Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone HTC One A9s
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1513:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
| HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Lenovo ZUK Z2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | Gigaset ME IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20 | HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 5% | -18% | -10% | 31% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle | 348 | 451 30% | 512 47% | 445 28% | 378 9% | 346 -1% |
| Brightness | 320 | 446 39% | 502 57% | 456 43% | 380 19% | 349 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 84 -1% | 93 9% | 91 7% | 93 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.3 -30% | 0.58 -152% | 0.38 -65% | ||
| Contrast | 1513 | 1503 -1% | 883 -42% | 1171 -23% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 3.84 -10% | 3.8 -9% | 4.29 -23% | 1.95 44% | 1.55 56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.4 | 11.2 -75% | 7.89 -23% | 3.09 52% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.97 1% | 2.7 32% | 4.97 -24% | 1.86 53% | 2.05 49% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.46 89% | 2.09 105% | 2.57 86% | 2.13 103% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6527 100% | 7283 89% | 6076 107% | 7625 85% | 6376 102% | 6267 104% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.07 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.14 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| Gigaset ME | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 58 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
HTC One A9s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.18 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.29 / 2.28 / 2.52 Watt |
| Carga |
4.06 / 5.91 Watt |
    
| |
| HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | OnePlus 2 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Gigaset ME 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -4% | -20% | 25% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.29 | 0.6 53% | 1.31 -2% | 0.75 42% | 0.96 26% | 0.9 30% |
| Idle Average * | 2.28 | 1.7 25% | 2.03 11% | 1.7 25% | 1.64 28% | 1.2 47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.52 | 1.8 29% | 2.08 17% | 1.84 27% | 1.71 32% | 1.4 44% |
| Load Average * | 4.06 | 5.7 -40% | 5.45 -34% | 7.18 -77% | 2.98 27% | 3.8 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.91 | 6 -2% | 6.75 -14% | 12.75 -116% | 5.08 14% | 5.9 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | OnePlus 2 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Gigaset ME 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | 6% | -45% | 46% | -26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1543 | 1393 -10% | 2323 51% | 1154 -25% | ||
| H.264 | 587 | 580 -1% | 672 14% | 465 -21% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 356 -31% | 546 6% | 393 -24% | 626 21% | 368 -29% |
| Load | 245 | 229 -7% | 83 -66% | 483 97% | 176 -28% |
Pro
Contra
O HTC One A9s definitivamente é um smartphone mainstream sólido. Você pode viver com a tela de baixa resolução graças à alta razão de contraste e cores com boa precisão, mas o painel é muito escuro. O padrão wireless 802.11ac faltante, não deveria ser um grande problemas para muito usuários. O desempenho e o equipamento de memória, inclusive foi melhorado – um motivo para se contentar?
Sim, o HTC One A9s é, de fato, um bom smartphone, mas é um segmento com muitos aparelho bons da Lenovo, OnePlus ou Samsung. A concorrência é, portanto, forte para o HTC One A9s, e alguns deles inclusive oferecem mais recursos de gama alta em comparação com o nosso modelo de teste. Mas será que você realmente precisa de um flash dual-LED, autofoco laser ou resoluções mais altas da câmera? Somente você pode responder isso.
O HTC One A9s é uma atualização bem sucedida do HTC One A9 e forneceu bons desempenhos em quase todas as seções de teste, mas não se destaca entre os rivais. Não existem verdadeiros destaques, mas você recebe um aparelho confiável sem frescuras.
A lista de desvantagens sérias para o HTC One A9s é bastante pequena: O alto falante poderia soar melhor e o sinal de WLAN poderia ser melhor. De outra forma, os resultados do teste são bons, mas não há destaques. Portanto, é um aparelho mainstream e um companheiro discreto e confiável, na prática, o qual também pode ser uma qualidade.
HTC One A9s
-
12/15/2016 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer
Pricecompare
