Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z, i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Pequeno, porém, poderoso. Da mesma forma que você não deve julgar um livro pela capa, seria prematuro julgar a potência de um portátil por sua altura, e o Tulpar T5 V18.1 do revendedor de barebones Monster é a prova viva disso. O portátil para jogos de 15 polegadas possui um chassi de metal super fino que acomoda uma CPU de seis núcleos emparelhada com uma GPU de gama alta. Vamos descobrir se o sistema de resfriamento está à altura da tarefa.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z) (Tulpar Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.73, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, 32 GB máx
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB, 480 GB 
, NVMe-SSD + Seagate Barracuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7,200 rpm. slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x fone, 1x microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 359 x 240
Bateria
46.74 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 3 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (Sound Blaster Cinema 5), Teclado: mecânico, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 150 W, guia de início rápido, unidade thumb com controladores e ferramentas, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.076 kg, Suprimento de energia: 496 g
Preço
1732 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
384 mm 262 mm 17.8 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 240 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.8 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s +72%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
642 MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
593 MBit/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s +103%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
682 MBit/s +1%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 MBit/s -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -2%
307
cd/m²		307
cd/m²		317
cd/m²
314
cd/m²		335
cd/m²		331
cd/m²
297
cd/m²		303
cd/m²		321
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 335 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 335 cd/m²
Contraste: 1015:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-5%
-1%
0%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
64.8
63.4
-2%
64.4
-1%
66.2
2%
63.6
-2%
sRGB Coverage
94.3
87.7
-7%
93.4
-1%
92.1
-2%
93.8
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.3
65.5
-1%
67.2
1%
64.9
-2%
Response Times
-112%
8%
-9%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
30.8 ?(13.6, 17.2)
-93%
13.6 ?(7.6, 6)
15%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-10%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
27.6 ?(16, 11.6)
-130%
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-0%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-7%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
7%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-7%
10%
9%
19%
Brightness middle
335
286.7
-14%
304.3
-9%
254
-24%
313
-7%
Brightness
315
281
-11%
293
-7%
262
-17%
300
-5%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
80
-10%
89
0%
78
-12%
Black Level *
0.33
0.39
-18%
0.38
-15%
0.22
33%
0.33
-0%
Contrast
1015
735
-28%
801
-21%
1155
14%
948
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.66
4.17
-14%
1.79
51%
2.37
35%
1.29
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.56
7.22
-10%
3.69
44%
4.71
28%
2.04
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.37
1.84
-34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.26
2.5
41%
1.1
74%
1.58
63%
0.69
84%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.274 97%
2.27 97%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
CCT
6461 101%
6885 94%
6665 98%
6785 96%
6550 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
57
-7%
59.8
-2%
60
-2%
60
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
87
-7%
92.8
-1%
92
-2%
94
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-41% / -21%
6% / 8%
0% / 5%
6% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Latenzen
 
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)
268 Points +53%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)
3082 Points +182%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1174 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points +4%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1093 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
1008 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=23, last 2 years)
3.21 Points +62%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 64.3, n=24, last 2 years)
35.6 Points +195%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points +7%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points +4%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.08 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points -2%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.08 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1093 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years)
7573 Points +54%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5184 Points +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points +3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5092 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points +3%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
4931 Points
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points +14%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4650 Points +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
4565 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points -1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4119 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5705 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
5486 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5111 Points -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4565 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5486 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4931 pontos
Ajuda
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD
-59%
28%
24%
-12%
Seq Read
1571
841
-46%
1820
16%
1266
-19%
2213
41%
Seq Write
1215
404.7
-67%
1917
58%
1834
51%
1163
-4%
4K Read
52.9
22.62
-57%
48.56
-8%
48.94
-7%
23.36
-56%
4K Write
101.3
67.1
-34%
99.2
-2%
107.2
6%
80.4
-21%
Score Read
1397
377
-73%
1407
1%
1346
-4%
1092
-22%
Score Write
996
345
-65%
1955
96%
2051
106%
939
-6%
Score Total
3101
900
-71%
4095
32%
4122
33%
2536
-18%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1677 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1643 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 363.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 307.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1671 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=235, last 2 years)
29366 Points +153%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points +30%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points +27%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11733 Points +1%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11621 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
11315 Points -3%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)
40342 Points +178%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points +32%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points +29%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14975 Points +3%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14507 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
14180 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
13166 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31561 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10195 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
116.4 fps +199%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.7 fps +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.4 fps +35%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
39 fps 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
38.9 fps
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
37 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)
219 fps +211%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
95.5 fps +36%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
92.8 fps +32%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
74.2 fps +5%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
70.4 fps
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
66 fps -6%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 70.4 38.9
FIFA 18 (2017) 217 213
Destiny 2 (2017) 94.2 78.4
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 65 54
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 82.1 77.1
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 74.8 62.3
The Crew 2 (2018) 59.4 58
F1 2018 (2018) 84 60

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 33 / 39 dB
HDD
33 dB
Carga
49 / 58 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
5%
10%
10%
3%
15%
off / environment *
29
28.6
1%
28.1
3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
31.4
-8%
28.1
3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
33
31.4
5%
33
-0%
31
6%
31
6%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
39
34.2
12%
33.5
14%
34
13%
35
10%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years)
21%
Load Average *
49
42.8
13%
42.2
14%
43
12%
49
-0%
43 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years)
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52
50.9
2%
45.3
13%
42
19%
51
2%
Load Maximum *
58
50.9
12%
45.7
21%
44
24%
54
7%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 51 °C52 °C43 °C 
 43 °C46 °C39 °C 
 41 °C41 °C38 °C 
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C
63 °C65 °C49 °C
64 °C64 °C44 °C
33 °C34 °C32 °C
Máximo: 65 °C
Médio: 49.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  56 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
-1%
12%
3%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
43
17%
51.2
2%
49
6%
53
-2%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
12%
Maximum Bottom *
65
46.6
28%
55.2
15%
63
3%
65
-0%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29.2
3%
31
-3%
24
20%
26
13%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Bottom *
30
34
-13%
35.6
-19%
25
17%
30
-0%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.142.62535.936.73127.932.64032.335.15026.227.7632626.78027.327.310027.730.912527.842.216022.624.92002530.425022.543.631522.452.440018.857.750017.457.963017.264.280018.269.3100018.667.5125017.565.7160016.863.6200017.161.9250017.257.5315017.160.8400017.456.1500017.263.5630017.264.5800017.160.11000017.250.81250017.349.61600017.255.7SPL29.975.3N1.435.1median 17.4median 57.7Delta1.99.638.637.53535.635.733.934.434.132.236.934.237.131.844.930.251.729.257.429.665.728.564.327.464.827.563.426.359.326.358.925.162.625.666.225.5662564.42564.524.26724.470.924.571.623.974.323.769.423.765.823.466.623.464.323.558.723.450.336.880.82.850.1median 25median 64.51.33hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMonster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (24.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 1.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 12 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 93 / 152 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-19%
-3%
-26%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
10
12.35
-24%
14.9
-49%
7
30%
14
-40%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years)
-38%
Idle Average *
12
19.98
-67%
17.5
-46%
11
8%
18
-50%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years)
-59%
Idle Maximum *
18
25.44
-41%
19.2
-7%
20
-11%
22
-22%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years)
-49%
Load Average *
93
94.28
-1%
103.2
-11%
98
-5%
91
2%
110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
110
132.9
-21%
123.1
-12%
132
-20%
142
-29%
Load Maximum *
152
140.63
7%
132.7
13%
182
-20%
173
-14%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-64%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 05min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 03min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 41min
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.74 Wh		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-22%
65%
32%
105%
37%
Reader / Idle
305
271
-11%
507
66%
762
150%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years)
78%
WiFi v1.3
243
240
-1%
402
65%
362
49%
513
111%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
51%
Load
101
45
-55%
81
-20%
156
54%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
-17%
H.264
356
504
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Chassi leve e compacto
+ Painel de 144 Hz (opcional)
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Marcos finos
+ SSD NVMe
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Optimus

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou USB 3.1 Gen2
- Turbo da CPU massivamente oscilante
- Desempenho de som pobre
- Lento leitor de cartões
- Controle pobre da ventoinha
- Bleeding da tela
- Bateria pequena
- Ruído da bobina
Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z). Review unit courtesy of Monster Notebook.
Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z). Review unit courtesy of Monster Notebook.

No final desta análise, nosso veredicto para o Tulpar T5 V18.1 é idêntico ao do Schenker XMG Neo 15 que se baseia no mesmo barebone Tongfang GK5CN6Z.

O muito bem feito painel IPS de 144 Hz, com marcos de tela consideravelmente estreitos e o teclado mecânico retro iluminado RGB certamente merecem elogios. Outros pontos fortes incluem seu baixo peso e baixo perfil, o que torna este portátil de jogos de 15 polegadas perfeito para viagens longas.

No entanto, o baixo desempenho de som, a bateria pequena e o controle muito ruim do ventilador impediram efetivamente uma melhor pontuação geral. O dispositivo foi extraordinariamente barulhento ao rodar aplicativos 3D, o que certamente vai assustar uma quantidade significativa de compradores em potencial.

O portátil da Monster dificilmente chegaria à nossa lista Top 1º dos Finos e Leves.

.

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
60 / 80 → 74%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
58 / 95 → 61%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
87%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
75 / 95 → 79%
Ruído
61 / 90 → 67%
Audio
57%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
72%
81%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 (Tulpar Serie)

Pricecompare

Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z, i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-30)