Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 530

Andreas Kilian (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/29/2016

O Desire de todo o mundo? A HTC oferece um novo smartphone da categoria de 200 Euros. O Desire 530 está para convencer os compradores com um design exclusivo, boas câmeras e som excepcionalmente bom, entre outras coisas. Nosso teste revela se o smartphone consegue cumprir com essa alegação, apesar do hardware de nível de entrada.

HTC Desire 530 (Desire Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Memória
1536 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.99 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, giroscópio, WiFi Direct, nano-SIM
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM quad-band (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28), Cat4 (max. 150 Mbit/s download, 51 Mbit/s upload), SAR body: 0.314 W/gg, SAR head: 0,375 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 146.9 x 70.9
Bateria
8.36 Wh, 2200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 14 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 696 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (auto foco f/2.4, 720p video @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo f/2.8, 720p video @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono frontal, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, in-ear headset, abraçadeira, News Republic, Facebook & Facebook Messenger, Instagram, ZOE Video Editor, Themes, HTC Club, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
140 g, Suprimento de energia: 58 g
Preço
219 EUR

 

Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
HTC Desire 530 - Route
HTC Desire 530 - Route
HTC Desire 530 - Underpass
HTC Desire 530 - Underpass
HTC Desire 530 - Turning point
HTC Desire 530 - Turning point
Camera app: Modes
Camera app: Modes
Camera app: Photo
Camera app: Photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
354
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 387 cd/m² Médio: 376.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.82 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 375 cd/m²
Contraste: 1172:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.26
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5
Huawei P8 lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V6
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG Class
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5
Screen
Brightness middle
375
295
-21%
365
-3%
336
-10%
518
38%
349
-7%
Brightness
376
299
-20%
353
-6%
315
-16%
492
31%
353
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
96
5%
93
2%
81
-11%
91
0%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.42
-31%
0.39
-22%
0.51
-59%
Contrast
1172
869
-26%
862
-26%
1016
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
5.8
3%
5.2
13%
8.29
-38%
5.41
10%
2.6
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
8.6
9%
8.76
8%
8.2
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.8
-7%
5.85
-30%
8.57
-90%
7.67
-70%
1.8
60%
Gamma
2.26 106%
1.84 130%
2.17 111%
1.96 122%
2.19 110%
2.06 117%
CCT
6975 93%
6252 104%
7252 90%
8172 80%
8521 76%
6542 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25
89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10435 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.8 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points ∼33% +15%
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points ∼36% +27%
LG Class
3803 Points ∼37% +30%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points ∼11% +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points ∼14% +35%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1007 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1280 Points ∼4% +27%
ZTE Blade V6
1807 Points ∼6% +79%
LG Class
1442 Points ∼5% +43%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
298 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
405 Points ∼9% +36%
ZTE Blade V6
626 Points ∼13% +110%
LG Class
482 Points ∼10% +62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points ∼34% +5590%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points ∼36% +6060%
ZTE Blade V6
699 Points ∼41% +6890%
LG Class
696 Points ∼41% +6860%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points ∼32% +5360%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
231 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points ∼2% -32%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points ∼3% +31%
ZTE Blade V6
287 Points ∼3% +24%
LG Class
312 Points ∼3% +35%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points ∼2% -10%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
742 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points ∼11% +53%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points ∼14% +98%
ZTE Blade V6
1200 Points ∼12% +62%
LG Class
1068 Points ∼10% +44%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points ∼5% -26%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
149 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points ∼10% +184%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points ∼16% +361%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points ∼16% +361%
LG Class
561 Points ∼13% +277%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points ∼10% +192%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps ∼0% -4%
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps ∼1% +106%
ZTE Blade V6
8.5 fps ∼0% +77%
LG Class
9.8 fps ∼1% +104%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps ∼0% -32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps ∼2% -15%
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps ∼3% +72%
ZTE Blade V6
15 fps ∼3% +69%
LG Class
5.2 fps ∼1% -42%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps ∼1% -36%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade V6
2.8 fps ∼1% +65%
LG Class
1.8 fps ∼0% +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V6
5.8 fps ∼2% +45%
LG Class
4.1 fps ∼1% +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points ∼11% +26%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points ∼10% +25%
ZTE Blade V6
9542 Points ∼12% +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points ∼1% -22%
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points ∼1% +33%
ZTE Blade V6
4415 Points ∼1% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points ∼2% -17%
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points ∼3% +32%
ZTE Blade V6
5013 Points ∼2% +18%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
5756 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7751 Points ∼5% +35%
Huawei P8 lite
7238 Points ∼5% +26%
ZTE Blade V6
8390 Points ∼5% +46%
LG Class
8969 Points ∼6% +56%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4189 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3453 Points ∼0% -18%
Huawei P8 lite
5732 Points ∼1% +37%
ZTE Blade V6
5677 Points ∼1% +36%
LG Class
4740 Points ∼1% +13%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4459 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3938 Points ∼0% -12%
Huawei P8 lite
6010 Points ∼1% +35%
ZTE Blade V6
6116 Points ∼1% +37%
LG Class
5295 Points ∼0% +19%

Legend

 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
17470.6 ms * ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13701.5 ms * ∼23% +22%
Huawei P8 lite
15866 ms * ∼27% +9%
ZTE Blade V6
25141.4 ms * ∼42% -44%
LG Class
13979.7 ms * ∼24% +20%
Microsoft Lumia 650
18237.4 ms * ∼31% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1796 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points ∼6% +58%
Huawei P8 lite
2483 Points ∼5% +38%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points ∼6% +66%
LG Class
3028 Points ∼6% +69%
Microsoft Lumia 650
2574 Points ∼5% +43%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
34 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
39 Points ∼5% +15%
Huawei P8 lite
47 Points ∼6% +38%
LG Class
57 Points ∼7% +68%
Microsoft Lumia 650
52 Points ∼6% +53%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
12.1 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points ∼5% +34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
18.22 MB/s ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
18.7 MB/s ∼21% +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
35.56 MB/s ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
20.82 MB/s ∼22% -41%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s ∼6% +5%
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s ∼5% -7%
ZTE Blade V6
3.66 MB/s ∼2% -59%
LG Class
7.7 MB/s ∼5% -14%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s ∼10% +42%
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s ∼11% +56%
ZTE Blade V6
27.08 MB/s ∼16% +129%
LG Class
9.67 MB/s ∼6% -18%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
55.76 MB/s ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s ∼19% -26%
Huawei P8 lite
52.79 MB/s ∼24% -5%
ZTE Blade V6
37.37 MB/s ∼17% -33%
LG Class
74.14 MB/s ∼34% +33%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
126.99 MB/s ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.42 MB/s ∼8% -49%
Huawei P8 lite
139.48 MB/s ∼17% +10%
ZTE Blade V6
269.31 MB/s ∼32% +112%
LG Class
128.61 MB/s ∼15% +1%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
300 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points ∼7% +5%
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points ∼18% +172%
ZTE Blade V6
922 Points ∼21% +207%
LG Class
427 Points ∼10% +42%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points ∼13% +92%
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high20 fps
 low42 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high13 fps
 very low21 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.1 °C37 °C36.8 °C 
 37.2 °C37 °C36.4 °C 
 35.8 °C36.8 °C34.5 °C 
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
33.5 °C36.3 °C38.3 °C
33.5 °C36.3 °C38.4 °C
32.1 °C36.1 °C37.1 °C
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 35.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  34.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Heat map HTC Desire 530 front
Heamap HTC Desire 530 rear
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.73 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.58 / 2.59 / 2.66 Watt
Carga midlight 5.22 / 5.67 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2200 mAh
LG Class
2050 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Power Consumption
50%
9%
21%
22%
44%
Idle Minimum *
1.58
0.96
39%
1.4
11%
1.2
24%
1.2
24%
0.7
56%
Idle Average *
2.59
1.14
56%
2.3
11%
1.8
31%
1.9
27%
1.1
58%
Idle Maximum *
2.66
1.23
54%
2.5
6%
2.1
21%
2.2
17%
1.18
56%
Load Average *
5.22
2.45
53%
3.9
25%
4.1
21%
3.1
41%
4.04
23%
Load Maximum *
5.67
2.92
49%
6
-6%
5.1
10%
5.6
1%
4.07
28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 37min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 50)
7h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 37min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 10min
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2200 mAh
LG Class
2050 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
-24%
-7%
0%
-10%
Reader / Idle
1117
1212
9%
715
-36%
976
-13%
910
-19%
H.264
457
590
29%
369
-19%
424
-7%
628
37%
510
12%
WiFi v1.3
425
502
18%
351
-17%
400
-6%
422
-1%
345
-19%
Load
250
433
73%
194
-22%
230
-8%
196
-22%
213
-15%

Pro

+ O cartão micro-SD pode ser utilizado como como armazenamento do sistema
+ Android Marshmallow mais recente
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Módulo GPS confiável
+ Suporte para LTE
+ Boa qualidade das chamadas mediante o fone
+ Bom som via conector do headset
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Interface do usuários Android fluente para o uso

Contra

- Desempenho total abaixo da média
- Carcaça relativamente grande
- Qualidade média da câmera principal
- Microfone silencioso no modo mãos livres
- WiFi somente na banda 2,4 GHz
- Sem suporte para Miracast, MHL ou USB OTG
- Sem LED de notificações
- Bateria não removível
- Moderada estabilidade dos ângulos de visão da tela
In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Se a tentativa da HTC de estabelecer um design exclusivo com o Desire 530 foi um sucesso, provavelmente seja uma questão de gosto. Sem importar isso, a carcaça agrada com uma boa construção e bons botões físicos. No entanto, ele dificilmente transmite uma sensação de alta qualidade devido à escolha de materiais, e, em particular, porque é bastante grande para um smartphone com uma tela de 5-polegadas. Especialmente o moderno sistema operacional, a opção de expandir o armazenamento via cartão micro-SD e a boa duração da bateria estão no lado dos pros. No entanto, é uma pena que o aparelho somente oferece algo mediano em termos de câmeras e a estabilidade dos ângulos do painel. Além disso, o desempenho geral normalmente é mais baixo que o de aparelhos comparáveis.

O HTC Desire 530 adiciona um toque de cor à grande massa de dispositivos Android acessíveis. No entanto, o smartphone não oferece quase nenhum destaque técnico. Os compradores, portanto, provavelmente optarão pelo aparelho pelo design e a moderna interface do usuário Android.

 

Boas alternativas para o Desire 530 são encontradas nos oponentes mencionados no teste. O Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) atualmente é cerca de  35 Euros a menos que o do modelo de teste com um preço de 150 Euros. Ele também oferece uma duração de bateria mais longa, excelente tela AMOLED e bateria removível. Em compensação, o comprador não encontrará um sensor de luz ou o mais recente sistema operacional. Quando o melhor desempenho possível é importante, vale a penas dar uma olhada nos modelo de gama média  ZTE Blade V6 e Huawei P8 lite . Seus preços caíram notoriamente.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

HTC Desire 530 - 06/22/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 64%
Peso
93%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
5 / 63 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
20 / 70 → 29%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
49 / 91 → 54%
Camera
58%
Médio
66%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC Desire 530
Andreas Kilian, 2016-06-29 (Update: 2016-07- 3)