Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo X62

Douglas Black (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/11/2017

Um clássico rejuvenescido? O X62 é um sucessor personalizado de terceiros para o amado subportátil X61 da Lenovo. Atualizado com um chipset Intel de 5ta geração e uma rara tela IPS SXGA+ 4:3, será que o X62 atende os altos padrões que a herança do ThinkPad demanda, entre os concorrentes modernos? Ou é uma decepção amadora que é melhor deixar no passado?

Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Dell Latitude 7280 Dell XPS 13-9343 X62 Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz

Left: USB 3.1, mini-DP, mini-HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, SD Card

Right: AC-in, 2x USB 2.0, 3.5mm Audio In, 3.5mm Audio Out

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7280	77 MB/s ∼100% +839%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00	62.2 MB/s ∼81% +659%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00	22.8 MB/s ∼30% +178%
X62	8.2 (min: 3.6, max: 9.8) MB/s ∼11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7280	90.92 MB/s ∼100% +536%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00	88 MB/s ∼97% +515%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00	27.02 MB/s ∼30% +89%
X62	14.3 MB/s ∼16%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	671 MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	645 MBit/s ∼96% +24%
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	641 MBit/s ∼96% +23%
X62 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260	522 MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	530 MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s ∼97% +20%
X62 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260	425 MBit/s ∼80%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	297 MBit/s ∼56% -30%


148.5 cd/m²	162 cd/m²	149.5 cd/m²
165.2 cd/m²	168.3 cd/m²	155.8 cd/m²
154.8 cd/m²	160.6 cd/m²	150.9 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 168.3 cd/m² Médio: 157.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
Contraste: 306:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 0.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
54.2% sRGB (Argyll) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19

Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	X62 IPS Flexview HV121P01-100, , 12.1, 1400x1050	Dell XPS 13-9343 SHP1421, IPS, 13.3, 3200x1800	Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Innolux N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 12.5, 1920x1080	Dell Latitude 7280 AUO236D , IPS, 12.5, 1920x1080	Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 LP133WF2-SPL78, IPS, LED, 13.3, 1920x1080	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, IPS, 12, 2304x1440
Response Times			19%	24%	24%	18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	59.6 (16.8, 42.8)		40.8 (21.2, 19.6) 32%	32.4 (12.4, 20) 46%	43.6 (20.8, 22.8) 27%	41.2 (15.6, 25.6) 31%
Response Time Black / White *	32 (18, 14)		30.4 (16.4, 14) 5%	31.2 (9.2, 22) 2%	25.2 (12.8, 12.4) 21%	30.4 (6.8, 23.6) 5%
PWM Frequency			26040 (50)		30860 (90)
Screen		51%	-19%	-12%	3%	69%
Brightness middle	168.3	367.3 118%	283 68%	310.4 84%	306 82%	387 130%
Brightness	157	372 137%	281 79%	301 92%	307 96%	358 128%
Brightness Distribution	88	77 -12%	94 7%	88 0%	89 1%	88 0%
Black Level *	0.55	0.178 68%	0.25 55%	0.32 42%	0.36 35%	0.47 15%
Contrast	306	2063 574%	1132 270%	970 217%	850 178%	823 169%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	6.1	5.92 3%	6.1 -0%	5.9 3%	5.1 16%	1.6 74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	30.5		15.4 50%	21 31%	13.3 56%	4 87%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	0.7	4.79 -584%	6 -757%	5.1 -629%	3.9 -457%	1 -43%
Gamma	2.19 ^110%	2.42 ^99%	2.05 ^117%	2.33 ^103%	2.17 ^111%	2.26 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	35	63 80%	42.26 21%	42 20%	38.24 9%	61.6 76%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	54.2	96.4 78%	65.43 21%	65 20%	59.75 10%	82.2 52%
CCT		7013 ^93%	6832 ^95%	6816 ^95%	6829 ^95%	6680 ^97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		51% / 51%	0% / -12%	6% / -6%	14% / 6%	44% / 60%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.8 ms rise
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 42.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected		≤ 100 % brightness setting
		≤ 168.3 cd/m² brightness
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.0x | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Core i7-7600U	164 Points ∼28%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points ∼25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points ∼22%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel Core m7-6Y75	110 Points ∼19%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points ∼15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points ∼15%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	88 Points ∼15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Core i7-7600U	351 Points ∼16% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	351 Points ∼16% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points ∼15% +51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel Core m7-6Y75	251 Points ∼12% +15%
X62 Intel Core i5-5200U	219 (min: 217, max: 220) Points ∼10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points ∼10% 0%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	217 Points ∼10% -1%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Core i7-7600U	1.87 Points ∼82%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	1.67 Points ∼74%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel Core m7-6Y75	1.17 Points ∼52%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1 Points ∼44%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.95 Points ∼42%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	0.98 Points ∼43%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Core i7-7600U	3.89 Points ∼16%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	3.87 Points ∼16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel Core m7-6Y75	2.53 Points ∼11%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.35 Points ∼10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.29 Points ∼10%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	2.33 Points ∼10%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	4835 Points ∼54% +7%
X62 Intel Core i5-5200U	4511 Points ∼51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	3353 Points ∼38% -26%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	2656 Points ∼30% -41%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	11109 Points ∼22% +18%
X62 Intel Core i5-5200U	9419 Points ∼19%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	7355 Points ∼15% -22%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	7208 Points ∼14% -23%

wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	793 s * ∼9%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	642.757 s * ∼8%
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Core i7-7600U	482 s * ∼6%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	3995 Seconds * ∼18%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel Core i5-5200U	744 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel Core i7-7600U	526 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4511

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

9419

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6054

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

219 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

30.62 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7280 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB	4957 Points ∼76% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	4838 Points ∼74% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	4660 Points ∼72% +24%
X62 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	3748 Points ∼58%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256	3636 Points ∼56% -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points ∼54% -5%
Dell XPS 13-9343 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	3225 Points ∼50% -14%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7280 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB	4662 Points ∼49% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	4583 Points ∼48% +37%
X62 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	3349 Points ∼35%
Dell XPS 13-9343 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	3288 Points ∼35% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	3705 Points ∼62% +27%
Dell Latitude 7280 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB	3667 Points ∼61% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	3575 Points ∼60% +22%
X62 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	2928 Points ∼49%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256	2651 Points ∼44% -9%
Dell XPS 13-9343 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	2582 Points ∼43% -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points ∼43% -13%

PCMark 7 Score		4729 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2928 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3349 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3748 pontos

Ajuda

... comparado com

	X62	Dell XPS 13-9343 Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Apple SSD AP0256	Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	Dell Latitude 7280 SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB	Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		129%	134%	258%	100%	236%
Write 4k QD32	137.7	326.3 137%	223.9 63%	418.3 204%	183 33%	443.1 222%
Read 4k QD32	107.1	354 231%	271.9 154%	495.3 362%	344.4 222%	578 440%
Write 4k	34.1	79.3 133%	24.87 -27%	124.5 265%	59.51 75%	138.5 306%
Read 4k	11.43	34.76 204%	16.28 42%	35.27 209%	30.23 164%	31.96 180%
Write 512	144.6	395.5 174%	736.6 409%	527.8 265%	323.2 124%	517.6 258%
Read 512	462.1	371.9 -20%	671.5 45%	857.5 86%	370.1 -20%	628.9 36%
Write Seq	154.4	424.2 175%	660.1 328%	984.6 538%	477.4 209%	652.5 323%
Read Seq	512.3	489.6 -4%	820.9 60%	1190 132%	470.8 -8%	1143 123%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Sequential Read: 512.3 MB/s

Sequential Write: 154.4 MB/s

512K Read: 462.1 MB/s

512K Write: 144.6 MB/s

4K Read: 11.43 MB/s

4K Write: 34.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 107.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 137.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
X62 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	1294 Points ∼7%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U	1219 Points ∼7% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U	1176 Points ∼7% -9%
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U	1104 Points ∼6% -15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1091 Points ∼6% -16%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U	1508 Points ∼3% +39%
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U	1442 Points ∼3% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U	1426 Points ∼3% +32%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1202 Points ∼2% +11%
X62 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	1082 Points ∼2%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U	819 Points ∼2% +4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	789 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U	789 Points ∼2% +1%
X62 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	784 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 7280 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U	7032 Points ∼4% +7%
X62 Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	6591 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	6497 Points ∼4% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U	6483 Points ∼4% -2%

3DMark 06 Standard		7382 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1220 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4912 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		729 pontos

Ajuda

... comparado com

Barulho

Ocioso		31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB
Carga		34.1 / 40.8 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)

	X62 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U	Dell XPS 13-9343 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK	Dell Latitude 7280 HD Graphics 620, 7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB	Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
Noise		-1%	5%	8%	9%
off / environment *	28.8		29 -1%	29.4 -2%	29.1 -1%
Idle Minimum *	31.8	30.2 5%	29 9%	29.4 8%	29.1 8%
Idle Average *	31.8	30.3 5%	29 9%	29.4 8%	29.1 8%
Idle Maximum *	31.8	30.4 4%	30.4 4%	30 6%	29.1 8%
Load Average *	34.1	34.4 -1%	34.1 -0%	30.6 10%	31.9 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	37.45
Load Maximum *	40.8	48 -18%	37.6 8%	32.7 20%	31.9 22%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


29 °C	27.4 °C	24 °C
29.8 °C	28.8 °C	24 °C
39.4 °C	28.8 °C	23.6 °C

Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 28.3 °C


27 °C	29 °C	34.6 °C
26.6 °C	32.6 °C	37 °C
25.2 °C	31.4 °C	44.2 °C

Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 32 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

X62 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.58 / 0.72 Watt
Ocioso	9.09 / 13.9 / 13.99 Watt
Carga	23.8 / 39.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	X62 5200U, HD Graphics 5500, , , 1400x1050, 12.1	Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3	Lenovo ThinkPad X220T 4298-2YG 2620M, HD Graphics 3000, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT000-9VL142, , 1366x768, 12.5
Power Consumption		32%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	9.09	3.16 65%	7.4 19%
Idle Average *	13.9	5.9 58%	12.2 12%
Idle Maximum *	13.99	6.5 54%	13.2 6%
Load Average *	23.8	30.6 -29%	53.1 -123%
Load Maximum *	39.7	35.8 10%	68.3 -72%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

32WHr Battery
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		1h 53min
Navegar com WLAN		2h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		2h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 55min
Note: These battery runtimes were measured with a 32WHr battery with 4% wear.
91WHr extended battery (original CCFL backlight, 100% brightness)
Navegar com WLAN		5h 35min

	X62 5200U, HD Graphics 5500, Wh	Dell XPS 13-9343 5200U, HD Graphics 5500, 52 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh	Dell Latitude 7280 7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 7500U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime		397%	278%	447%	732%	378%
Reader / Idle	113	912 707%		1023 805%	1553 1274%	904 700%
WiFi	135	580 330%
Load	55	140 155%	208 278%	104 89%	159 189%	85 55%
WiFi v1.3			554	324	682	475

Pro

+ Exclusivo

+ Tela 4:3(?)

+ Construção sólida

+ Design compacto

+ Leve

+ Teclado + TrackPoint

+ ThinkLight

+ Fácil manutenção

+ Desempenho relativamente forte

Contra

- Tela escura e voraz

- Tela 4:3(?)

- O chassi pode chegar com certo desgaste devido à carcaça reutilizada do X61

- Sem Trackpad

- Pousa palma esquerdo quente

- Áudio pobre

In review: X62 (Generation 3) provided by 51nb.com

O X62 pega o chassi sólido e compacto de um X61 2007 e tenta moderniza-lo em um a efetiva máquina de trabalho para hoje em dia. Em sua maior parte, podemos dizer que o X62 emprestado para nós pela 51nb tem bastante sucesso neste objetivo: O chassi é ThinkPad clássico em sua melhor expressão, o teclado exibe zero flexões e é um prazer digitar com ele, e o desempenho da quinta geração das CPUs ULV Broadwell está no mesmo nível ou pe superior a portáteis com especificações similares. No entanto, a tela — embora seja uma excelente tela de 12,1 polegadas com resolução de 1400 x 1050 — é escura, inclusive para os padrões ThinkPad. Embora comprar um kit de atualização de iluminação LED seja uma opção, seria aproximadamente outros US$50 sobre o custo inicial do X62. O fato de que a tela precise ser mantida quase no brilho máximo o tempo todo, também afeta a duração da bateria da máquina, o que significa que a bateria aior de 8 células de 75WHr será uma necessidade se não atualizar a iluminação de fundo.

O X62 é um ultra portável absolutamente exclusivo que consegue se posicionar com bastante sucesso como uma mistura de nostalgia e modernidade com apenas alguns engasgos. Não é u portátil para qualquer um, no entanto, e para alcançar o seu potencial será necessário uma atualização pós-venda adicional de um kit de iluminação de fundo de LED.

O X62 é uma carta de amor para a época dos ThinkPads e ThinkLights clássicos e para as telas 4:3. A natureza "faça você mesmo" do kit e a a necessidade de uma atualização da luz de fundo de LED, significa que que é um portátil para quem gosta de hobbys e para aqueles confortáveis com "mexer" na máquina, em lugar de para os usuários convencionais. No entanto, achamos que isso é bom, dado que serão produzidos muitos poucos desses portáteis e eles já são um item de coleção. Os bare-bones X62 (sem incluir RAM, HD, bateria, ou adaptador) já têm um valor não-insignificante de US$750 pelo modelo básico i5. Para edições futuras do X62, gostaríamos de ver kit de iluminação de fundo de LED instalado como padrão e que inclua baterias e adaptadores com a unidade.

Se estiver interessado em adquirir um X62 ou outro aparelho da 51nb creations, você pode conferir seu website em inglês aqui para entrar em contato com eles.

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo X62

Os Top 10

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

X62 audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare