Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC One A9s

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/03/2017

Algo novo do leste? O One A9s do fabricante taiwanês HTC é o sucessor do One A9, muito mais acessível, que analisamos o ano passado. Vamos descobrir o que mudou em comparação com o modelo anterior.

HTC One A9s (One Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 2 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Gorilla Glass, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 17.7 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: microSD de até 2TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de luz, Sensor de proximidade, Bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); Bandwidth (Download/​Upload): 300Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE), 42Mbps/​5.76Mbps (UMTS); SAR: 0.49 W/kg (head), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 146.5 x 71.5
Bateria
8.7 Wh, 2300 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 13 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 432 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix ƒ/2.2 aperture, 28x3 mm focal length (74.4° wide angle), AF, LED flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix ƒ/2.8 Blende und 33.7 mm Brennweite (65.3° Weitwinkel), Videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Lautsprecher an der Unterkante, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, headset, Boost+, News Republic, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless
peso
150 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
299 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
532 MBit/s ∼100% +422%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼53% +175%
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritz!Box 6490 Cable)
102 MBit/s ∼19%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
101 MBit/s ∼19% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
485 MBit/s ∼100% +345%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼69% +207%
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM Fritz!Box 6490 Cable)
109 MBit/s ∼22%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490 Cable)
104 MBit/s ∼21% -5%
GPS HTC One A9s – Overview
GPS HTC One A9s – Overview
GPS HTC One A9s – Bridge
GPS HTC One A9s – Bridge
GPS HTC One A9s – Forest
GPS HTC One A9s – Forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
296
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 348 cd/m² Médio: 319.8 cd/m² Minimum: 10.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1513:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4 | - Ø
95.1% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.3
HTC One A9s
IPS, 1280x720, 5
OnePlus 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Gigaset ME
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC One A9
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
1%
-19%
-14%
31%
31%
Brightness
320
446
39%
502
57%
456
43%
380
19%
349
9%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
84
-1%
93
9%
91
7%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.23
0.3
-30%
0.58
-152%
0.38
-65%
Contrast
1513
1503
-1%
883
-42%
1171
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.5
3.84
-10%
3.8
-9%
4.29
-23%
1.95
44%
1.55
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
3.97
1%
2.7
32%
4.97
-24%
1.86
53%
2.05
49%
Gamma
2.3 104%
2.46 98%
2.09 115%
2.57 93%
2.13 113%
2.15 112%
CCT
6527 100%
7283 89%
6076 107%
7625 85%
6376 102%
6267 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.14

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 959 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
51330 Points ∼28%
OnePlus 2
65936 Points ∼36% +28%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points ∼66% +139%
Gigaset ME
54213 Points ∼29% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼23% -19%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
2936 Points ∼11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
711 Points ∼13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
1175 Points ∼46%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points ∼59% +29%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1648 Points ∼65% +40%
Gigaset ME
1408 Points ∼55% +20%
HTC One A9
1060 Points ∼42% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
359 Points ∼7%
OnePlus 2
846 Points ∼16% +136%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2792 Points ∼52% +678%
Gigaset ME
1027 Points ∼19% +186%
HTC One A9
326 Points ∼6% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
425 Points ∼11%
OnePlus 2
938 Points ∼24% +121%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2419 Points ∼62% +469%
Gigaset ME
1093 Points ∼28% +157%
HTC One A9
385 Points ∼10% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
1269 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points ∼55% +11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points ∼66% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼57% +17%
HTC One A9
1051 Points ∼41% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
524 Points ∼7%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points ∼24% +254%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points ∼58% +760%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼4% -48%
HTC One A9
618 Points ∼8% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
603 Points ∼12%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points ∼36% +188%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points ∼68% +448%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼7% -44%
HTC One A9
680 Points ∼14% +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
12025 Points ∼17%
OnePlus 2
10985 Points ∼16% -9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points ∼30% +74%
Gigaset ME
10927 Points ∼16% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼14% -21%
HTC One A9
9423 Points ∼14% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
10453 Points ∼2%
OnePlus 2
31858 Points ∼7% +205%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points ∼7% +216%
Gigaset ME
25016 Points ∼6% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼2% -28%
HTC One A9
9015 Points ∼2% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
10766 Points ∼5%
OnePlus 2
22400 Points ∼11% +108%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points ∼15% +172%
Gigaset ME
19445 Points ∼10% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼4% -27%
HTC One A9
9163 Points ∼5% -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
18 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 2
48 fps ∼4% +167%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps ∼7% +406%
Gigaset ME
51 fps ∼4% +183%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼1% -22%
HTC One A9
16 fps ∼1% -11%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
27 fps ∼6%
OnePlus 2
47 fps ∼10% +74%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps ∼13% +122%
Gigaset ME
50 fps ∼11% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼3% -48%
HTC One A9
16 fps ∼3% -41%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
7.2 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 2
23 fps ∼4% +219%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps ∼8% +511%
Gigaset ME
24 fps ∼4% +233%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -47%
HTC One A9
6.4 fps ∼1% -11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
14 fps ∼6%
OnePlus 2
23 fps ∼10% +64%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps ∼19% +207%
Gigaset ME
25 fps ∼11% +79%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -73%
HTC One A9
6.7 fps ∼3% -52%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
2.6 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼5% +631%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps ∼7% +1054%
Gigaset ME
17 fps ∼4% +554%
HTC One A9
3.8 fps ∼1% +46%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
11 fps ∼6%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼11% +73%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps ∼17% +164%
Gigaset ME
18 fps ∼10% +64%
HTC One A9
4 fps ∼2% -64%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
3350 Points ∼41%
OnePlus 2 (OxygenOS 2.0)
4282 Points ∼53% +28%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points ∼86% +108%
Gigaset ME
4544 Points ∼56% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼49% +20%
HTC One A9
4293 Points ∼53% +28%

Legend

 
HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset ME Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s (Chrome 54)
4395 Points ∼9%
OnePlus 2 (Chrome 44)
6955 Points ∼14% +58%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
8436 Points ∼17% +92%
Gigaset ME (Chrome 43)
7109 Points ∼14% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
3611 Points ∼7% -18%
HTC One A9 (Chrome 46.0)
3911 Points ∼8% -11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s (Chrome 54)
9346 ms * ∼16%
OnePlus 2 (Chrome 44)
6585.3 ms * ∼11% +30%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
3290.2 ms * ∼6% +65%
Gigaset ME (Chrome 43)
7670 ms * ∼13% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
11887 ms * ∼20% -27%
HTC One A9 (Chrome 46.0)
11053.7 ms * ∼19% -18%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s (Chrome 54)
69 Points ∼12%
OnePlus 2 (Chrome 44)
80 Points ∼14% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
64 Points ∼11% -7%
HTC One A9 (Chrome 46.0)
69 Points ∼12% 0%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9s (Chrome 54)
27.48 Points ∼0%
OnePlus 2 (Chrome 44)
44.286 Points ∼0% +61%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 (Chrome Version 51)
51.655 Points ∼0% +88%
Gigaset ME (Chrome 43)
28.475 Points ∼0% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Chrome 38)
22 Points ∼0% -20%
HTC One A9 (Chrome 46.0)
24.79 Points ∼0% -10%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC One A9s (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
25.6 MB/s ∼29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC One A9s (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.6 MB/s ∼41%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
34.6 MB/s ∼23%
OnePlus 2
13.94 MB/s ∼9% -60%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
5.64 MB/s ∼4% -84%
Gigaset ME
15 MB/s ∼10% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s ∼7% -68%
HTC One A9
3.61 MB/s ∼2% -90%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
21.3 MB/s ∼13%
OnePlus 2
21.87 MB/s ∼13% +3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
21.27 MB/s ∼13% 0%
Gigaset ME
22 MB/s ∼13% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s ∼14% +8%
HTC One A9
10 MB/s ∼6% -53%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
68.6 MB/s ∼35%
OnePlus 2
125.51 MB/s ∼64% +83%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
46.52 MB/s ∼24% -32%
Gigaset ME
131 MB/s ∼67% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s ∼31% -12%
HTC One A9
39.61 MB/s ∼20% -42%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC One A9s
210.2 MB/s ∼28%
OnePlus 2
234.21 MB/s ∼32% +11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
239.42 MB/s ∼32% +14%
Gigaset ME
232 MB/s ∼31% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s ∼28% 0%
HTC One A9
187.57 MB/s ∼25% -11%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high58 fps
Carga Máxima
 32.5 °C31.4 °C32.3 °C 
 32.9 °C31.4 °C33.5 °C 
 32.4 °C30.9 °C32.3 °C 
Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
30.5 °C31.4 °C30.9 °C
30.8 °C31.8 °C32.1 °C
30.9 °C31.9 °C32.3 °C
Máximo: 32.3 °C
Médio: 31.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.628.827.62526.626.426.63125.726.325.74027.725.127.75027.924.827.96322.825.422.88024.223.224.210027.123.527.112536.930.936.916035.12035.120041.519.941.525046.921.746.931553.124.253.14005521.25550056.421.156.463057.617.957.680059.32059.3100062.520.462.5125067.918.167.9160068.414.868.4200070.51670.5250072.914.972.9315074.814.474.8400075.213.975.2500072.213.372.2630067.912.867.9800068.812.968.81000058.312.958.31250050.613.250.61600044.912.844.9SPL82.629.282.6N48.71.248.7median 58.3HTC One A9smedian 17.9median 58.3Delta10.83.610.829.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9Apple iPhone 7median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HTC One A9s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.29 / 2.28 / 2.52 Watt
Carga midlight 4.06 / 5.91 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
OnePlus 2
 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Gigaset ME
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Power Consumption
13%
-4%
-20%
25%
25%
Idle Minimum *
1.29
0.6
53%
1.31
-2%
0.75
42%
0.96
26%
0.9
30%
Idle Average *
2.28
1.7
25%
2.03
11%
1.7
25%
1.64
28%
1.2
47%
Idle Maximum *
2.52
1.8
29%
2.08
17%
1.84
27%
1.71
32%
1.4
44%
Load Average *
4.06
5.7
-40%
5.45
-34%
7.18
-77%
2.98
27%
3.8
6%
Load Maximum *
5.91
6
-2%
6.75
-14%
12.75
-116%
5.08
14%
5.9
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 43min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
8h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 47min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 05min
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
OnePlus 2
 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Gigaset ME
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
6%
-45%
46%
-26%
Reader / Idle
1543
1393
-10%
2323
51%
1154
-25%
Load
245
229
-7%
83
-66%
483
97%
176
-28%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
517
356
-31%
546
6%
393
-24%
626
21%
368
-29%
H.264
587
580
-1%
672
14%
465
-21%

Pro

+ Chassi metálico sofisticado
+ Tela de alto contraste com cores precisas
+ Boas fotos da câmera, bons vídeos
+ Durações úteis na prática
+ Modos de economia de energia e carga rápida
+ Dispositivos de entrada precisos
+ Baixas temperaturas

Contra

- Chassi pode ranger sob pressão
- Queda de conexão ocasional em redes wireless
- Tela escura com baixa resolução
- Alto falante medíocre
- Microfone um pouco embotado
- Consumo de energia relativamente alto
In review: HTC One A9s. Test model courtesy of HTC Germany.
In review: HTC One A9s. Test model courtesy of HTC Germany.

O HTC One A9s definitivamente é um smartphone mainstream sólido. Você pode viver com a tela de baixa resolução graças à alta razão de contraste e cores com boa precisão, mas o painel é muito escuro. O padrão wireless 802.11ac faltante, não deveria ser um grande problemas para muito usuários. O desempenho e o equipamento de memória, inclusive foi melhorado – um motivo para se contentar?

Sim, o HTC One A9s é, de fato, um bom smartphone, mas é um segmento com muitos aparelho bons da Lenovo, OnePlus ou Samsung. A concorrência é, portanto, forte para o HTC One A9s, e alguns deles inclusive oferecem mais recursos de gama alta em comparação com o nosso modelo de teste. Mas será que você realmente precisa de um flash dual-LED, autofoco laser ou resoluções mais altas da câmera? Somente você pode responder isso.

O HTC One A9s é uma atualização bem sucedida do HTC One A9 e forneceu bons desempenhos em quase todas as seções de teste, mas não se destaca entre os rivais. Não existem verdadeiros destaques, mas você recebe um aparelho confiável sem frescuras.

A lista de desvantagens sérias para o HTC One A9s é bastante pequena: O alto falante poderia soar melhor e o sinal de WLAN poderia ser melhor. De outra forma, os resultados do teste são bons, mas não há destaques. Portanto, é um aparelho mainstream e um companheiro discreto e confiável, na prática, o qual também pode ser uma qualidade.

HTC One A9s - 12/15/2016 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
92%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
20 / 63 → 32%
Desempenho da aplicação
34 / 70 → 48%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Camera
72%
Médio
71%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC One A9s
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-17)