Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone CAT S61
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| CAT S41 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| CAT S41 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 693 cd/m²
Contraste: 900:1 (Preto: 0.77 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.834
| CAT S61 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Land Rover Explore IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | Crosscall Action-X3 IPS, 1280x800, 5.00 | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.70 | CAT S41 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -15% | 3% | 38% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 693 | 633 -9% | 417 -40% | 604 -13% | 537 -23% |
| Brightness | 672 | 604 -10% | 425 -37% | 580 -14% | 506 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 91 1% | 91 1% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.77 | 0.84 -9% | 0.29 62% | 0.44 43% | 0.9 -17% |
| Contrast | 900 | 754 -16% | 1438 60% | 1373 53% | 597 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.23 | 6.41 -23% | 7.12 -36% | 1.2 77% | 5.02 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.18 | 11.88 -17% | 10.19 -0% | 2.3 77% | 7.98 22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 9.2 -33% | 6.1 12% | 1.6 77% | 5.3 23% |
| Gamma | 2.834 78% | 1.927 114% | 2.687 82% | 2.25 98% | 2.154 102% |
| CCT | 7137 91% | 6165 105% | 7687 85% | 6688 97% | 7226 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| CAT S61 | |
| Land Rover Explore | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| CAT S41 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12) | |
| CAT S61 (Chrome 68) | |
| CAT S41 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67) | |
| CAT S61 (Chrome 68) | |
| CAT S41 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| CAT S41 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
| CAT S61 (Chrome 68) | |
| Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67) | |
| CAT S61 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10) | |
* ... smaller is better
| CAT S61 | Land Rover Explore | Crosscall Action-X3 | CAT S41 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -23% | -15% | -31% | 18% | 750% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 284.7 | 237.3 -17% | 264.7 -7% | 253 -11% | 273 ? -4% | 1502 ? 428% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 212.2 | 104.5 -51% | 139.3 -34% | 117.2 -45% | 176.8 ? -17% | 1111 ? 424% |
| Random Read 4KB | 44.7 | 28.7 -36% | 47 5% | 65.5 47% | 59.1 ? 32% | 247 ? 453% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.1 | 11.2 -26% | 8.4 -44% | 12.99 -14% | 31.7 ? 110% | 271 ? 1695% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.4 ? | 75.2 ? -10% | 84.1 ? 1% | 23.87 -71% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.3 ? | 66.3 ? 5% | 56.2 ? -11% | 5 -92% | 58.3 ? -8% |
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 30 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 31 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
CAT S61 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
CAT S41 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.2 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.4 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt |
| Carga |
3.5 / 5.6 Watt |
    
| |
| CAT S61 4500 mAh | Land Rover Explore 4000 mAh | Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | CAT S41 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -16% | 19% | -11% | 12% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 1.2 14% | 1.1 21% | 0.54 61% | 1.4 -0% | 0.732 ? 48% | 0.897 ? 36% |
| Idle Average * | 1.9 | 1.5 21% | 1.9 -0% | 1.63 14% | 2.2 -16% | 1.835 ? 3% | 1.452 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.6 | 3 -15% | 2.9 -12% | 1.67 36% | 2.8 -8% | 2.16 ? 17% | 1.629 ? 37% |
| Load Average * | 3.5 | 4.5 -29% | 4.8 -37% | 2.74 22% | 4.1 -17% | 3.81 ? -9% | 5.55 ? -59% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.6 | 8.6 -54% | 8.4 -50% | 7.78 -39% | 6.4 -14% | 5.62 ? -0% | 8.31 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
| CAT S61 4500 mAh | Land Rover Explore 4000 mAh | Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | CAT S41 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -43% | -9% | -30% | 3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1891 | 1629 -14% | |||
| H.264 | 962 | 698 -27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 923 | 529 -43% | 843 -9% | 585 -37% | 953 3% |
| Load | 341 | 202 -41% |
Pro
Contra
O CAT S61 é, naturalmente, um especialista. Com seu exterior robusto e as funcionalidades adicionais muito específicas, não é realmente um smartphone para qualquer um. Mas quem geralmente usa uma câmera de imagem térmica pode aproveitar a solução integrada. A medição de distância via laser também funciona bem, mesmo que não seja tão fluente quanto um dispositivo dedicado.
Qualquer pessoa atraída pela medição de distância a laser, medição da qualidade do ar e uma câmera de imagem térmica terá uma ferramenta versátil em suas mãos com o CAT S61.
Naturalmente, outros recursos são mais importantes para profissionais do que para os clientes habituais, mas a tela e a câmera do CAT S61 são bastante utilizáveis. Da mesma forma, o desempenho é bom, há armazenamento suficiente e o GPS também funciona com bastante precisão. Enquanto o CAT S61 pode ser usado em muitas áreas, para alguém que não usa suas funcionalidades adicionais, há melhores opções na faixa de preço deste smartphone: Com mais desempenho, mais armazenamento e melhores câmeras. Existem também telefones reforçados mais acessíveis, como o Land Rover Explore ou o CAT S41, se você está apenas procurando por um smartphone robusto.
No geral, o CAT S61 é um dispositivo versátil que vale seu preço, contanto que você também use suas características especiais.
CAT S61
-
10/16/2019 v7
Florian Wimmer