311 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points ∼63% +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
3497 Points ∼59% +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3457 Points ∼58%
Medion Akoya P6670
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G
3396 Points ∼57% -2%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points ∼56% -4%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
2854 Points ∼48% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3457 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Hynix HFS128G3MND
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Medion Akoya P6670
Phison S11-128G
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
AS SSD
24%
-1%
15%
75%
Score Write
229
301
31%
306
34%
388
69%
327
43%
Score Read
378
426
13%
206
-46%
461
22%
870
130%
Access Time Write *
0.116
0.066
43%
0.157
-35%
0.321
-177%
0.035
70%
Access Time Read *
0.117
0.127
-9%
0.111
5%
0.174
-49%
0.055
53%
4K-64 Write
145.36
203.69
40%
198.78
37%
271.85
87%
197.7
36%
4K-64 Read
302.88
345.55
14%
137.4
-55%
371.33
23%
722.85
139%
4K Write
63.57
59.67
-6%
75.28
18%
77.2
21%
91.98
45%
4K Read
24.49
32.4
32%
19.37
-21%
40.83
67%
29.52
21%
Seq Write
200.63
377.79
88%
316.85
58%
385.19
92%
372.76
86%
Seq Read
511.25
479.81
-6%
495.76
-3%
492.16
-4%
1179.3
131%

* ... smaller is better

Hynix HFS128G3MND
Sequential Read: 511.25 MB/s
Sequential Write: 200.63 MB/s
4K Read: 24.49 MB/s
4K Write: 63.57 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 302.88 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 145.36 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.117 ms
Access Time Write: 0.116 ms
Copy ISO: 208.23 MB/s
Copy Program: 170.33 MB/s
Copy Game: 150.8 MB/s
Score Read: 378 Points
Score Write: 229 Points
Score Total: 793 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Akoya P6670
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2516 Points ∼5% +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2436 Points ∼5% +62%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1835 Points ∼4% +22%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1502 Points ∼3%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1257 Points ∼2% -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
1621 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5728 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
825 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 54.0831.2125.79fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 24.6218.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 19.8fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB
Carga
36.8 / 38.2 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 29.7 °C28.9 °C24 °C 
 34.1 °C30.8 °C24 °C 
 30.2 °C28.1 °C24.2 °C 
Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C
24.6 °C31.6 °C26.9 °C
24.2 °C30.4 °C35.6 °C
23.9 °C28 °C33 °C
Máximo: 35.6 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.934.72532.134.23133.229.64037.932.65038.8416332.331.38028.228.710035.936.412535.239.916024.447.520024.554.925024.760.131523.262.640022.260.950021.162.663020.559.880019.863.1100019.766.7125019.665160019.468.5200019.461.7250019.158315019.364.5400019.163.7500019.263.4630019.360.5800019.358.91000019.558.21250019.3571600019.155.6SPL32.275.6N1.837.9median 19.6Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKBmedian 60.5Delta2.63.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.32 / 0.46 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.5 / 6.1 / 7 Watt
Carga midlight 31.2 / 42.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Hynix HFS128G3MND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Medion Akoya P6670
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Power Consumption
-22%
12%
-49%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
3.9
-11%
3.6
-3%
6.7
-91%
7
-100%
Idle Average *
6.1
7.4
-21%
6
2%
9.2
-51%
8
-31%
Idle Maximum *
7
9.5
-36%
6.4
9%
9.7
-39%
8.4
-20%
Load Average *
31.2
41
-31%
26
17%
40.6
-30%
38.8
-24%
Load Maximum *
42.9
48
-12%
28.1
34%
58
-35%
52.8
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 12min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge)
3h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 21min
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Medion Akoya P6670
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh
Battery Runtime
20%
30%
22%
44%
Reader / Idle
612
634
4%
Load
81
109
35%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
230
275
20%
347
51%
280
22%
332
44%
H.264
313

Pro

+ Econômico
+ Teclado relativamente bom
+ Quase sem emissões de calor.
+ Muito espaço de armazenamento

Contra

- Carcaça econômica tem muito pontos fracos
- Sem USB Tipo C
- Sem teclado iluminado
- Controles pobres do touchpad
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
- Afogamentos sob uso intenso
- Disco rígido barulhento
- Bateria muito pequena
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB. Test model provided by campuspoint.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB. Test model provided by campuspoint.de

O Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB tem como objetivo ser um poli funcional de escritório e multimídia. No entanto, para ser um verdadeiro portátil multimídia, ele precisa ter uma tela melhor e possivelmente uma GPU mais potente. Por outro lado, o portátil definitivamente é um bom portátil de escritório com certas fraquezas. Se você gosta de trabalhar em paz, então este modelo pode não ser para você, dado que o HD do IdeaPad é um companheiro barulhento constante. Este problema pode ser resolvido trocando o HD por um SSD. As barras/teclas do mouse também são bastante irritantes de usar, mas o teclado é confiável. Trabalhar durante uma viagem não é possível devido á tela pobre e à bateria pequena. 

No final do dia, não conseguimos reunir suficientes motivos para recomendar o IdeaPad. Definitivamente é médio e não consegue se destacar entre a multidão.

Por que você deveria comprar o IdeaPad 310-15IKB? A principal motivo é o preço. Este portátil é mais barato que alguns de seus concorrentes. No entanto, por outro lado, você verá que pagando um pouco mais pode obter um painel IPS muito melhor. Este é um ponto especialmente importante, dado que a tela de qualidade pobre do nosso modelo de teste é uma de suas maiores fraquezas.

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB - 11/29/2016 v5.1
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
73 / 98 → 74%
Teclado
78%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
40 / 80 → 50%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Bateria
74%
Pantalha
73%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 68 → 84%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 92 → 94%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
87%
Audio
50%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Médio
69%
77%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - página inicial > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB
Benjamin Herzig, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)