Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo X62

Douglas Black (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/11/2017

Um clássico rejuvenescido? O X62 é um sucessor personalizado de terceiros para o amado subportátil X61 da Lenovo. Atualizado com um chipset Intel de 5ta geração e uma rara tela IPS SXGA+ 4:3, será que o X62 atende os altos padrões que a herança do ThinkPad demanda, entre os concorrentes modernos? Ou é uma decepção amadora que é melhor deixar no passado?

Lenovo X62
Processador
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Análises do: 850 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, Memória compartilhada
Memória
8192 MB 
, SK Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB
Pantalha
12.1 polegadas 4:3, 1400x1050 pixel 145 PPI, IPS Flexview HV121P01-100, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Broadwell-U PCH-LP (Baseline)
Disco rígido
,  GB 
, SATA 3 SSD 120GB
Placa de Som
Intel Broadwell PCH-LP - High Definition Audio Controller
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 35.5 x 268.7 x 212
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Características adicionais
6 Meses Garantia
peso
1.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 230 g
Preço
730 Euro

 

Left: USB 3.1, mini-DP, mini-HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, SD Card
Left: USB 3.1, mini-DP, mini-HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, SD Card
Right: AC-in, 2x USB 2.0, 3.5mm Audio In, 3.5mm Audio Out
Right: AC-in, 2x USB 2.0, 3.5mm Audio In, 3.5mm Audio Out
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7280
(Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
77 MB/s ∼100% +839%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.2 MB/s ∼81% +659%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.8 MB/s ∼30% +178%
Lenovo X62
8.2 (min: 3.6) MB/s ∼11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7280
(Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
90.92 MB/s ∼100% +536%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼97% +515%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.02 MB/s ∼30% +89%
Lenovo X62
14.3 MB/s ∼16%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (I217-V)
671 MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
645 MBit/s ∼96% +24%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
641 MBit/s ∼96% +23%
Lenovo X62
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260
522 MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (I217-V)
512 MBit/s ∼97% +20%
Lenovo X62
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260
425 MBit/s ∼80%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
297 MBit/s ∼56% -30%
148.5
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
149.5
cd/m²
165.2
cd/m²
168.3
cd/m²
155.8
cd/m²
154.8
cd/m²
160.6
cd/m²
150.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 168.3 cd/m² Médio: 157.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
Contraste: 306:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 0.7 | - Ø
54.2% sRGB (Argyll) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19
Lenovo X62
IPS Flexview HV121P01-100, , 12.1, 1400x1050
Dell XPS 13-9343
SHP1421, IPS, 13.3, 3200x1800
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Innolux N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 12.5, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 7280
AUO236D , IPS, 12.5, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
LP133WF2-SPL78, IPS, LED, 13.3, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
APPA027, IPS, 12, 2304x1440
Response Times
19%
24%
24%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
59.6
40.8
32%
32.4
46%
43.6
27%
41.2
31%
Response Time Black / White *
32
30.4
5%
31.2
2%
25.2
21%
30.4
5%
PWM Frequency
26040
30860
Screen
43%
-38%
-29%
-14%
59%
Brightness
157
372
137%
281
79%
301
92%
307
96%
358
128%
Brightness Distribution
88
77
-12%
94
7%
88
0%
89
1%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.55
0.178
68%
0.25
55%
0.32
42%
0.36
35%
0.47
15%
Contrast
306
2063
574%
1132
270%
970
217%
850
178%
823
169%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.92
3%
6.1
-0%
5.9
3%
5.1
16%
1.6
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
0.7
4.79
-584%
6
-757%
5.1
-629%
3.9
-457%
1
-43%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.42 99%
2.05 117%
2.33 103%
2.17 111%
2.26 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
63
80%
42.26
21%
42
20%
38.24
9%
61.6
76%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
54.2
96.4
78%
65.43
21%
65
20%
59.75
10%
82.2
52%
CCT
7013 93%
6832 95%
6816 95%
6829 95%
6680 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
43% / 43%
-10% / -27%
-3% / -19%
5% / -6%
39% / 51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 42.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected100 % brightness setting
168.3 cd/m² brightness

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 1486 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

 
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo X62
Intel Core i5-5200U
223 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
164 Points ∼74% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
110 Points ∼49% -51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10 Bootcamp)
91 Points ∼41% -59%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (OS X)
90 Points ∼40% -60%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
88 Points ∼39% -61%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
351 Points ∼19% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
351 Points ∼19% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼18% +51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
251 Points ∼14% +15%
Lenovo X62
Intel Core i5-5200U (R15)
219 (min: 217) Points ∼12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10 Bootcamp)
218 Points ∼12% 0%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
217 Points ∼12% -1%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.87 Points ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.67 Points ∼76%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
1.17 Points ∼53%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10)
1 Points ∼45%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (OS X)
0.95 Points ∼43%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
0.98 Points ∼45%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.89 Points ∼19%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.87 Points ∼19%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel Core m7-6Y75
2.53 Points ∼13%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10)
2.35 Points ∼12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (OS X)
2.29 Points ∼11%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.33 Points ∼12%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
4835 Points ∼63% +7%
Lenovo X62
Intel Core i5-5200U
4511 Points ∼59%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10)
3353 Points ∼44% -26%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
2656 Points ∼35% -41%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
11109 Points ∼28% +18%
Lenovo X62
Intel Core i5-5200U
9419 Points ∼23%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30 (Windows 10)
7355 Points ∼18% -22%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
7208 Points ∼18% -23%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
793 s * ∼9%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
642.757 s * ∼8%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
482 s * ∼6%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3995 Seconds * ∼18%
Dell XPS 13-9343
Intel Core i5-5200U
744 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
526 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4511
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9419
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6054
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
223 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
219 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
30.62 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
4957 Points ∼76% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4838 Points ∼74% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4660 Points ∼72% +24%
Lenovo X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
3748 Points ∼58%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256
3636 Points ∼56% -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼54% -5%
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
3225 Points ∼50% -14%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
4662 Points ∼50% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4583 Points ∼49% +37%
Lenovo X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
3349 Points ∼36%
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
3288 Points ∼35% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3705 Points ∼62% +27%
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
3667 Points ∼61% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3575 Points ∼60% +22%
Lenovo X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
2928 Points ∼49%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256
2651 Points ∼44% -9%
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
2582 Points ∼43% -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼43% -13%
PCMark 7 Score
4729 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2928 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3349 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3748 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo X62
Dell XPS 13-9343
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Dell Latitude 7280
SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
129%
134%
258%
100%
236%
Write 4k QD32
137.7
326.3
137%
223.9
63%
418.3
204%
183
33%
443.1
222%
Read 4k QD32
107.1
354
231%
271.9
154%
495.3
362%
344.4
222%
578
440%
Write 4k
34.1
79.3
133%
24.87
-27%
124.5
265%
59.51
75%
138.5
306%
Read 4k
11.43
34.76
204%
16.28
42%
35.27
209%
30.23
164%
31.96
180%
Write 512
144.6
395.5
174%
736.6
409%
527.8
265%
323.2
124%
517.6
258%
Read 512
462.1
371.9
-20%
671.5
45%
857.5
86%
370.1
-20%
628.9
36%
Write Seq
154.4
424.2
175%
660.1
328%
984.6
538%
477.4
209%
652.5
323%
Read Seq
512.3
489.6
-4%
820.9
60%
1190
132%
470.8
-8%
1143
123%
Sequential Read: 512.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 154.4 MB/s
512K Read: 462.1 MB/s
512K Write: 144.6 MB/s
4K Read: 11.43 MB/s
4K Write: 34.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 107.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 137.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
1294 Points ∼8%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1219 Points ∼8% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1176 Points ∼7% -9%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1104 Points ∼7% -15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1091 Points ∼7% -16%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1508 Points ∼3% +39%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1442 Points ∼3% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1426 Points ∼3% +32%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1202 Points ∼2% +11%
Lenovo X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
1082 Points ∼2%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
819 Points ∼2% +4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
789 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
789 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
784 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
7032 Points ∼4% +7%
Lenovo X62
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
6591 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
6497 Points ∼4% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6483 Points ∼4% -2%
3DMark 06 Standard
7382 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1220 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4912 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
729 pontos
Ajuda

Barulho

Ocioso
31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB
Carga
34.1 / 40.8 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
Lenovo X62
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
Dell XPS 13-9343
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Noise
-1%
6%
10%
10%
Idle Minimum *
31.8
30.2
5%
29
9%
29.4
8%
29.1
8%
Idle Average *
31.8
30.3
5%
29
9%
29.4
8%
29.1
8%
Idle Maximum *
31.8
30.4
4%
30.4
4%
30
6%
29.1
8%
Load Average *
34.1
34.4
-1%
34.1
-0%
30.6
10%
31.9
6%
Load Maximum *
40.8
48
-18%
37.6
8%
32.7
20%
31.9
22%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 29 °C27.4 °C24 °C 
 29.8 °C28.8 °C24 °C 
 39.4 °C28.8 °C23.6 °C 
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 28.3 °C
27 °C29 °C34.6 °C
26.6 °C32.6 °C37 °C
25.2 °C31.4 °C44.2 °C
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 32 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.234.22532.9343132.633.74033.4345031.9326332.432.38031.132.210031.131.212529.629.116028.230.120028.630.425026.630.331526.834.540025.942.55002552.563024.85780024.657.8100024.960.8125024.266.2160023.974.6200023.671.8250023.269.3315023.269400023.568.8500023.470630023.368.4800023.266.21000023.359.51250023.256.11600023.554SPL36.180.8N2.642.5median 24.2Lenovo X62median 57.8Delta1.614.835.331.434.433.431.731.229.829.328.228.525.9282628.824.627.224.528.62328.222.83121.437.220.147.719.551.818.9501851.317.454.817.353.516.654.616.652.916.453.416.454.216.35416.653.216.958.816.958.917.354.517.350.917.252.217.15029.366.81.221.3median 17.3Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00median 52.22.16hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo X62 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 21%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.58 / 0.72 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 9.09 / 13.9 / 13.99 Watt
Carga midlight 23.8 / 39.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo X62
5200U, HD Graphics 5500, , , 1400x1050, 12.1
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X220T 4298-2YG
2620M, HD Graphics 3000, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT000-9VL142, , 1366x768, 12.5
Power Consumption
32%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
9.09
3.16
65%
7.4
19%
Idle Average *
13.9
5.9
58%
12.2
12%
Idle Maximum *
13.99
6.5
54%
13.2
6%
Load Average *
23.8
30.6
-29%
53.1
-123%
Load Maximum *
39.7
35.8
10%
68.3
-72%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
   32WHr Battery
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
1h 53min
Navegar com WLAN
2h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 55min
Note: These battery runtimes were measured with a 32WHr battery with 4% wear.
   91WHr extended battery (original CCFL backlight, 100% brightness)
Navegar com WLAN
5h 35min
Lenovo X62
5200U, HD Graphics 5500,  Wh
Dell XPS 13-9343
5200U, HD Graphics 5500, 52 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh
Dell Latitude 7280
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
397%
278%
447%
732%
378%
Reader / Idle
113
912
707%
1023
805%
1553
1274%
904
700%
Load
55
140
155%
208
278%
104
89%
159
189%
85
55%
WiFi
135
580
330%
WiFi v1.3
554
324
682
475

Pro

+ Exclusivo
+ Tela 4:3(?)
+ Construção sólida
+ Design compacto
+ Leve
+ Teclado + TrackPoint
+ ThinkLight
+ Fácil manutenção
+ Desempenho relativamente forte

Contra

- Tela escura e voraz
- Tela 4:3(?)
- O chassi pode chegar com certo desgaste devido à carcaça reutilizada do X61
- Sem Trackpad
- Pousa palma esquerdo quente
- Áudio pobre
In review: X62 (Generation 3) provided by 51nb.com
In review: X62 (Generation 3) provided by 51nb.com

O X62 pega o chassi sólido e compacto de um X61 2007 e tenta moderniza-lo em um a efetiva máquina de trabalho para hoje em dia. Em sua maior parte, podemos dizer que o X62 emprestado para nós pela 51nb tem bastante sucesso neste objetivo: O chassi é ThinkPad clássico em sua melhor expressão, o teclado exibe zero flexões e é um prazer digitar com ele, e o desempenho da quinta geração das CPUs ULV Broadwell está no mesmo nível ou pe superior a portáteis com especificações similares. No entanto, a tela — embora seja uma excelente tela de 12,1 polegadas com resolução de 1400 x 1050 — é escura, inclusive para os padrões ThinkPad. Embora comprar um kit de atualização de iluminação LED seja uma opção, seria aproximadamente outros US$50 sobre o custo inicial do X62. O fato de que a tela precise ser mantida quase no brilho máximo o tempo todo, também afeta a duração da bateria da máquina, o que significa que a bateria aior de 8 células de 75WHr será uma necessidade se não atualizar a iluminação de fundo.

O X62 é um ultra portável absolutamente exclusivo que consegue se posicionar com bastante sucesso como uma mistura de nostalgia e modernidade com apenas alguns engasgos. Não é u portátil para qualquer um, no entanto, e para alcançar o seu potencial será necessário uma atualização pós-venda adicional de um kit de iluminação de fundo de LED.

O X62 é uma carta de amor para a época dos ThinkPads e ThinkLights clássicos e para as telas 4:3. A natureza "faça você mesmo" do kit e a a necessidade de uma atualização da luz de fundo de LED, significa que que é um portátil para quem gosta de hobbys e para aqueles confortáveis com "mexer" na máquina, em lugar de para os usuários convencionais. No entanto, achamos que isso é bom, dado que serão produzidos muitos poucos desses portáteis e eles já são um item de coleção. Os bare-bones X62 (sem incluir RAM, HD, bateria, ou adaptador) já têm um valor não-insignificante de US$750 pelo modelo básico i5. Para edições futuras do X62, gostaríamos de ver kit de iluminação de fundo de LED instalado como padrão e que inclua baterias e adaptadores com a unidade.

Se estiver interessado em adquirir um X62 ou outro aparelho da 51nb creations, você pode  conferir seu website em inglês aqui para entrar em contato com eles.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo X62
Douglas Black, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-16)