Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB (Core i5-7200U, 940MX)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 24510 Hz | ≤ 60 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 24510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 24510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 1522:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
61.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.05% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus X302UV-FN016T InfoVision M133NWN1 R3, , 1366x768, 13.30 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-ad065nr LG Philips LGD0576, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 16% | 57% | 3% | 18% | 45% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.58 | 48.37 16% | 66 59% | 42.88 3% | 48.94 18% | 65.5 58% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.8 | 72.6 17% | 95.5 55% | 64.1 4% | 73.3 19% | 83.8 36% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.05 | 49.98 16% | 67.8 57% | 44.3 3% | 50.5 17% | 61.3 42% |
| Response Times | -33% | -44% | -39% | -6% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 42 ? -11% | 49 ? -29% | 45 ? -18% | 32.8 ? 14% | 28 ? 26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 23 ? 13% | 27 ? -2% | 26 ? 2% | 33.2 ? -26% | 22.4 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 24510 ? | 50 ? -100% | 50 ? -100% | 50 ? -100% | 10200 ? -58% | |
| Screen | -13% | 26% | 3% | 14% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 274 | 218 -20% | 347 27% | 257 -6% | 351.2 28% | 290 6% |
| Brightness | 256 | 210 -18% | 334 30% | 263 3% | 325 27% | 270 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 88 6% | 80 -4% | 90 8% | 89 7% | 78 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.5 -178% | 0.27 -50% | 0.24 -33% | 0.195 -8% | 0.32 -78% |
| Contrast | 1522 | 436 -71% | 1285 -16% | 1071 -30% | 1801 18% | 906 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 3.89 42% | 3.29 51% | 5.44 19% | 7.4 -10% | 4.8 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.8 | 7.11 52% | 4.69 68% | 10.93 26% | 9.08 39% | 11.2 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 4.9 22% | 3.62 43% | 3.95 37% | 6.71 -7% | 2.8 56% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.41 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.74 80% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6363 102% | 7860 83% | 7307 89% | 6896 94% | 7222 90% | 6382 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.6 | 46 16% | 62 57% | 40 1% | 50.48 27% | 54.9 39% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61.5 | 73 19% | 95 54% | 64 4% | 73.31 19% | 83.5 36% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-11% | 13% /
19% | -11% /
-5% | 9% /
12% | 15% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3554 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4628 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2844 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Asus X302UV-FN016T Hynix HFS128G3MND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 29% | 113% | -88% | 76% | -26% | |
| Read Seq | 472.3 | 510 8% | 1818 285% | 113.3 -76% | 1209 156% | 428.2 -9% |
| Write Seq | 254.1 | 458.8 81% | 582 129% | 110.2 -57% | 314 24% | 178.6 -30% |
| Read 512 | 347.8 | 399.7 15% | 1134 226% | 30.83 -91% | 282.6 -19% | |
| Write 512 | 252.8 | 299.3 18% | 586 132% | 47.13 -81% | 179.1 -29% | |
| Read 4k | 24.74 | 35.27 43% | 34.93 41% | 0.34 -99% | 43.4 75% | 6.559 -73% |
| Write 4k | 77.7 | 90.2 16% | 133.4 72% | 0.981 -99% | 153.4 97% | 71.2 -8% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 279.6 | 397.7 42% | 373.7 34% | 0.72 -100% | 487.6 74% | 253 -10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 244.8 | 257.3 5% | 210.8 -14% | 1.026 -100% | 312.2 28% | 174 -29% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2700 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7222 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1936 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 135.8 | 73.4 | 63.8 | 23.49 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 39.82 | 32.42 | 19.43 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 44.21 | 25.01 | 13.45 | 8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 45.79 | 25.49 | 13.63 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.9 / 29.9 / 30.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.1 / 36.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.9 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.8 °C / -8.7 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.24 / 0.41 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.37 / 5.2 / 7.1 Watt |
| Carga |
46.2 / 57 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, Hynix HFS128G3MND, TN LED, 1366x768, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -6% | 25% | 18% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.37 | 3.9 -16% | 4 -19% | 4.1 -22% | 2.8 17% | 3.3 2% |
| Idle Average * | 5.2 | 7.1 -37% | 6.6 -27% | 4.2 19% | 5.8 -12% | 5.1 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.1 | 8.8 -24% | 7.4 -4% | 5.1 28% | 6.4 10% | 5.2 27% |
| Load Average * | 46.2 | 27.6 40% | 41.7 10% | 22.1 52% | 31.3 32% | 29.5 36% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.5 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 57 | 30.2 47% | 52.4 8% | 29.4 48% | 31.7 44% | 44 23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -36% | -28% | -31% | 28% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 864 | 638 -26% | 718 -17% | 1295 50% | 1487 72% | |
| H.264 | 557 | 231 -59% | 423 -24% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 568 | 384 -32% | 389 -32% | 392 -31% | 677 19% | 570 0% |
| Load | 136 | 100 -26% | 83 -39% | 157 15% | 127 -7% |
Pro
Contra
O IdeaPad 520s-14IKB é um bom pacote geral que faz muitas coisas, mas tem fraquezas em alguns detalhes. No entanto, essas fraquezas podem ser desculpadas em grande medida pelo preço. Primeiro o positivo: Em comparação com o antecessor, o design é mais atraente e a carcaça não mostra fraquezas em termos de estabilidade e acabamento. A boa estabilidade também ajuda com a experiência de digitação, de modo que você também pode contar o teclado com os aspectos positivos, e o Touchpad que está de acordo com o padrão Precision da Microsoft. A duração da bateria é muito boa e melhorou claramente em comparação com o antecessor, dado que a Lenovo colocou uma bateria maior. O ventilador é muitas vezes desligado e quando funciona, ele funciona com um zumbido agradável e silencioso. Mesmo que a tela esteja longe de ser perfeita (cobertura de espaço de cores baixa), ela ainda pode mostrar os bons ângulos de visualização típicos do IPS e um contraste surpreendentemente alto.
Em princípio, a Lenovo fez todas as coisas mais importantes. Porém, há pequenas deficiências em alguns detalhes: Por exemplo, a carcaça esquenta muito quando sob uso intenso. No geral, o resfriamento não é muito adequado. Embora seja silencioso, houve um forte afogamento no teste de estresse. Já no Cinebench loop, a CPU não consegue manter seu desempenho máximo. Ainda é incompreensível para nós que a conexão USB-C integrada não suporte o DisplayPort, nem possa ser usada para carregar. Que pena! Também é lamentável que a Lenovo apenas inclua uma placa WLAN 1x1.
No geral, o IdeaPad 520s é um bom poli funcional que convence com uma boa duração da bateria e um design atraente.
Os pontos negativos não são suficientes para conseguir uma recomendação para o IdeaPad 520s-14IKB. Simplesmente é um Ultrabook relativamente bem sucedido, que pode ser interessante para estudantes em particular, com boa duração da bateria, a dGPU e o teclado confortável. Se o comparar, por exemplo, com o popular Dell XPS 13, o IdeaPad é maior e mais pesado, mas ainda é muito portável e quase adequado para jogos com a GPU GeForce. Também é muito mais barato.
Precisamos mencionar um pequeno qualificador para a recomendação, dado que, no momento do teste, o IdeaPad 520s-14IKB já está desatualizado. Uma nova versão do mesmo portátil com Core i5-8250U e GeForce MX150 seria muito mais atraente. No entanto, também precisamos perguntar o quão bem o resfriamento poderia lidar com os componentes mais novos.
Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE
-
09/05/2017 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig