Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 – Smartphone de $200 com câmera versátil

Grampo de gama média. A série Moto G da Motorola é um grampo de smartphones confiáveis de gama média há muitos anos. O Moto G8 é mais acessível que seu antecessor e, pela primeira vez, possui uma lente de zoom. Parece um bom negócio, certo?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Motorola Moto G8 (Moto G8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.4 polegadas 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 268 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 161.3 x 75.8
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​1.7, phase detection AF, laser AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (câmera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (câmera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, macro (câmera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, protetor de silicone, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 13/​5 (400Mbps/​75Mbps); head SAR: 0,62 W/kg, body SAR 1,68 W/kg, fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 68 g
Preço
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Test Group

Rating
ratingversion
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %7
05/2020
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"1560x720
85 %6
02/2019
Motorola Moto G7
SD 632, Adreno 506
172 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"2270x1080
76 %7
01/2020
Xiaomi Redmi 8
SD 439, Adreno 505
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
79 %7
12/2019
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2
166 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"1560x720
76 %7
11/2019
Honor 9X
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
197 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080
Motorola Moto G8
Motorola Moto G8
Motorola Moto G8
Motorola Moto G8
Motorola Moto G8
Motorola Moto G8

Size comparison

163.5 mm 77.3 mm 8.8 mm 197 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.8 mm 166 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼100% +404%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
170 (156min - 179max) MBit/s ∼62% +213%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
122 (119min - 123max) MBit/s ∼45% +124%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (94min - 118max) MBit/s ∼41% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.2 (47min - 58max) MBit/s ∼21% +3%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (38min - 57max) MBit/s ∼20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼100% +368%
Honor 9X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
142 (118min - 160max) MBit/s ∼54% +154%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (107min - 117max) MBit/s ∼43% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
100 (92min - 105max) MBit/s ∼38% +79%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 (40min - 67max) MBit/s ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.2 (24min - 56max) MBit/s ∼19% -10%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54 (38-57)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (40-67)
Motorola Moto G8 – overview
Motorola Moto G8 – overview
Motorola Moto G8 – turning point
Motorola Moto G8 – turning point
Motorola Moto G8 – bridge
Motorola Moto G8 – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 – overview
Garmin Edge 520 – overview
Garmin Edge 520 – turning point
Garmin Edge 520 – turning point
Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
57.7 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
59 ∆E
58.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
45 ∆E
33 ∆E
68.4 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8: 42.34 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 68.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8: 10.05 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 16.73 ∆E
416
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 504 cd/m² Médio: 451.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.48 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 504 cd/m²
Contraste: 1800:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.235
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.4
Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Xiaomi Redmi 8
IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.22
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Super AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.4
Honor 9X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.59
Screen
-35%
15%
24%
-50%
Brightness middle
504
471
-7%
554
10%
488
-3%
494
-2%
Brightness
452
453
0%
516
14%
489
8%
483
7%
Brightness Distribution
83
94
13%
85
2%
93
12%
94
13%
Black Level *
0.28
0.5
-79%
0.24
14%
0.51
-82%
Contrast
1800
942
-48%
2308
28%
969
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.84
5.5
-43%
2.6
32%
1.7
56%
5.74
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.1
7.95
-30%
4.9
20%
3.3
46%
10.26
-68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
5
-85%
2.7
-0%
2
26%
7.3
-170%
Gamma
2.235 98%
2.326 95%
2.17 101%
2.1 105%
2.086 105%
CCT
7125 91%
7654 85%
6814 95%
6506 100%
8572 76%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 625 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 625 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 625 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
447 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +265%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
363 Points ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼21% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼100% +385%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1280 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1405, n=7)
1346 Points ∼69% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=108)
1955 Points ∼100% +53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=7)
311 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=108)
555 Points ∼100% +80%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5134 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼88% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5134 - 5663, n=3)
5388 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=417)
4999 Points ∼93% -3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1495 Points ∼98%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼82% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1495 - 1536, n=3)
1509 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=417)
1528 Points ∼100% +2%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6969 Points ∼99%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6038 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4664 Points ∼66% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5474 Points ∼78% -21%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7018 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=11)
7048 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=511)
5919 Points ∼84% -15%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9051 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
7187 Points ∼76% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6076 Points ∼64% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6628 Points ∼70% -27%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
9509 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=669)
6487 Points ∼68% -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2118 Points ∼80% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2096 Points ∼79% -6%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2345 Points ∼88% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=11)
2284 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=165)
2653 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
914 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
411 Points ∼14% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
620 Points ∼21% -32%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
801 Points ∼27% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=11)
933 Points ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=165)
2966 Points ∼100% +225%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1052 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
501 Points ∼19% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
735 Points ∼28% -30%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
938 Points ∼35% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=11)
1074 Points ∼40% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=165)
2665 Points ∼100% +153%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points ∼92%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2206 Points ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1582 Points ∼61% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1729 Points ∼67% -27%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2579 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=10)
2378 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=514)
2203 Points ∼85% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
467 Points ∼22% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
432 Points ∼20% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
548 Points ∼26% -45%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
844 Points ∼40% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=514)
2112 Points ∼100% +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points ∼58%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
566 Points ∼29% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
505 Points ∼26% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
646 Points ∼33% -43%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
992 Points ∼50% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1135 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=515)
1973 Points ∼100% +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2201 Points ∼85% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼62% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1745 Points ∼67% -26%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2598 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=11)
2365 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=545)
2114 Points ∼81% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
809 Points ∼29% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼26% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
824 Points ∼29% -51%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1350 Points ∼48% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=11)
1668 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=545)
2830 Points ∼100% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points ∼75%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
941 Points ∼40% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼35% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
933 Points ∼39% -48%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼64% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=11)
1786 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=545)
2377 Points ∼100% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2251 Points ∼88% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1598 Points ∼63% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1869 Points ∼73% -22%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2549 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=11)
2417 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=595)
2086 Points ∼82% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
419 Points ∼24% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
372 Points ∼21% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
545 Points ∼31% -42%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
848 Points ∼48% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=11)
968 Points ∼54% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=595)
1780 Points ∼100% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
512 Points ∼30% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
448 Points ∼26% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
647 Points ∼38% -41%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
995 Points ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=11)
1118 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=596)
1697 Points ∼100% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2273 Points ∼90% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼63% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1874 Points ∼74% -22%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2536 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=11)
2429 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=637)
1951 Points ∼77% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
780 Points ∼33% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼31% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
713 Points ∼30% -56%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1333 Points ∼57% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=11)
1622 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=636)
2342 Points ∼100% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
913 Points ∼45% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼41% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
827 Points ∼41% -53%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1490 Points ∼74% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=11)
1750 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=639)
2014 Points ∼100% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
16647 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
12809 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13009 Points ∼53% -47%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
22492 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20916 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=783)
15426 Points ∼63% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14475 Points ∼54% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
13656 Points ∼51% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14338 Points ∼54% -42%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21792 Points ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=10)
23960 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=781)
26562 Points ∼100% +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14907 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
13435 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14020 Points ∼57% -43%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21943 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23870 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=781)
20767 Points ∼84% -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼80%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
24 fps ∼53% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
23 fps ∼51% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼31% -61%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼87% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 36, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=786)
44.9 fps ∼100% +25%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
42 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼50% -50%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=795)
31 fps ∼74% -26%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼72%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
9.8 fps ∼37% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼45% -37%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼79% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=9)
19.2 fps ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=691)
26.5 fps ∼100% +39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼71% -29%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=9)
21.1 fps ∼62% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=699)
22.3 fps ∼66% -34%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼61%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.9 fps ∼32% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.6 fps ∼31% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼38% -38%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼66% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=9)
13 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=554)
21.3 fps ∼100% +64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
27 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
14 fps ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼63% -37%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=9)
15 fps ∼56% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=556)
19.4 fps ∼72% -28%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼81%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2 fps ∼18% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4 fps ∼35% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.8 fps ∼51% -36%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.3 fps ∼20% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼50% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=307)
11.3 fps ∼100% +24%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼15% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1.2 fps ∼15% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.8 fps ∼22% -36%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4 fps ∼50% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=11)
2.77 fps ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=305)
8.07 fps ∼100% +188%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼89%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼21% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.7 fps ∼40% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼58% -35%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.1 fps ∼36% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=11)
9.31 fps ∼55% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=311)
16.8 fps ∼100% +12%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼42%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼20% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.7 fps ∼19% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼26% -39%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼36% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=11)
8.13 fps ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=310)
19.4 fps ∼100% +137%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼27% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.6 fps ∼25% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼36% -28%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼54% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=9)
7.06 fps ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=479)
14.3 fps ∼100% +99%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼28% -72%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
7.1 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
10 fps ∼77% -23%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=9)
7.86 fps ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=483)
12.7 fps ∼98% -2%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
167305 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
94601 Points ∼30% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
105840 Points ∼33% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼54% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=108)
317934 Points ∼100% +90%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1224 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1008 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
849 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1035 Points ∼85% -15%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1090 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=725)
818 Points ∼67% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1932 Points ∼78%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1075 Points ∼43% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1009 Points ∼41% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1118 Points ∼45% -42%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼59% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=725)
2491 Points ∼100% +29%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2780 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1963 Points ∼67% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1287 Points ∼44% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2154 Points ∼73% -23%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2948 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=725)
1850 Points ∼63% -33%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4391 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4378 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2587 Points ∼49% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3869 Points ∼73% -12%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5297 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼91% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=725)
3444 Points ∼65% -22%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2318 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1747 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1294 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A30s
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1762 Points ∼76% -24%
Honor 9X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2240 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=725)
1754 Points ∼76% -24%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=185)
40.6 Points ∼100% +39%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
32.916 Points ∼81% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)
29.2 Points ∼72% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
29.117 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
25.689 Points ∼63% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
16.678 Points ∼41% -43%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼100% +42%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=616)
47.1 Points ∼99% +41%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
45.541 Points ∼96% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
42.191 Points ∼89% +26%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
33.377 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
25.622 Points ∼54% -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=168)
42.9 runs/min ∼100% +69%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
33.9 runs/min ∼79% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)
28.9 runs/min ∼67% +14%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)
25.4 runs/min ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
23 runs/min ∼54% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
17.4 runs/min ∼41% -31%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=252)
69.8 Points ∼100% +84%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
58 Points ∼83% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼73% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
43 Points ∼62% +13%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
38 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
33 Points ∼47% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
9851 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼90% +45%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
8351 Points ∼85% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
8048 Points ∼82% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=783)
7840 Points ∼80% +28%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6133 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
4585 Points ∼47% -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
9976.3 ms * ∼100% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=809)
9777 ms * ∼98% -46%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6719 ms * ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78)
5707.4 ms * ∼57% +15%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
4900 ms * ∼49% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼48% +29%
Honor 9X (Chrome 78)
4123.4 ms * ∼41% +39%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G7Xiaomi Redmi 8Samsung Galaxy A30sHonor 9XAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-3%
-6%
65%
-14%
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
48.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
37%
63.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31%
64.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31%
67.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
38%
57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=125)
19%
51 (1.7 - 87.1, n=527)
5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
68.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26%
86.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26%
80.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
76.8 (21.1 - 87.2, n=125)
12%
69 (8.1 - 96.5, n=527)
0%
Random Write 4KB
128.1
75.6
-41%
7.33
-94%
13.95
-89%
159.3
24%
27.7 (3.4 - 147, n=143)
-78%
35.4 (0.14 - 319, n=879)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
57.3
69.3
21%
78.98
38%
93.24
63%
142.32
148%
56.3 (11.4 - 149, n=143)
-2%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=879)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
239
216
-10%
202.65
-15%
101.74
-57%
196.1
-18%
175 (40 - 254, n=143)
-27%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=879)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
301
297
-1%
285.66
-5%
291.79
-3%
860.34
186%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=143)
-9%
339 (12.1 - 1802, n=879)
13%
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø30 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 0.18.0: Ø24.9 (23-26)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (29-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (28-31)
Carga Máxima
 41.2 °C38.3 °C36.5 °C 
 40.6 °C38.2 °C36.7 °C 
 40.5 °C38.5 °C36.1 °C 
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C
33.5 °C37.9 °C40.3 °C
33.8 °C37.6 °C41.6 °C
34.2 °C37.6 °C39.4 °C
Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.428.9253530.63127.128.4402629.85030.430.86325.226.98022.72310025.522.912520.122.316019.230.420017.842.825017.849.531516.152.440016.654.350015.959.463014.36180014.767.3100014.871.8125014.367.8160014.166.1200016.368.9250014.471.4315013.870.1400013.970.5500014.265.2630014.561.6800014.665.2100001566.61250015.358.61600015.741.1SPL64.571.226.980.1N17.725.60.945.7median 15median 61.6Delta1.610.338.735.637.138.733.733.337.433.436.336.828.329.923.726.423.224.12230.520.442.218.445.417.75017.354.817.759.218.161.62066.216.367.115.57514.17714.174.614.571.714.366.51565.214.765.816.965.815.369.21573.614.573.214.758.214.555.96727.983.419.4154.5median 15.5median 65.82.38.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.3 / 2 / 2.8 Watt
Carga midlight 3.9 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A30s
4000 mAh
Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
36%
31%
-49%
8%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.1
15%
0.57
56%
0.79
39%
2.3
-77%
1.036 (0.62 - 1.7, n=10)
20%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
32%
Idle Average *
2
1.8
10%
1.8
10%
1.98
1%
3
-50%
1.942 (1.3 - 2.3, n=10)
3%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
12%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
2.6
7%
1.82
35%
2.03
27%
4.2
-50%
2.43 (1.6 - 3.5, n=10)
13%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
27%
Load Average *
3.9
4.2
-8%
2.57
34%
2.37
39%
5.3
-36%
3.88 (3.2 - 4.7, n=10)
1%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
-5%
Load Maximum *
7.2
6.8
6%
4.12
43%
3.68
49%
9.4
-31%
6.82 (6.09 - 7.7, n=10)
5%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
32h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 36min
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A30s
4000 mAh
Honor 9X
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
9%
-9%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1953
1548
-21%
2521
29%
H.264
1048
819
-22%
798
-24%
982
-6%
WiFi v1.3
988
798
-19%
1157
17%
634
-36%
832
-16%
Load
276
219
-21%
308
12%
317
15%

Pro

+ Câmera grande angular e macro
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Desempenho acima da média
+ Leitor de digitais dedicado
+ Permanece frio

Contra

- A precisão do GPS não é particularmente boa
- Resolução de apenas 720p
- Distribuição irregular do brilho
- Falta de contraste em algumas fotos

Veredicto – Câmera com benefício real

In review: Motorola Moto G8. Review unit courtesy of Motorola Germany
In review: Motorola Moto G8. Review unit courtesy of Motorola Germany

O Motorola Moto G8 é um smartphone de gama média decente para orçamentos apertados. Oferece uma configuração de câmera mais convencional e, portanto, mais útil do que a do Moto G8 Plus. As câmeras tiveram um desempenho muito bom para sua classe e inclusive suportam o zoom. Em troca, a razão de contraste era muito baixa ocasionalmente.

Também gostamos da duração da bateria do G8, do desempenho acima da média e da carcaça robusta. O leitor de digitais dedicado é um prazer para usar, o dispositivo permanece relativamente frio e o alto-falante é bom.

O Motorola Moto G8 é bastante acessível e oferece várias câmeras e, portanto, uma vantagem real sobre seus rivais.

Os cortes de preços em relação ao seu antecessor se manifestaram em uma tela com resolução mais baixa. Felizmente, permaneceu bom o suficiente e continua a oferecer uma imagem de qualidade decente. Comparado aos seus concorrentes, o principal benefício do G8 são sem dúvida suas câmeras versáteis. Uma razão para isso pode ser que a maioria dos smartphones de médio porte para 2020 ainda nem foi lançada. No entanto, em seu atual preço acessível, o Moto G8 oferece um pacote geral decente, sem grandes falhas.

Motorola Moto G8 - 05/12/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
37 / 70 → 53%
Peso
89%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
13 / 64 → 20%
Desempenho da aplicação
56 / 86 → 65%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
67 / 90 → 75%
Camera
53%
Médio
71%
77%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 – Smartphone de $200 com câmera versátil
Florian Schmitt, 2020-05-14 (Update: 2020-05-18)