Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone CAT S61

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

Multi-functional. O robusto CAT S61 coloca todos aqueles que dizem que não há inovações no mercado de smartphones em vergonha. No entanto, com a câmera de imagem térmica integrada, um medidor de distância a laser e a medição automática da qualidade do ar interno, seus recursos mais importantes podem ser mais úteis para usuários profissionais.

CAT S61 (S Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD de até 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro, termômetro, higrômetro, sensor da qualidade do ar (VOC), USB-C, câmera infravermelha, medição de distância a laser
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13 x 163 x 78
Bateria
17.1 Wh, 4500 mAh Lítio-Ion, Carga rápida
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Phase comparison AF, dual-LED flash, Videos @ 2160 p and ​30 fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda infeiror, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, Measure, Air, App Toolbox, FLIR, 24 Meses Garantia, Protegido pelo IP68 & IP69K; MIL SPEC 810G, Resistência de temperatura: suporta mudanças de temperatura entre -25 °C (-13 °F) e 55 °C (131 °F) durante até 24 horas; resistência à vibração: Category 4; resistente à umidade e sal; LTE Cat. 13 600 Mbps (download) Cat. 12 150 Mbps (upload); SAR value: 0.416 W/kg (head), 1.594 W/kg (body), fanless, ruggedized
peso
250 g, Suprimento de energia: 91 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s ∼100% +170%
CAT S61
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 MBit/s ∼37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=307)
211 MBit/s ∼23% -38%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
199 MBit/s ∼22% -41%
Land Rover Explore
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash
61.1 MBit/s ∼7% -82%
CAT S41
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.1 MBit/s ∼4% -89%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
CAT S61
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
341 MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=307)
207 MBit/s ∼58% -39%
Crosscall Action-X3
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
201 MBit/s ∼57% -41%
Land Rover Explore
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash
62.7 MBit/s ∼18% -82%
CAT S41
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.7 MBit/s ∼11% -89%
GPS CAT S61 – overview
GPS CAT S61 – overview
GPS CAT S61 – forest
GPS CAT S61 – forest
GPS CAT S61 – bridge
GPS CAT S61 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
675
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
670
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
631
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 705 cd/m² Médio: 671.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 693 cd/m²
Contraste: 900:1 (Preto: 0.77 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
84.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.834
CAT S61
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Land Rover Explore
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Crosscall Action-X3
IPS, 1280x800, 5
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
CAT S41
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
-15%
3%
38%
-7%
Brightness middle
693
633
-9%
417
-40%
604
-13%
537
-23%
Brightness
672
604
-10%
425
-37%
580
-14%
506
-25%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
91
1%
91
1%
86
-4%
Black Level *
0.77
0.84
-9%
0.29
62%
0.44
43%
0.9
-17%
Contrast
900
754
-16%
1438
60%
1373
53%
597
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.23
6.41
-23%
7.12
-36%
1.2
77%
5.02
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.18
11.88
-17%
10.19
-0%
2.3
77%
7.98
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.9
9.2
-33%
6.1
12%
1.6
77%
5.3
23%
Gamma
2.834 78%
1.927 114%
2.687 82%
2.25 98%
2.154 102%
CCT
7137 91%
6165 105%
7687 85%
6688 97%
7226 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8933 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
44128 Points ∼22%
Land Rover Explore
75939 Points ∼37% +72%
Crosscall Action-X3
42924 Points ∼21% -3%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼100% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)
68642 Points ∼34% +56%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=390)
76481 Points ∼37% +73%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
90674 Points ∼77%
Land Rover Explore
107921 Points ∼91% +19%
Crosscall Action-X3
57023 Points ∼48% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=10)
89507 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼100% +31%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
CAT S61
4748 Points ∼97%
Land Rover Explore
4580 Points ∼94% -4%
Crosscall Action-X3
3666 Points ∼75% -23%
CAT S41
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5085, n=11)
4876 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=256)
4551 Points ∼93% -4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
CAT S61
5548 Points ∼98%
Land Rover Explore
5041 Points ∼89% -9%
Crosscall Action-X3
4665 Points ∼82% -16%
CAT S41
4778 Points ∼84% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=12)
5689 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼87% -11%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
CAT S61
896 Points ∼100%
Land Rover Explore
769 Points ∼86% -14%
CAT S41
731 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=12)
863 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼78% -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61
1499 Points ∼86%
Land Rover Explore
1222 Points ∼70% -18%
CAT S41
1126 Points ∼65% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1470 - 1523, n=12)
1501 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼100% +16%
Memory (sort by value)
CAT S61
1228 Points ∼97%
Land Rover Explore
1230 Points ∼97% 0%
CAT S41
1269 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=12)
1217 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼98% +1%
System (sort by value)
CAT S61
3283 Points ∼100%
Land Rover Explore
2889 Points ∼88% -12%
CAT S41
2372 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=12)
3147 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼77% -23%
Overall (sort by value)
CAT S61
1526 Points ∼100%
Land Rover Explore
1352 Points ∼89% -11%
Crosscall Action-X3
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S41
1255 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=12)
1487 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼82% -18%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
3930 Points ∼87%
Land Rover Explore
3605 Points ∼80% -8%
Crosscall Action-X3
2045 Points ∼45% -48%
CAT S41
2888 Points ∼64% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=11)
3714 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼100% +15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
4202 Points ∼40%
Land Rover Explore
4927 Points ∼47% +17%
Crosscall Action-X3
2360 Points ∼23% -44%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼100% +147%
CAT S41
3414 Points ∼33% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=12)
3733 Points ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼42% +3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
885 Points ∼21%
Land Rover Explore
1739 Points ∼42% +96%
Crosscall Action-X3
634 Points ∼15% -28%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼100% +370%
CAT S41
869 Points ∼21% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 4210, n=12)
1132 Points ∼27% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼31% +44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61
1711 Points ∼86%
Land Rover Explore
1668 Points ∼84% -3%
Crosscall Action-X3
1098 Points ∼55% -36%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼100% +16%
CAT S41
1529 Points ∼77% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=12)
1742 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼83% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61
708 Points ∼27%
Land Rover Explore
892 Points ∼35% +26%
Crosscall Action-X3
234 Points ∼9% -67%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼100% +265%
CAT S41
613 Points ∼24% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=12)
719 Points ∼28% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼46% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
CAT S61
814 Points ∼34%
Land Rover Explore
995 Points ∼41% +22%
Crosscall Action-X3
284 Points ∼12% -65%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼100% +197%
CAT S41
707 Points ∼29% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=12)
827 Points ∼34% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼47% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61
1729 Points ∼97%
Land Rover Explore
1610 Points ∼91% -7%
Crosscall Action-X3
1099 Points ∼62% -36%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼100% +3%
CAT S41
1261 Points ∼71% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=12)
1751 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼87% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61
1234 Points ∼76%
Land Rover Explore
1103 Points ∼68% -11%
Crosscall Action-X3
492 Points ∼30% -60%
CAT S41
909 Points ∼56% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=12)
1259 Points ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼100% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
CAT S61
1318 Points ∼95%
Land Rover Explore
1186 Points ∼86% -10%
Crosscall Action-X3
561 Points ∼40% -57%
CAT S41
969 Points ∼70% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1318 - 1374, n=12)
1343 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼100% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61
12945 Points ∼54%
Land Rover Explore
10223 Points ∼42% -21%
Crosscall Action-X3
8864 Points ∼37% -32%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼100% +86%
CAT S41
12063 Points ∼50% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12667 - 13217, n=12)
13007 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼53% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
18375 Points ∼16%
Land Rover Explore
17173 Points ∼15% -7%
Crosscall Action-X3
9342 Points ∼8% -49%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼100% +512%
CAT S41
13844 Points ∼12% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=12)
18313 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼16% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
CAT S61
16808 Points ∼27%
Land Rover Explore
14919 Points ∼24% -11%
Crosscall Action-X3
9231 Points ∼15% -45%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼100% +269%
CAT S41
13404 Points ∼22% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=12)
16789 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼24% -10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
CAT S61
29 fps ∼18%
Land Rover Explore
32 fps ∼20% +10%
Crosscall Action-X3
15 fps ∼9% -48%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼100% +456%
CAT S41
23 fps ∼14% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=12)
29.8 fps ∼18% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼19% +8%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
CAT S61
29 fps ∼24%
Land Rover Explore
33 fps ∼28% +14%
Crosscall Action-X3
26 fps ∼22% -10%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100% +313%
CAT S41
23 fps ∼19% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=12)
29.5 fps ∼25% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼21% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
CAT S61
14 fps ∼20%
Land Rover Explore
16 fps ∼23% +14%
Crosscall Action-X3
6.7 fps ∼9% -52%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼100% +406%
CAT S41
10 fps ∼14% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=12)
13.9 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼24% +20%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
CAT S61
13 fps ∼11%
Land Rover Explore
19 fps ∼17% +46%
Crosscall Action-X3
14 fps ∼12% +8%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100% +781%
CAT S41
10 fps ∼9% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=12)
14 fps ∼12% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼14% +23%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61
9.7 fps ∼18%
Land Rover Explore
12 fps ∼22% +24%
Crosscall Action-X3
4.4 fps ∼8% -55%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼100% +457%
CAT S41
6.8 fps ∼13% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=12)
9.38 fps ∼17% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼26% +47%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61
5.3 fps ∼5%
Land Rover Explore
13 fps ∼12% +145%
Crosscall Action-X3
10 fps ∼9% +89%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100% +1970%
CAT S41
6.8 fps ∼6% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=12)
9.49 fps ∼9% +79%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼13% +162%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61
5.5 fps ∼56%
Land Rover Explore
6.8 fps ∼69% +24%
Crosscall Action-X3
2.4 fps ∼24% -56%
CAT S41
4 fps ∼41% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=12)
5.5 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼100% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61
5.4 fps ∼61%
Land Rover Explore
7.3 fps ∼82% +35%
Crosscall Action-X3
5.3 fps ∼60% -2%
CAT S41
4 fps ∼45% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 6, n=12)
5.58 fps ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼100% +65%

Legend

 
CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Land Rover Explore MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Crosscall Action-X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
CAT S41 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼100% +635%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)
48.863 Points ∼24% +74%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼18% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)
28.3 Points ∼14% +1%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
28.136 Points ∼14%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)
26.675 Points ∼13% -5%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
18.048 Points ∼9% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼100% +564%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)
9798 Points ∼29% +90%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼16% +8%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
5146 Points ∼15%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)
5024 Points ∼15% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=12)
4971 Points ∼15% -3%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
3251 Points ∼10% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)
13331 ms * ∼100% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼86% -18%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)
10444.4 ms * ∼78% -8%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
9692 ms * ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=12)
9656 ms * ∼72% -0%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)
4261.4 ms * ∼32% +56%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼5% +92%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +212%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)
156 Points ∼43% +36%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)
115 Points ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼31% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)
106 Points ∼30% -8%

* ... smaller is better

CAT S61Land Rover ExploreCrosscall Action-X3CAT S41Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-15%
-31%
-2%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
56.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
5
-92%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=68)
-14%
45.6 (3.4 - 87.1, n=319)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
23.87
-71%
73.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=68)
-12%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=319)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
15.1
11.2
-26%
8.4
-44%
12.99
-14%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=78)
31%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
7%
Random Read 4KB
44.7
28.7
-36%
47
5%
65.47
46%
50.3 (11.4 - 149, n=78)
13%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
212.2
104.5
-51%
139.3
-34%
117.16
-45%
164 (40 - 246, n=78)
-23%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.7
237.3
-17%
264.7
-7%
253.02
-11%
269 (115 - 704, n=78)
-6%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-19%
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality30 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 42.4 °C36.5 °C33.9 °C 
 43.3 °C36.8 °C33.6 °C 
 42.2 °C37.3 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 43.3 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
34.2 °C36.2 °C42.1 °C
34.3 °C36 °C42.5 °C
33.9 °C36.2 °C41.3 °C
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  47.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.342.32525.635.43125.732.94027.428.2503738.46323.327.28021.424.810021.728.812519.934.516017.440.5200174725016.450.131514.552.740014.259.150014.161.863012.664.280012.568.610001267.4125011.864.9160011.668200011.470.6250011.369.2315011.471400011.167500011.265.6630011.363.1800011.265.81000011.363.11250011.350.61600011.346.5SPL67.365.824.179.4N21.617.80.644.8median 11.8median 63.1Delta1.7932.334.125.630.125.733.227.429.73738.823.327.921.422.921.72519.932.417.434.51741.116.445.414.548.914.25714.159.212.662.312.565.61265.311.864.911.66911.472.511.371.711.470.911.169.411.261.711.357.211.263.211.365.311.353.311.345.865.824.180.117.80.643.4median 11.8median 61.71.78.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCAT S61CAT S41
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
CAT S61 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

CAT S41 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.4 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt
Carga midlight 3.5 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
CAT S61
4500 mAh
Land Rover Explore
4000 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
CAT S41
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-16%
19%
-11%
12%
10%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
1.2
14%
1.1
21%
0.54
61%
1.4
-0%
0.733 (0.35 - 1.4, n=12)
48%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=637)
37%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.5
21%
1.9
-0%
1.63
14%
2.2
-16%
1.808 (1 - 2.31, n=12)
5%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=636)
10%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
3
-15%
2.9
-12%
1.67
36%
2.8
-8%
2.16 (1.4 - 3.8, n=12)
17%
1.997 (0.74 - 6.6, n=637)
23%
Load Average *
3.5
4.5
-29%
4.8
-37%
2.74
22%
4.1
-17%
3.85 (2.82 - 6.2, n=12)
-10%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=631)
-15%
Load Maximum *
5.6
8.6
-54%
8.4
-50%
7.78
-39%
6.4
-14%
5.64 (4.56 - 8, n=12)
-1%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=631)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
31h 31min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 41min
CAT S61
4500 mAh
Land Rover Explore
4000 mAh
Crosscall Action-X3
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
CAT S41
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-9%
-30%
3%
Reader / Idle
1891
1629
-14%
H.264
962
698
-27%
WiFi v1.3
923
529
-43%
843
-9%
585
-37%
953.4
3%
Load
341
202
-41%

Pro

+ Funções especiais abrangentes e práticas
+ Carcaça robusta e bem protegida
+ GPS bastante preciso
+ Ótima duração da bateria
+ Tela muito brilhante
+ Bom desempenho
+ Boas câmeras

Contra

- Só vale o seu preço se você usar as funções especiais
- Carcaça pesada
- Tela com baixa precisão de cor
In review: CAT S61. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: CAT S61. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O CAT S61 é, naturalmente, um especialista. Com seu exterior robusto e as funcionalidades adicionais muito específicas, não é realmente um smartphone para qualquer um. Mas quem geralmente usa uma câmera de imagem térmica pode aproveitar a solução integrada. A medição de distância via laser também funciona bem, mesmo que não seja tão fluente quanto um dispositivo dedicado. 

Qualquer pessoa atraída pela medição de distância a laser, medição da qualidade do ar e uma câmera de imagem térmica terá uma ferramenta versátil em suas mãos com o CAT S61. 

Naturalmente, outros recursos são mais importantes para profissionais do que para os clientes habituais, mas a tela e a câmera do CAT S61 são bastante utilizáveis. Da mesma forma, o desempenho é bom, há armazenamento suficiente e o GPS também funciona com bastante precisão. Enquanto o CAT S61 pode ser usado em muitas áreas, para alguém que não usa suas funcionalidades adicionais, há melhores opções na faixa de preço deste smartphone: Com mais desempenho, mais armazenamento e melhores câmeras. Existem também telefones reforçados mais acessíveis, como o Land Rover Explore ou o CAT S41, se você está apenas procurando por um smartphone robusto.

No geral, o CAT S61 é um dispositivo versátil que vale seu preço, contanto que você também use suas características especiais.

CAT S61 - 09/20/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
52 / 60 → 87%
Peso
87%
Bateria
98%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 63 → 65%
Desempenho da aplicação
52 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
74%
Médio
75%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone CAT S61
Florian Wimmer, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)