Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart 2020 - Confortável e obsoleto

Conhecido em roupas novas? O Huawei P Smart 2020 vem com o Google Services e é muito parecido com o seu antecessor. Embora tenha recebido algumas novas cores e um pouco mais de armazenamento, as poucas pequenas alterações são suficientes o suficiente para manter o smartphone acessível atualizado?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Huawei P Smart 2020 (P Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.21 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 155.3 x 73.5
Bateria
3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, depth sharpness (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, fone, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 6 (300Mbps/​50Mbps); rádio FM; LED de notificação (multi-colored), fanless
peso
163 g, Suprimento de energia: 62 g
Preço
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
06/2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
163 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
76 %
06/2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
81 %
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
77 %
05/2020
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1560x720
85 %
01/2019
Huawei P Smart 2019
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
160 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"2340x1080
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Huawei P Smart 2020

Size Comparison

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 185 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g155.3 mm 73.5 mm 8.2 mm 163 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.95 mm 160 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s ∼99% +43%
Huawei P Smart 2020
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
200 (126min - 252max) MBit/s ∼69%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (28min - 206max) MBit/s ∼57% -18%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
145 (20min - 215max) MBit/s ∼50% -27%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (38min - 57max) MBit/s ∼19% -73%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s ∼93% +21%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (197min - 262max) MBit/s ∼82% +7%
Huawei P Smart 2020
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
211 (175min - 242max) MBit/s ∼76%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (25min - 258max) MBit/s ∼59% -23%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 (40min - 67max) MBit/s ∼20% -74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø200 (126-252)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø211 (175-242)
Garmin Edge 520 locating – overview
Garmin Edge 520 locating – overview
Garmin Edge 520 locating – junction
Garmin Edge 520 locating – junction
Garmin Edge 520 locating – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 locating – bridge
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – overview
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – overview
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – junction
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – junction
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – bridge
Huawei P Smart 2020 locating – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
89.8 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2020: 46.61 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 89.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2020: 5.59 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 10.35 ∆E
423
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 484 cd/m² Médio: 448.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.166 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 446 cd/m²
Contraste: 875:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.43
Huawei P Smart 2020
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.40
Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.20
Screen
1%
22%
35%
34%
Brightness middle
446
523
17%
622
39%
504
13%
458
3%
Brightness
448
482
8%
612
37%
452
1%
440
-2%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
94
8%
83
-5%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.51
0.46
10%
0.56
-10%
0.28
45%
0.35
31%
Contrast
875
1137
30%
1111
27%
1800
106%
1309
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.22
6.22
-19%
3.98
24%
3.84
26%
1.4
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.66
10.56
-22%
7.33
15%
6.1
30%
3.8
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
8
-18%
4.5
34%
2.7
60%
2.4
65%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.226 99%
2.206 100%
2.235 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7956 82%
8856 73%
7361 88%
7125 91%
6235 104%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 344 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 344 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 344 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2329 Points ∼84%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2321 Points ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼81% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2196 - 2345, n=6)
2293 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼95% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
803 Points ∼27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
995 Points ∼33% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points ∼75% +181%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
914 Points ∼30% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (796 - 1220, n=6)
924 Points ∼31% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼100% +275%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
940 Points ∼35%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼43% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points ∼89% +150%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1052 Points ∼40% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (927 - 1365, n=6)
1061 Points ∼40% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼100% +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2257 Points ∼69%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼74% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼100% +44%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points ∼73% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2085 Points ∼64% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=15)
2350 Points ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼70% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
831 Points ∼33%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼39% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼100% +207%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼39% +19%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
838 Points ∼33% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=15)
831 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼90% +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
967 Points ∼36%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼43% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +177%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points ∼42% +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
966 Points ∼36% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=15)
965 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼79% +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2221 Points ∼68%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼73% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +47%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points ∼72% +6%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2459 Points ∼75% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=15)
2358 Points ∼72% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼68% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1251 Points ∼33%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼44% +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100% +204%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points ∼44% +33%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1225 Points ∼32% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=15)
1250 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼83% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1385 Points ∼38%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼49% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +165%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points ∼49% +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1379 Points ∼38% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=15)
1395 Points ∼38% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼70% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2325 Points ∼74%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼100% +36%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼76% +4%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2392 Points ∼76% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=15)
2429 Points ∼77% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼69% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
728 Points ∼31%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼42% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼100% +225%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points ∼40% +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
703 Points ∼30% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 857, n=15)
755 Points ∼32% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼80% +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
859 Points ∼34%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼46% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼100% +192%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points ∼44% +27%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
834 Points ∼33% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 1002, n=15)
891 Points ∼36% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼72% +111%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2328 Points ∼76%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points ∼78% +3%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2381 Points ∼78% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=15)
2422 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼66% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
979 Points ∼27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼46% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100% +273%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points ∼45% +67%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼19% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1355, n=15)
1072 Points ∼29% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼70% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1124 Points ∼32%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼51% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +211%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points ∼50% +56%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
812 Points ∼23% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1503, n=15)
1218 Points ∼35% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼62% +93%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12009 Points ∼49%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼83% +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼82% +67%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points ∼100% +104%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11212 Points ∼46% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=12)
16572 Points ∼68% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼65% +33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19251 Points ∼37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼29% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100% +174%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points ∼47% +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19510 Points ∼37% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2177 - 22605, n=12)
18746 Points ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼55% +51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16976 Points ∼44%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼62% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼100% +128%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points ∼64% +46%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16754 Points ∼43% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=12)
19147 Points ∼50% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼58% +31%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1146 Score ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2416 Score ∼94% +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (961 - 1146, n=3)
1047 Score ∼41% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=100)
2561 Score ∼100% +123%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3256 Points ∼66%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼64% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=11)
3514 Points ∼71% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=365)
4925 Points ∼100% +51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5430 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6263 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5134 Points ∼82% -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5407 Points ∼86% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=11)
5454 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14476, n=432)
5053 Points ∼81% -7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1550 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2620 Points ∼100% +69%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1495 Points ∼57% -4%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1527 Points ∼58% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=11)
1560 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4970, n=432)
1545 Points ∼59% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1021 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points ∼100% +38%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1224 Points ∼87% +20%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
982 Points ∼70% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=13)
1092 Points ∼77% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼60% -17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1488 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points ∼100% +156%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1932 Points ∼51% +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1469 Points ∼39% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=13)
1470 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼69% +76%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3098 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points ∼100% +39%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2780 Points ∼65% -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2972 Points ∼69% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=13)
3181 Points ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼46% -36%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5132 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4391 Points ∼64% -14%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5074 Points ∼74% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=13)
5208 Points ∼76% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼53% -30%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2208 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points ∼100% +60%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2318 Points ∼65% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2159 Points ∼61% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=13)
2255 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼52% -16%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.527 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼88% +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)
31.5 Points ∼65% +2%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
30.776 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
29.117 Points ∼60% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.457 Points ∼100% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
50.323 Points ∼56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10)
50.2 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
49.673 Points ∼56% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
33.377 Points ∼37% -34%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min ∼98% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)
31.9 runs/min ∼71% +5%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chome 81)
30.4 runs/min ∼67%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)
25.4 runs/min ∼56% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
69 Points ∼97% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points ∼97% +11%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
62.1 Points ∼87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)
61.7 Points ∼87% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
38 Points ∼53% -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
9708 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
9699 Points ∼56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)
9659 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼49% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6133 Points ∼35% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -137%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6719 ms * ∼71% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)
4223 ms * ∼45% -6%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)
4000.3 ms * ∼42%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)
3998.8 ms * ∼42% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794.2 ms * ∼29% +30%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P Smart 2020Nokia 5.3Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8Huawei P Smart 2019Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
31%
70%
27%
7%
8%
-0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
48.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-27%
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
61.8 (26.1 - 73.5, n=30)
-8%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
68.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
75 (29.2 - 85.9, n=30)
-1%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
61.1
45.2
-26%
123.6
102%
128.1
110%
70.7
16%
45.2 (8.48 - 151, n=32)
-26%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-34%
Random Read 4KB
41.2
109.1
165%
137
233%
57.3
39%
45.66
11%
69.1 (20.7 - 112, n=32)
68%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
53%
Sequential Write 256KB
168.3
243.2
45%
214.8
28%
239
42%
191.4
14%
192 (90 - 314, n=32)
14%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB
282.1
299.5
6%
496.6
76%
301
7%
288.27
2%
291 (107 - 501, n=32)
3%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
29%
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (24-32)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.2 (19-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29 (19-31)
Carga Máxima
 43.8 °C40.2 °C38.4 °C 
 44.3 °C40 °C39.3 °C 
 43.4 °C40.3 °C38.7 °C 
Máximo: 44.3 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C
38.8 °C40.3 °C43.5 °C
38.7 °C40.6 °C45.3 °C
38.5 °C40.6 °C44.7 °C
Máximo: 45.3 °C
Médio: 41.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.433.42539.733.6312829.94027.430.75029.830.76325.828.68022.223.610023.424.212521.221.316019.224.220018.9362501938.431517.246.24001649.850016.755.763018.86080014.765.6100015.666.812501463.8160013.962.5200014.460.4250014.756.6315014.355.840001564500015.765.6630015.862.8800015.763.41000016.264.91250015.749.91600015.951SPL67.471.86327.674.8N21.626.315133.9median 15.8median 56.6Delta1.910.432.430.53531.927.126.4262730.431.225.228.822.722.525.522.120.124.719.235.417.839.417.845.916.149.916.655.715.962.514.365.514.770.414.873.614.37114.165.116.369.114.472.313.868.713.970.414.264.414.559.114.666.41568.115.359.115.751.660.964.571.226.98113.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.41.610.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart 2020Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Carga midlight 4.3 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart 2020
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-5%
4%
-4%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1
1.5
-50%
1.3
-30%
0.84
16%
1.058 (0.8 - 2.3, n=13)
-6%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
11%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.1
-0%
2
5%
2.21
-5%
2.2 (1.2 - 3, n=13)
-5%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
2.5
-0%
2.8
-12%
2.23
11%
2.57 (2.2 - 4.2, n=13)
-3%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
18%
Load Average *
4.3
5.2
-21%
3.9
9%
4.2
2%
4.61 (4.06 - 6, n=13)
-7%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
4%
Load Maximum *
7.5
7.5
-0%
7.2
4%
7.86
-5%
7.6 (6.13 - 9.4, n=13)
-1%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 24min
Huawei P Smart 2020
3400 mAh
Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
67%
91%
64%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1325
2263
71%
1953
47%
1293
-2%
H.264
489
1269
160%
1048
114%
464
-5%
WiFi v1.3
523
876
67%
1187
127%
988
89%
506
-3%
Load
264
279
6%
276
5%
257
-3%

Pro

+ Confortável e leve
+ Boa qualidade de voz
+ Alto-falante reparável
+ WLAN veloz
+ Muito armazenamento

Contra

- Android 9 e patches de segurança datados
- Poucas frequências LTE
- Uma só lente para as fotos
- A tela poderia ter sido mais brilhante
- Esquenta bastante
- Problemas com alguns aplicativos
- Duração da bateria relativamente curta
- Cintilação PWM com baixo brilho

Veredicto - Uma pequena atualização para uma grande diferença de preço

In review: Huawei P Smart 2020. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P Smart 2020. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

Huawei's P Smart series is popular. Isso é compreensível, porque até agora a série oferecia muito pelo dinheiro. Isso também possibilita que o P Smart 2020 ainda pareça bastante atual, embora haja poucas mudanças em comparação com o antecessor.

Mas os primeiros sinais de desgaste tornaram-se visíveis: Enquanto a câmera ainda tira fotos sólidas, ela não possui a capacidade de zoom, oferecida por muitos dispositivos dessa faixa de preço neste momento. Você também procurará em vão recursos modernos, como uma porta USB-C, VoLTE ou LTE mais rápido, com mais bandas de frequência. Introduzir um smartphone com o Android 9 em 2020 sem que fique claro que ele obterá o Android 10 também é questionável. 

A bateria pequena acaba sendo uma bênção ou uma maldição, dependendo do usuário. Aqueles que querem fugir do carregamento diário de seus smartphones não terão muita chance, a menos que o usem com moderação. Por outro lado, a bateria pequena permite uma recarga mais rápida e um peso bastante baixo.

Para quem gosta de fino e leve, o Huawei P Smart 2020 ainda pode ser recomendado. Mas aqueles que valorizam uma bateria de longa duração e o software moderno devem procurar outra coisa.

A localização é bastante precisa, a WLAN é bastante rápida, o desempenho é correto e os 128 GB de armazenamento também são um ponto positivo para o smartphone.

No entanto, o Huawei P Smart 2020 também tem um problema adicional: Este se chama P Smart 2019 e é basicamente o mesmo smartphone com um pouco menos de armazenamento por muito menos dinheiro. Portanto, se você quiser economizar, talvez queira comprar o predecessor. Embora o sucessor ainda seja um smartphone sólido de gama média acessível, ele não se sente mais tão atual quanto outros modelos nesta faixa de preço.

Huawei P Smart 2020 - 05/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
77%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
42 / 70 → 60%
Peso
91%
Bateria
79%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
30 / 64 → 47%
Desempenho da aplicação
56 / 86 → 65%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
55%
Médio
71%
77%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P Smart 2020 - Confortável e obsoleto
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 1 (Update: 2020-06- 3)